March 3

• Elsevier responds to Faculty Senate vote on costly journal subscriptions

February 4

• Cleo Eulau deserves more recognition

January 28

• A message of thanks from family of deceased Stanford Report editor

November 19

• Changes to GERs are 'ill conceived'

November 5

• Reader blasts foreign policy critics
• Salmon farming good for consumers
• Artificial intelligence won’t match humans

October 15

• Faced with Delphi stumbling blocks, administrator seeks help, support

October 8

• President emeritus registers a plea for better Faculty Senate attendence
• Lamenting ClariNet’s disappearance, reader asks ITSS why it had to go
• ITSS responds to ClariNet queries, says it plans to reactivate service

August 20

• STAP cuts called a 'double-whammy'

June 11

• Toledo should act in Berenson case

April 30

• Iraq story needed balance
  
• Lessons from the debate over CIV

March 5

• Helmets required for youth on scooters

February 26

• Readers respond to Hennessy's statement supporting affirmative action

February 12

• Readers respond to story on Beinin

December 11

• Faculty against 'bellicose' climate

November 6

• Beyers, Deva fondly remembered

October 30

• Marguerite buses spew black smoke

October 16

• Hennessy urges 'civil' dialogue

July 10

• Supervisor Kniss has been an 'impediment'

Letters policy: Stanford Report will consider letters to the editor relating to campus and academic issues and is generally limited to correspondence from staff, faculty and students. Stanford Report reserves the right to edit all submissions. Anonymous letters will not be printed, nor will letters specifically addressed to other publications or to individuals. In the interest of fairness, we occasionally will run a letter and a response in the same issue. It is our policy to obtain permission from the author of the original letter before we seek a response. We will not run letters that make unsubstantiated allegations without an accompanying reply.