|
Yes you are partly right about that, you could see Newspeak this way. I was in fact mocking the various so-called universal languages which have been proposed over the years.
C.K.Ogden, who proposed Basic English, thought English had evolved towards structural simplicity and semantic purity, and I was a supporter of his theories for a while. But I saw in it a certain authoritarian, even imperialistic streak. To illustrate the likeness from my novel: Ogden stated that verbs are wasteful - the character Syme says that ''the great wastage is in verbs''; Ogden also recommended that all antonyms should be formed regularly and transparently, for example, straight/unstraight, etc - Syme : ''What need is there for a word like ''bad''? ''Ungood'' will do just as well''. Wittgenstein was another advocate of a
logically perfect language, which presented a closed system that can say nothing of reality outside itself - Newspeak corresponds term by term with a certain political reality, designed to render inaccessible other realities.
Yours
George
|