Nitpicking the nitpickers
Since so many people with no military background seem to believe we in the military care about their thoughts on body armor, hardened vehicles, and military tactics, I'm sure everyone will suffer me providing some commentary on how Bob Woodruff and Doug Vogt could have been better protected by ABC News.
Facts provided by various ABC News articles. I will reference photos, which I am too lazy to find and link to, but they are all over the ABC News website.
1. Bob Woodruff did not have his Kevlar helmet on properly. You can clearly see in photos that the strap was not tight around his chin, nor was it properly in place. Mr. Woodruff had allowed the strap to gather loosely around his neck, providing I am sure a better "reporting voice" but also providing the opportunity for his Kevlar to be blown back in the event of a roadside bomb. Better training could have prevented this.
2. The body armor worn by the ABC News crew was completely insufficient for providing actual protection. In every picture you can see that:
A. The armor is being worn loosely, so that the main front plate is below its proper location center chest. Better training and attention to detail could have prevented this.
B. They wore no attachments. That is, there was no shoulder protection, neck protection, groin protection, or side protection. How ABC News can sleep at night knowing that it hasn't provided its reporters the ABSOLUTE BEST in body armor is beyond me.
3. They rode in an Iraqi vehicle. Common sense could have prevented this.
4. Woodruff stood in a hatch while Vogt sat on the ledge of a hatch. Name tape defilade you morons. First they enter an Iraqi vehicle against the suggestion of the US military, but far be it from us to stop a reporter from acting like an idiot. Then they violate basic principles of vehicle movement, and leave both their bodies completely exposed. ABC News is not providing either sense or training to its reporters in the field.
I'm sorry they got hit by an IED. But that doesn't eliminate the fact that the reporters were being stupid in the name of journalism and put themselves a position that virtually guaranteed that they would be injured should enemy activity occur. Which, unfortunately for them, it did.