hosted by tripod
Get Four DVDs for $.49 each. Join now. Tell me when this page is updated
helmet crest on black
GAIDS
SHEMA ISRAEL

Home

Sickularism - The Age of Decay
Jewish Identity
Everlasting Hatred To The Everlasting Nation
The Jewish Year
LINKS
Judaism In Pictures

Sodomy - The Pride of Liberal Secularism

An abomination which turned to be the pride of secular civilization:

Sodomy.

Which is one of the 365 negative commandments in the Torah. Non Jews, who are obliged by the seven Noachide Commandments, are forbidden from this perpetration as well. Since this misdeed turned to be in recent years one of the leading banners of secular liberalism, it's proper then to dedicate to it a special chapter in our agonizing survey of the maladies of secular civilization: AIDS.

Start with some references from the pillars of Judaism on the subject of sodomy.
(Note: the transgression of "Mishkav Zachor" ( = Sodomy) is perpetrated in the form of penetration of one male's sexual organ inside the rectum of another male):

What Does The Torah Say

A Deviation

Sodomy is a deviation. Normal people do not behave that way.

A society which endorses that behavior; uses the media to brainwash the masses to consider it as legitimate; combined with an all-out attack on the senses with promiscuous messages - is prone to lead to loosening of inhibitions, which eventually leads people to try and reach more and more sensual highs. Thus, enlarging the percentage of otherwise straight persons, who are joining the sodomizer circles.

People who have a born inclination (if there is one) to such a deviation should be encouraged to a psychological treatment, that will lead them to behave normal, like all deviations should be treated in a normal society.

Sodomy - The Source Of Aids

Besides being a moral abomination, sodomy is responsible for the spread of the Aids epidemic:

1. The decease was discovered in 1981 in the US.

2. When first identifying the virus in Paris in 1983, the frequency among over-all homosexual population was 10-15%, none in practical percentage in heterosexual population.

3. Today, 90% of the HIV's and active Aids sick are in the third world. 80% of the recorded active Aids sick are in western countries.

4. 55% of the Aids to day is in homosexuals, 25% in drug addicts, 5% hemophilia patients, 5% infected by blood transfusion, 5% heterosexuals, 5% unknown.

5. Scientist explain the phenomenon of the divergence reaction among different populations in the world to the disease, in the existence of different HIV subtypes. HIV sub-type B is, they say, the active one in the US. This one is being activated by blood contact (while others, in Africa for example, react to heterosexual sex). That's their explanation the spread of Aids mainly among homosexuals in the western world - the traumatic nature of homosexual sex accompanied by bloody fractures, in contrast to the milder heterosexual intercourse.

6. The fact is (be it because of poor medical system with no efficient registration) that also to day, 80% of recorded active AIDS sick are in western countries.

The source of the above facts, is Dr. Mayan, head of the Aids clinic in Hadasa hospital, Jerusalem.

the above is more than a sufficient proof that:

* Sodomizers are responsible for the spread of Aids in western countries.

* That sodomy sexual activity is still the main menace to world's health.

* That, beside using condoms - which is a first aid resort - the best defense against AIDS is changing behavioral patterns.

The Origins of AIDS

"The story of the detective hunt for the cause of AIDS is told by Randy Shilts in the best-selling book "And the Band Played On." (In 1994, Shilts, at the age of 42, became a casualty of the disease himself.)...

In the U.S., the first AIDS or AIDS-like death that we know for sure was also associated with HIV infection was that of a 17 year-old possibly homosexual male, who died of strange opportunistic infections in 1968, and whose preserved tissues also proved to be harboring HIV genetic material on testing decades later. This early AIDS-sufferer had never been out of the country, showing that the virus was already active in the Western Hemisphere in 1968.

Why, then, was the U.S. first hit with an AIDS epidemic only in the 1980s, with HIV infection quickly rising to 50% in some risk-groups? The answer may be that it was not the simple presence of HIV virus in the United States that changed; rather it was the social milieu.

beginning around 1969 (the date of the New York City "Stonewall" riots), homosexuals in the U.S. began to take open political power, and concomitantly one faction of male homosexuals began to engage in the high-infection risk "bathhouse lifestyle" chronicled by Shilts. In addition, the American homosexual- male community was apparently many times re-infected by many world-traveling disease "vectors" from other countries in the 1970s, including an airline steward named Dugas (described in Shilts as the C.D.C. "patient zero") who traveled widely in Europe, Canada, and the U.S., died of AIDS, and is known to have had sex with no less than 40 of the first 248 Americans to be diagnosed with AIDS by April, 1982...

What happened in the late 1970s in the U.S. is that when a large enough fraction of the American homosexual-male population became infected with HIV, the U.S. blood supply, maintained with volunteer donations only, finally became contaminated with the virus. (This started in 1978, as we know from later testing of archived serum samples taken from homosexual men originally for hepatitis B studies).

The dates are not coincidental--crossover between initial HIV infected groups occurred as some homosexual men experimented with IV drugs in the late 1970s, and male IV drug users in large cities turned to homosexual prostitution in order to obtain drugs...

The small incidence of AIDS in the American homosexual- male and IV drug-user communities before the late 1970s in no way subtracts from the reality of the dramatic increase in AIDS which took place in the early 1980s on the heels of exploding HIV infection rates in these groups...

Historically, what happened in the U.S. in 1981 was that in increasing numbers homosexual men began coming to physicians with very, very low CD4+ lymphocyte blood counts (but not lowered counts for other subtypes of lymphocytes), a destroyed immune system with lymphatic tissue destruction, opportunistic infections, and Kaposi's sarcoma. No one who had treated diseases in the male homosexual community could remember having seen anything remotely like what had began happening on an increasingly large scale in the early 1980s...

It was in the Summer of 1981 that alert physicians brought to the attention of the C.D.C. a mini-epidemic of immunodeficiency and pneumonia caused by unusual organisms (a fungus called Pneumocystis carinii, and a virus called CMV) in homosexual men in Los Angeles...

investigators found that of the first 19 cases of AIDS reported in Los Angeles, nine had direct or indirect (one intermediate partner) sexual contact with a single French-Canadian airline steward (previously mentioned), a man who was also sick with immunodeficiency...

By 1983, the C.D.C. was sure it had a new infectious disease on its hands... it was found that blood products AIDS patients had received had more often come from people who themselves were at "high-risk" for AIDS due to promiscuous male homosexual behavior...

The remarkable fact--from which there was no escape--was that AIDS in a transfusion recipient predicted the lifestyle of a blood- donor he or she had never met (a donor which generally turned out to be a promiscuous homosexual man who had thought himself to be perfectly healthy)...

it now seems likely from many studies that sexual transmission of HIV often requires mucosal tissue trauma, which is much more likely with anal intercourse, and/or a concomitant inflammation or ulcer from a second sexually transmitted disease. Because transmission may be inefficient even so, promiscuity also greatly enhances the chance of HIV spread. These requirement(s) for efficient HIV sexual transfer easily explain the difference between spread of HIV in tropical Africa vs. the developed countries.

They also adequately explain why a disease which spreads well sexually only in populations with an extreme level of both promiscuity and rectal mucosal trauma (i.e., one sub-segment of American homosexual men) has not yet become a generally spreading sexually-transmitted disease epidemic in the U.S."

Skeptic, vol. 3, no. 2, 1995, pp. 42-58.

The Statistics

Cases Among All Reported U.S.

Transmission Category*--------------AIDS Cases(%)

Injection drug use-----------------------24

Men who have sex with men----------------55

Men who have sex with men
and inject drugs--------------------------6

Heterosexual contact----------------------7

*Percentages do not add up to 100% because some transmission categories have been omitted.

Source: CDC National AIDS Clearinghouse
October 1993

The facts clealry demonstrate that:

1. AIDS was introduced by the homosexual community.

2. It is a new disease, not known before.

3. It was spread due to promiscuous behavior.

4. The correlation between the sexual homosexual habits and the spread of AIDS - is obvious.

5. That correlation is more striking than the one between smoking and lung cancer.

6. In order to protect itself, society must fight sodomy; If legally banning is not possible, then at least stop promoting and legitimizing it socially.

"Homophobia" - Alligator's Tears

"Where some homosexuals contribute greatly to society's homophobia and condemnation of homosexuality, is with their own extreme sociopathic "in-your-face" behavior... militant homosexuals push for ever more perverse legitimization of extreme deviations. San Francisco's pedophilia groups conducting their meetings at the city's public libraries -with the blessing of the library board- is one rather extreme example. Here we have a city so sick with its own brand of political correctness, they couldn't even find it within their collective consciousness to condemn child molestation for fear of offending middle age homosexual pedophiles.

Now homosexual pedophiles take their proclivities abroad. One of the hottest overseas tours circulating underground San Francisco these days, are the "Thai-Boy Tours," in which adult American homosexuals fly off for sex tours to remote towns in Thailand, where they are supplied with 10 and 11 year-old Thai boys, who generally have been sold into sexual slavery by their unsuspecting parents.

Hundred-thousand man marches in San Francisco where bare asses, leather, and chains are the rule rather than the exception, don't go a long way in furthering the cause of homosexual acceptance either. Neither does bending over every other block for symbolic spates of anal intercourse in front of national news cameras.

Militant homosexuals now cry out for equal treatment under the law insofar as "marriages" and "child rearing" are concerned, and are quick to condemn any who would stand in their path as "homophobic." Act Up tells us there is a national conspiracy to suppress a cure for Aids because of our collective "homophobia." Lesbian activists tell us it is our "homophobia" which stands in the way of their being able to act on maternal instincts".

A post from a web forum

"handles"

How come so many people are led astray and adhere to views that are against common sense, contradict basic morals, and are so obviously harmful?

Let's study some words from the Ramchal's "Da'at Tevunot":
(Translated By Rabbi David Sackton & Rabbi Chaim Tscholkowsky)

"The pleasure in discovering truth is a natural trait of the intelligent soul that exists in every one of us. Any normal person, then, will make the utmost effort to reveal the true nature of anything he observes and banish falsehood."

However,

"If truth were self-evident, we could gain wisdom by simple observation. The more we observed the world around us, the wiser we would be. But... experience shows us that many people imagine false ideas to be absolutely true. They generally remain firm in their beliefs, refusing to see anything wrong with them. After initial study, a person may think that his ideas are clear and true, and only afterwards does he find them false and have to retract them. We can therefore say with certainty that the true nature of things is neither apparent nor readily understood, and there is, in fact, considerable room for mistakes, for what is false may appear true, and the human mind is not always discriminating enough to hit upon the truth. The mind, in fact, may even turn aside from the path of truth without being aware of doing so.

In light of this, it is beneficial for a person to find guidelines and a method to keep himself on the straight path without straying... The basis of this method is the systematic compilation of all logical categories of things, explaining their functions and rules as they really are. This method is a guide, leading the mind unfalteringly in the search for wisdom.

This is exactly what our rabbis of blessed memory meant when they praised King Solomon for making "handles for the Torah" (Eruvin 21b). He was able to acquire a large measure of knowledge with ease through the application of short, concise and properly ordered rules.

Now do not think that these principles are so profound that they are beyond the understanding of ordinary people. On the contrary, they are extremely simple and obvious...

Even though all these rules are really natural laws of thinking, they cannot help anyone unless they are consciously used and organized as a tool. Once they are properly organized, a person has the "handles" with which to easily grasp the most profound and intricate ideas, as I explained earlier..."

Only when one tries to discern truth via the revelation by the source of truth, is he able to avoid being trapped in falsehood. As Explained further by the Ramchal:

"The Talmud is like a vast ocean set before us, whose arguments are mighty waves, whose laws roll forth rising to the heavens and plunging to the depths. Through the forward movement of these strong currents the Truth of Torah is clarified and distilled - this is called the Holy Way. It is in the Talmud that I have chosen to base my building, so that my method will be successful and immutable. This Torah method, then, is the paradigm for all understanding and wisdom...

May the Al-mighty, who is the source of all knowledge and understanding, grant us knowledge, wisdom and understanding so that we may fear Him, do His will and serve Him..."

And do not fall pray to the liars of the the mass media. It's symptomatic that the media ( if not mistaken it was the NYT the first to coin it) disguised the abomination of sodomy under the term:

GAYS

While true happiness lies in the pursuit of the truth revealed by the Creator, which is in reality spiritual, misery lies in denying this truth and in the pursuit of the imaginary sensual.

Rav Aharon Kotler zt'l expounded this matter:

"The constant pursuit of physical pleasure in which people are so involved is actually an attempt to dispel the sadness caused by their physical side".

quoted in his son Rav Shhneur's introduction to Mishnas Rav Aharon, Vol. I)

Says further, the Rosh Yeshiva ZT'L:

"A person is essentially spiritual. He - his Neshomo (soul) - yearns to come close to his Creator; to bask in His light. This is only possible through Torah and Mitzvos. Lacking that, he feels a gnawing dissatisfaction - he feels unfulfilled. So he looks for what he imagines will satisfy him - physical pleasure.

It doesn't satisfy him however, certainly not for very long. It is not what his Neshomo needed in the first place. On the contrary, overindulgence is counterproductive, distancing him from his creator and thereby leading to more dissatisfaction.

If however a person understands his purpose in life and lives accordingly, if he is involved in Torah and Mitzvot and develops a taste and love for them, then he will find fulfillment in that very involvement and won't need or even desire more than the basic necessities of life.

The greater his Ahavoh V'cheshkas Hatorah (love and joy in Torah study and pursuits) will be, the less will be his need for material possessions."

From: A Living 'Mishnas Rav Aharon'
Selections From A Forthcoming Biographic Anecdotal Study Of The Teachings Of The Rosh Yeshiva ZT'L
by Rabbi Yitzchok Dershowitz

When the thirst of the soul is denied, and man turns to the salty waters of bodily pleasures, he crashes on the solid rock of reality, and "GAYS" turns to be

GAIDS

Up to the skies, or down to the abyss

"G-d put man in control of the world and all that is therein. Man with his actions can bring the entire universe to its highest use in serving him to enable him to recognize his Creator, or he can degrade it to its lowest form by using it as a means to fill his lusts and base desires. It is all dependent on his free will which direction he chooses for himself. Should he wish to use the world to serve his Creator and show his appreciation for all He has done and come closer to Him, he will not only raise himself, but the entire universe which serves him will rise with him to its ultimate purpose. If, on the other hand; he uses G-d's creations only to satisfy his lusts and feed his animalistic desires, then he will not only bring destruction upon himself, but the entire universe will lose value as well.

From: Mankind - At the Top of the Ladder

The Erosion Of Normalcy

By Charles W. Socarides, M.D.

The author is a clinical professor of psychiatry at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center in New York. He is president of the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality.

"A significant portion of society today holds the belief that homosexuality is a normal form of sexual behavior... This revolutionary change in our sexual mores and customs has been ushered in by a single act of considerable consequence: The removal of homosexuality from the category of aberrancy by the American Psychiatric Association in 1973. This act... created injustices for the homosexual and his family, as it belied the truth and prevented the homosexual from seeking and receiving help... This amounted to a full approval of homosexuality and an encouragement to aberrancy by those who should have known better, both in the scientific sense and in the sense of the social consequences of such removal.

To many American psychiatrists, this action remains a chilling reminder that if scientific principles are not fought for they can be lost... unless we make no exceptions to science, we are subject to the snares of political factionalism and to the propagation of untruths to an unsuspecting and uninformed public, to the rest of the medical profession, and to the behavioral sciences.

Those who would prefer to retain homosexuality as a valid diagnosis have been essentially silenced in lectures, meetings, and publications... The press has been influenced in addition to the electronic media. Television and movies promote homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle and censor movies that might show homosexuality as a disorder. Homosexual sex education has entered our schools and colleges; pro-gay activists -- homosexual or otherwise - portray their way of life as normal and as "American as apple pie," while intimidating those with different views.

In essence, this movement has accomplished what every other society, with rare exceptions, would have trembled to tamper with: a revision of the basic code and concept of life and biology, that men and women normally mate with those of the opposite sex and not with each other.

This psychiatric nonsense and social recklessness bring with it many individual tragedies, as men and women who no longer appreciate their own appropriate sexual roles create confusion in the very young for generations to come. Gender identity disturbance is bound to increase, and more true homosexual deviations result as parents distort the maleness or femaleness of their infants and children.

Currently, homosexuals who are in therapy have developed tremendous resistance, which retards their progress, while others are dissuaded even from seeking appropriate help... , it is the individual homosexual wishing to change who suffers the most.

Adolescents, nearly all of whom experience some degree of uncertainty as to sexual identity, are discouraged from assuming that one form of gender identity is preferable to another. Those persons who already have a homosexual problem are discouraged from finding their way out of self destructive fantasy - discouraged from learning to accept themselves as male or female, discouraged from following those often painful but necessary courses that allow people to function as reasonable and participating individuals in a cooperating society.

Psychoanalysis reveals that sexual behavior is not an arbitrary set of rules... At the individual level, these patterns create a balance between the demands of sexual instinct and the external realities surrounding each of us.

Some behaviors are universally deviant and every society considers them destructive. Incest, rape, and psychopathic (apparently unmotivated) violence are considered taboo in all societies. So is predominant or exclusive homosexuality or even bisexuality. While homosexuals can and should be protected by all the laws of society, homosexuality should not be encouraged.

Charges of being "undemocratic," "cruel and inhuman," or "irresponsible, homophobic, and prejudiced," are leveled at those who would question the normality of homosexuality. These accusations are then reinforced by the media and motion pictures."

In the Name of "Civil Rights" - Homosexuals Remake Society

by Elizabeth Wright
"Issues & Views", Spring 1996

"Homosexuals are no dummies. From the first, they recognized the advantage of hitching their wagon to the "civil rights" star. By asserting that their goal is to achieve their rights as citizens, and invoking the rhetoric of the 1960s, they touched a nerve in American society. Yet homosexuals as a group have never been denied their full civil rights.

The activist homosexual strives for the advantages that come with being officially recognized as a bona fide "protected minority" in America's weird patchwork of ethnic favoritism. Even without this designation, through dogged perseverance, homosexuals have intruded their political agenda into the platforms of major religious denominations, into the policies of major corporations and government agencies and, as we know, into the curriculums of schools and colleges around the country.

The organized homosexual lobby knows how to be tough. Toughness, and the threat of physical violence, was all it took to get the American Psychiatric Association to remove homosexuality from its list of sexual disorders. Throughout its history, this Association had diagnosed homosexuality as the aberrance that it is. The homosexual impulse was defined in medical circles as "an uncompleted gender identity seeking after its own sex to replace what was not fully developed." Medical journals were full of articles on the treatment of homosexuality.

But in the early 1970s, the homosexual lobby began to disrupt APA annual meetings and other gatherings, with an aim to force the organization to change its diagnosis in its official Diagnostic and Statistics Manual. Bullied and intimidated by constant threats of physical violence, in 1973, the APA issued its now infamous statement that more or less "normalizes" homosexuality and removed it from its diagnostic list of deviations.

This is how a psychiatric diagnosis came to be changed on the books. Not through years of scientific research, but through a vote taken under fear of mayhem and possible riots. As one APA member put it, "This was an action demanded by the ideological temper of the times."

The homosexual who wishes to be freed from his abnormal behavior faces the possibility of a confrontation with the homosexual lobby. Anthony Falzarano, a member of an organization of former homosexuals, denounces political "gays" who work to coerce their agendas on scientific research organizations, and says, "For the American Psychological Association to even consider denying homosexuals the right to choose to seek help for their disorientation is outrageous and is baseless in science."

What about the claims being made about biology? The research studies that supposedly suggest a possible link to inborn homosexual traits turn out to be more fantasy than reality.

The 1993 Hamer study which purported to find a "gay gene" in humans and was eagerly disseminated by a willing liberal media, is looked at askance by most other scientists, and considered by some to be fraudulent.

Since independent researchers have been unable to replicate the data supposedly discovered by Hamer, the claim for a genetic basis for homosexuality is considered more wishful thinking than science. The Hamer data is now being closely investigated.

Even though this "research" is under a cloud of doubt and considered by many to be bogus science, the homosexual lobby is successfully using this widely publicized study anyway.

When a body of knowledge gets in their way, the homosexual lobby simply revises it, says Linda Tebedo of Colorado for Family Values, an organization that has been a front line opponent of homosexual proselytizing. "Homosexual activists have made a science out of comprehensively revising any body of knowledge standing in their way: revising biology, revising psychology, revising genetics, revising the U.S. Constitution," says Tebedo.

Psychiatrist William Byne, after questioning the accuracy of studies that claim genetic origins of homosexuality, was subjected to the usual vitriolic verbal attacks. However, he claims there is something worse than being smeared with the homophobic label. "More troubling is that some of the more senior and influential figures in sex research have openly suggested that it is politically incorrect for anyone to criticize the biological, deterministic data pertaining to homosexuality."

What sane society would allow its abnormal members to set the community's standards?

The Real Goal

If homosexuals really believed the "gene" theory, they would not push so hard to have access to children. In spite of their lies to the contrary, their end goal is recruitment. Common sense tells us this has to be so. How else could a miniscule population (about 1% to 2%), that cannot biologically reproduce itself, extend the field of partners?

Under legal pressure, public schools now must give access to all kinds of advocacy groups. In some parts of the country, schools have opened their doors to homosexual groups like "Project 10," whose members come into the school, distribute leaflets and books, and then engage the children in discussions about the intricacies of homosexual behavior. The children are then reassured that it's "okay" to have sexual desires for members of their own sex.

In Denver schools and in Washington state youth facilities (with predominantly black youngsters), homosexual advocates were allowed to distribute questionnaires that included questions designed to sow doubt and confusion in the minds of children. Among several leading (and often titillating) questions were: "Is it possible that your heterosexuality is just a phase you may grow out of?" and "How can you become a whole person if you limit yourself exclusively to heterosexuality and fail to develop your natural, homosexual potential?" Sowing doubt and confusion in the impressionable young is the primary goal of groups like Project 10. Another goal is to create and maintain a "gay" presence at all educational levels.

During the homosexual lobby's attempt to foist crude sex education courses onto New York City's school children, newspaper columnist Ray Kerrison minced no words in describing their real aims. "Why," he asked, "would a few homosexuals, who are not generally in the child-raising business, spend so much time, energy and money targeting schools for condom giveaways? Why would they insist on flooding the schools with incredibly explicit descriptions of exotic sex and encourage kids with such blandishments as 'Do it. Have fun'? The answer is not tolerance or health, but recruitment."

Homosexual advocate Al Kielwasser claims that to ignore the subject of homosexuality in children's programs, "exacerbates the national climate of hate violence." And, furthermore, Kielwasser points out, programs with "gay" themes will help the young figure out their sexual identity by age four or five! Obviously, a matter of great urgency to people like Kielwasser.

Homosexuals recognized early the advantage of linking the terms "racist" and "homophobe," in order to bring moral condemnation down on their enemies.

The tactics of homosexual activists and civil rights activists are quite similar. Both groups specialize in the art of exaggerated rhetoric, accusing opponents of being "haters" or "gay bashers." Taking their cues from blacks who use the word "racist" to describe anyone who opposes their political demands, homosexuals push the envelope of overstatement.

All those who challenge the homosexual lobby are deemed "gay bashers" and people filled with "hate."

Thanks to the media, American society is now being bathed, if not drowned in homosexual propaganda. From television sitcoms and soap operas to movies and daily newspaper features, we are awash in the ethos of "gayness." Outright, even fervent approval of homosexual behavior is now a litmus test demanded from all straights.

Dr. Socarides, writes, "Movies have been routinely censored by a gay Hollywood review board for the last seven to eight years; other films critical of homosexuality have been boycotted at the box office; books which portray homosexuality in any unfavorable way have not been published, and many such books have been removed from library shelves in universities and public libraries."

Describing what he calls "heavily political and polemical" literature on homosexuality, psychiatrist Joseph Berger says, "Because most people do not have a detailed knowledge of the scientific literature on homosexuality, they are vulnerable to the vast amount of incorrect and often deliberately misleading information that receives disproportionate publicity in the media." Dr. Berger warns the ordinary reader not to give in unthinkingly to what is "one of the most powerful propaganda exercises of modern times."

The goals of Homosexuality promoters:

The implementation of homosexual, bisexual, and transgendered curriculum at all levels of education.

The lowering of the age of consent for homosexual and heterosexual sex.

The legalization of homosexual marriages.

Custody, adoption and foster care rights for homosexuals, lesbians, and transgendered people.

The redefinition of family to include the full diversity of all family structures.

The access to all programs of the Boy Scouts of America.

Affirmative action for homosexuals.

The inclusion of sex-change operations under a universal health care plan.

Those who oppose homosexuality are fighting for:

The prevention of social sanctions, either concretely or in principle, for homosexual acts.

Outlaw public homosexuality.

The right not to have homosexuality imposed upon their sentiments by having it treated in public school curricula as if it were a normal alternative lifestyle.

The right not to have homosexuality imposed upon their sentiments by being forced to hire someone because he is a homosexual.

Resist the effort of the homosexual community to establish their lifestyle as legitimate.

TAKE SIDES

No Coincidence In A Purposeful Creation

Randy Shilts:

"Why, then, was the U.S. first hit with an AIDS epidemic only in the 1980s, with HIV infection quickly rising to 50% in some risk-groups? The answer may be that it was not the simple presence of HIV virus in the United States that changed; rather it was the social milieu.

What happened in the late 1970s in the U.S. is that when a large enough fraction of the American homosexual-male population became infected with HIV, the U.S. blood supply, maintained with volunteer donations only, finally became contaminated with the virus. (This started in 1978, as we know from later testing of archived serum samples taken from homosexual men originally for hepatitis B studies).

The dates are not coincidental--crossover between initial HIV infected groups occurred as some homosexual men experimented with IV drugs in the late 1970s, and male IV drug users in large cities turned to homosexual prostitution in order to obtain drugs.

The small incidence of AIDS in the American homosexual- male and IV drug-user communities before the late 1970s in no way subtracts from the reality of the dramatic increase in AIDS which took place in the early 1980s on the heels of exploding HIV infection rates in these groups."

The solid indisputable fact is, that Aids sprang in the wake of sodomy turning from an act sanctioned with a jail term, to a way of life welcomed and promoted by the ruling elites:

In 1981, Washington, DC's Mayor Marion Barry eagerly obliged the homosexual lobby by leading the drive to remove laws against sodomy from the books.

1981, June
The federal Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports the first cases of the illness that will be known as AIDS.

It was in the Summer of 1981 that alert physicians brought to the attention of the C.D.C. a mini-epidemic of immunodeficiency and pneumonia caused by unusual organisms (a fungus called Pneumocystis carinii, and a virus called CMV) in homosexual men in Los Angeles.

The Assault on Normalcy

"There is an assault on the normalcy of heterosexuality (and other traditional standards, like the sanctity of marriage and the sexual protection of children) that is being led by an academic sexological elite in consort with gay activism. Here are just some of the documentable facts:

In a 1989 National Research Council report supposedly relevant to AIDS prevention, sex research experts John Gagnon, Charles Turner and others urge us to challenge our preconceived notions of childhood sexual development by looking at the Sambia society of Papua (New Guinea).

Why?

Because in this enlightened group young boys are initiated into homosexual practices at ages seven to 10. Dr. Gagnon, a SUNY professor and occasional op-ed writer for the New York Times, also tells us in his book "Human Sexualities" that human sexuality can be made to fit the molds we want and that for our children to have fulfilling sex lives "we may have to promote sexual activity."

Gay activism is more about fierce opposition to the traditional view of family than it is about promoting one alternative; i.e., it is against one view (the accepted norm) and for everything else (almost anything formerly known as deviant).

The late Lester Kirkendall, prominent sex educator, founding board member of SIECUS (Sex Information and Education Council of the United States) and a former professor in the Department of Family Life at Oregon State University, wrote in the Journal of Sex Education and Therapy (spring/summer 1985) that sex education programs of the future "will probe sexual expression ...with same-sex {partners} and even across ...generational lines." When our sense of guilt is sufficiently diminished, "these patterns will become legitimate."

Wardell Pomeroy, sex educator, Kinsey co-author and SIECUS founding board member, wrote in a Forum Variations article in 1977 that "incest between adults and younger children can prove to be a satisfying and enriching experience...."

Edward W. Eichel
J. Gordon Muir
New York
(Mr. Eichel is co-author and Mr. Muir is contributing author, editor and co-publisher of "Kinsey, Sex and Fraud," Huntington House, 1990).

From a letter Published 3/18/94 in Wall Street Journal, Letters to the Editor

The Aids Sprung By Sodomizers Threatens The Entire Population

4/18/85

"Currently, just 1% of the 9,608 AIDS cases in the U. S. are known to stem from heterosexual contact; the main risk groups are homosexual men and intravenous drug users.

Dean F. Echenberg of the San Francisco Public Health Department, who urged that promiscuous heterosexuals in his city be classified as an AIDS risk group, said, "If we do nothing, we can expect to see rivulets of AIDS into the heterosexual community for some time to come." AIDS will spread into the majority population, he said. "The question is how fast."

Wall Street Journal

October 1993

Cases Among All Reported U.S. Transmission

Category----------------------------------------------------AIDS Cases (%)

Injection drug use----------------------------------------------24

Men who have sex with men--------------------------------55

Men who have sex with men and inject drugs------------6

Heterosexual contact--------------------------------------------7

CDC National AIDS ClearinghouseM

From 4/85 to 10/93, it rose from 1% to 7% among heterosexual. The sodomy lifestyle of the homosexual community initiated the Aids epidemic to the world, and - as statistics clearly show - is one of the greatest hazarads to society's health.

How Does The Ruling Establishment "Protect" The Population

In Learning About Sex - Contemporary Guide for Young Adults, published by Gary Kelly in 1986, it was advised that "there were no special medical dangers associated with anal sexual contact."

The Message Was Written On The Wall

"Warning to the Homophobes"

By Steve Warren
September 1, 1987
"The Advocate."
("The Advocate" is the nation's largest homosexual publication.)

" . . . now the tide has turned. We have at last 'come out,' and in so doing we have exposed the mean-spirited nature of Judeo-Christian morality. You have been narrow-minded and self-righteous. But with the help of a growing number of your own membership, we are going to force you to recant everything you have believed or said about sexuality. Here are some of the things you will be expected to affirm in the process of renouncing love, marriage and family:

1. Henceforth, homosexuality will be spoken of in your churches and synagogues as an 'honorable estate.'

2. You can either let us marry people of the same sex, or better yet, abolish marriage altogether, since it will give the lie to everything you have said or done about sexuality.

3. You will be expected to offer ceremonies that bless our sexual arrangements, whether or not you retain marriage as something to be celebrated in your churches. You will also instruct your young people in homosexual as well as heterosexual behavior, and you go out of your way to make certain that homosexual youths are allowed to date, attend religious functions together, openly display affection, and enjoy each other's sexuality without embarrassment or guilt.

4. If any of the older people in your midst object, you will deal with them sternly, making certain they renounce their ugly and ignorant homophobia or suffer public humiliation.

5. You will also make certain that all of the prestige and resources of your institutions are brought to bear on the community, so that laws are passed forbidding discrimination against homosexuals and heavy punishments are assessed. We expect and demand the same commitment to us that you made to Blacks and to women, though their suffering has not been as great as ours.

6. Finally, we will in all likelihood want to expunge a number of passages from your Scriptures and rewrite others, eliminating preferential treatment of marriage and using words that will allow for homosexual interpretations of passages.

Warning: If all of these things do not come to pass quickly, we will subject Orthodox Jews and Christians to the most sustained hatred and vilification in recent memory. We have captured the liberal establishment and the press. We have already beaten you on a number of battlefields. And we have the spirit of the age on our side. You have neither the faith nor the strength to fight us, so you might as well surrender now."

How Should A Mindful Person Act

A person who really cares about people, would act in a way that could help them.

Since sodomy (or homosexuality as is the common use of the term) is by all means a deviation, people who, for some reason, suffer from it, should be treated professionally in order to help them overcome it.

To try and present this deviation as a norm, does harm to the ones who suffer from it, and does grave harm to society, both morally and physically.

The following are excerpts from an article, written by Charles W. Socarides, worthwhile reading, concerning this issue:

"From the beginning of my practice in New York City, I have tried to use my science--my psychoanalytic skills--to help hundreds of homosexuals. I tell them, "We are all products of how we were treated when we were very small. Whatever conflicts we have now took root in the soil we were planted in long ago. But, unlike plants, we are not stuck to those roots. We can move. We can change. Our often tortured pasts need not be our destiny. Our capacity of healing and repair is greater than we know."

I have spent most of my professional life, some 40 years, helping homosexuals get on with that healing and repair, and, in many cases, find happiness in marriage and a family... In doing this work--it is partly like detective work and partly like gardening--I have come to learn about the mysterious, but imperative, drives that force men and women into same-sex sex (it is only one of a variety of sexual deviations, sometimes called philias) and about the things a doctor can do to help them overcome these drives.

Out of this experience, I have produced some 80 works on homosexuality, most of them in learned journals, so that I can help other doctors deal with all the thousands of men and women out there who are not happy with their orientation and want to change. If they want to change, I am here to say they can. For the past 20 years, this fact has been one of the better-kept secrets in our society. I think it is time to let the secret out.

Why now? Because now, to me, homosexuality has become more than one of the many psychological disorders that walk into my office almost every day. Now homosexuals have co-opted the civil rights movement in the U.S., and made same-sex sex into a kind of civil liberty. Some lower courts and the mainstream mass media seem to have endorsed this view in the name of tolerance. "Nice people," they say, "good democratic people, do not discriminate against others merely because they are different."

Yes. But we have to distinguish between tolerance and approval. Because homosexuals are compelled by unconscious forces within them, they have the right to do what they do with willing partners and not be persecuted for it by members of the heterosexual majority--who should live and let live, in the spirit of tolerance that has made this country great. But we have to avoid putting homosexuality on a par with heterosexuality.

I know this is not a popular view. But in light of so much false information and outright disinformation about homosexuality, I must insist on it here, because this is my field of expertise. I can see that many millions of people who never thought much about homosexuality before are confused.

At this particular moment in history, however, what was long taken for granted has come under significant challenge. A new sexual liberation has become inextricably bound to the concept of freedom. This sounds good... ask average people how they feel about homosexuality and many of them will say, "Why not? As long as nobody is hurt, then what harm?"

They are aware of rapidly changing sexual codes, but their lives are rarely touched by these new ways. Or so they think. But changes in sexual behavior do not long remain merely interesting items in the news. Now, it seems that homosexuality has also become a social movement, even a fashionable pose. And that means trouble ahead, mainly for our children, and their children, who look for guidance from their elders on how to use the great gift of sex, but are being told, instead, by some moderns that, in sexual matters, "anything goes." Already, an effort to educate the children of New York's public schools toward greater tolerance of gays and lesbians (which I applaud) has led to outright approval of the freedom to enjoy same-sex sex (which I do not applaud).

In November 1993, Newsweek reported that "at high schools around the country, multiculturalism has begun to embrace multisexualism. With or without official blessing, student gay organizations have cropped up in Chicago, Berkeley, Miami, Minneapolis, New York. In Massachusetts alone, more than a hundred public and private schools have such groups, including George Bush's alma mater.

The time has come for someone to call this sexual re-formation into question, and try to de-code the clever rationalizations worked out by gay and lesbian politicians to lessen their own psychic pain. If there's one thing I know as a psychoanalyst, I know this: people don't get to the bottom of their pain by lying about it, to themselves or to the world--much less by creating what a critic of the movement calls "an upside down moral universe, which is just another way of saying a general, community-wide dementia."

Murders Most Foul

Paul Gordon's article on "homosexual" murders ["What Are These Murders?" April] took great courage for him to write and Buzz to publish. Gay politics have heretofore prevented public airing of this type of homicide, whose numbers are almost certainly much higher than those cited by Mr. Gordon.

Several years ago, a dear friend of mine was brutally murdered by his gay lover It was at this time I learned from detectives and others in the police department of the prevalence of such murders. If any of these policemen had been "homophobic," I would have recoiled from them. But they had seen too much of life's dark side to embrace such facile bigotry. They went out of their way to be both helpful and sympathetic.

Emphatically not helpful were most gay men, either as individuals or as part of gay organizations or publications. They would not testify, investigate, or publicize either my friend's death as an individual gay man or this type of murder in general. Though they absolutely knew about "homosexual" murders, they so feared engendering public hatred that they acted like ostriches.

From: BUZZ LETTERS

Porn, AIDS and the Public Health

"Only yesterday everybody who was anybody agreed that what consenting adults did in private was nobody else's business. Today, moved by the suffering and fear caused by Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, the same everybody insists that the consequences of certain private acts are the public's business.

The proposition that what consenting adults do in private is nobody else's business was never very convincing when examined at all closely. If a sadist and a masochist consent to one of them torturing the other in private, does that mean the courts should not treat the torture as a crime? Would the survivor in a game of Russian roulette be well-advised to rest his defense on a plea of having only engaged in a private act between consenting adults?

San Francisco has overridden the right claimed by some homosexual men to continue doing what they did in the privacy of the bathhouses they frequented. The bathhouses have been closed.

For most, a manifest danger to the public health is rather more urgent than a hypothetical threat to a not especially respected minority's right to do noxious things. In November and December, NBC found majorities agreeing that governmental restrictions should be placed on the sexual activities of people who are known carriers of AIDS.

Even if we agree not to call sin what homosexual men do in bathhouses and what drug addicts do in their shooting galleries, even if we agree to call it deviant behavior, it is nonetheless true that that deviant behavior conduces to AIDS, which results in death."

1/8/86, Wall Street Journal, By Milton Himmelfarb

No Fences Down The Road To Abyss?

What happened in the last 30 years, is that the most abhorrent behavior gains the upper hand, while 2,000 years of training in the self discipline, Jewish monotheism introduced to pagan Europe crushes under the attack of new age hedonists who preach introducing pagan practices of indulgence in materialistic lusts.

In 1984 the Institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality (ISIS), found that children raised in non-religious homes had a 450% higher chance of choosing the homosexual life style.

It's either back to morals based on the Divine revelation in Sinai, or all the way down the drain.

The sexual behavior of a normal couple, that is a male and a female, is up to them to decide. The Torah doesn't forbid any kind of sexual activity between the two mates of a married couple.

But, there are two major objective facts, (no matter of our subjective evaluation of them) one must bear in mind when relating to this subject:

1. The Torah forbids sodomy, i.e. anal intercourse between two males.

2. Sodomy is what caused the Aids epidemic.

Let's examine some milestones in the raving gallop down the drain:

1981, June
The federal Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports the first cases of the illness that will be known as AIDS.

July
A New York Times article announces a "Rare Cancer Seen in Homosexuals."

August
Alarmed by the report, 80 men gather in New York writer Larry Kramer's apartment to hear a doctor speak about "gay cancer.'

October
The CDC declares the new disease an epidemic.

1981, December 31
152 cases of the mysterious new disease have been reported in the U.S.

1982, January
Six gay men -- Nathan Fain, Larry Kramer, Larry Mass, Paul Popham, Paul Rapoport and Edmund White -- meet in Kramer's apartment in January and officially name themselves Gay Men's Health Crisis.

September
The illness doctors are calling GRID (gay-related immune deficiency) or "gay cancer," is officially named by the CDC: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or AIDS.

1985, August
AIDS cases have now been reported in every populated continent in the world.

1986, October
GMHC's original client pool of gay men has expanded to include heterosexual men and women, hemophiliacs, intravenous drug users and children.

1986, December 31
37,061 AIDS cases have been reported in the U.S.; 16,301 people are dead.

1987, February
The AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (Act Up) is founded

October
Senator Jesse Helms, "disgusted" by GMHC's Safer Sex Comix, amends a federal appropriations bill to prevent funding of AIDS education efforts that "encourage or promote homosexual sexual activity." GMHC, working with the ACLU, proceeds to litigate against the amendment.

1987, December 31
59,572 are diagnosed with AIDS in the U.S.; 27,909 people are dead.

1988, December 31
89,864 cases of AIDS have been reported in the U.S.; 46,134 people are dead.

1989, February
GMHC leads successful effort to draft and pass New York State's AIDS confidentiality bill preventing the wrongful disclosure of AIDS-related information.

1989, December 31
115,786 cases of AIDS have been reported in the U.S.; 70,313 are dead.

1990, June
Protesting immigration laws that bar HIV-infected individuals from entering the U.S.

December
In New York, AIDS deaths surpass those of the great influenza epidemic 1918, making AIDS the worst epidemic in the state's history.

1990, December 31
161,073 cases of AIDS have been diagnosed in the U.S.; 100,813 are dead.

1991, January
Tuberculosis cases in New York City are reported to have increased by 38% in a one-year period.

February
GMHC joins fight for New York City Schools' Chancellor Fernandez' HIV/AIDS initiative, including condom availability. The Board of Education approves the plan on February 28.

1991, December 31
206,392 cases of AIDS have been diagnosed in the U.S.; 132,233 are dead.

1992, July
New York State passes landmark legislation against HIV discrimination, barring mandatory testing of health care workers and requiring all insurers to offer open enrollment and community rating.

August
In protest of U.S. immigration policies that bar entrance to people with HIV, Harvard University holds the VII International Conference on AIDS in Amsterdam.

1992, December 31
Over 242,000 cases of AIDS have been reported in the U.S.; 160,000 are dead.

1993, December
San Francisco researchers warn of a second wave of HIV infections among young gay men; studies project that a majority of 20-year-old gay American men will eventually have the virus.

1993, December 31
361,509 cases of AIDS have been reported in the U.S.; 220,871 are dead.

1994, Januar
y GMHC creates "Young, Hot, Safe" safer sex subway campaign aimed at gay, lesbian and heterosexual young adults.

August
The Senate votes 63 to 36 on an amendment drafted by Senators Helms and Smith to deny funds to school districts "encouraging or supporting homosexuality as a positive lifestyle."

1994, December 31
441,528 cases of AIDS have been reported in the U.S.; over 250,000 are dead.

The above are excerpts from a GMHC document, in which they brag about their fight to "prevent" Aids.

No sane person can evade a sober evaluation of this parade of fools, without drawing the conclusions.

The secular liberal media brainwashed the masses with the wrong notion that sodomy is to be considered as a normal behavior, rather than what it realy is, namely, a deviation caused by circumstances which can be avoided when the right educative measures are taken

What Causes Homosexuality

"THE UNHAPPY GAYS: What Everyone Should Know About Homosexuality" by Tim LaHaye (Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., Wheaton Illinois, 1978). In his chapter on "What Causes Homosexuality?" Tim LaHaye first describes...

The Components For Developing A Predisposition To Homosexuality

Please carefully note that the components listed below DO NOT CAUSE ONE TO BECOME A HOMOSEXUAL. Rather, they can contribute to the development of a PREDISPOSITION TOWARDS HOMOSEXUALITY. A person can (and many do) have all these components and still not be a homosexual. As listed and describe by LaHaye, these components include:

1. A Melancholy Temperament
2. Inadequate Parental Relationships
3. Permissive Childhood Training
4. Insecurity About Sexual Identity
5. Childhood Sexual Trauma
6. Early Interest In Sex
7. Youthful Masturbator And Sexual Fantasizer
8. Childhood Associates And Peer Pressure

LaHaye carefully documents how studies have often found these factors present in the development of a predisposition towards homosexuality. Only the first ("A Melancholy Temperament") is truly related to genetics, but many of the others are environmental factors that can occur so early in the development of a child that one could easily believe that once a predisposition towards homosexuality has developed they feel they must have been "born that way."

But even if one has a "predisposition" towards homosexuality, they are not necessarily homosexual. As LaHaye continues to illustrate, to a "predisposition" must be added other factors. He describes this as...

The Formula For Producing A Homosexual

This formula can be illustrated in this way:

A Predisposition Toward Homosexuality
Plus
That First Homosexual Experience
Multiplied By
Pleasurable and Positive Homosexual Thoughts
To Which Is Added
More Homosexual Experiences

Multiplied By
More Pleasurable Thoughts

---------------------------

A Homosexual

When the walls fell

Gay men are still getting AIDS, long after we learned how to stop it. How do we fix the breakdown between theory and practice? Eric Rofes brings some different ideas to the table.

By Gabrielle Antolovich

The difficult issues around relationships between men where one is HIV-negative and the other is HIV-positive is one of Rofes' discussion points. "How much of what's going on in that couple, on a deep psychological level, is about the uninfected man getting infected? How much of what's going on is the part of the culture of romance and a wish to merge with one's lover's health condition; giving him everything, including the ability to infect you?" asks Rofes.

"I think this, in terms of the Christian right, is a huge problem, because at the same time we've played into the blame syndrome," he warns. "I'm particularly nervous about the upcoming presidential race where I feel if the conservatives control both houses of Congress and the presidency, and if the new high levels of infection that are occurring among young gay men goes public, I'm afraid of what actions might be taken."

From: The Internet's Gay Newspaper

NO actions were taken. Modern civilization surrendered unconditionally to the new age pagan hedonists.

The Risk-AIDS Hypothesis

Immunosuppressive Behavior, Not HIV, May Be the Cause of AIDS

by Peter H. Duesberg and Bryan J. Ellison

"...The alternative views of AIDS can be grouped together as the "risk hypothesis" of AIDS -- that the AIDS diseases are entirely separate conditions caused by a variety of factors, most of which have in common only that they involve risk behavior.

Joseph Sonnabend, a New York physician who founded the journal "AIDS Research" in 1983, has pointed out that repeated, constant infections may eventually overload the immune system, causing its failure; still worse are simultaneous infections by two or more diseases. "Fast track" homosexuals have generally experienced repeated bouts not only of a full spectrum of venereal diseases, but also of all forms of hepatitis, cytomegalovirus infection, Epstein-Barr virus infection, and various protozoan infections. They have commonly developed multiple infections, usually repeatedly.

Behavioral Changes in the '70s

Both the AIDS diseases and the risk factors causing them have increased before and during the same period that AIDS has been officially defined. Although homosexuality is older than recorded history, the "gay liberation" movement in 1969 began a wave of increasing activity by many homosexuals. Bath houses were opened in major cities, where both sexual promiscuity and drug use exploded. The number of sexual contacts per individual jumped to hundreds or thousands over only a few years, and the diseases discussed above exploded in frequency a the same time. Chronic disease epidemics actually became the medical hallmark of homosexuals in New York and San Francisco.

the risk hypothesis suggests that AIDS diseases can be attributed to the explosion in drug use and multiple infections associated with sexual promiscuity among certain sectors of the population.

The risk hypothesis also accounts for the rough correlation between HIV infection and the development of various diseases; because HIV is difficult to transmit, it has naturally become a surrogate marker for risk behavior. Those people with the most risks are often the ones most likely to spread such an inactive microbe.

The risk-AIDS hypothesis also calls into question the direction of current AIDS education programs... education programs that promote condoms and sterile needles without emphasizing the danger of the risk behavior itself... may inadvertently encourage spread of the disease.

Unfortunately, no studies have been done, but anecdotal case descriptions exist of AIDS patients who recover after ending drug use, sexual promiscuity...

Accidental infection of humans by HIV, by means other than specific risk behavior, is especially revealing. Some 19 health care workers in the United States have been presumed infected with HIV by accidental needlestick or other medical injuries, based on the inability to identify any other modes of transmission in their cases. One of these cases was reported in 1988 as having developed AIDS, but that diagnosis was changed shortly after that patient recovered spontaneously. Now the CDC claims that two of these workers have converted to AIDS, but has failed to publish any data confirming this claim. Thus, there are still no confirmed cases of AIDS among health workers after accidental infection with HIV"

From: the journal "Policy Review", Summer, 1990

Statistics

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
March 30, 1994

The following data are from the CDC quarterly "HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report." Numbers are based on AIDS cases reported to CDC through December 31, 1993.

The 10 leading metropolitan statistical areas reporting the highest number of AIDS cases among residents are as follows:

New York City -----58,807
Los Angeles ---------22,803
San Francisco -------18,135
Miami -----------------10,920
Washington, DC ----10,177
Chicago ----------------9,797
Houston-----------------9,538
Newark------------------8,248
Philadelphia-------------7,964
San Juan-----------------7,291

Are those towns with the highest homosexual activity and sexual promiscuity? If so, can one establish correlation between this behavior and Aids?

AIDS Case Rate Is Said to Peak In San Francisco

2/16/94
Wall Street Journal.

About 28,000 people, or 4% of the city's population, have HIV in San Francisco.

Is San Francisco by any case related to promiscuous sodomy behavior?...

AIDS Has Been Cruel To Greenwich Village And Its Homosexuals

3/13/87
Wall Street Journal.

AIDS has cut a cruel swath through Greenwich Village, an affluent old neighborhood of 61,000 on Manhattan's West Side. Traditionally a haven for artists, writers and bohemians, the Village is generally assumed to have a homosexual population as high as 25% or 30% -- altogether perhaps 18,000 people. Accordingly, the Village has become an epicenter of acquired immune deficiency syndrome, the fatal immunity disorder that in the U. S. struck first among homosexual men.

Is Greenwich Village?...

Statistics

The 7 states with the lowest rates of Aids are those who fight sodomy and have anti sodomy laws:

South Dakota --- 2.4
Iowa -------------- 3.5
Montana --------- 3.6
North dakota --- 4.3
West Virginia -- 4.3
Wyoming ------- 4.5
idaho ------------- 5.2

This, against annual rate of 36.2 (46.2 in California).

Source:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS Surveillance
Report, 1994;6(no.1).
Table 1. AIDS cases and annual rates per 100,000 population, by state, reported July 1992 through June 1993 and July 1993 through June 1994; and cumulative totals, by state and age group, through June 1994, United States.

The figures above concern to:
July 1993- June 1994

Fact

Aids sprang in gay bathhouses of California in 1981. When identified in 1983 - 99.99% of the carriers were sodomizers. Due to their promiscuous sex behavior and contaminating the blood banks, 15 years later, 7% of the death toll consisted of heterosexuals. (Of course, among those who committed extra martial sex relations). This is an indisputable and telling fact. Is AIDS a behavioral disease? it certainly is. Sodomy generated AIDS, and sexual promiscuity spreads it all over.

A Model

QUESTION: Shall constitution be amended to require that all governments discourage homosexuality, other listed "behaviors," and not facilitate or recognize them?

Be it Enacted by the People by [sic] the State of Oregon:
SECTION 41 (1) This state shall not recognize any categorical provision such as "sexual orientation," "sexual preference," and similar phrases that includes homosexuality, pedophilia, sadism or masochism. Quotas, minority status, affirmative action, or any similar concepts, shall not apply to these forms of conduct, nor shall government promote these behaviors. (2) State, regional and local governments and their properties and monies shall not be used to promote, encourage, or facilitate homosexuality, pedophilia, sadism or masochism. (3) State, regional and local governments and their departments, agencies and other entities, including specifically the State Department of Higher Education and the Public schools, shall assist in setting a standard for Oregon's youth that recognizes homosexuality, pedophilia, sadism and masochism as abnormal, wrong, unnatural, and perverse and that these behaviors are to be discouraged and avoided. (General Voters' Pamphlet 93)

On November 3, 1992, the voters of the state of Oregon defeated Measure 9

Pity

In The Perspective Of A Believer

Believing in almighty, infinite, all-knowing being which all that occurs in existence is an outcome of his providence - inevitably compels one to see every phenomena in an overall context of a given set of morals, not as some incidental happening.

Let's examine AIDS in that perspective . Science is our best tool to deal with existing phenomena. Science is our way of explaining the "what". Science however does not tell us "why". That is, per definition, beyond its scope, or it ceases to be science. After the plague of AIDS was introduced to the world, we use science to detect it's material cause. And so it did - identifying the HIV virus that causes the disease. It was established as originating from the homosexual communities of California. Now, we found further that AIDS is also prevalent in Africa and Asia. But while in western countries the most affected were male homosexuals, in 3rd world countries - it was prostitutes - customers (truck drivers) - and over. As best demonstrated from that one:

A Thriving Sex Industry

"From the cage girls of Bombay to the dancers in Calcutta's pleasure houses, from the tribal women along Rajasthan's highways to the call girls of New Delhi, India's sex industry is extraordinarily varied. "Want some high-risk entertainment for the evening?" asks Smarajit Jana, manager of an HIV intervention program in Calcutta's red light district. "Step out into the street and take your pick--female prostitutes, male prostitutes, child sex workers, housewives, college students, starlets, virgins, fresh Nepali girls.

In Bombay--a city that has nearly twice as many inhabitants as New York yet almost twenty times as many sex workers--the narrow lanes of the Falkland Road area serve as viewing galleries. In the gloom, girls peer mutely from between the bars of five-foot-high cages.

The inability to negotiate safe sex and the necessity to sell sex to survive have rendered sex workers throughout Bombay vulnerable to HIV: their seroprevalence rate shot up from less than 2 percent in 1988 to 52 percent in 1994.

n Pune, condom use has risen in part from the outreach efforts of the Indian Health Organization, a nongovernmental organization whose mottos include "AIDS spreads in sex, blood, and ignorance" and "condoms prevent unwanted births and unwanted deaths." Yet while more than 26,000 free condoms are now distributed in the city's red light district each month, already half the sex workers there are HIV positive."

Harvard AIDS Review, Fall 1995
Harvard AIDS Institute, 1995

Let's review again scientist explanation to the difference in HIV behaviour:

"Scientist explain the phenomenon of the divergence among different populations reaction to the disease, in the existence of different HIV sub-typs. HIV sub-type B is, they say, the active one in the US. This one is being activated by blood contact (while others, in Africa for example, react to heterosexual sex). That's their explanation to the the spread of AIDS among homosexuals mainly - the traumatic nature of homosexual sex, accompanied by bloody fractures, in contrast to the milder heterosexual intercourse."

The source is Dr. Maayan, head of the AIDS clinic in Hadasa hospital, Jeruaslem.

That's "what' science can say. "why'? That answer is an outcome of one's set of values. One who believes id Divine Providence will naturally say: AIDS is G-d's punishment for violating His laws.

Note:

1. Besides the commandments that only Jews are obliged to, there are the Nochaides commandments that oblige all mankind. Included are the prohibition against anal intercourse between males. There are also prohibitions concerning heterosexual sex, for instance - adultery. To some it up: Torah based sexual behavior is monogamous heterosexuality.

2. When saying that non Jews should avoid male sodomy - one is not coming out of the blue, trying to convince some align culture with out of the moon teachings. The Torah is the moral basis of The entire western culture. Sodomy is still outlawed in 25 states in the US. (That was true, as best as I know, up to 6 years ago). It was so in all states, till 1981. (Correct me if I'm wrong).

So, when the AIDS plague hits America exactly when anal intercourse is being allowed in some states; When it hits the homosexual communities; generates from bathhouses that are the source of the most lewd promiscuous behavior; When it spreads all over homosexual communities around the country and in other western countries, which like the US, allow anal male intercourse; When in other countries, like India, Thailand - where perpetration against Divine laws concern mainly heterosexual relations - it hits heterosexuals involved in promiscuous sex.

In light of all this, the believer's answer to the "why" seems to be the most valid one. At least one that should be given grave consideration.

If not politically possible to outlaw again sodomy (which is still to be debated), the least what western society should do, is stop promoting homosexuality and promiscuous sex, fortify moral values such as family, and condemn unleash of wild material lusts. Trying to impose a wild sexual behavior of a tiny percentage, on a whole nation by revolutionizing all existing moral standards, is contrary to real democracy and humanity.

Men with homosexual inclination are also severely damaged by such social misbehavior. Their deviation should be treated compassionately, but professionally, by psychiatrists, in an effort to help cure them. Not by legitimizing their lewd behavior, thus driving them towards physical and spiritual perdition.

I don't suggest government agents to go poke their noses in private bedrooms to look for perpetrators. But anti sodomy laws are a legal manifestation of a society's scale of values. Thus, committing itself to a G-'dly conduct, enhancing family structure and modest behavior, and protecting itself from plagues.

Kudos

KANSAS STATUTES
SEX OFFENSES
21-3505. CRIMINAL SODOMY. (1) Criminal sodomy is sodomy between persons who are members of the same sex or between a person and an animal. (2) Criminal Sodomy is a class B misdemeanor.
---------------------------------------------------------

Some 5 years ago 25 states and the District of Columbia had sodomy laws (hope that data is still valid).
----------------------------------------------------------

The president of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe, denounced homosexuals Feb. 1, reported the German wire service Deutsche Press Agentur (DPA):
"Let us have no more talk of prostitutes rights or of homosexual rights, and recognize their activities for what they are -- a threat to the morality and health of our growing nation," Mugabe said while visiting a hospital in the city of Bulawayo.
"I believe our young people ... can discern what these perverted movements, coming from the so-called developed nations, really desire," Mugabe said.
-----------------------------------------------------------

As part of a national campaign against public broadcasting, Donald Wildmon, president of the American Family Association, attacked the American Playhouse series Tales of the City as "the latest in an ongoing campaign by PBS to promote the homosexual lifestyle and agenda."
In 1995, in part as a result of the AFA campaign, Congress reduced the proposed budget for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting by ten million dollars.
----------------------------------------------------------

In Cobb County, Georgia, all funding for the arts was eliminated by the County Commission in response to community objections to homosexual references in a local theater production of Lips Together, Teeth Apart by Terrence McNally.
The County Commission passed a resolution condemning homosexuality.
----------------------------------------------------------

Utah legislators, encouraged by Gov. Mike Leavitt, passed (as reported on February 1, 1997) a law Wednesday night educators will be prohibited from supporting or encouraging criminal conduct (homosexual acts are illegal).
-----------------------------------------------------------

April 18, 1996
LEGISLATURE PASSES BAN ON GAY CLUBS
Utah legislators voted late Wednesday to require that school boards ban certain student clubs from school grounds, including groups for gay and lesbian students.
In late afternoon, the school-clubs bill passed by a 21-7 vote in the Senate.
"Let's give the power to the local school boards to set limits and deny certain behaviors we should be denying anyway," said Sen. Joseph Hull, D-Hooper and a teacher.
Rep. David Bresnahan, R-West Jordan, urged restrictions on gay groups by evoking the memory of his brother Donald, who died of AIDS five years ago - after being recruited into the gay lifestyle by members of his Boy Scout troop. "They're out there and they're after our children."
the House voted 47-21 for passage.

Sen. Craig Taylor, R-Kaysville, and sponsor of the measure: "Who are the ones who really care and have compassion? Is it those who encourage youth to follow a very unhealthy destructive and potentially fatal lifestyle? Or is it those who point out that they may be headed down the wrong path?"
"The introduction of gay clubs officially in the high schools of Utah is a detrimental act," writes Charles W. Socarides, president of the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality. "This is a form of psychiatric nonsense and social recklessness that may well bring individual tragedies to our young people both now and in the future."
Taylor included copies of the letter as legislative intent in the proposed ban on gay and lesbian clubs, along with articles by doctors Jeffrey Satinover and Thomas and Ann Pritt.
-----------------------------------------------------------

In Jan. 1996, State Senator John Russell, a Republican from Lebanon, MO, again introduced a bill making the use of any 'pro-homosexual' materials in Missouri public schools illegal. A copy of the bill appears below.
**************

Senate Bill No. 600, 88th General Assembly

An Act Relating to the public schools, with penalty provisions.
Section 1.
1. As used in this section, the term "material" means any pamphlet, leaflet, book or booklet, banner, sign, poster, or any other matter whether printed or otherwise displayed, which the teachers, administrators, or any other employees of the public school know of or should know of, containing any words, messages, pictures, or symbols, disseminated or in any manner presented to students of the public schools, whether or not as a part of the academic curriculum or incident to any extracurricular activity.
2. No public school district shall publish, disseminate or use any material that promotes or advocates homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle.
3. No administrator, teacher, or any other employee of any public school shall publish, disseminate or in any other manner present any material to any public school student which promotes or advocates homosexuality as an acceptable lifestyle.
4. Any person who violates subsection 3 of this section is guilty of an infraction.
5. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a teacher from referring to homosexuality in the teaching of health or specifically mentioning acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS).

The "Gene" Theory

by Elizabeth Wright

"What about the claims being made about biology? The research studies that supposedly suggest a possible link to inborn homosexual traits turn out to be more fantasy than reality.

The 1993 Hamer study which purported to find a "gay gene" in humans and was eagerly disseminated by a willing liberal media, is looked at askance by most other scientists, and considered by some to be fraudulent.

Since independent researchers have been unable to replicate the data supposedly discovered by Hamer, the claim for a genetic basis for homosexuality is considered more wishful thinking than science. The Hamer data is now being closely investigated.

Even though this "research" is under a cloud of doubt and considered by many to be bogus science, the homosexual lobby is successfully using this widely publicized study anyway.

When a body of knowledge gets in their way, the homosexual lobby simply revises it, says Linda Tebedo of Colorado for Family Values, an organization that has been a front line opponent of homosexual proselytizing. "Homosexual activists have made a science out of comprehensively revising any body of knowledge standing in their way: revising biology, revising psychology, revising genetics, revising the U.S. Constitution," says Tebedo.

Psychiatrist William Byne, after questioning the accuracy of studies that claim genetic origins of homosexuality, was subjected to the usual vitriolic verbal attacks. However, he claims there is something worse than being smeared with the homophobic label. "More troubling is that some of the more senior and influential figures in sex research have openly suggested that it is politically incorrect for anyone to criticize the biological, deterministic data pertaining to homosexuality."

In 1991, two research studies were published that proposed a major biological component in male homosexuality. Both received a great deal of press coverage, including a cover story in News Week. The authors of both studies were careful, not to claim a genetic basis of their findings. However the authors in their interviews said that they believe in the genetic basis of their findings. Simon Levay of Salk Institute for biological studies in San Diego, in the first paper claimed that an area of hypothalamus (a region at the base of the brain) is smaller in homosexual men and heterosexual women than it is in heterosexual men, and that the smaller size is linked to preference for males as sexual partners. This linkage presumes a size similarity for the area between heterosexual men and lesbians, though no lesbians were included in the study, but Levay was unable to test that part of the hypothesis. This is one defect of Levay's work. Other 'grey' and 'black' areas are enumerated below:

1. All the brain tissues that were under study, were taken from cadavers, and it was impossible to determine their sexual orientation.

2. There were 19 'homosexuals' men (including one bisexual), six 'presumed heterosexual' men, and sixteen 'presumed heterosexual' women.

3. All the 'homosexuals' men had died of AIDS, which may have affected their brain tissue.

4. The published data does show that the range of sizes of the individual samples was virtually the same for both homosexual and 'presumed heterosexual' men, and even smaller in some heterosexual men than in many of the homosexuals."

Promoters of homosexuality are brainwashing the masses in recent years about the "gene theory", trying to establish homosexual behavior as an unchangeable fact - putting it on one level as being black or Jew. Let's then examine the following:

Asper W. Gadpaille, "preferential homosexuality is not found naturally in any infra human mammalian specie" (Conservative Chronicle September 5, 1990).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. R. C. Lewontin, a prominent geneticist of Harvard University, states that "the entire discussion of the evolutionary basis of human sexual preference is a made-up story, from beginning to end." (Biology As Ideology - Page 77)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Byne W, Parsons B. Human sexual orientation: The biologic theories reappraised. Archives of General Psychiatry 1993;50:228-239. (Byne critiques all the biologic theories to date and concludes that there is no solid evidence that homosexual behavior is mainly caused by biology.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maddox J. Sexual orientation [Letter]. Nature 1993;365:702. (J Maddox responds to Dean Hamer's reply of his original criticism [Nature 1993;364:281] of Hamer's genetic study.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Risch N, Squires-Wheeler E, Keats BJB. Male sexual orientation and genetic evidence [Letter]. Science 1993;262:2063-2064. (Highly technical and mathematical critique of Dean Hamer's 1993 study, suggesting that Hamer's conclusions were not objective because of inconsistencies. It concluded, "There is little disagreement that male homosexual orientation is not a Mendelian trait. In fact, a priori, one would expect the role of a major gene in male orientation to be limited because of the strong selective pressures against such a gene. It is unlikely that a major gene underlying such a common trait could persist over time without an extraordinary counterbalancing mechanism."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jeffrey Satinover, M.D., former Fellow in Psychiatry and Child Psychiatry at Yale:

"Two profoundly mistaken ideas have sunk deeply into public sentiment where they exert a powerful influence in the shaping of public policy as it relates to family, sexuality and marriage. 1) Homosexuality is genetic, and that consequently, 2) Homosexuality is unchangeable.

Neither idea is true, and in fact there is a mountain of scientific evidence to the contrary. The Americans most severely harmed by the propagation of these untruths are the very large number of homosexuals who wish nothing more than to rid themselves of these unwanted impulses and establish quiet marriages and families. The gay and lesbian activism that claims to speak for these many struggling fellow citizens speaks for their interests in no way whatsoever. Completely ignored are the very large number of people who have already succeeded in leaving homosexuality behind."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The attempt to depict sodomy as some predestined fate is an integral part of the over all campaign of secularism against the monotheistic milestone notion of free will

Absolute Nihilism Vs. Absolute Truth

Linda Page, former school principal and education consultant:

"Our kids will be bombarded with the propaganda from books such as Heather Has Two Mommies....Same-sex 'marriage' is a result of a destructive, narcissistic way of thinking and of 'value-neutral' curriculums....We have communicated to students that all values are equal. How ludicrous...."

NARTH spoke to Jeffrey Burke Satinover, M.D., a diplomate of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology and a diplomate of the C.G. Jung Institute of Zurich, Switzerland. A recently published author, he is now in private practice in Connecticut.

The following text is taken from a radio interview in which Dr. Satinover was a guest.
He spoke to the interviewer as follows:

"In America of late, truth has become subject to terrible political pressure... I think many people have a sense, especially in America, that too many barriers have come down. We now have so little of a moral compass that we're really completely at sea. We're awash in the tide of unconstrained instinctive behaviors which are all being labeled "okay" because nobody really has a sense, any more, as to what's right and what's wrong. In Joseph Campbell's words, "Follow your bliss." This has led us into a growing barbarism...

Now we are now looking at a generation of young people who are exposed to a sometimes explicit, and sometimes implicit set of values that says that homosexuality is perfectly okay--it's just a complement to heterosexuality.

The implication of such a set of values to an impressionable, possibly confused and certainly exploring youngster, is that there is no reason whatsoever not to go out and try it and see whether it fits. It's simply that a door has been opened and a certain number of people will walk through that door and thereby expose themselves to terrible risks at an age where they are not really capable of making intelligent judgments about the risks.

In the news, now, we're hearing so many overblown claims of a genetic foundation for homosexuality. The whole subject of behavioral genetics is complex. It does not lend itself to sound bites at all.

The real genetic question is--what is it in the background of people who become homosexual that opens that door for them, whereas the door is essentially closed for other people?

In a nutshell, every behavioral trait in human nature has a genetic component. For example, basketball playing is clearly genetic. If you were to perform on basketball players the kinds of studies that have been done on homosexuality, you would find an unequivocal genetic association--very powerful, probably much stronger than there is with homosexuality. But if you ask yourself what that's about--it's clear that it's NOT that there is a gene for basketball playing...

A recent article in a psychiatric publication informed us that 30% of all 20-year-old homosexual men will be HIV- positive or dead by the age of thirty. You would think that the objective, ethical medical approach would be: let's use anything that works to try to take these people out of their posture of risk. If it means getting them to wear condoms, fine. If it means getting them to give up anal intercourse, fine. If it means getting them to give up homosexuality, fine. But that last intervention is the one intervention that is absolutely taboo.

There is no doubt that a cold, statistical analysis of this epidemic would lead you to the conclusion that this attitude of political correctness is killing a substantial portion of those people. I think there is an element of denial, in the psychological sense, of what gay-related illnesses really mean.

The normalization of homosexuality was a classic example where the American Psychiatric Association knuckled under to a victim group's pressure tactics...

The reason the APA talks about disorders--rather than illnesses--is precisely because there are very, very few mental illnesses where underlying pathophysiology is even suspected. In most cases, if you are going to use the term illness, you would have to use it as a metaphor. They are possibly spiritual illnesses, or they are ways of life that are consensually undesirable. But they don't necessarily reflect some underlying disorder in the hardware that backs up the mind.

And so the whole question of what constitutes psychiatric illness is already so weak that it opened the door for activists to come in and make a change in the nomenclature without even having to appeal to rigorous scientific standards...

The underlying problem is clearly that we've lost our moorings in terms of what life is all about. We don't know what's good and what's evil. People simply have lost the ability now to stand up and say this is good, this is bad, this is what I believe in.

We've now entered into a stage in our civilization of absolute nihilism, where the opinion leaders--the people who should be the moral exemplars--are simply espousing a philosophy of absolute nihilism. That's simply what it amounts to. The language is very fancy--deconstructionism, relativism, etc.--but what it all boils down to is that there is nothing outside of the cogitations in one's own skull. It seems to me that anybody with even a passing familiarity with history should see that that kind of an attitude leads nowhere but to destruction...

In adopting the methods of science to understand the human psyche, psychology and psychiatry have inadvertently put forth a philosophy of life that says the psyche is really illusion."

NARTH Interviews Dr. Satinover

Q: How did you get involved in the issue of homosexuality?

A: I had been reading Leanne Payne's The Healing Presence... I was invited to a conference of hers and I accepted. At that time, I did not even know that the conference was related to homosexuality... There I met hundreds of people struggling with that issue, and many who had successfully emerged on the other side and were married with children...

The struggle against homosexuality is like so many of the desperate challenges that are common to our modern age--so many people are wrestling with the results of emotional deprivation within the family, because damaged childhoods are so endemic... These people had found their way back from the greatest degree of brokenness to embody the values that our culture has always held dear (at least, until recently).

Q: Should the American Psychiatric Association have de-pathologized homosexuality?

...There are many psychological "illnesses" which cannot be adequately or convincingly explained using the medical model of psychiatry. Being homosexual is not like having a tumor. We should throw out the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and start carefully rethinking all of these so-called illnesses. Right now, the DSM is mostly a collection of problems labeled illnesses because they are simply consensually undesirable within our present culture. But at base, they are really issues of values, philosophy, and character.

How can we "prove" to the psychiatric establishment that homosexuality is psychologically unhealthy? When we tried to defend the idea that homosexuality is a disorder as evidenced by the higher associated suicide rate, gay activists said that the suicide was not due to the inherently dissatisfying nature of the condition--it was due to the stresses of homophobia. When we point to the high level of gay promiscuity, they said we were using a narrow, "heterosexist" and outdated definition of promiscuity. Gays could be emotionally faithful to one partner, they argued, while being sexually active with many partners.

And you can't get around those arguments unless you're actually willing to say that promiscuity is an inferior way of life. You need to be able to say that some certain standard is better. If we can't settle on a shared higher vision, then it's amazing what we must be prepared to accept. For example, there is actually a growing body of literature in sexological journals arguing that the psychological and emotional benefits of promiscuity more than outweigh the risks to life from AIDS.

So that is the fundamental flaw of psychology--it is meaningless without the backdrop of a framework of values. There I believe homosexuality--like narcissism--is best viewed as a spiritual and moral illness.

Now psychology as a discipline must step up to the table and accept responsibility for the extent to which it has been propagating an amoral ethos. Dostoevsky put it best in The Grand Inquisitor: "Without God, everything is permissible."

"Don't Forsake Homosexuals Who Want Help"

Wall Street Journal (01/09/97) P. A12; Socarides, Charles; Kaufman, Benjamin; Nicolosi, Joseph; et al.

Although treatment is available for men who experience an unwanted sexual attraction to other men, it is denied to many potential patients because of political pressure, claim the writers of an Wall Street Journal commentary. Charles Socarides, a clinical professor of psychiatry at Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and colleagues, contend that, without treatment, men with unwanted homosexual inclinations become depressed and turn to unprotected sex, increasing their risk for HIV infection. The authors cite as an example a study that found that 38 percent of homosexual adolescents had engaged in unprotected sex in the previous six months. Socarides et al. conclude that the lives of many men who died of AIDS could have been saved had their attempts to seek treatment for homosexuality been successful.

Anthony Falzarano, executive director of Transformation Ministries:

"I am a former homosexual. I lived that lifestyle from the time I was 17 until I was 26. I entered the gay lifestyle thinking that there really wasn't any choice for me. What I didn't realize is that although I didn't choose to be homosexual, I did not have to be gay. I had a choice. I could change my orientation....four national ex-gay networks are currently ministering to more than 10,000 former homosexuals. Many of us are sick and tired of a lifestyle that initially seems very freeing but eventually puts us in all kinds of bondage and eventually will kill us. I have lost over 35 of my friends and acquaintances to the disease of AIDS and don't want to see one more person become infected...."

Even if there was some substance to that "gene theory" (which, in light of the above, I doubt) - since when is the existence of some gene, a good enough reason for justifying wild promiscuous behavior that endangers the physical, as well as the moral structure of a whole society?

"Japanese researchers have announced results of a genetic study of the enzymes ADH and ALDH among alcoholics; Yomiuri Shimbun (18 Feb 1994), 30. Alcoholic patients were found to have two alleles for low levels of ADH and two alleles for high levels of ADLH, something found in 4.5% of Japanese. A biochemical study of the dopamine receptor gene is P.V. Gejman et al., "No structural mutation in the dopamine D2 receptor gene in alcoholism or schizophrenia. Analysis using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis", JAMA 271 (1994), 204-8. A paper reporting an addiction gene is discussed in Science 263 (1994), 176."

Will somebody cancel AAA and say alcoholics should drink as much as they want - because of the gene?

"The study of male cocaine addicts reported a linkage to the A1 allele of the D2 dopamine receptor. The use of the drug bromocriptine to treat alcoholics with the D2 dopamine receptor A1 allele is in Nature Medicine 1 (1995), 337-41."

So, how about allowing cocaine usage, in light of the above?

"The AJMG Neuropsychiatric Genetics issue (15 June) 54: 83-157, contains many papers, especially on schizophrenia linkage studies. Also on schizophrenia, Lancet 343 (1994), 1044-6. A study on the gene causing maniac depression is in PNAS (15 June)."

And why should be schizophrenia be considered an aliment, while homosexuality is "natural behavior"? If they are both cause by a gene?

"The debate over genetic links to violence, from a Danish study, continues to evoke strong emotions, Science 263 (1994), 1375. A discussion of aggressive behavior and mutations in monoamine oxidase gene is Current Biology 4: 175-7. Also on violence, New Scientist (26 Feb 1994), 10, 31-3. A book review of The Psychology of Crime, is Nature 368 (1994), 111."

The next step then, will be to abolish criminal law altogether...

Down The Drain

Urine sex: About 10% of Kinsers gays reported having engaged in "golden showers" [drinking or being splashed with urine). In the largest survey of gays ever conducted, 23% admitted to urine-sex. In the largest random survey of gays, 29% reported urine-sex. Of 655 gays, only 24% claimed to have been monogamous in the past year. Of these monogamous gays, 5% drank urine, 7% practiced "fisting", 33% ingested feces via anal/oral contact, 53% swallowed semen, and 59% received semen in their rectum in the previous month.

The typical sexual practices of homosexuals are a medical horror story. Imagine exchanging saliva, feces, semen and/or blood with dozens of different men each year. Imagine drinking urine, ingesting feces and experiencing rectal trauma on a regular basis. Often these encounters occur while the participants are drunk, high on drugs, and/or in an orgy setting. Further, many of them occur in extremely unsanitary places (bathrooms, dirty peep shows), or, because homosexuals travel so frequently, in other parts of the world. Every year about a quarterofhomosexuals visit another country. Fresh American germs get taken to Europe, Africa and Asia. And their fresh germs come here. Foreign homosexuals regularly visit the U.S. and participate in this biological swapmeet.

Unfortunately the danger of these exchanges does not merely affect homosexuals. Travelers carried so many tropical diseases to New York City that it had to institute a tropical disease center, and gays carried HIV from New York City to the rest of the world. Most of the 6,349 Americans who got AIDS from contaminated blood as of 1992 received it from homosexuals and most of the women in California who got AIDS through heterosexual activity got it from men who engaged in homosexual behavior. The rare form of airborne scarlet fever that stalked San Francisco in 1976 also started among homosexuals. There is a pattern here that we ignore at our peril. With the rise of these new contagious diseases, homosexuality not only raises our medical costs, it also increases the hazards of medical care, receiving blood, and eating out.

Homosexuals are sexually troubled people engaging in dangerous activities. It is neither a kindness to those tempted by homo-sexuality, nor wise of us to encourage or legitimize such a destructive lifestyle.

From U.S.NEWS & WORLD REPORT- August 17,1992

A Society Resolved To Commit Suicide?

"Heather Has Two Mommies" is a children's book about a lesbian couple having a child through artificial insemination. It is one of many books listed in the first-grade teachers' guide for New York City public schools. So is "Daddy's Roommate," which features a happy youngster with two male parents who concludes that "being gay is just one more kind of love."
So how did these books make it onto the reading list?
The answer is tucked away on Page 145 of the city's "Children of the Rainbow" first-grade curriculum: Teachers must "be aware of varied family structures, including ... gay or lesbian parents," and "Children must be taught to acknowledge the positive aspects of each type of household." A line is being crossed here; in fact a brand new ethic is descending upon the city's public school system. The traditional civic virtue of tolerance (if gays want to live together, it's their own business) has been replaced with a new ethic requiring approval and endorsement (if gays want to live together, we must "acknowledge the positive aspects" of their way of life).
---------------------------------------------------------

A letter writer to Newsday said: "If my wife and I choose to believe in what the Holy Scriptures say about homosexuality, it is not up to teachers, or any municipal or political group, public or private to refute these teachings." His letter amounts to a case for traditional pluralism. He approves of banning religion from the schools; that is, he is willing to park his values at the schoolhouse door, but he wants the gays to park theirs outside too. However, under the new city school curriculum, this sort of tolerance is gone. The letter writer's beliefs are not just ignored by a value-neutral curriculum. They are overridden by newly imposed values.
---------------------------------------------------------

Journalist Richard Vigilante, writing in The City Journal, a conservative New York quarterly, says that "to ask people to accept in their own children's schools a curriculum that undermines or contradicts their own deeply held moral beliefs is to ask of them an enormous sacrifice. If Americans do not have the right to maintain, for themselves and their families, moral beliefs taught for millennia by the religions to which between 70 and 90 percent of the population subscribe, then a lot of us are living in the wrong country." To slough off the distress of parents who learn that their 6-year-olds "are to be taught the positive side of homosexuality," he says, "is not tolerance but moral and intellectual imperialism."
---------------------------------------------------------

Recently, at a "gay pride" march in New York City, the NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association), whose motto is "sex before eight or else its too late," passed out leaflets commending pedophilia while sodomites and lesbian profligates marched under a banner reading "Man-Boy Love is Beautiful."
---------------------------------------------------------

The militant gay activist, Michael Swift proclaimed: "We shall sodomize your sons." He favored revoking all laws against homosexual activity and closing all churches who condemned the gay death style. He further stated: "Our only gods are handsome young men."
But the real foundation of this contemptible perversion was succinctly related in a March 26, 1992 editorial defending pedophilia in the Sentinel, a San Francisco "gay" publication: "The love between man and boy is the foundation of homosexuality."
---------------------------------------------------------

Better watch your kids. They are after your children. Sodomites don't reproduce, they recruit.
---------------------------------------------------------

>

"To Cast Aside Millennia Of Moral Teaching"

The notion that homosexual activity is a fundamental right is a recent invention. In his concurring opinion in "Bowers v. Hardwick", where the Supreme Court upheld the Georgia prohibition of consensual sodomy, Chief Justice Burger stated:

Decisions of individuals relating to homosexual conduct have been subject to state intervention throughout the history of Western Civilization. Condemnation of those practices is firmly rooted in Judeo-Christian moral and ethical standards. Homosexual sodomy was a capital crime under Roman law.... During the English Reformation when powers of the ecclesiastical courts were transferred to the King's Courts, the first English statute criminalizing sodomy was passed.... Blackstone described "the infamous crime against nature" as an offense of "deeper malignity" than rape, an heinous act "the very mention of which is a disgrace to human nature," and "a crime not fit to be named." ... The common law of England, including its prohibition of sodomy, became the received law of Georgia and the other Colonies.... To hold that the act of homosexual sodomy is somehow protected as a fundamental right would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching.