Starting in 1996, Alexa Internet has been donating their crawl data to the Internet Archive. Flowing in every day, these data are added to the Wayback Machine after an embargo period.
Negotiation is the process of conferring, discussing and/or bargaining to reach
an agreement. In my opinion, it is the best way to resolve a dispute. Most
importantly, it is the best way to obtain the desired results. To put
negotiation in perspective, the by-products of other dispute resolution methods
need to be examined:
·At least
some control of resolution of the problem will be given up;
· The
result becomes more uncertain;
· Third
parties become involved which will add complexity to the dispute;
·When a
third party becomes involved, that party's skill at mediating, arbitrating, or
litigating the dispute will be relied on;
·When
involving third parties in the process, their needs and interests
will play a role in your dispute;
·The
monetary cost of resolving the dispute will probably increase;
·As hard
as confronting the opponent may be, the emotional costs when
involving a third party may increase; and,
·
The resolution of the dispute may drag on.
Considering these factors, you will be more likely to get the desired results by
negotiation.
Of course, effective negotiation is the key. Generally,
negotiation may:
·
Take less time than the other methods.
· Cost less money.
· Have a lower emotional cost.
· Give the best chance of obtaining the desired results.
Like some
of the other methods of resolving disputes, negotiation is:
· Private
· Allows creativity
· Allows opportunities to preserve the relationship between the parties to
the dispute.
EFFECTIVE
NEGOTIATING
The most
important factor in becoming an effective negotiator is to: recognize that you
have the power to negotiate disputes. To be effective, you should:
·
Prepare for the negotiation by gathering facts and information about the
issues and the other person or company being dealt with.
An attorney or expert who has
experience negotiating in a certain field may be consulted with to obtain
information that can be used in the negotiation.
·
Consider what process of negotiation will be the most effective toward getting
the best result:
A. Will
it be a meeting or meetings?
B. Will
it be a series of letters going back and forth?
C. Will
it be a series of phone calls?
D. Will
it be a combination of these processes?
·
Read books about negotiation. Some prominent negotiation books are listed in
the
bibliography.
·
Talk about the problem with a friend or trusted colleague. Ask how he would
approach the
problem.
·
Talk to a lawyer or mediator about techniques that could be used to help bring
you and your
adversary closer together.
·
Learn as much as possible about the opponent’s circumstances. What is
motivating him?
What are the interests behind his stated position(s)?
·
Consider all the options. What are the ramifications of each option? Is
ignoring or avoiding
the problem a possibility? Are there other ways to simply
avoid the dispute all together?
Is legal action a viable alternative?
·
Talk to your opponent about joint resolution of the mutual problem that exists
between the two
of you. Explain that even if he doesn’t see that there is a
problem, a problem exists because
your relationship with him is at stake. Or, a
problem exists because each of you will end up
devoting time and energy to the
problem if a satisfactory result cannot be negotiated and you
are “forced” to
proceed with a more intrusive dispute resolution method or legal action.
·Have
faith in your ability to achieve a favorable outcome. Draw on past
experiences. Go for the best result that can be achieved.
Learn
and use these “tried and true” negotiating techniques:
·Ask
questions - note what is not said by your opponent and observe his body
language. Also, use questions to make your opponent invest time and energy into
you.
·Stall -
if there is something to gain by waiting
·Bluff -
don't let the other side know your upset or happy
·Act dumb
- let your opponent help you with filling in the details by asking questions
·Use
silence - use not speaking to your advantage. The other side may speak or your
silence may cause the other side to think the worst.
·Negotiate
on the telephone when you initiate the call - this gives you the advantage.
·Separate
people from the problem - be polite to the person and hard on the problem you
are negotiating about.
·Try and
get the other side to make the first offer - that way you can find out his
thinking and position first. Also, he may offer you a deal better than you
expected.
·Find out
the other side's time deadline - and, even if you have a deadline, never let on
you are acting under pressure.
HIRING A
PROFESSIONAL NEGOTIATOR
If you
decide not to negotiate alone and want to hire a negotiator to help with the
dispute, consider the following:
The
dynamics of the negotiation will become more complex. It will no longer be only
the negotiating parties who will influence or even decide the outcome of the
negotiation. Both parties' negotiators will have an impact on the outcome.
Involving professional negotiators may prove to be an expedient way to resolve
your dispute. Experienced negotiators can help the parties clarify the
decisions which need to be made to reach an agreement. However, any negotiator
may hinder or hurt the chances to bring the negotiation to a successful close as
well.
Never
give up decision making power regarding the whole dispute or the points that
really matter. If this power is given up, you may end up with a decision that
you are not really happy with. You may also be legally bound to the decision
that has been reached by someone else. For example, a lawyer generally has the
power to make binding decisions for his client.
Giving up
power to make decisions takes away an advantage of hiring a third party
negotiator in the first place. Utilizing a third-party allows the opportunity
to take a break in the negotiations for consultations between negotiators and
the parties. The negotiator and the party may brainstorm about the best way to
handle the pending negotiations. Also, the negotiator can get as much as he can
while not giving anything up until it is approved by you. To maintain control
over the negotiator and the negotiation:
·Make it
clear up front that that it is very important to be kept informed about the
progress or lack of progress in the negotiation.
·Instruct
the negotiator whether or not to provide written reports and/or phone calls
about the progress of the negotiation.
·Advise
him of the points or items that require prior authorization and the concessions
that may be made without being consulted.
·Make sure
the negotiator is accessible. You don't need someone who won’t return your
phone calls.
·Make sure
the fee arrangement with the negotiator is clear.
·Make sure
you are satisfied you will be getting the most for your money.
·Solicit
the negotiator’s honest assessment of your dispute. Some useful information may
be obtained. You may also decide that your views are a lot different from the
prospective negotiator’s views and decide to hire someone else.
·Ask the
negotiator about his personal feelings or views about the dispute. See if you
agree with his views or not. Keep in mind that the negotiator’s personal
feelings and perspective about the problem will influence, in some way, the
result of the negotiation.
·Consider
the negotiator’s advice but don’t accept it blindly. Make sure the rationale
behind the advice is understood. If the advice stems from the previous
experience of the negotiator, ask what specific experience(s) the negotiator has
had in cases like yours.
A NOTE ABOUT LAW, LAWYERS AND NEGOTIATION
Essentially, law is power if one has a dispute with another party or
wants to prevent problems in the future. It may be used to force a party to pay
money or do something. It may also be used as a tool to enforce a negotiator's
agreement if it falls apart. Yet, law should only be one of several factors
that should be considered when negotiating a dispute.