|
Portrait of
Dr. Richard
von Kraftt-Ebing
(Courtesy of the Archiv und Bibliothet des Schwelen Museums, Berlin) |
Sharon’s death and the publicity surrounding the
case led to an increased interest in understanding deviant sexual
behaviors, especially sadism, masochism and the use of asphyxia during
sexual intercourse. Psychologist Richard von Krafft-Ebing first coined
the terms “sadist” and “masochist” to describe behavior in which
sexual arousal was achieved through the infliction or reception of
pain.
According to Reber’s Dictionary of Psychology,
sadism is the association of sexual pleasure with the inflicting of
physical and psychic pain upon another, including humiliation,
exploitation and debasement. Masochism refers to “any tendency to
direct that which is destructive, painful or humiliating against
oneself.” Psychologist Sigmund Freud was the first to combine the two
terms into “sadomasochism” in an attempt to emphasize the reciprocity
of the use of pain during sexual intercourse (Des de Moor, 1997).
A controversial form of deviant sexual “play”
practiced by some sadomasochists involves the use of strangulation.
Sexual strangulation is referred to by the psychological community as
a form of asphyxiophilia. Asphyxiophilia refers to the general
practice of controlling or restricting oxygen to the brain by
“interfering with the breath directly or through pressure on the
carotid arteries” in order to achieve sexual gratification (The
Deviants’ Dictionary, 1997). Often, the hands or a tourniquet of some
sort is tied around the throat during sexual intercourse or
masturbation to achieve a feeling of euphoria and elation, which
accompanies a lack of oxygen to the brain. Supposedly, this can
increase the intensity of an orgasm.
According to The Deviants’ Dictionary, sexual
strangulation practiced with a partner is a form of “edge play,” in
which one’s life is literally in the hands of another. Supposedly, the
thrill lay in the danger and vulnerability associated with the
activity. However, there have been cases in which such edge play had
resulted in an unintentional death. According to the American
Psychiatric Association, about 250 deaths occur every year in the
United States involving strangulation or chokeholds during sexual
activity. A large majority of these deaths have occurred during
auto-erotic asphyxiation, in which one restricts one’s own oxygen
during masturbation or “solo play.” Jay Wiseman of the Society for
Human Sexuality says that only a few of those cases resulting in a
death, due to strangulation or chokeholds, have involved sexual play
with a partner.
There are many theories to explain why some
people participate in deviant sexual behavior such as sexual
strangulation. One theory suggests that deprivation of normal social
sexual contact or childhood trauma cause such behaviors (Nathan,
Gorman and Salkind, 1999). There are also theories based on
physiological causes of deviant sexual behavior that focus on the
relationship between sexual hormones and the central nervous system
(Psychology Today, 1999). Currently, there is no evidence that
suggests that either Sharon or Bobby suffered from early childhood
trauma, abnormal sexual experiences or hormonal dysfunction.
What makes their case exceptional is that Sharon
ventured into the relationship with one apparent intention -- to die.
Thus, Sharon was a suicidal masochist. However, she was not the first
in history to seek out a willing participant who would fulfill a
request to be strangled to death for sexual gratification.
Knud R. Joergensen wrote in 1995 about the 1791
case of composer Franz Kotzwara who enlisted the help of a London
prostitute, Susannah Hill, to assist him with his bizarre wish. After
paying Hill two shillings, Kotzwara asked her to cut off his genitalia
– a request the prostitute refused. Yet, Hill did agree to fulfill
Kotzwara’s sexual wish of strangling himself with a rope. It was the
first documented case of death by sexual strangulation. Hill was
eventually arrested for Kotzwara’s murder, but later acquitted when
authorities learned that she was more or less an innocent bystander,
unlike Bobby Glass, who more than 200 years later faced first-degree
murder charges for the sexual strangulation death of Sharon Lopatka.
The charge was eventually reduced to voluntary manslaughter.
|
Mugshot of Bobby Glass (News-Topic,
Lenoir, N.C.) |
The case against Bobby Glass stretched on for
three years following several lengthy delays. On January 27, 2000,
Bobby pleaded guilty to voluntary manslaughter, as well as six counts
of second-degree sexual exploitation of a minor. The latter charges
resulted from the pornographic material found on Bobby’s computer.
Bobby was sentenced to 36 to 53 months in prison for the manslaughter
of Sharon Lopatka and 21 to 26 months for the possession of child
pornography.
|
Avery-Mitchell Correctional Institution
(Dept. of Prisons, N.C.) |
He was sent to Avery-Mitchell Correctional
Institution in North Carolina. On February 20, 2002, two weeks before
his release, Bobby Glass had a heart attack. He was pronounced dead at
1:30 a.m. at Spruce Pine Community Hospital in North Carolina.
|