Web crawl snapshots generously donated from Accelovation. This data is currently not publicly accessible.
From the site:
Accelovation is pioneering the delivery of Insight Discovery? software solutions that help companies move from innovation idea to product reality faster and with more success.
Our solutions are used by leading firms in the Fortune 500 and beyond ? companies from a diverse set of industries ranging from consumer packaged goods to high tech, foods to chemicals, and others. We help them mine the online world for market and technical insights to help speed the process of innovation.
TIMESTAMPS
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/all/20060325223723/http://www.whatbooks.com/store/dvd/B00005MP58.html
NTSC Rating:
NR (Not Rated)
DVD Description:
Jane Austen's classic novel of 1813, Pride and Prejudice, still wins the hearts of countless schoolgirls with its romantic story of Elizabeth Bennet and her Mr. Darcy. Now, the 1996 BBC miniseries is winning over adults, with its faithful adaptation, gorgeous scenery, and superb acting.
The essence of the story is the antagonism between Mr. Darcy, a wealthy single man who believes Elizabeth to be beneath him, and Elizabeth, who upon being insulted at a dance by the aloof Darcy refuses to associate with him in any manner. Austen evokes incredible tension with the wit and flirtation of the two characters, and director Simon Langton (who also directed Upstairs Downstairs) successfully translates the repartee and conflict in this six-hour miniseries. Dialogue, for the most part, is painstakingly replicated, except when fleshing out and smoothing for modern sensibilities was necessary. Darcy, for instance, is drawn out, giving his personality significantly more depth. The acting sweeps you away to Regency England: Jennifer Ehle (of Wilde) is convincing as the obstinate Elizabeth, who, despite her mother's attempts to marry her off, spurs the attentions of Darcy. And Colin Firth (of The English Patient) will have women everywhere longing for a Mr. Darcy of their own.
For those who have been on an Austen binge--enjoying such excellent adaptations as Sense and Sensibility and Persuasion--this miniseries will round out the ultimate Austen video library. For those new to these romantic period pieces, this version of Pride and Prejudice will have you hooked and longing for more. One caveat, however: plan to watch it in an entire day, because very few have the self-control to not watch all six hours in a single sitting. --Jenny Brown
Average Customer Rating:
great movie
This is a great adaptation of a classical standard. We truly enjoyed the movie.
This TV 'Pride and Prejudice' is far better than the movie...
Review of the TV production of 'Pride and Prejudice' starring Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle
I have long been a devotee of Jane Austen's novel and I am always interested in dramatizations of it. This TV production is certainly the best I have seen; and contrasts very favourably, in my opinion, with the film that was recently released. It is always a challenge to turn a novel into a film, especially when the novelist is as great a wordsmith and stylist as Jane Austen. How can a dramatization, which must entail the abridgement of the words to a serious extent, succeed in presenting a meaningful interpretation? And how, in a production aimed at a wide audience, is the apparent gulf between the contemporary viewer and the language of a late 18th/early 19th century novel to be bridged?
The most obvious point of contrast between this production and the recent movie lies in its preservation of much of the original dialogue, and hence, not only of the nature and depth of the personalities of the novel, but also of its central theme: the painful and humiliating process of enlightenment which Darcy and Elizabeth must both undergo in order to merit their happiness. The easy path, followed by the movie, of modernizing (and frequently replacing altogether) Austen's language, is fortunately avoided here.
Firth and Ehle bring to their parts a crucial ability to communicate intelligence and depth of feeling, and give us the clear impression that they have thought seriously about the nature of the characters they are playing. The challenge presented here to Firth as the actor of Darcy lies in the fact that in the novel we are never given Darcy's view of events except in an oblique way. Firth has clearly endeavoured to create Darcy's own inner narrative - and I find his attempt interesting and convincing. Whole scenes are added to provide additional insight into the 'missing pieces' of Darcy's personality and experience, and the viewer must make up her mind whether these are successful (the famous 'diving scene' at Pemberley, and the fencing lesson are two major examples).
In fact, it is easy to identify differences between Firth's own view of certain scenes and some explicit descriptions in the book. An important example is the early interaction between the two at Netherfield, where Elizabeth indirectly accuses Darcy of pride. In the novel, the exchange is conducted at a playful level, and Darcy's growing attraction to Elizabeth is not yet a matter of serious anxiety to him. In this production, on the other hand, Firth's Darcy is visibly disturbed at his emotional response to her; and the exchange is fraught and intense. Whether Firth's deviation from the overt intention of the author, here and elsewhere in the production, amounts to any kind of challenge to Austen's own judgment in building the story, or should rather be viewed as a side-effect of translating the story into a visual medium (perhaps that is why it was thought necessary to spell out the birth of Darcy's conflicted passion for Elizabeth in a more obvious way) is an interesting question to consider. In any case, the quality of Firth's acting ensures that the scene is successful.
On the whole, I think the director has done an admirable job of making the novel entertaining for a contemporary audience, and at the same time preserving the essence of Austen's novel. A clear example of the superiority of this production to the recent movie, is the 'second proposal scene', where Elizabeth finally accepts Darcy. The scene is plausible and dignified, and the actors understand, and manage to recreate for us, the mixture of restraint and profound emotion, of propriety and daring, that Austen creates on the page. In the movie, by contrast, the interpretation of the scene is so loosely 'adapted' that nothing is left but a sweet and banal love scene between characters who merely happen to share the names of Austen's characters, and look nice in their period costume. An adaptation of 'Pride and Prejudice' should surely strive to present the novel's inner substance, and not just its outer shell. By this measure, it is the TV production that succeeds.
best movie ever
I was very impress with this movie. The plot doesn't have much to it, but the excelent performance of all of the actors, the acuracy of the period time (respected in details), truly takes you in the romantic world of Regeny and keeps you captivated through out the entired movie.
Can't find the dvd you're looking for? Then try Google.