"I may not be multiple , but I'm certainly plural ! "- Jaye

Welcome to the Wonderful World of the MidContinuum!

The dissociative continuum, that is.

While there is a small but growing collection of resources on the net devoted to MP (both orthodox and otherwise , there seems to be very little that discusses the experience of being "neither fish nor fowl", neither clearly multiple nor clearly singleton.

This makes it even harder for those of us who find ourselves in the midcontinuum to accept and understand our own experience. We hope with this page to provide validation for those people in this situation, as well as a chance to discuss similarities and differences in experience along the whole continuum.


What is the Dissociative Continuum?

Caveat: We have no training in the theory of dissociation. What follows is our understanding based on what we have learned from reading, discussion, and experience.
Everyone dissociates. At one end of the dissociative continuum is "normal" or "common" dissociation that nearly everyone engages in, such as daydreaming, highway hypnosis or other forms of spacing out, or getting lost in a book. At the other end are the behaviors that characterize "classical" multiples, who may have large numbers of very distinct insiders with little internal communication, serious difficulties with time loss, amnesia, and so on.

Between these two extremes, there is a lot of gray. Ranging from having different "roles" that you live out in different situations, to having an "inner child" or "inner children" with varying degrees of separateness, to having "ego states", "parts" or "fragments" that don't seem to be whole people, to having some but not all of the diagnostic criteria for what is now known as DID, Dissociative Identity Disorder (formerly MPD, Multiple Personality Disorder). 

Some things about being in the midcontinuum

Spoiler warning! In this section, we talk about some of the forms of denial that are especially hard to deal with in the midcontinuum. Sometimes it is helpful to hear that other people have struggled with the same forms of denial. At other times, however, even hearing about it, even when it is discussed in a supportive context, can be upsetting.

Please be safe. If you are feeling fragile about believing in yourself(ves), or just feeling fragile generally, please consider whether you want to skip this section for the moment. You can either jump to the following section on this page, or jump to an essay that might be helpful in dealing with this issue.

End spoiler warning. Now back to our regularly scheduled topic.

Share your experience here

We would like to add other people's descriptions of their experience of the mid-continuum to this page. This is one way we can validate each other, and get a little bit more information "out there". If you would be willing to share your experience here, please email us ( vickis@asarian.org ). You can be as anonymous as you like in what you share; we can either link to your web site, or post what you send us on ours. And our thanks to those who've allowed us to link them to this page!!

Some of our writings on living plural

These are essays that we've written that specifically address the topic of plurality in some way. They're also linked from another section of our web page, but in this section we will collect only those which pertain to this topic.

Resources

These are places which we've found to be generally welcoming of midcontinuum dissociatives. If you know of more, let us know !
alt.support.dissociation
Just like it says in the newsgroup name. It's not just for MPs, it's for supportive discussion of dissociation in all its forms. And there are a lot more midcontinuum types out there posting than you might think from a first impression.
SANCTUARY, Inc
We could say a great many wonderful things about Sanctuary, but instead we invite you to click here to get to the SANCTUARY home page and find out more about it.
Amongst Ourselves
We were sent mail by the founders of this website and companion email list. It seems to be a bit heavy on the "disorder" terminology for our taste. Although it is described as a list and website for DID, the invitation and front page of the website also do specifically mention DD-NOS, which is often the category that mid continuum folks would end up in if they were given a diagnosis, so we decided to include it here. We haven't participated in it ourselves, so can't recommend it one way or another.
 Not Quite Plural
Someo has formed a "Yahoo Club" specifically dedicated to people in the mid continuum! Although we'd prefer a name like "Not Quite Multiple", thus leaving "plural" broad enough to cover the midcontinuum too, we think this is a great idea. Yahoo clubs have message boards and chat rooms, so this is a good place to go to find other midcontinuum folk to talk to.

Second thoughts about this whole model

Okay. We suppose this had to happen. We are starting to wonder whether the "dissociative continuum" is really the best model to use, for us, the members of the dissociative community, to organize and define ourselves by.

See, the problem is this. It was made up by doctors and other medical types, who perceived dissociation as "the problem" and multiplicity as "a disorder". Well - we don't believe it's a disorder, and we don't believe dissociation is always a problem. People get classified along this continuum - see, we noticed this as we were writing this page - what happens is that instead of _behaviors_ getting classified as more or less dissociative, _people_ get classified along it. With the presumption, of course, that the closer you are to the "singleton" end, the "better" or "healthier" you are.

Furthermore - we don't know about anybody else out there, and we'd love to hear other people's opinions on this - but we don't experience dissociation as a continuum. It looks and feels more like a two dimensional space, to us. One sort of dissociation feels like distancing, spacing, numbing. That would be one axis. The other sort feels like barriers, separation, disconnection, distinctness. That would be the other axis. They are experientially different sensations for us, and we are not entirely convinced that they are different points along the same continuum.

So basically, we begin to wonder whether "plurality" and "dissociation" are actually two different things. And we take as our starting point that plurality is not the problem. However, many dissociative behaviors or manifestations are problems, for the people and households that experience them. The solution is to work on the specific behaviors or manifestations... not to paint dissociation as "bad".

Several of our readers have sent in comments on this topic - our thanks to them, this is great! We are always looking for more contributions!