The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/all/20021021005611/http://www.unfpa.org:80/gender/traditions.htm

Search   

     
Home Programme News State of World Population Publications About

 

  Empowering Women  
  Involving Men  
  Gender-based Violence  
  Harmful Practices  
  Human Trafficking  
  Gender & HIV  

 

 

Resources

 
  Fast Facts  
  FAQs on Gender  
  FAQs on FGC  
  International Concensus Language  
  International and Regional Agreements  
  Partners and Links  
  Publications  
 
 

Taking a Stand Against Practices That Harm Women

Throughout the world, practices that undermine the well-being of women while preserving male dominance endure -- often defended in the name of culture and tradition. But like slavery and foot-binding, they constitute egregious violations of basic human rights.

At least 130 million women have been forced to undergo
female genital cutting.  Another 2 million are at risk each year from this degrading and dangerous practice.

So-called "honour" killings take the lives of thousands of young women every year, mainly in Western Asia, North Africa, the Middle East and parts of South Asia.
At least 60 million girls who would otherwise be expected to be alive are "missing" from various populations as a result of
sex- selective abortions or neglect.

In most industrialized societies, although gender–based violence is officially condemned, it persists, implicitly sanctioned by messages in mass media.

In some developing countries, practices that subjugate and harm women – such as wife-beating, ‘honour’ killings, female genital cutting and dowry deaths – are condoned as being part of the natural order of things. Throughout much of Asia, a preference for male children results in the neglect and sometimes infanticide of girls, or their elimination by abortion in places where prenatal tests are available to determine the sex of the foetus.

Forced early marriage of young girls or adolescents is another culturally-defended practice that can cause lifelong psychological as well as physical problems, especially those resulting from early childbearing.

And as conflicts among ethnic groups rage, women and girls have increasingly become pawns of war, and face rape and forced pregnancies. FGC, coerced sex and early marriage are also factors in the spread of HIV to women.

A Global Consensus to End Female Genital Cutting

Female genital cutting (FGC) generally refers to the removal of part or all of a girl's external genitalia, and, in a more radical version (infibulation), the stitching up of the vaginal opening. An excruciating and sometimes deadly procedure, FGC is aimed at preserving female chastity and marriage prospects. It achieves this at the expense of a woman's sexual health and bodily integrity.
 

The recollections of Zainab (22), who was infibulated at the age of 8.

My two sisters, myself and our mother went to visit our family back home. I assumed we were going for a holiday. A bit later they told us that we were going to be infibulated. The day before our operation was due to take place, another girl was infibulated and she died because of the operation. We were so scared and didn’t want to suffer the same fate. But our parents told us it was an obligation, so we went. We fought back; we really thought we were going to die because of the pain. You have one woman holding your mouth so you won’t scream, two holding your chest and the other two holding your legs. After we were infibulated, we had rope tied across our legs so it was like we had to learn to walk again. We had to try to go to the toilet, if you couldn’t pass water in the next 10 days something was wrong. We were lucky, I suppose, we gradually recovered and didn’t die like the other girl. But the memory and the pain never really goes.
 


In 1984, a United Nations working group conducted a broad exchange of views on traditional practices affecting the health of women and children. Based on the number of women affected, the associated toll on their health, and the possibility of modifying the practice, and other criteria, the group concluded that FGC should be given top priority by the international community.

Female genital cutting is now on the international agenda, and it is condemned by most governments. Because of FGC’s devastating consequences on women’s reproductive health, and because it is a violation of their human rights, UNFPA is in the forefront of advocating against and working to end the practice.

 

Female Genital Cutting

Immediate complications

Long term consequences

  • Severe pain
  • Shock
  • Haemorrhage
  • Tetanus or sepsis
  • Urine retention
  • Ulceration of the genital region and injury to adjacent tissue
  • Wound infection
  • Urinary infection
  • Fever
  • Septicaemia.
  • Haemorrhage and infection can be of such magnitude as to cause death.
Anaemia, the formation of cysts and abscesses, keloid scar formation, damage to the urethra resulting in urinary incontinence, painful sexual intercourse and sexual dysfunction, hypersensitivity of the genital area.

Infibulation can cause severe scar formation, difficulty in urinating, menstrual disorders, recurrent bladder and urinary tract infection, fistulae, prolonged and obstructed labour, and infertility (as a consequence of earlier infections).

Cutting of the scar tissue is sometimes necessary to facilitate sexual intercourse and/or childbirth. Almost complete vaginal obstruction may occur, resulting in accumulation of menstrual flow in the vagina and uterus. During childbirth the risk of haemorrhage and infection is greatly increased.

Finding Strategic Ways to Intervene

Eradicating long-standing traditional practices does not happen overnight. One way to begin, though, is by information and advocacy that raises public awareness and changes the climate of public opinion. UNFPA supports national organizations who advocate against FMG because they are best placed to address specific cultural issues that sustain the practice. UNFPA is also active in efforts aimed at decision-makers at many levels. About ten African countries have outlawed the practice. The European Parliament also recently issued a strong condemnation of FGC.

Consensus-building around social issues is extremely difficult, because it touches the identity of nations, communities and individuals. Discussion of social questions polarizes viewpoints and may seem to widen the gap between cultures. But in the end, the overriding social purpose concentrates our minds and enables us to bridge all cultural gaps—not because we want to go home with an agreed form of words, but because all of us, each in our own way, want to save people’s lives.

 – UNFPA Executive Director Thoraya A. Obaid

UNFPA also supports a number of country level programmes to abolish FGC. Among the most successful are those offer alternative safe rituals to serve as rites of passage. Another component of successful projects is the participation and support of local leaders, including religious leaders, who thoroughly understand existing norms, attitudes and social dynamics, and who serve as agents of change.

UNFPA’s supports many efforts to eliminate FGC >>

 
 

HOME

    .........................................................................

OTHER RELATED ISSUES

| Mothers | Adolescents | HIV/AIDS | Emergencies | RH Commodity Security |