Techworld - the UK's infrastructure and network knowledge centre
  • The switches and routers and the infrastructure that drive the enterprise
  • Dealing with storage technology: from Fibre Channel to SANs; from tape libraries to RAID
  •  Keeping your network safe: all about current viruses, worms and vulnerabilities
  • The enterprise is no longer bound by four walls and wires; making use of airwaves
  • How to handle enterprise software across the network
  • Windows or Apple? Unix or Linux? What to choose
  • nav
Network Awards

Home | News | Insight | How-tos | White papers | Case studies | Interviews | Briefings | Reviews

Print-friendly page

March 16, 05

Bluetooth and ZigBee: compare and contrast

Different tools for different jobs

By Joanie Wexler, Network World

Bluetooth and ZigBee have much in common. Both are types of IEEE 802.15 "wireless personal-area networks," or WPANs. Both run in the 2.4-GHz unlicensed frequency band, and both use small form factors and low power.

At the Wireless Communications Alliance's February meeting in Silicon Valley, Bhupender Virk, president and CEO of WPAN components maker CompXs, sorted out the application and technical differences between Bluetooth (IEEE 802.15.1) and the ZigBee specification (based on IEEE 802.15.4), which was ratified in December.

ZigBee controls sensors
ZigBee protocols define a type of sensor network for residential and commercial applications such as heating, air conditioning and lighting control. It combines IEEE 802.15.4, which defines the physical and MAC protocol layers, with network, security and application software layers as specified by the ZigBee Alliance, a consortium of technology companies (see Zigbee starts its rise to power).

Imagine the freedom if light switches were to become wireless, eliminating the electrical cabling through your walls, for example.

Bluetooth eliminates cables
Bluetooth, as you likely know, eliminates cabling between electronic products and accessories, such as between computers and printers or between phones and headsets. Bluetooth users with handhelds or laptops can exchange files, business cards and calendar appointments. Bluetooth is more oriented toward user mobility and eliminating short-distance cabling; ZigBee aims more for grand-scale automation and remote control.

The recently ratified version 2 of Bluetooth, improves its functions significantly, and will appear in products this year.

The first ZigBee products are now in interoperability testing through April, says Virk, who expects alliance-certified products to be available in the third quarter (when he says CompXs will ship a ZigBee protocol analyzer). Industry reports imply that, eventually, ZigBee might be built into mobile phones via dual-function ZigBee-Bluetooth chips for remote control of nearly anything you can think of and for buying items from vending machines.

Finally, for the geeks among us, Virk pointed out some technical differences between the two protocols:

  • Modulation technique
    Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS)
    ZigBee: Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS)

  • Protocol stack size
    250 kbyte
    ZigBee: 28 kbyte

  • Battery
    Intended for frequent recharging
    ZigBee: Not rechargeable (one reason batteries will last for up to 10 years)

  • Maximum network speed:
    1 Mbit/s
    ZigBee:250 kbit/s

  • Network range:
    1 or 100m, depending on radio class
    ZigBee: Up to 70m

  • Typical network join time
    3 seconds
    ZigBee: 30 milliseconds

<< previous | next >>