The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/all/20041214200407/http://www.state.gov/s/p/
Skip Links
U.S. Department of State
HomeContact UsEmail this PageFOIAPrivacy NoticeArchiveEspanol
Search
U.S. Department of State
About the State Dept.Press and Public AffairsTravel and Living AbroadCountries and RegionsInternational IssuesHistory, Education and CultureBusiness CenterOther ServicesEmployment
Bureaus/Offices Reporting Directly to the Secretary
Policy Planning Staff (S/P)
Speeches, Articles, Testimony, and Interviews
The Staff
Think Tank Links
Directors of Policy Planning
Contact Policy Planning
Secretary's Open Forum
  

Policy Planning Staff (S/P)

MISSION STATEMENT

Fusing Thought With Action: The Mission and Purpose of the Policy Planning Staff

Created in 1947 by George Kennan at the request of Secretary of State George C. Marshall, the Policy Planning Staff (S/P) serves as a source of independent policy analysis and advice for the Secretary of State. The Policy Planning Staff's mission is to take a longer term, strategic view of global trends and frame recommendations for the Secretary of State to advance U.S. interests and American values.

In his memoirs Present at the Creation, former Secretary of State Dean Acheson characterized the role of Policy Planning: "To anticipate the emerging form of things to come, to reappraise policies which had acquired their own momentum and went on after the reasons for them had ceased, and to stimulate and, when necessary, to devise basic policies crucial to the conduct of our foreign affairs."

For today's Policy Planning Staff, fulfilling this same, core mission for the Secretary requires striking a fine balance between engagement in the day-to-day requirements of diplomacy and development of long term, strategic plans. Broadly speaking, the daily work of the Policy Planning Staff may be divided into six areas:

Analysis
Policy Planning serves as an internal think tank for the Department of State - undertaking broad analytical studies of regional and functional issues, identifying gaps in policy, and initiating policy planning and formulation to fill these gaps. Policy Planning also serves as an institutionalized "second opinion" on policy matters - providing recommendations and alternative courses of action to the Secretary of State.

Special Projects
Policy Planning assumes special projects or takes the lead on certain issues as tasked by the Secretary of State. Recent examples include Policy Planning's work on assembling the international coalition against terrorism, coordinating the reconstruction of Afghanistan through February 2002, and implementing the Good Friday agreement in Northern Ireland.

Policy Coordination
Policy Planning engages functional and regional bureaus within the State Department and relevant government agencies to ensure coordination and integration of policy with longer-term objectives.

Policy Articulation
The speechwriters for the Secretary of State are members of the Policy Planning Staff and work together with the whole Staff and all bureaus to draft the Secretary's speeches, public remarks, testimony before Congress, and contributions to print media.

Liaison
Policy Planning acts as a liaison with nongovernmental organizations, the academic community, think tanks, and others to exchange expert views on matters relevant to U.S. policy and to ensure that broad public opinion informs the policy formulation process.

Planning Talks
Policy Planning holds a series of dialogues -- known as planning talks -- with counterparts from other countries, including our key European allies, Japan, South Korea, Australia, China, and Russia. These talks provide an opportunity to discuss broad strategic issues that go beyond crisis management or the day-to-day concerns of diplomacy.

Dr. Mitchell B. Reiss is the 22nd Director of Policy Planning and holds a rank equivalent to Assistant Secretary of State.

The Policy Planning Staff is typically a mix of career government officials and outside experts who bring differing perspectives and bases of experience to the conduct of U.S. diplomacy.  Recently, the staff has included Foreign Service Officers, academics from universities and think tanks, intelligence analysts, former congressional staffers, an emergency room physician, a retired military officer, a business consultant, an arms control expert, and an economist. The staff is responsible for covering the full range of foreign policy issues facing the United States, although staff members exercise discretion and judgement in identifying the areas they focus on.

Shortly after he left the Policy Planning Staff in 1969, Zbigniew Brzezinski (who went on to become President Carter's National Security Advisor) wrote: "The purpose of planning policy is to fuse thought with action." That imperative guides us today.

  
Highlights

Recent Speeches by the Director of Policy Planning

Dec. 6, 2004,
German Marshall Fund: "...it is with some large measure of regret that I must tell you that the ideas put forward by many members of the community you support have been disappointing.... Much of what I see is heavy on criticism and light on constructive suggestions.... The present approach...isn't serving you well, and it's not serving those of us in the government well either. You can do better, and we need you to do better." (full text)

Dec. 3, 2004, Sejong Institute in Seoul: "We -- the Republic of Korea and the United States -- have a vision of a brighter future for this region.... If the 20th century was marked by the struggles among the powers, we have an opportunity to define a new pattern of cooperation in Northeast Asia to meet common challenges." (full text)

Nov. 30, 2004, Japan Institute of International Studies: "American and Japanese leaders seek nothing less than to define a new international system and our shared role within it. We are doing so on a solid foundation--a deep awareness of our commonly held values and our commonly held commitments." (full text)

Oct. 6, 2004, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy: "The 9/11 attacks demonstrated that, in today's international system, threats are defined more by the fault lines within societies than by the territorial boundaries between states. This is an important point, because it turns on its head one of the major presuppositions of Waltz's argument [in Man, the State, and War] -- namely that the governments of nation-states are the only credible instruments of applying power in the international arena." (full text)

Sept. 30, 2004, National Committee on American Foreign Policy: "The Administration's approach to Northern Ireland reflects core American values: the primacy of the rule of law, protection of human rights and safeguarding equality of treatment. We bring to the table our experiences as Americans--in policing, and in building a shared society, including integrated education--all areas central to the Good Friday Agreement." (full text)

  
This site is managed by the Bureau of Public Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
External links to other Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein.
Copyright Information | Disclaimers