Contact Info
CMS Watch
info@cmswatch.com
PO Box 1664
Olney, MD
USA 20832
+1 301 585 7004 (editorial)
+1 301 570 6788 (cust. svc.)
800 325 6190 (USA only)
Fax: +1 214 242 3048
CMS Watch™ offers practical, independent advice regarding Content Management, Enterprise Portal, and Search solutions. For a small fraction of your overall project investment, our vendor-neutral evaluation reports can help you minimize the time and effort to identify and evaluate technologies suited to your unique requirements.
Version 1, 2007
CMS Watch is Hiring
CMS Watch is recruiting a Web Content Management Analyst. Details here.
Don't take our word for it
"The Enterprise Portals Report does an excellent job of articulating the key complexities and challenges associated with portal implementations, and will greatly assist organizations in planning for and executing portal initiatives."
-- Mike Girifalco,
Principal Consultant, Engineering, Molecular
The CMS Watch Newsletter
Keep getting the real story via our monthly newsletter
Quoted
"In enterprise software, product selections are still sometimes made on fairways and putting greens. If you think that could happen at your firm, my advice is: hide your boss’s golf clubs…"
--Andrew Van Etten
CMS Watch™ provides independent evaluations of content management, records management, enterprise search, and portal solutions.
March, 2007: The Web CMS Report
Objective reviews of 30 Web CMS products.
Advice on avoiding pitfalls, selecting tools, & getting a good price.
Read more
Sample the report
Buy the report now
Feature - ECM 2007
Enterprise Content Management Marketplace: Opportunities and Risks
Buyers looking at strategic ECM investments can find product research from CMS Watch and other analyst firms, but, Alan Pelz-Sharpe argues, you need to look beyond the tools to the vendors themselves. And here, Alan finds that some of the biggest and well-known vendors are undergoing substantial change right now, at some near-term risk for their customers...
Read More
Feature - CMS Consolidation
Your enterprise accountants may get very excited calculating how
much money could be saved by consolidating disparate content management systems.
Graham Oakes argues, however, that once you ask some key questions, the cost
savings -- and business benefits -- might not add up....
Read More
Report Excerpt
The Enterprise Search Report looks at... Difference between low-cost and mid-range solutions
"Nevertheless, it is certainly possible to generalize on functional differences between Mid-range and Lower-cost products. Most lower-cost enterprise search solutions do not offer tunable content monitoring and indexing architectures with the same degree of sophistication as those found in Mid-range solutions. Consequently, they are usually not as scalable."
More about The Enterprise Search Report
The Enterprise Search Report: Version 3
Objective reviews of 28 Search products.
Detailed analysis of costs, benefits, and technical choices.
TrendWatch: CMS Watch Blog
A Thank You to the web analytics community
27-Apr-2007 [Permalink]
The web analytics marketplace is in the middle of a significant transformation, with new features coming out nearly every week, plus the occasional acquisition. In my role as Principal Analyst for the Web Analytics Report (to be released next Tuesday), I’ve tried to interpret these trends from the perspective of a buyer and user of these solutions. Enterprise analytics customers too numerous to mention were very generous providing their tips and best practices for planning, implementing, and maximizing value from an analytics initiative. The report also benefited from the input of a host of top web analytic gurus, including: Nicholas Aucher, Gary Angel, Justin Cutroni, Stephane Hamel, Kurt Krake, and Robbin Steif.
My goal is to help you succeed. Any questions or issues you have? Thoughts on specific vendors? By all means, drop me a line.
Submitted by Phil Kemelor, Contributing Analyst
Your iPod, or your business? Taxonomies in-depth...
26-Apr-2007 [Permalink]
A couple of months ago, I got many reponses from fellow frustrated iPod owners to my post about how bad metadata in iPods makes for a bad user experience. The same was true last week at the AIIM Expo, when during my taxonomy tutorial, the audience was quick to point out the problems they endured transfering bad metadata from CDs to their online jukebox. Interestingly, most of them had previously not made the connection with bad metadata in their content management systems. The more complex the technology, the more challenging it can be to pinpoint metadata and classification problems.
FYI, in early June, I'll be presenting the same in-depth tutorial on taxonomies at the Gilbane Conference on Content Management in Washington, DC; the tutorial will include case studies and interactive exercises to help you build a better (or first) taxonomy for your business. Later that week, I'll also be talking tagging with Thomas Vander Wal, the crafty IA guru who coined the term "folksonomy." Do join us, and e-mail me with your latest taxonomy and tagging challenges beforehand.
Submitted by Theresa Regli, Analyst
RedDot's Purple Monkey and the ECM/WCM divide
26-Apr-2007 [Permalink]
Open Text's Web CMS subsidiary RedDot has just chosen Chicago-based interactive agency Purple Monkey Studios, Inc. as their "Partner of the Year." Purple Monkey can certainly boast a decent client list and the obligatory cool home page. To me, this news more than perhaps anything else exemplifies the gulf between enterprise content management (ECM) and web content management (WCM). Could you imagine Open Text (or any other large ECM vendor) citing a firm called Purple Monkey as their ECM partner of the year? More typically, they will laud more prosaic resellers -- like this IT firm that resells Open Text's e-mail management tools.
We'll argue til we're blue in the face that the management of enterprise documents versus the management of website pages beget very many similar challenges. But you the buyer should recognize the big differences between processing corporate files and overseeing an interactive web experience. And partly that difference is cultural. Does your WCM vendor truly grasp the depth of your required enterprise controls? Does your ECM vendor really understand the adaptive communications needs of your web publishing team? Today, closing that gap will mostly fall to you.
Submitted by Tony Byrne, Analyst
SharePoint and your public website
25-Apr-2007 [Permalink]
Today we announced research that finds Microsoft Office SharePoint Server ("MOSS") 2007 coming up a bit short when it comes to traditional web content management. MOSS continues to offer a very promising document collaboration platform. But when you try to smoosh a web publishing process through a tool designed to list out documents in portal fashion, it can lead to some unexpected results. Read our press release about it here.
Submitted by Tony Byrne, Analyst
Comments on TrendWatch? Write the editor...
Send This Page to a Colleague...
About | Feedback
| Customer Support|
Free Report Samples | Vendor Lists
Copyright © 2001-2007 by CMSWorks, Inc. Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy