|
Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment
A recent analysis of national reports on progress
toward meeting the MDGs found that “Despite the
rights-based perspective reflected by most reports
in discussions on Goal 3 [gender equality and empowerment
of women], the approach to women in
discussions under other goals continues to be instrumental
rather than rights-based. Examples are the
discussions on child mortality in several reports,
where women’s lack of knowledge of care and feeding
practices is most commonly identified as a barrier to
achieving the goal. Such a formulation ignores the
gendered variables that mediate child survival, while
accepting without comment the invisibility of fathers
in parenting and care.” (11)
Even 10 years after Cairo, the report found that
“women are still being seen in terms of their vulnerabilities”
and cast most often within their traditional roles of mothers or as victims—not as actors in the
development process.
Other impediments to progress include the continued
lack of good quality data disaggregated by sex,
the paucity of financial and technical resources for
women’s programmes at both international and
national levels, and confusion about the relative
merits of gender mainstreaming versus womenfocused
programmes.
DATA. Without sex-disaggregated data, it becomes
impossible to put benchmarks on or monitor policy or
programme effectiveness. In most countries, serious
gaps still exist in available data on women’s economic
activity and decision-making ability and on the differential
impacts of anti-poverty or other programmes.
Data that allow cross-country comparisons are even
more scarce. Efforts currently under way to fill these
gaps need to be prioritized and strengthened.(12)
LIMITED RESOURCES. A second ongoing problem is
the paucity of resources. Many commitments made
by governments and agencies cannot be met because
of the lack of funds. National programmes promoting
women’s advancement are particularly susceptible to
arbitrary budget cuts in times of fiscal stringency.
A particularly unfortunate trend is the tendency to
cut funding to women-focused programmes or agencies
based on the argument that gender is now being
mainstreamed throughout the institution. A particularly unfortunate trend is the tendency to
cut funding to women-focused programmes or agencies
based on the argument that gender is now being
mainstreamed throughout the institution.
MAINSTREAMING EFFORTS. Gender mainstreaming
became the approach of choice in the 1990s in response
to the recognition that women-focused programmes or
agencies are easy to isolate or marginalize. However,
gender mainstreaming is a difficult process and one in
which good practices are still evolving.
The UNFPA global survey found considerable shortcomings
in understanding of what a gender equity
approach means and how to operationalize it within
programmes and policies as called for by the ICPD.
Mainstreaming efforts, undertaken without a women’s
agency to back it up, can be unfocused and even easier
to ignore than women-focused initiatives. What is
required is a combination of mainstreaming efforts
(with a clear operations research approach to determine
what works and what doesn’t and why within
key institutions(13)) and a well-funded and resourced
women’s machinery (including ministries for women’s
affairs or gender equality and focal points for gender
issues within ministries, commissions and departments)
that has the technical capacity and political placement
to spearhead policies and programmes.
POLITICAL WILL. Behind these factors lie the questions
of political clout and commitment. In situations
where a vocal national women’s movement is able
to advocate for needed policies, programmes and
resources, forward movement can be quick. In other
situations, NGOs or other civil society organizations
are running interesting programmes for gender
equality, but most are not scaled up into governmentsupported
programmes. However, even in situations
where the women’s movement is not strong, political
leadership can play an important role in advocating
for gender equality and women’s empowerment at
the policy level.
|
11 |
CEDAW |
|
For the rights-based approach to population issues to be translated into effective laws, policies and programmes, it is
important that the most important existing human rights
instrument, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), be used effectively.
The UN Millennium Project’s Task Force 3 on Primary Education and Gender Equality has recommended using
CEDAW to monitor progress and strengthen accountability on gender equality and women’s empowerment. A 2000 study concluded that effective utilization of CEDAW depends on
widespread knowledge of CEDAW; dialogue among government
representatives, CEDAW committee members, and NGOs; use of sex-disaggregated indicators for tracking policies, laws, and budgets; and government recognition of how to
link policies to CEDAW.
To date, CEDAW has been insufficiently used to track the
implementation of the ICPD Programme of Action or to develop the mechanisms for such implementation. See Sources
|
|
|
|