| Using Indicators
to Measure Progress
Every year, a
million children lose their mothers to the complications of childbirth.
It is
difficult and costly to accurately measure maternal mortality (see
below), and the results are not actionable. However, process indicators
are monitoring tools that can provide information about where interventions
are needed.
One example
of a process indicator is whether there is skilled attendance at
birth. This particular indicator will be used as a global benchmark
to monitor progress towards the goal of maternal mortality reduction,
as agreed at ICPD + 5.
A series
of process indicators published
in 1997 by UNICEF, WHO and UNFPA focuses specifically on monitoring
whether women who develop serious obstetric complications receive
the services they need. This information can guide programmes and
policies.
 |
Facilities |
For
every 500,000 people, 4 facilities that provide
basic EOC, and one that offers more comprehensive
care. |
 |
Number
of all births in EOC facilities |
At
least 15 per cent of all births. |
 |
Met
needs |
All
women with complications receive EOC. |
 |
Number
of Caesarian sections |
Between
5 and 15 percent of all births. |
 |
Case
fatalities |
Less
than 1 per cent. |
|
|
Indicators
include the number of facilities offering emergency obstetric care,
their geographic distribution, the percentage of women with complications
treated in emergency obstetric care facilities, the Caesarean-section
rate and the case fatality rate, an indicator of the quality of
care provided.
This
series of process indicators is now often used to assess the outcome
of interventions at district and facility level and may be included
in national management information systems. They were recently used
to monitor emergency
obstetric care in West Africa.
Maternal
deaths audits, undertaken with families, communities and health
providers, are also a powerful way of improving the delivery of
services.
Maternal
morality rates and ratios are difficult and expensive to obtain
and are often inaccurate because of under-reporting and misclassification.
Maternal mortality tends to be under-reported because people in
developing countries often die outside the health system, which
makes accurate registration of deaths difficult. In some studies,
the actual number of maternal deaths was double or triple what was
initially reported.
Maternal
mortality is also misclassified, because health workers may not
know why a woman died, or whether she was or had recently been pregnant.
Deaths are sometimes intentionally misclassified, especially if
they are associated with clandestine abortions.
Methods used to calculate
maternal death rates are often complex and costly to use. The actual
number of maternal deaths in a specific place at a specific time
is relatively small. Therefore, very large populations must be surveyed
in order to get accurate estimates, which is costly. The relative
infrequency of maternal deaths over a short period also means that
the rates will appear to jump around, making interpretation of trends
over time difficult. In addition, some of the poorest countries
do not have adequate vital registration systems.

Back to top
|