Quick search in Citations
*Required field
Quick Search in Journals
Quick Search in Journals
AnywhereCitationPNAS NexusProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Advanced Search
SUGGESTED SEARCHES:
Covid-19 Demography Mpox Climate Change Gun Violence
Research Article
Anthropology
Free access

Preceramic maize from Paredones and Huaca Prieta, Peru

Alexander Grobman, Duccio Bonavia, Tom D. Dillehay [email protected], Dolores R. Piperno [email protected], José Iriarte, and Irene HolstAuthors Info & Affiliations
Contributed by Dolores R. Piperno, December 12, 2011 (sent for review October 23, 2011)
January 17, 2011
109 (5) 1755-1759
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120270109

Abstract

Maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) is among the world's most important and ancient domesticated crops. Although the chronology of its domestication and initial dispersals out of Mexico into Central and South America has become more clear due to molecular and multiproxy archaeobotanical research, important problems remain. Among them is the paucity of information on maize's early morphological evolution and racial diversification brought about in part by the poor preservation of macrofossils dating to the pre-5000 calibrated years before the present period from obligate dispersal routes located in the tropical forest. We report newly discovered macrobotanical and microbotanical remains of maize that shed significant light on the chronology, land race evolution, and cultural contexts associated with the crop's early movements into South America and adaptation to new environments. The evidence comes from the coastal Peruvian sites of Paredones and Huaca Prieta, Peru; dates from the middle and late preceramic and early ceramic periods (between ca. 6700 and 3000 calibrated years before the present); and constitutes some of the earliest known cobs, husks, stalks, and tassels. The macrobotanical record indicates that a diversity of racial complexes characteristic of the Andean region emerged during the preceramic era. In addition, accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon determinations carried out directly on different structures of preserved maize plants strongly suggest that assays on burned cobs are more reliable than those on unburned cobs. Our findings contribute to knowledge of the early diffusion of maize and agriculture and have broader implications for understanding the development of early preindustrial human societies.
Genetic and archaeological data indicate that corn or maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) was domesticated in Mexico by ∼8700 calibrated years before the present (cal BP) (1–4). It then spread into other tropical regions in and south of Mexico in the following millennia (5–13). In South America, preceramic-aged microfossils such as starch grains and phytoliths are reported from southwest Ecuador by ∼7000–5500 cal BP (11–13); in the southern Andean highlands, by 4000 cal BP (14); and in southeastern South America, by 4500 cal BP (15). Macrofossils (cobs and kernels) have been recovered from a number of archaeological sites in the Andean region, yet none have produced secure accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) age determinations before ∼3800 cal BP (7).
We report here 293 newly excavated macrofossils of popcorn and flour corn remains; 15 radiocarbon ages directly determined from these fossils; and maize phytoliths and starch grains from deep, undisturbed stratigraphic contexts AMS-dated as early as 6775–6504 cal BP at the sites of Paredones and Huaca Prieta on the north coast of Peru (Fig. 1) (dates on maize from the sites are given in 2σ-calibrated age ranges). Our data appear to document the chronological development and use of early landraces of maize at these sites.
Fig. 1.
Location map of Paredones and Huaca Prieta, Peru.
Huaca Prieta is a large artificial mound located on the desert north coast of Peru. The site was first excavated by Junius Bird (16) in the 1940s and more recently by a team directed by Tom Dillehay and Duccio Bonavia (17). The mound measures ∼62 m in width and ∼138 m in length and contains at least 32 m of cultural deposits. Archaeological excavations at the site have revealed the remains of room structures; human burials; numerous stone, textile, and wood artifacts; rich faunal remains; and other plant assemblages, including cultigens, in the mound. A series of 160 radiocarbon dates from our excavations date the premound and mound deposits from ∼13700–3800 cal BP (17). Paredones is an artificial mound located ∼1 km north of Huaca Prieta that measures ∼30 m in width and ∼70 m in length and exhibits ∼6.2 m of cultural deposits with intact floors and fills. Fifteen AMS radiocarbon assays date Paredones to between ∼6700 and 4000 cal BP. A small, nonmound, domestic site also containing maize, unit 16, is located immediately north of Huaca Prieta and dates between ∼7200 and 2300 cal BP (17) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Radiocarbon dates on maize remains and wood charcoal from floors and features in excavated units at Paredones and Huaca Prieta
Sample no.Provenienceδ13CConventional radiocarbon (yrs BP)1σ-Calibrated age range (BP)2σ-Calibrated age range (BP)Material
Unit 3 (Huaca Prieta)
 AA76977Unit 3, floor 2−22.83530 ± 363827–36933849–3636Wood charcoal
 Beta233649Unit 3, floor 3−10.21090 ± 40973–9111052–809Corn cob
 AA76978Unit 3, floor 5a−19.63567 ± 403841–37173901–3643Wood charcoal
 AA76979Unit 3, floor 5b−19.63758 ± 404142–39784216–3901Wood charcoal
 Beta247695Unit 3, stratum 8, below floor 6−20.84000 ± 404510–42964520–4245Organic sediment
Unit 16
 Beta263319Unit 16, floor 3−11.7830 ± 40728–678767–664Corn cob
 AA86935Off-mound domestic unit 16, floor 13−22.66310 ± 337251–71627266–7021Wood charcoal
Unit 20 (Paredones)
 AA86938Unit 20, stratum 5–6−11.21130 ± 271051–9361055–831Corn cob
 AA86936Unit 20, stratum 5b−23.84783 ± 315578–53305583–5324Wood charcoal
 Beta263322Unit 20, stratum 6a−9.31310 ± 401268–11431279–1076Corn cob
 AA86932Unit 20, stratum 6b-18−23.5†4770 ± 355577–53215582–5321Husk fragment
 AA86937Unit 20, stratum 6b-18−25.84849 ± 315589–54795603–5333Charred wood
Unit 15/21 (Huaca Prieta)
 AA86941Unit 21, floor 2-3-16−10.63599 ± 293889–37283956–3704Charred corn cob
 AA86931Unit 21, floor 3-2−25.23638 ± 293957–38383982–3728Wood charcoal
 AA86946Unit 21, floor 9−11.93783 ± 414148–39884235–3928Charred corn cob
 AA75322Unit 21, floor 26−29.45018 ± 865860–55995911–5488Wood charcoal
 AA85507Unit 15, first mound layer−25.66522 ± 547429–73237474–7268Wood charcoal
Unit 22 (Paredones)
 AA86934Unit 22, floor 6−13.44181 ± 344809–45704821–4527Charred corn cob
 Beta263988Unit 22, floor 10—105.4 ± 5132–44133–34Corn cob
 Beta263320Unit 22, floor 10, capa 14−24.54590 ± 405308–50625435–5044Charred material
 Beta263321Unit 22, floor 15−25.64790 ± 405580–53315585–5325Charred material
 AA86947Unit 22, floor 16, fill 10−24.04898 ± 495644–54835711–5335Wood charcoal
 AA88761*Unit 22, floor 18-3−30.71.0751 ± 0.0047  (postbomb)——Corn cob
 Beta27823*Unit 22, floor 18-3−9.8750 ± 40679–571722–563Corn cob
 Beta27804*Unit 22, floor 18-3−9.0770 ± 40720–578729–569Corn cob
 Beta282127*Unit 22, floor 18-3−9.2790 ± 40721–662738–572Corn cob
 OS86020*Unit 22, floor 18-3−10.35900 ± 406734–65696775–6504Husk and shank
 AA83260Unit 22, floor 24−26.05750 ± 606561–64056640–6319Wood charcoal
Bird's HP-3 (Huaca Prieta)
 AA81926HP-3, stratum 5−28.03394 ± 403634–34853688–3464Wood charcoal
 AA86943HP-3, stratum 14−24.63806 ± 284213–39994233–3985Wood charcoal
 AA86940HP-3, stratum 19−25.63875 ± 304287–41044406–4090Wood charcoal
 AA81924HP-3, stratum 22−23.53687 ± 404063–38764084–3838Wood charcoal
 AA81927HP-3, stratum 23−17.33728 ± 404084–39274147–3875Wood charcoal
 Beta278050HP-3, stratum 28(33)−14.93740 ± 404087–39314149–3839Charred corn cob
 AA82121HP-3, upper stratum 52 (39)—5980 ± 406789–66766882–6657Cotton yarn
 AA81907First mound layer: lower stratum 52–53−23.86170 ± 457154–68997162–6808Wood charcoal
*Dates processed on same integrated cob/shank/husk from floor 18.
†Aberrant δ13C assay. All dates in Table 1 were calibrated using shcal04 (25).
Between 2007 and 2011, we excavated more than 2000 m3 in the mound at Paredones, in the mound and off-mound areas at Huaca Prieta, and in the domestic structures at unit 16 (17). Approximately 485 individual floors and hundreds of different features were exposed at these sites. All macro, phytolith, and starch grain remains of maize reported from them were excavated in clearly stratified, intact, undisturbed floors and features at depths of 1.2–12 m below the present-day ground surface (Figs. S1 and S2; SI Text). These remains represent one of the largest and most morphologically diverse collections of well-preserved early maize specimens available for study. Two hundred ninety-three macrobotanical maize remains were recovered from the excavations while they were ongoing and also from wet and dry screening of the cultural deposits. Forty-three other maize specimens were recovered from various preceramic contexts but were moderately damaged that they are not described in detail (SI Text). The maize remains appear only intermittently through time and space at all three sites, suggesting that this crop was not a primary element of the diet in comparison with other faunal and floral resources, which included fish, shellfish, seaweed, sea lions, wild plants, squash, beans, chili peppers, and other cultigens (16, 17). Given the dry desert environment of the sites, preservation is not a significant factor accounting for the presence or absence of macrobotanical plant remains.
The macro remains consist of 288 cobs and cob fragments, a husk and husk fragment, two fragments of the main culm or stalk including fragments of attached shanks and a tassel, one complete tassel, and one kernel (Fig. 2). Two hundred fifty-two cobs were excavated in different contexts of the mound at Huaca Prieta (Table S1). Of these, 195 are associated with the middle to late preceramic period (∼6700–4000 cal BP), 22 with the Cupisnique early ceramic period (∼4000–3000 cal BP), and 7 with the following Gallinazo ceramic period (∼2800–2300 cal BP) (Table 1 and Table S1). The frequency of cobs for certain races were identified by their morphology and by their kernel row numbers (Materials and Methods). Tables S2–S5 present cob length and width, glume, cupule, and other morphological characteristics.
Fig. 2.
Various preceramic maize elements from the Paredones site. (A) Husk with high venation index. (B) Tassel showing no condensation, unlike tassels from most Mexican maize. (C) Popcorn grain. (D) Stalk internode from a slender plant, probably no taller than ∼1.5 m.
Fifteen AMS radiocarbon dates were obtained directly from various macromaize remains (Table 1). The dates provided mixed sets of determinations, some of which we consider to be valid and some anomalously young. Six of the radiocarbon dates on a husk, an articulated piece of a husk and charred shank, and burned cobs are stratigraphically consistent with 160 AMS dates on single pieces of wood charcoal and other burned material recovered from directly associated features in intact floors at these sites (17) (Table 1), providing a long, well-dated chronological sequence for the taxonomic identity and economic use of maize. Nine dates on five uncharred cobs are much younger than the AMS dates on associated features and floors and attached carbonized maize structures and appear to be in error (see below and SI Text for detailed discussion including possible sources of contamination). The valid dates resulted in calibrated ages ranging from ∼6700 to 3800 cal BP for the preceramic maize remains.
A charred cob fragment from floor 6, at a depth of 1.2 m in unit 22 at Paredones, was dated to 4821–4527 cal BP (AA86934: Fig. S1). A fragment of husk attached to its partially charred shank from floor 18 (Fig. 3A), at a depth of 5.2 m in unit 22, provided an age of 6775–6504 cal BP (OS86020). This is the earliest assay obtained for maize at the three sites. However, four fragments of the same uncarbonized cob, attached to the dated fragment of husk articulated with its charred shank from floor 18, were measured at 722–563 (Beta27823), 729–569 (Beta27804), and 738–572 cal BP (Beta282127) and at a postbomb age of 1.0751 ± 0.0047 (AA88761), which is far too young and also internally inconsistent with other stratigraphically sequenced AMS dates on wood charcoal from unit 22 (Table 1). The discrepancy between the date on the husk/shank and those on the attached cob is striking. The δ13C value of –30.7 for the postbomb assay suggests a contaminant in the cob that is altering the age to be much younger than it should be. This value indicates that the carbon providing the date was largely not from maize but from another, younger source (see SI Text for further discussion).
Fig. 3.
Races of preceramic maize cobs from Paredones and Huaca Prieta. (A) Proto-Confite Morocho cob with large soft glumes; the extreme lower right tip of the cob shows the remainder of a partially charred shank fragment (arrow), a portion of which with its attached husk fragment was removed and AMS dated to 6775–6504 cal BP. (B) Confite Chavinense cob exhibiting fasciation and cupules underlying very small kernels. (C) Proto-Alazan cob.
Another husk sample recovered from stratum 6b, at a depth of ∼2.2 m in the stratigraphically intact unit 20 at Paredones (Fig. 2A), was dated at 5582–5321 cal BP (AA86932), and two uncarbonized cob fragments from this same unit—one from stratum 5–6 at a depth of ∼2.0 m and another from stratum 6a at a depth of ∼2.1 m—were dated at 1055–831 cal BP (AA86938) and 1279–1076 cal BP (Beta263322), respectively. These two younger dates are anomalous and rejected. Units HP-3 and 15/21 also produced acceptable and internally consistent dates on charred cobs at 4149–3839 cal BP (Beta278050) in stratum 28 (33) at a depth of ∼6.9 m in HP-3; at 3956–3704 cal BP (AA86941) in floor 2 at a depth of ∼1.5 m and at 4235–3928 cal BP (AA86946) in floor 9 at a depth of ∼2.8 m in unit 15/21. These three dates are internally consistent with other AMS dates in these units. It thus appears that the most reliable dates are for maize husks, shanks, and charred cobs, which have a more rigid, impenetrable plant structure. In assessing the radiocarbon dates directly on macromaize remains, the stratigraphically consistent 14C dates obtained on directly associated wood charcoal, husks, and charred shanks and cobs should also be emphasized, as shown in Fig. S1 and Table 1 for unit 22.
The cob from floor 18 in unit 22, whose fragment of husk attached to its charred shank is dated at 6775–6504 cal BP (OS86020), is 3.1 cm long, slender, and cylindrical; has eight rows of kernels; and can be identified as belonging to the Proto-Confite Morocho race (Fig. 3A). The number and size of cupules of this early maize suggests as many as 96 kernels (Tables S2–S3). The other cobs stratigraphically associated with the early part of the middle preceramic phase, ∼6700–5500 cal BP, are also from primitive popcorn races previously identified at other late preceramic sites in Peru (7–10) as Proto-Confite Morocho, Confite Chavinense (Fig. 3B and Table S1), and hybrid types between Proto-Confite Morocho and Confite Chavinense. The other Proto-Confite Morocho cobs of this period are 2.5–6.2 cm long, slender, and cylindrical with 8 rows of kernels, navicular cupules, and some 12 kernels per row. (See SI Text for more detailed information on the distribution of the various kinds of maize remains at the sites.)
Samples dated to the later part of the middle preceramic phase between ∼5500 and 5000 cal BP included two stalks and a husk. On the basis of the length and size of the stalk fragments and husks, the late-middle-phase maize appears to have short plants perhaps no more than ∼1.5 m in height (Fig. 2D). The complete husk indicates a well-covered ear with a high venation index (Fig. 2A), resulting in high mechanical resistance to predatory feeding, perhaps by larvae of Helicoverpa zea, which are indirectly observed by punctures in husk leaves from other preceramic sites along the coast of Peru (10).
Although the earliest maize cobs at Paredones and Huaca Prieta are predominantly of the eight-row Proto-Confite Morocho type, Confite Chavinense, a fasciated type of maize ear, is also present in the middle preceramic contexts and demonstrates evidence of hybridization with the race Proto-Confite Morocho (Tables S2–S5). These cobs of Confite Chavinense have two different diametrical axes; shortened, deeper cupules; and a higher number of rows; they have a clear association with present races from the coast such as Mochero and from the Andean highlands such as Huayleño, Granada, Paro, and Chullpi. Fasciation of the cob allows for a larger number of rows of kernels and could have been one of the early mechanisms of selection for higher grain yield. More productive races—identified by a higher number of kernel rows and more kernels in the row, achieved by fasciation first and length increase of the cob later—are found predominating in the later ceramic periods dated after ∼4000 cal BP in Peru (8). The races Proto-Kculli and Proto-Alazan appear in the final preceramic phase (see SI Text for further detail on the maize in this phase).

Microfossil Results

Study of fifty-four sediment samples from various floors and features at Paredones and Huaca Prieta and a cutting blade made of andesite revealed that both phytoliths and starch grains from maize occurred, although they did not occur in many contexts. The diagnostic phytoliths used to unequivocally identify maize occur in low frequency in maize cobs and are absent in some races, a factor that may in part account for their low numbers at the sites (Materials and Methods). Phytoliths definitively identified as maize were recovered from the 4.1- and 5.2-m levels of unit TP-18 at Paredones, which 14C-dated between ∼6200 and 5800 cal BP (Fig. S3). Starch from maize kernels occurred in a sediment sample from unit 23 at Huaca Prieta and were 14C-dated to ∼5902–5606 cal BP. A total of seven starch grains with size and morphological attributes of maize (mean length: 18 μm; range of length: 10–24 μm) were isolated from this sample.
Also, a 12.7-cm-long blade cutting tool made of andesite from floor 18, unit 22, at Paredones that was directly associated with four maize cobs of the Proto-Confite Morocho race yielded on one of its sharp lateral edges nine starch grains with morphologies like those of maize and with a mean length of 14 μm (range of length: 6–18 μm) (Figs. S4 and S5). The mean and maximum length of the grains is consistent with modern Latin American maize races, but because a few wild grasses contribute starch grains that are large, the archaeological grains cannot be definitively identified as maize. Given their context, the grains are likely to be from maize, however (see SI Text for further detail on the tool and its use and wear characteristics). In their attributes, the starch grains from the sediments and cutting tool are consistent with grains found in hard endosperm varieties of maize, such as popcorns that were identified from the macrobotanical remains (3, 6, 12, 13).
The maize kernel recovered from floor 18 of Paredones that dates to ∼5400 cal BP provided the opportunity to study starch grains directly from an ancient variety of popcorn. Starch grains occurred in substantial quantity from the sample removed from the kernel (Materials and Methods). Many grains were in clumps and could not be accurately measured. Measurements of a total of 23 grains yielded an average size of 19 μm (range: 12.8–27 μm). In shape and surface features, the grains display the characteristic attributes of popcorn (e.g., with irregular polyhedral shapes, rough surfaces, and fissures) (6) (Fig. S6) and are like those previously recovered from archaeological stone tools and sediments from Mexico, Panama, and Ecuador that were identified as hard endosperm-popcorn types (3, 6, 12, 13).
The infrequent occurrence of maize phytoliths could in part result from an occasional use of maize as a food source, as is also implied by the macrobotanical record. Because starch grains of any plant type were infrequent occurrences in most excavated deposits, it is probable that poor starch preservation as well as infrequent maize consumption accounts for the overall infrequency of maize starch in the three sites. We found no archaeological evidence such as drinking cups, boiling vessels, and storage bins to suggest that maize was used as a fermentable drink in late preceramic times, as suggested by some investigators (18, 19).

Discussion

The archaeological macroremains from Paredones and Huaca Prieta attest to a long and diverse history of maize in the northern Peruvian Andean region that can be traced to at least 6775–6504 cal BP, with an early development of distinct maize racial groupings in that region. This is the oldest AMS date on maize macrofossils from South America and shows that the earliest maize at the sites is roughly contemporary in age with the earliest macrofossil remains of maize currently recorded from Mexico, which are the cobs from Guila Naquitz Cave that were directly dated to ca. 6200 cal BP (20). Our study also provides collections of both macrofossils and microfossils of pre-5000 cal BP maize in the Americas. The 6775–6504 cal BP date is in accord with the presence of archaeological maize starch grains and phytoliths in central Panama at ∼7600 cal BP (6) and maize phytoliths in southwest Ecuador by ∼7000 cal BP (11). On the basis of our results, the early Peruvian maize was a popcorn type in seed size, hardness, and popping ability. Interestingly, the early Peruvian maize described here is different in some significant respects from the nearly contemporaneous earliest specimens from the Guila Naquitz Cave (20, 21), suggesting that maize may have undergone important developments when it left Mexico. For example, the Peruvian specimens all lack indurated and extended lower glumes, have paired spikelets, nearly twice the number of rows, and are polystichous and slightly longer. These features selected by human cultivators resulted in increased seed yield and made kernels easier to remove from chaff and turn into food. The cobs do not exhibit the bilaterally symmetrical distichous inflorescences found in Guilá Naquitz cobs, which exhibit strong teosinte influence (21). Grobman (10) has found no teosinte traits in coastal Peruvian maize, including the Huaca Prieta and Paradones specimens.
It should probably not be assumed that maize was developed in the same ways or at the same times by different cultures after it was dispersed out of Mexico or even in Mexico during earlier periods in its evolution. It is possible, for example, that when hybridization with teosinte could not occur, improvements in maize productivity were easier for prehistoric farmers to achieve. Continuing the search for and recovery of early macrofossils will expand our limited knowledge of the morphological evolution of maize into the traditional landraces still grown by many farmers in Latin America today. This study also indicates that re-excavation of sites along the arid Peruvian coast first studied many years ago, along with searches for habitation sites not previously explored, may provide a substantial amount of information in that regard.
Our data also importantly show that two primitive Andean landraces, Proto-Confite Morocho and Confite Chavinense, are present during all preceramic phases at Paredones and Huaca Prieta, although their relative frequencies change. These data agree with previous findings at other late preceramic sites along the coast of Peru (7–10). Given the scarcity and discontinuous stratigraphic presence of maize macrofossils and microfossils at Paredones and Huaca Prieta and at other preceramic sites in the region (10), we infer that this crop, in both its popcorn and floury forms, was not a primary food staple in the local diet before ∼4500–4200 cal BP. With more evidence in the future, the complex social, environmental, and technological trajectories of maize dispersion and development in South America will be better understood.

Materials and Methods

Macrobotanical Maize Remains.

All complete cobs and cob fragments, stalks, and husk leaves were studied under low-power magnification from each excavation unit at Paredones, Huaca Prieta, and unit 16. The morphological characteristics of the cobs were identified from previously defined pre-Hispanic races of maize (8) and from maize remains from other preceramic sites (7). The external measurements of cob length, cob diameter, and cob pith were measured directly. Although Huaca Prieta is located in an arid setting, some cobs were in only fair condition due to the humidity and high water tables found in the ocean beachline setting. This prevented determination of the diameter of the rachis in these specimens. Therefore, the ratio of the cob-to-pith diameters was used instead of the index cob/rachis (8). We also measured the average linear means and weighted means and adjusted for the number of cobs of each type. The characteristics of the glumes, cupules, and cupule hairs were also defined. Examination of the cupule characteristics was made with procedures established by previous studies (8, 22, 23).

Phytoliths and Starch Grains.

Phytolith extractions from the archaeological sediments followed standard procedures (11). Extended counts were carried out to search for wavy-top maize rondel types, which constitute a minor part of the prolific rondel assemblages produced by maize cobs and may be absent in some maize races (11). Other phytoliths consistent with maize cob decay were present in other excavation units but could not be definitively identified. Phytolith identifications were based on a modern reference collection of more than 750 specimens including major South American crops and their closest wild relatives housed at the Archaeobotany Laboratory, Department of Archeology, University of Exeter (Exeter, United Kingdom).
Starch grain analysis of sediments and the stone tool followed standard procedures (3, 6). The maize kernel was sampled by inserting a thin needle through the outer layer into the endosperm, removing the needle, and then washing it with water in a plastic container to collect the adhering residue. The residue was mounted directly in water on a microscope slide. Archaeological starch grains were compared with a modern reference collection consisting of about 500 species of neotropical plants, including 24 traditional maize races from Central and South America. It has been shown through extensive studies of wild neotropical grasses, including taxa native to coastal northwestern South America, that a combination of morphological and size criteria can securely separate the starch grains of neotropical grasses from maize (3, 6, 12, 24).

Acknowledgments

We thank two reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript and the Ministerio de Cultura, Lima, Peru, for granting us the permission to work at Huaca Prieta and Paredones. We are grateful to Cesar Galvéz and Jesus Briceño (Dirección Regional del Ministerio de la Cultura, Trujillo) for their support. Additional support was provided by the Lapinski and O'Leary families. We thank Tim Messner for assistance with the starch grain study and Sandra Manrique for photographing the maize phytolith remains. The authors are grateful to the Department of Anthropology at the American Museum of Natural History for granting permission to study Junius Bird's notes and photographs from Huaca Prieta, as well as the artifacts that he recovered from the site. Financial support for this project came from the National Science Foundation, the National Geographic Society, Vanderbilt University, the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information (PDF)
Supporting Information

References

1
J van Heerwaarden, et al., Genetic signals of origin, spread, and introgression in a large sample of maize landraces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 1088–1092 (2011).
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
2
Y Matsuoka, et al., A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 6080–6084 (2002).
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
3
DR Piperno, AJ Ranere, I Holst, J Iriarte, R Dickau, Starch grain and phytolith evidence for early ninth millennium B.P. maize from the Central Balsas River Valley, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 5019–5024 (2009).
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
4
AJ Ranere, DR Piperno, I Holst, R Dickau, J Iriarte, Preceramic human occupation of the Central Balsas Valley, Mexico: Cultural context of early domesticated maize and squash. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 5014–5018 (2009).
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
5
MED Pohl, DR Piperno, KO Pope, JG Jones, Microfossil evidence for pre-Columbian maize dispersals in the neotropics from San Andres, Tabasco, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 6870–6875 (2007).
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
6
DR Piperno, AJ Ranere, I Holst, P Hansell, Starch grains reveal early root crop horticulture in the Panamanian tropical forest. Nature 407, 894–897 (2000).
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
7
D Bonavia El Maiz (Univ. San Martin de Porres, Fondo Editorial, Lima, Peru, 2008).
Google Scholar
8
A Grobman, W Salhuana, R Sevilla, PC Mangelsdorf Races of Maize in Peru (National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council, Pub. 915, Washington, DC, 1961).
Google Scholar
9
D Bonavia Precerámico Peruano, Los Gavilanes: Mar, Desierto y Oasis en la Historia del Hombre (Corp. Finan. Desarrollo S.A. COFIDE, Instituto Arqueológico Alemán, Lima, Peru, 1982).
Google Scholar
10
A Grobman, Mays (Zea mays). Precerámico Peruano, Los Gavilanes: Mar, Desierto y Oasis en la Historia del Hombre, ed D Bonavia (Corp. Finan. Desarrollo S.A. COFIDE, Instituto Arqueológico Alemán, Lima, Peru), pp. 157–180 (1982).
Google Scholar
11
DR Piperno Phytolith Analysis: A Comprehensive Guide for Archaeologists and Paleoecologists (Alta Mira Press, Lanham, MD, 2006).
Google Scholar
12
S Zarrillo, DM Pearsall, JS Raymond, MA Tisdale, DJ Quon, Directly dated starch residues document early formative maize (Zea mays L.) in tropical Ecuador. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105, 5006–5011 (2008).
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
13
DM Pearsall, K Chandler-Ezell, A Chandler-Ezell, Maize in ancient Ecuador: Results of residue analysis of stone tools from the Real Alto site. J Archaeol Sci 31, 423–442 (2004).
Crossref
Google Scholar
14
L Perry, et al., Early maize agriculture and interzonal interaction in southern Peru. Nature 440, 76–79 (2006).
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
15
J Iriarte, et al., Evidence for cultivar adoption and emerging complexity during the mid-Holocene in the La Plata basin. Nature 432, 614–617 (2004).
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
16
JB Bird, J Hyslop, MD Skinner Huaca Prieta: A Preceramic Site in Northern Peru (Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, New York, 1985).
Google Scholar
17
TD Dillehay, et al., Coastal environment and cultural complexity at Huaca Prieta, Peru from 9000 to 4500 years ago. Antiquity, in press. (2011).
Google Scholar
18
HH Iltis, Homeotic sexual translocations and the origin of maize (Zea mays Poaceae): A new look at an old problem. Econ Bot 54, 7–42 (2000).
Crossref
Google Scholar
19
J Smalley, M Blake, Sweet beginnings: Stalk sugar and the domestication of maize. Curr Anthropol 44, 675–703 (2003).
Crossref
Google Scholar
20
DR Piperno, KV Flannery, The earliest archaeological maize (Zea mays L.) from highland Mexico: New accelerator mass spectrometry dates and their implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 2101–2103 (2001).
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
21
BF Benz, Archaeological evidence of teosinte domestication from Guilá Naquitz, Oaxaca. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 2104–2106 (2001).
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
22
HH Cutler, Races of maize in South America. Bot Mus Leaflets 12, 257–291 (1946).
Google Scholar
23
NH Nickerson, Variation in cob morphology among certain archaeological and ethnological races of maize. Ann Mo Bot Gard 40, 79–111 (1953).
Crossref
Google Scholar
24
I Holst, JE Moreno, DR Piperno, Identification of teosinte, maize, and Tripsacum in Mesoamerica by using pollen, starch grains, and phytoliths. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104, 17608–17613 (2007).
Crossref
PubMed
Google Scholar
25
FG McCormac, et al., SHCal04 Southern Hemisphere Calibration 0 - 11.0 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46, 1087–1092 (2004).
Crossref
Google Scholar

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

Go to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Go to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 109 | No. 5
January 31, 2012
PubMed: 22307642

Classifications

  1. Biological Sciences
  2. Anthropology
  3. Social Sciences
  4. Plant Biology

Submission history

Published online: January 17, 2011
Published in issue: January 31, 2012

Keywords

  1. early crops
  2. social complexity

Acknowledgments

We thank two reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript and the Ministerio de Cultura, Lima, Peru, for granting us the permission to work at Huaca Prieta and Paredones. We are grateful to Cesar Galvéz and Jesus Briceño (Dirección Regional del Ministerio de la Cultura, Trujillo) for their support. Additional support was provided by the Lapinski and O'Leary families. We thank Tim Messner for assistance with the starch grain study and Sandra Manrique for photographing the maize phytolith remains. The authors are grateful to the Department of Anthropology at the American Museum of Natural History for granting permission to study Junius Bird's notes and photographs from Huaca Prieta, as well as the artifacts that he recovered from the site. Financial support for this project came from the National Science Foundation, the National Geographic Society, Vanderbilt University, the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, and the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute.

Authors

Affiliations

Alexander Grobman
Universidad Nacional Agraria, La Molina 12, Lima 1, Perú;
View all articles by this author
Duccio Bonavia
Academia Nacional de la Historia, Lima 1, Perú;
View all articles by this author
Tom D. Dillehay1 [email protected]
Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235;
View all articles by this author
Dolores R. Piperno1 [email protected]
Program in Human Ecology and Archaeobiology, Department of Anthropology, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013;
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado Postal 0843-03092, Balboa, Republic of Panama; and
View all articles by this author
José Iriarte
Department of Archaeology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX1 2LU, United Kingdom
View all articles by this author
Irene Holst
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado Postal 0843-03092, Balboa, Republic of Panama; and
View all articles by this author

Notes

1
To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected].
Author contributions: A.G., D.B., T.D.D., and D.R.P. designed research; A.G., D.B., T.D.D., D.R.P., J.I., and I.H. performed research; A.G., D.B., T.D.D., and D.R.P. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; A.G., D.B., T.D.D., D.R.P., J.I., and I.H. analyzed data; and A.G., D.B., T.D.D., D.R.P., and J.I. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Citation statements




Altmetrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Get Access

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian
    Save for later Item saved, go to cart

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to get full access to it.

    Single Article Purchase

    Preceramic maize from Paredones and Huaca Prieta, Peru
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 109
    • No. 5
    • pp. 1355-1808

    Restore content access

    Restore content access for purchases made as a guest

    Media

    Figures

    Tables

    Other

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media

    Further reading in this issue

    Trending