Fossil Fuel Subsidies:
A Taxpayer Perspective
Cut
fossil fuel subsidies...
As a
first step toward action on climate change, the U.S. should cut over
$5 billion in annual subsidies to the fossil fuel industry. Eliminating
subsidies for oil, gas, and coal can attract broad political support
because it will save taxpayer money, reduce greenhouse gas emissions,
and eliminate obsolete government programs. Cutting government support
for fossil fuels is a common sense idea supported by economists, climate
scientists, international organizations, and free-market activists.
Taxpayers dont need to wait for international negotiations.
Congress and the Administration should act immediately to cut fossil
fuel subsidies
Save
taxpayers $5 billion a year
The fossil fuel industry is no longer an infant enterprise that
can argue for government nurturing, but a mature industry that does
not deserve government handouts. The sixteen subsidies highlighted
in this fact sheet give coal, oil, and natural gas over $5 billion
per year. The industry has already received more than its fair share,
collecting $150 billion in subsidies from the federal government between
1918 and 1978, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Finally,
many of the existing subsidies, such as funds for a rural electrification
agency, continue to drain tax dollars even though their original purpose
has long been fulfilled or forgotten.
Reduce
greenhouse gas emissions.
Cutting
subsidies can play a part in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Eliminating
all federal energy subsidies would reduce U.S. carbon emissions by
4% annually, or 65-70 million metric tons, according to a study prepared
for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This is 30% of the reduction
the U.S. will need to reach 1990 emission levels, a current benchmark
for reductions acknowledged by President Clinton and other global
leaders.
|
Eliminating $5 billion in annual
subsidies will reduce U.S. greenhouse gas output 30% toward the
goal of freezing emissions at 1990 levels. |
The
16 Worst Subsidies $5 Billion Every Year
- Immediate
Expensing of Exploration and Development Costs $200 million/year
Oil, gas, and coal producers can immediately expense (write
off) most or all of their development costs. Other businesses must
deduct these expenses over a longer period of time.
- Percentage
Depletion Allowance for Oil and Gas $600 million/year
Independent oil and gas companies can deduct 15 percent of their
sales revenue using the special percentage depletion allowance
instead of the standard cost depreciation regardless of the
actual loss in value over time.
- Requiring
Full Coal Firm Support for the Black Lung Fund $350 million/year
Designed to internalize the health-related costs of coal mining,
this fund requires government support to pay for work-related disabilities
of coal miners.
- Intangible
Drilling Costs $500 million/year
Integrated oil and gas companies can immediately deduct 70 percent
of "intangible" drilling costs. Most other businesses
deduct such expenses over time and therefore receive less of a tax
benefit.
- Passive
Loss for Oil and Gas $100 million/year
This tax shelter for investors in oil and gas allows certain
owners to offset "passive losses" against income to pay
lower taxes.
- Non-Conventional
Fuel Production Credit $1.3 billion/year
This tax credit for certain types of fuel extracted from "non-conventional"
sources was intended to provide incentives for petroleum alternatives,
but most of the credit has gone for oil and gas production.
- Tax Breaks
for Enhanced Oil Recovery $100 million/year
Expensing (writing off) tertiary injectant costs and the tax
credit for enhanced oil recovery encourage extraction of
difficult to reach and expensive oil deposit remnants.
- Clean Coal
Technology Program $250 million/ year
This program helps finance private companies to develop cleaner
burning coal technologies by providing up to 50 percent in federal
matching funds.
- Coal R&D
$100 million/year
The Department of Energy supports research in technology programs
for producing, refining, and burning coal products.
- Other Fossil
Energy R&D $100 million/year
The federal government provides subsidies for oil and natural
gas research and development.
- Multilateral
Development Bank Loans for Fossil Fuel $80 million/year
The U.S. federal government supports several multilateral development
banks, which provide loans for fossil fuel development in other
countries.
- Export Import
Bank Guarantees for Fossil Fuel $300 million/year
The Export Import Bank provides federal loan guarantees for
investments in unstable countries. A portion of these loans are
used for fossil fuel development.
- Capital
Gains Treatment of Royalties on Coal $15 million/year
Individual owners (as opposed to corporations) who lease out
their coal mining rights are able to pay capital gains taxes on
these royalties, rather than the higher top individual income tax
rate.
- Income Tax
Exemption for Publicly Owned Utilities $200 million/year
Publicly owned utilities and cooperatives are not subject to
federal income tax on their profits or retained earnings. Some of
these utilities use fossil fuels.
- Rural Utilities
Service Loans $900 million/year
The federal government provides low-interest loans to rural-electrification
cooperatives. These cooperatives have invested heavily in energy
plants using fossil fuels.
- Tax Exemption
for Publicly Owned Utility Bonds $550 million/year
Publicly owned utilities (POUs) can issue tax-exempt bonds.
A significant portion of POUs have invested in energy sources using
fossil fuels.
Cutting
$5 billion in annual U.S. subsidies to use fossil fuel makes economic
sense
"The most
efficient approach to slowing climate change is through market-based
policies."
statement signed by over 1,000 economists
"Without
the right incentives there will be very little practical action
on global climate change], just words. But with the right incentives
in place there is a lot that could be done."
John Browne, Group Chief Executive, British Petroleum
"Elimination
of [energy] subsidies would . . . provide long-term benefits for the
nation as a whole." The President's Council on Sustainable
Development
and
is important to addressing climate change.
"A number
of studies . . . indicate that global emission reductions of 4 18%,
together with increases in real incomes, are possible from phasing
out fuel subsidies."
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
"After
2015, the elimination of subsidies [now] prevents the growth of
total [U.S.] carbon emissions."
Decision Focus Incorporated for the U.S. EPA
"The elimination
of federal [fossil fuel] energy subsidies secures reductions in carbon
emissions that average between 4.0 and 4.4 percent annually. . . .
In absolute terms, carbon emissions are lower by between 65 and 70
million metric tons annually as these subsidies are removed."
Dale W. Jorgenson Associates for the U.S. EPA
So
lets take action.
"The most
expensive subsidies that raise emissions are leftovers
from
history in the sense that their original justification has long since
disappeared."
Decision Focus Incorporated for the U.S. EPA
"The
removal of fossil fuel subsidies has been advocated as the first
order of priority in instituting economic policies to protect
local and global environments." World Bank
|
Regardless
of the outcome of the Kyoto Treaty, it violates common
sense for federal taxpayers to continue subsidizing the
consumption of fossil fuels.
|
|