Sustainable Developments.ie
   
   
building
Lissan house has great plans made for its restoration. Building proposal turns into a vertical threaten to the coastal areas in Donaghadee. 77,000 new homes in 2005 Construction has record year High noon for cowboy builders Implications for North as South gets €34b transport plan Double-glaze all social housing, says Labour Real estate boom in Tralee as town properties fetch over €1m We need 80,000 new homes a year, predicts economist €1.1m for couple's cool eco house! Battle of the Boyne site gets €15m visitor centre Dublin Port Tunnel to top 1 billion euro Rural communities forced to accept residential developments 2.4bn plan to upgrade urban sewerage systems Ireland's first eco-village gets approval Burning issue of cover for timber-frame homes Northern Holiday homes hit €643000 Tree chippings to heat eco-homes Taxpayers fork out for road bill that jumped by over €500m Don't mention the M3: hypocritical parading of Irish heritage
Next
  print pdf Dublin Port Tunnel to top 1 billion euro  
Written by Martin
Thursday, 08 September 2005

THE main contractor on the Dublin Port Tunnel is preparing a claim that could reach €300m against Dublin City Council.

If successful, the claim would add almost 40pc to the total cost of the €751m project, making it top €1bn.

Nishimatsu Mowlem Irishenco (NMI), a Japanese, British and Irish consortium, has instructed PricewaterhouseCoopers consultants to aid its preparation of the claim.

The claim arises, NMI believes, because of unexpected costs and delays in the project. The claim is currently looking like approaching €300m, according to a source, but this could change as the process continues.

It is standard practice, the source added, for claims initially to include all alleged costs and then be negotiated downwards.

Both NMI and Dublin City Council declined to comment yesterday.

NMI was awarded the £353m (€448m) - including VAT - contract to build the 5.6km long project, 4.5km of which is in tunnel, in October 2000.

The size of the contract was allowed to vary if the price of plant, machinery, materials etc, as measured by standard indices, changed.

However, the NMI claim will maintain that the cost of the project shot up because of additional factors outside their control.

The Port Tunnel was originally scheduled to be completed in early 2005.

But it is now due to officially open around April of next year.

A number of factors are alleged to have driven up NMI's costs.

These are understood to include additional costs arising from overtime and night work.

Other costs were associated with stoppages and changes in practices associated with complaints by Iarnrod Eireann, who claimed to be affected by Dublin Port Tunnel work.

This included a claim in January 2003 by Irish Rail that alleged subsidence under a busy train track was caused by the tunnel.

The claim examines if demands made by resident engineers, appointed to oversee the major infrastructure project on behalf of the State, may have unduly slowed down the project.

A number of significant variation orders/ diversion of services orders that arose during excavation are also part of the claim.

Tom Lyons

© Irish Independent

Article courtesy of http://www.friendsoftheirishenvironment.net

Last Updated ( Friday, 04 November 2005 )