Template for Creating New Headers - Must Add Banman Zone
home| search jobs | my account employer profiles | career center | about us | for employers
Key Sponsors


Village Archive  Categories
Business, Finance & Economics
Careers, Workplace, Employment
Civil, Human & Equal Rights
Education & Academia
Opinion and Letters
Politics & Law
World Affairs
Special
Announcements
Organizations & Links
Quick Job Search


 
My Job Tools Login

Username:


Password:

Forgot your username or password?

Women's Village News
villages/woman/ AP Headlines Update Page
Women's groups urge Bush to withdraw nominee for refugee post
Study: Gender, race gap still exists in sports admin
Miers indicated she supported ban on most abortions
VT conference teaches women to weld, use chain saws
Ark State U to honor Hattie Caraway Oct 24
Specials

"Wall of Angels"
Employers announcing open jobs, other aid available to those displaced by Katrina

New! 140 Carondelet, New Orleans Street Billboard

Internships, coops, summer gigs, and entry-level jobs for new grads

Pharmaceutical Careers Channel

Graduate School Opportunities Channel

What's New with the IMDiversity site renovation
 

WHM Profile: U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer

As top vote-getter and a champion for electoral justice, the California Senator is the activist-author's 2005 Woman of the Year

By Elena Ong

 

Elected to the U.S. Senate in 1992, the “Year of the Woman,” U.S. Senator Boxer has been a leading force and champion for social justice, economic justice and environmental justice, On November 2, 2004, Boxer made history by mobilizing the 2004 vote, receiving 7 Million votes, which is the highest total for any candidate in the nation, except for the two presidential candidates, and the highest total for any Senate candidate in U.S. history.[i]  On January 6, 2005, she also made history by being the only Senator in U.S. history to join 31 members of U.S. Congress, to interrupt a joint session of Congress to champion the fight for electoral justice.[ii]

We all remember the 2000 Presidential Election.  It was a cliff-hanger.  By 9 PM, November 7, 2000, the election results in New Mexico, Oregon and Florida were too close to call, and neither presidential candidate received the 270 electoral votes it would take to win the election outright.  By the time the clock struck midnight, Mr. Gore received 255 electoral votes and Mr. Bush received 246 votes.  Americans went to bed believing that we would wake up the morning after to learn who our President would be.  Instead, Americans got a rude “wake-up call” when we discovered that because of voting irregularities and “pregnant” chads, the electorate’s vote no longer counted, and that the fate of the presidency could be decided by “just one vote” of a U.S. Supreme Court Justice.

I used to encourage my friends to vote by cajoling them, “Remember to vote by 8 PM on Election Day because there’s no such thing as a “morning-after” vote.” But I don’t say that anymore.  Why?  Because our nation, and the world, hung in limbo, for a total of 36 “morning-afters,” without knowing officially who the President of the United States would be between November 7 – December 13, 2000.  The Dow Jones plummeted.  Our nation’s credit rating changed.  Worse, concerns about the fairness and accuracy of the voting process in Florida made American voters lose faith in the integrity of the bedrock of our nation’s the electoral process.  The country was on an emotional roller-coaster.  Hearts pounded as both parties witnessed the official recount of the Florida vote that ultimately declared George W. Bush the victor by a razor-thin margin of 537 votes and 5 electoral college votes.  Emotions ran high when the U.S. Supreme Court voted 7-2 to end the recount, and 5-4 that no new recount be conducted.  Hearts fell numb as Al Gore officially conceded the election to George W. Bush at 9 PM, December 13, 2000.  But nothing compares to the sense of hopelessness that overwhelmed America when members of Congress stood up to express their concerns about voter disenfranchisement, and not one of their colleagues in the U.S. Senate joined them to validate their concern during the joint session of Congress that confirmed the presidential vote on January 6, 2001.

Voters were in a state of denial or confusion.  Americans lost faith in their democratic ideals, and no longer believed that their vote mattered, even though Blacks sought the right to vote but didn’t get that right until 1868 when the 14th Amendment was ratified, and women waged a 72-year battle for women’s suffrage but didn’t get that right until 1920 when the 19th Amendment was ratified.   Others who believed in democracy wanted to take matters in their own hands, by advancing the “Help America Vote Act” and mobilizing new and existing voters to reclaim democracy by voting in numbers in the 2004 election.  The system was broken, and it was up to every day people, non-profit organizations and 527’s to take charge and mobilize the vote for the 2004 presidential election.  In fact that was what inspired so many of us in the non-partisan community – www.shevotes.org, APIA Vote!, Asian Pacific American Women’s Leadership Institute, National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum – to work with www.onevoteradio.org to produce and air culturally-relevant “Get Out the Vote” Public Service Announcements in 14 different languages, targeting women, and women of color, nationwide, to register and vote on November 2. [iii]

The good news is, we succeeded!


MAJORITY OF VOTERS IN EACH CATEGORY
VOTED FOR BOXER IN 2004[xiii]

 

 

 

 

% Voting

% of 2004

 

Boxer

Voters

 

 

 

Total Voters

 

 

 

 

 

First Time Voter

70%

 

Repeat Voter

57%

 

 

 

 

Women

63%

52%

Men

54%

48%

 

 

 

African-American

84%

6%

Latina/o

72%

18%

Asian/Other

68%

9%

White

51%

67%

 

 

 

18-29

63%

22%

30-44

57%

28%

45-59

57%

27%

60 or older

59%

23%

 

 

 

Jewish

83%

4%

Other Religions

78%

8%

No Preference

68%

15%

Catholic

65%

28%

Protestant

44%

45%

 

 

 

Post Graduate

65%

17%

College Grad

61%

29%

HS Grad or Less

58%

20%

Some College

54%

34%

 

 

 

Democrat

92%

43%

Independent/Nonpartisan

60%

21%

Republican

15%

36%

 

 

 

Source: Field Research Corporation, Vote in 2004 Election: Vol 1, 2005.

 

Record Voting

We broke a new record and got 122 Million voters to the polls,[iv] 10 Million more than in 2000!  On November 2, 2004, the percent of women who voted increased from 52% in 2000[v] to 54% in 2004[vi] and the percent of unmarried women voters increased by 7.5 M, from 19% in 2000 to 23% in 2004.[vii]    The total number of women voters increased by 7 Million, from 59.3 Million in 2000[viii] to 66 Million in 2004.[ix]

I’m also proud to report that my state, California, turned out 11% of the nation’s vote![x]  We turned out a record high of 12.6 Million voters in 2004, 1.4 Million more voters than in 2000.   Voter turnout was 75%, the highest we’ve had in the last 24 years!   The number of women voters who voted increased by 600,000 voters, from 5.9 M in 2000 to 6.5 M in 2004, and the number of men voters increased by 800,000 voters, from 5.2 M in 2000 to 6.0 M in 2004.[xi]

Why did Californians turn-out in record numbers?   To vote for U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer and for U.S. Presidential Candidate John Kerry, in that order.

Boxer was California’s #1 vote-getter, receiving 0.3 Million more votes than presidential candidate U.S. Senator John Kerry, and 1.5 Million more votes than U.S. President George W. Bush. 

Boxer attracted first-time voters - 70% of first-time voters cast their vote for Boxer, and 61% for Kerry.[xii]   And that’s because Boxer has broad appeal.  The majority of women, men, every racial/ethnic group, every age group, and every income group, voted for US Senator Boxer.

 

Why Boxer?

Why did California voters vote for Boxer?  Boxer’s voting record and her leadership on issues that California’s women care about.

According to the California Opinion Poll, 80% of California’s women are concerned about the well-being of children, 75% about education and the schools, 72% about health, 65% about the well-being of seniors, the cost of living and the war, 58% about crime and law enforcement, 57% about the economy and 53% about the environment.  These are areas Boxer championed for California. 

So when Californians voted on November 2, they voted because of Boxer's record of leadership on issues California's women care about:

Children: Boxer led the fight in the Senate to require handguns sold in the U.S. to have child safety locks. She co-sponsored the Family and Medical Leave Act and the Working Families Child Care Act, and authored the Children’s Environmental Protection Act and the Violence Against Children Act.

Education: Boxer introduced the law that authorized funding for Local After School Programs and the School Safety Fund Act to fund Violence Prevention Programs at the schools. She also, established the Excellence in Education Award, authored the Computer Donation Incentive Act, and successfully amended the 1999 Juvenile Justice Bill.

Health: Boxer is the Senate’s leading defender of a woman’s right to choose, she fought to remove the Hyde Amendment, and she led the floor fight to ensure passage of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act. She authored the Freedom of Choice Act, she introduced the Family Planning and Choice Act, and advocated for contraception, prenatal care and abortion in the President’s National Health Care Plan. She introduced the Health Insurance Tax Relief Act and the Women’s Autoimmune Diseases Research & Prevention Act and she co-sponsored the Women’s Health Equity Act, the Newborn & Mothers Health Protection Act and the National Research Investment Act.

Elderly: As a former stockbroker, Boxer introduced the 401 K Pension Protection Act and is leading the fight against the privatization of Social Security. She also supports comprehensive prescription drug coverage through Medicare.

Cost of Living: Boxer serves on the Senate Committees on Commerce and Foreign Relations.

War: Boxer voted "no" on enacting an additional $87 Billion for Iraq, "no" the the use of force.  She voted for the creation of the Department of Homeland Security.

Economy: Boxer fought for the passage of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act and for continued funding for the Market Access Program. She supports a 50% Capital Gains Tax Reduction on Investment Profits in Start-Ups and a permanent Research & Experimentation tax credit that would benefit biotechnologic innovation.

Law Enforcement & Safety: Boxer is the Senate’s Leader to ban junk guns – she supported the Brady Bill and formed the Alliance Against Junk Guns. She co-sponsored the Hate Crimes Prevention Act and the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act. She co-authored the Assault Weapons Ban and the Violence Against Women Act.

Post 9/11, she authored the First Responders Homeland Defense Act, the High-Tech Port Security Act and a provision of the 2001 Aviation Security Law. She co-sponsored the Domestic Defense Act, the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act, and a Bioterrorism Bill.

Environment: Boxer is revitalizing the Superfund to make polluters pay to clean up toxic waste they leave behind and blocked a proposed nuclear waste dump. She is leading the fight to remove Arsenic from drinking water & block oil drilling in the Alaska Wildlife Refuge. She introduced the California Ocean Protection Act and the Coastal States Protection Act. She authored the California Wild Heritage Wilderness Act, the Amendment to the Safe Drinking Water Act and co-authored the Bi-partisan Revitalization & Environmental Restoration Act of 2001. She secured federal assistance to promote alternative fuel vehicle industry development, wrote the law to repeal the luxury tax on alternative fuel vehicles, and led the effort to fund electric and natural gas vehicles for California transit and the military.

 

Beyond California

But as Californians cast the largest number of votes ever cast for a U.S. Senator in U.S. history, word of electoral irregularities in Ohio cast doubt on the accuracy of the presidential election.

Ohio’s concerns were documented in the study, “Preserving Democracy:  What Went Wrong in Ohio.”  The report recommended that Congress challenge the results of the electoral tally in Ohio and immediately appoint a joint committee to investigate election irregularities that may have disenfranchised tens of thousands of voters.

Déjà vu. 

Flash back 4 years to January 6, 2001.

Americans recall the scene from the controversial political documentary, “Farenheit 9/11,” that depicts a joint session of US Congress that meets on January 6, 2001 to certify the US Electoral College vote.  Twenty members of the House of Representatives rose one by one to file objections to Florida’s electoral votes, but each was ruled out of order by Al Gore because an 1877 law required that any such objection would have to be sponsored by an U.S. Senator, none of which was willing to do so.[xvi]

Flash forward 4 years to January 6, 2005.

U.S. Congresswoman Stephanie Tubbs Jones from Ohio, seeks the support of members of the U.S. Senate, to join 30 members of the House of Representatives, to challenge the certification of Ohio’s 20 electoral college votes.  The purpose of the challenge was restore our nation’s faith in the electoral process, and not overturn the outcome of the 2004 election.

Only one U.S. Senator rose to the challenge, and that was California’s U.S. Senator Boxer.  

She appealed to her colleagues with the following message:

 

“I have a great respect for all of you.  But I think it is key, whether it is Republicans or Democrats, that we understand that the centerpiece of this country is democracy, and the centerpiece of democracy is ensuring the right to vote.”

“Every citizen of this country who is registered to vote should be guaranteed that their vote matters, that their vote is counted, and that in the voting booth, their vote has as much weight as any senator, any congressperson, any president, any cabinet member, or any CEO of any Fortune 500 corporation.” [xvii]

 

 

January 6, 2005 - Statement of U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer - Objection to the Certification of Ohio’s Electoral Votes
[in new browser window]

 

Boxer joined 31 members of the House of Representatives, not in an attempt to overturn the outcome of the 2004 election, but an effort to highlight ongoing election problems that needed to be corrected to ensure every voter who wants to vote can vote, and that every voter's vote is accurately counted.”

And that why US Senator is my woman of the year.

She doesn’t have to use negative campaign tactics to win an election.  She can inspire and turnout people to vote because of her integrity, and her willingness to take a stand and lead on the issues that Californians care about. 

At the same time, she won’t abandon the nation. 

When Ohio was in trouble, she had the courage to take the high road to protect Ohio, and the rest of the nation, by advancing the ideals of electoral justice.

 

New Page 1

 

Elena Ong is a public affairs leader and political consultant who is recognized by Who’s Who of American Women, Who’s Who in California, Who’s Who in Health Care and Who’s Who in Research for her commitment to improving the health and economic well-being of all Californians.  She is a public speaker and author of “APIA Women in Politics:  Transcending the Glass & Bamboo Ceiling.”  Active in the women’s community, she has held numerous leadership positions including First Vice Chair of the California Commission for Women, Board Member of www.shevotes.org, Co-Founder of the Women’s TownHall, Task Force Member of the National Women’s Political Caucus - California, Steering Committee Member of the California State Economic Network, State Director of the National Women’s Political Caucus – LA/Metro, Public Policy Committee Member of the National Association of Women Business Owners – LA, Technical Assistance Advisory Committee Member of the California Commission for Children and Families, and President of the Los Angeles Women’s Appointment Collaboration.  She attended UC Berkeley, UC San Francisco, the Kennedy School of Government and the Harvard School of Public Health.


IMDiversity.com is committed to presenting diverse points of view. However, the viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at IMD.

 

IMDiversity, Inc.
contact us
© 2005 IMDiversity Inc. All Rights Reserved.
privacy statement