The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/all/20060213230405/http://jaylipe.typepad.com:80/smart_marketing/2005/12/brands_are_not_.html

« The Sounds of Marketing | Main | Retail Marketing Tricks »

Brands are NOT dead

I just finished reading an article in one of our local business publications Minnesota Business
that had the curious title "Brands are Dead". Written by an author claiming to own a "marketing architecture consultancy" (whatever that is) it quoted a CEO of Saatchi & Saatchi as saying "Brands have run out of juice. They are dead."

This is way off base. Sure, the dynamics of the marketplace are changing to a more opt-in environment, and yes competitive pressures are found most everywhere these days. But brands are NOT dead. In this hyper-competitive environment we face, you are obligated to build a strong brand; rooted in trust and customer confidence. If you don't, your customers will turn elsewhere, in the blink of a mouseclick.

My second book Stand Out from the Crowd: Secrets to Crafting a Winning Company Identity (due out  next year by Dearborn Trade Publishing) will cover all the tools a company needs to distinguish itself from its competitors. But building a company brand, is at the heart of it, and still very much alive.

Do you agree?

December 19, 2005 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/3879695

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brands are NOT dead:

Comments

I very much agree that brands are still alive. If you consider that every interaction (whether, online, written, graphical or personal) your company and anyone involved with it has as a source of branding, then either you have a brand that's alive and flourishing or your company has died and you haven't noticed yet.

Posted by: Ardath Albee | Dec 19, 2005 10:04:08 PM

Your broader definition of what constitutes a brand is dead on. Perhaps those who are sounding the death knell for brands don't appreciate how all-encompassing a brand can be...

Posted by: Jay Lipe | Dec 20, 2005 9:08:29 PM

Post a comment