GAMESPOT

PC GAMES
  News
  Reviews
  Previews
  Movies/Media
  Downloads
  Hints/Codes
  Special Features
  Beta Center
  Release Calendar
  Top Games

PC GENRES
  Action
  Adventure
  Driving
  Puzzle
  Role-Playing
  Simulation
  Sports
  Strategy


SWITCH TO:
VIDEO GAMES

WATCH:
GAMESPOT LIVE

PREMIERE SPONSORS
  Outpost.com
  Egghead.com
  GameFever.com
  Buy.com



Click Here!



ELITE SERVICES
  Contests
  E-Mail
  eCircles
  PC Newsletter
  VG Newsletter
  Play Games
  Forums
  i-Drive
  Join GameSpot

INFORMATION
  Help
  Contact Us
  Worldwide

SEE ALSO
  3DFiles.com
  GameGuides.com
  Gamespy Arcade
  Heat.net
  Gamespyder.com

MAGAZINES

 




  

Warcraft Adventures

  Intro
The Early Days
A Brief History
Meet Bill Roper
The Future
   

Why Warcraft Adventures was canceled

GameSpot: However, despite the renewed design, things still weren't going in the right direction. When did you get the sense that Warcraft Adventures might not ever reach the vision you wanted and that it might have to be canceled?

Bill Roper: Well, we sat down as we were gearing up for E3 of 1998, and both Starcraft and Adventures were ready to show. We were taking a very hard look at where the product was at that point, which we always do around E3 because we know we'll get asked tons of release questions, so we like to get as firm a grasp as possible on where we really are [on a project]. We really just started talking about what was there and what needed to be there, and I think that there were a couple things that made us think the game was not living up to our expectations.

I think that if there was a fatal flaw in the project it was that we were a little too nostalgic. We definitely identified a lot of very strong things from classic adventure games that were missing in the adventure games at that time, like strong characters, strong storyline, excellent vocalization and acting... and interesting, fun puzzles that tied into the storyline. And while we definitely had all of that, I think that by that point we had really fallen behind a certain technology curve. And if the game came out, I think that people would have bought it and said, "This is really fun, but this would have been great a couple of years ago." We don't ever want to have a product that is like that, where the view on it is that it would have been great two or three years ago.

Certainly by the time we were getting into the release window we wanted, that was the same time Monkey Island III was to be released (and LucasArts started development around the same time as us I think). And I think that Monkey Island was a very strong [brand] in adventure games, and it was doing that more-nostalgic class of adventure game to a hilt. Grim Fandango had already been announced, and the early screenshots of that were showing that Lucas was really going to start going to the next level of adventure games. So we killed the product and said "For this to be a Blizzard title, for this to have that certain something and spark that we believe our games have, there has got to be something that takes it to a level that people don't expect when they get the game." And we didn't really feel that the game had that. And so it was an incredibly tough decision. I mean we worked on the project for well over a year and had poured a lot of time and effort into it. But we knew that it wasn't going to meet the expectations of anybody here and certainly not the expectations of our fans.

So we had to make the hard decision to go ahead and cancel.

Executing orders to kill

   

  

 
 
Use of GameSpot is subject to certain Terms & Conditions.

Copyright © 2000 ZDNet All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of ZDNet is prohibited.