|
Columns
/ Current
Issue / Goldberg
File / Nota
Bene / Subscribe
/ Ad
Info / Washington
Bulletin / Home
|
3.17.00 2.16.00 |
||
2/16/00
11:00 a.m. Baseless Republicans Can't throw out the pro-growth conservative agenda. By Stephen Moore, NR contributing editor |
||
ate last year one of Washington's leading political consultants
confided to me that Republicans will have two overriding themes in this year's
election: money and moderation. Money: raise as much of it as possible.
Moderation: run to the 50-yard line on the political playing field, and camp
out there. I realized then that we were in for a long year.
John McCain's New Hampshire miracle seems to thoroughly validate that "moderation" model. Seemingly every talking head in Washington agrees that voters even Republican voters don't want tax cuts and don't want "risky schemes" for Social Security. Instead, they allegedly want fiscal moderation meaning Eisenhower-style debt retirement with the multi-trillion dollar tax surplus. Not so fast. The Washington-based Club for Growth just released findings from a Zogby poll of 1,000 Republican voters that every GOP office-seeker should read and then memorize. The poll verifies that if the GOP de-emphasizes its core cluster of growth issues, its conservative base will evaporate. One question asked: How likely would you be to turn out to vote in the 2000 elections if the Republican congressional candidate supported simplifying the current IRS tax system? 82 percent responded very likely; 11 percent somewhat likely. Only 3 percent said not likely. A second question asked: How likely would you be to turn out to vote in the 2000 elections if the Republican congressional candidates supported allowing workers to place some or all of their payroll tax dollars into an individual retirement account? Sixty-six percent said they would be "very likely" to vote for the candidate, 22 percent said "somewhat likely," and only 7 percent said "not likely." The new GOP strategy capitulating to Clintonite nanny-state spending initiatives, "saving Social Security" instead of taking bold first steps to privatize it, and backpedaling on tax cuts has already been tried once before. That experiment was called the 1998 midterm election; and it wasn't a pretty picture. Conservatives stayed home, and the big GOP gains in Congress that had been predicted simply vaporized; GOP majorities were narrowed. Given the widespread mood of voter contentment around the country, the GOP might not be able to win even with its pro-growth conservative agenda. But the Club for Growth poll indicates they don't have a snowball's chance in hell of winning without them. |
||
|
Columns
/ Current
Issue / Goldberg
File / Nota
Bene |
||
National Review 215 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10016 212-679-7330 Customer Service: 815-734-1232.
Contact
Us.
|