The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/all/20060314204227/http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990321.html

Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox, March 21, 1999:

URL as UI

The URL will continue to be part of the Web user interface for several more years, so a usable site requires:

In principle, users should not need to know about URLs which are a machine-level addressing scheme. In practice, users often go to websites or individual pages through mechanisms that involve exposure to raw URLs:

Persistent URLs Attract Links

Links from other websites are the third-most common way people find sites (after search engines and email recommendations), so build your site to make it easy to attract inbound links:

Should Domains End in .com?

The most frequently asked question on my recent lecture tour to Iceland was whether it is better to get a domain ending in .com or to use the country's own domain (.is).

Unfortunately, many users have been trained to view ".com" as the standard ending for commercial websites: this is an artifact of the early American dominance on the Web and of the completion algorithm in several popular browsers which automatically add .com to any name. Because of this situation, my advice is:

I recommend use of the local domain for local sites because it is misleading to use the "international" domain ending .com for such sites. As ecommerce and other uses of the Web grow around the world, people will start to expect local domains for local sites and they will not think to type .com for local service. Since the ability to provide great local service is a major selling point, sites are better off by staying with their own country's domain name unless they deliberately want to be seen as disembodied cyberspace entities.

Domain Names May Die

It is likely that domain names only have 3-5 years left as a major way of finding sites on the Web. In the long term, it is not appropriate to require unique words to identify every single entity in the world. That's not how human language works.

The proposals to open up new top-level domains like .shop are a poor solution from a usability perspective since there is no easy way to remember which domain ending is associated with which site. The only new TLD that's useful is .sex which would allow very simple ways of filtering content that's undesired (or desired, as the case may be).

New addressing schemes are likely to be introduced with better support for ambiguity and the ability to find things without knowing the exact spelling. Search engines and directories are an early attempt, but we can surely do better.

Because of the conservatism of Web users, we will have to cater to old browsers, old software, and old habits for many years, so good domain names will continue to be important for many years. The remaining useful life of a domain name may be as much as ten years.


Update added 2005: Domain names are still in use, and it looks like they may have several more years to go. But my prediction that they would become a less important way to find sites has come true: it is now much more common for users to type a company name, a site name, or even a domain name into a search engine than it is for them to guess the URL. Even so, enough users continue to enter their destination directly into the browser's URL field that it's still important to have an easily guessable domain name and easily typable URLs.

URLs also impact several of the design guidelines for confirmation email, because these messages often need to refer the user back to the originating website.


See reader comments on this Alertbox and a sidebar on compound domain names


Previous: March 7, 1999: Trust and Web use
Next: April 4, 1999: intranet portals as the corporate information infrastructure

See Also: List of other Alertbox columns