Nanotech: Scientific Realities and Political Bedtime Stories
Lawrence Lessig reminds us that the Smalley-Drexler debate (and the resultant elimination of funds for molecular manufacturing from the National Nanotechnology Initiative) was really about politics, not science:
So why do some scientists say [molecular manufacturing] can't be done? As the editors of Chemical & Engineering News put it, Smalley's "objections go beyond the scientific." They are a strategy - if so-called dangerous nanotech can be relegated to summer sci-fi movies and forgotten after Labor Day, then serious work can continue, supported by billion-dollar funding and uninhibited by the idiocy that buries, for example, stem cell research.
Lessig goes on to bemoan a political process plagued by "irrationality" where policy is based on fears. To which I say: bemoan it all you want but this is the political process we have. Given the situation, it is far better for advanced technology to have advocates like Smalley who know how to lobby for a successful iniative that brings billions of dollars into the field, some of which will go to building various kinds of "intermediate nanotech" which will then serve as a stepping stone to the eventual creation of molecular assemblers anyway... that is assuming such Star-Trekie, pseudoscience contraptions are even possible, which I highly doubt...
Link via Instapundit.
So why do some scientists say [molecular manufacturing] can't be done? As the editors of Chemical & Engineering News put it, Smalley's "objections go beyond the scientific." They are a strategy - if so-called dangerous nanotech can be relegated to summer sci-fi movies and forgotten after Labor Day, then serious work can continue, supported by billion-dollar funding and uninhibited by the idiocy that buries, for example, stem cell research.
Lessig goes on to bemoan a political process plagued by "irrationality" where policy is based on fears. To which I say: bemoan it all you want but this is the political process we have. Given the situation, it is far better for advanced technology to have advocates like Smalley who know how to lobby for a successful iniative that brings billions of dollars into the field, some of which will go to building various kinds of "intermediate nanotech" which will then serve as a stepping stone to the eventual creation of molecular assemblers anyway... that is assuming such Star-Trekie, pseudoscience contraptions are even possible, which I highly doubt...
Link via Instapundit.