'How do you ignore history?'-Perspectives-Today's Features-Editorial-Opinion-The Economic Times
PERSPECTIVES
whiteet.jpg
Searchin
Indiatimes> The Economic Times> Editorial> Today's Features> Perspectives> Article
Home
News
News By Industry
Companies A-Z
Politics/Nation
International Business
Economy
Multimedia
Most Read Articles
Money Matters
Mutual Funds
Insurance
Savings Centre
Loan Centre
Credit Cards
Tax Centre
Markets
Real Estate
Stocks
Forex
Debt / Money
Commodities
Hot Links
Career Track
e-paper
RSS feeds
BPO
Jobs
Cars
Blogs
Earnings
Magazines
Auto
The Sunday ET
Big Bucks: Inv. Guide
Brand Equity
Corporate Dossier
ET Travel
Financial Times
Times b2b
Opinion
Columnists
Editorial
Today's Features
View Point
ET Energy Survey
Policy
ET telecom Survey
ET Survey On Banking
ET Steel Survey
ET Pharma Survey
ET Capital Expenditure Survey
ET Result Survey
ET PSU Survey
ET Market Survey
ET Real Estate Survey
ET M & A Review
The ET Business Confidence Survey
ET Unlisted Companies Survey
ET SCM Best Practices Survey
Emerging Markets: Where the future is
The ET-TNS Consumer Confidence Survey
The ET CIO Survey
The ET Insurance Survey
The Learning Curve
Corporate Counsel
Infrastructure Index
Hard Driving
Networked
Money & Banking
Perspectives
Letters to Editor
For NRIs
Remit2India
Parents' Insurance
Services
Wallet365 New
Hosting
Legal Services
Websites
Tenders
Test Centre
Bulkhosting
Domains
Biz Mail
Portfolio Tracker
Portfolio in Email
Expert Aid
Invest Online
Archives
E-Commerce
Auctions
Shopping
Classifieds
Travel Booking

Loyalty Logo
to win great prizes
'How do you ignore history?'Add to Clippings
THE V S NAIPAUL INTERVIEW / URMI GOSWAMI

TIMES NEWS NETWORK
[ TUESDAY, JANUARY 14, 2003 01:10:11 AM]
Nobel laureate V S Naipaul was in India to attend the Pravasi Bharatiya Divas. He talks to Urmi Goswami about the Indian diaspora, about the need to open up to overseas influences and discusses some of his controversial ideas about rewriting Indian history. Excerpts:
<b>The Indian diaspora can be broadly categorised as those in the developed world and those in the developing world. They seem to integrate well in developed countries, but in the developing countries they seem to hold themselves separate. What explains this?</b>
If you go to a developed nation, in a way you are being parasitic on that country, its law, institutions, its economy are already developed. You fit in rather easily if you are gifted and talented.
The Indian middle class is quite well educated and they will fit in into an advanced country. A hundred years ago, when the peasantry went out to agricultural colonies, the situation was entirely different.
In a developed country there is a high culture to aspire to and to fit into. In an agricultural colony say in the Caribbean or Fiji, they were primitive societies.
There would be a resistance to falling into primitive societies, they do not encourage people to aspire. There is a difference. The current diaspora is successful but we shouldn't hesitate to call it parasitic, because he finds everything ready-made.
<b>Do the first lot of Indian emigrants, people who were taken to the Caribbeans or to Fiji, have a love and hate relationship with India?</b>
Families that went abroad 120 years ago have an ambiguous attitude towards India.
It isn't love and hate, we mustn't simplify it. Our own communities are not so hot, we are not so developed. But India is full of shocks for us, yet we are attached to India.
<b>Just after the government allowed dual citizenship for certain people of Indian origin, some people have started demanding political and voting rights. What do you think about that?</b>
We're too far away from that, I think it is just a nice and sentimental move.
I haven't thought a lot about it but I think we can't allow people who live abroad, have homes and careers abroad, to vote in India. I think they should have other facilities but this voting facility I think should not be there unless it is accompanied by a long period of residence.
I think this idea of being ruled by Indians who are alien in spirit is a fantasy.
<b>Would you say that India looks to the world outside for a developmental boost? Does that explain this engagement with the diaspora?</b>
It is inevitable because the modern world, our universal civilisation, was not created in India.
All its tools have been gained from abroad. All its ideas of science, human associations, law and rights are things that were not generated here. We knew only despots here.
I know that sometime ago people were talking of the great socialist Indian republic, the village republic, that is a whole lot of hooey. We knew nothing but despotism. That is why the very rich Mughal empire could break up into nothing. Turn to dust at the merest touch of a foreign power. There was no institution, there was no creative nation, no university, no printing press, there was nothing but personal power. We have to accept that, so we need what is abroad.
<b>There is an ongoing effort to deny history, particularly the last 800 years of the past, or present them in a negative light. Instead what is going on is a kind of leapfrogging to a certain construct of the past, perhaps a mythical past whose contours are unclear. How does such selectivity affect a nation?</b>
How do you ignore history? But the nationalist movement, independence movement ignored it. You read the Glimpses of World History by Jawaharlal Nehru, it talks about the mythical past and then it jumps the difficult period of the invasions and conquests.
So you have Chinese pilgrims coming to Bihar, Nalanda and places like that. Then somehow they don't tell you what happens, why these places are in ruin.
They never tell you why Elephanta island is in ruins or why Bhubaneswar was desecrated.
So history has to be studied, it is very painful history. But it is not more painful than most countries have had. Take the history of Britain after the Roman withdrawal, a terrible period till the restoration of reasonable rule, the Scandinavian looting expeditions coming every year for centuries.
It isn't India alone that has had a rough time, that has to be understood. But the rough time has to be faced and it cannot be glossed over.
There are tools for us to understand the rough time. We can read a man like Ibn Battuta who will tell you what it was like to be there in the midst of the fourteenth century, terrible times. An apologist of the invaders would like to gloss that over. But it would be wrong to gloss that over, that has to be understood.
The recovery of past? We have had from western historians and archaeologists an immense attempt to discover things that have long been destroyed or superseded. Look at the amount of work that is being done in Italy, to recover as much as possible of the Etruscan past. So that mythical past can be made concrete again.
We must not be afraid to let down these archaeological shafts into the past. You see, I am less interested in the Taj Mahal which is a vulgar, crude building, a display of power built on blood and bones.
Everything exaggerated, everything overdone, which suggests a complete slave population. I would like to find out what was there before the Taj Mahal.
Some work is being done I haven't gone through it. The idea that India was a desert before these structures were built is foolish. The world is never a desert really. So the past can be recovered.
I have trouble with the past I must say, I find its sensibility alien to me. I have tried very hard to read Kalidas, the plays. I don't get on with it at all, it is outside my kind of mind. I'm actually more at ease with the epics, the Ramayan and the Mahabharat, and the stories from the Panchantantra.
But I would like to see this past recovered and not dodged. And I wouldn't like the version of history that tells you: “Ibn Batuta came to India at this time and made interesting observations”.
I want them to tell me what those observations were, but they don't want to.
That foolish man Nirad Chaudhuri, who wrote one good book, The Autobiography of an Unknown Indian, then went into kind of absurd fantasy, he built a whole book around somebody who came with the invaders, Al-Beruni, who said, “the Hindus are very violent and aggressive people”.
Their land is being taken away from them, they are being destroyed and enslaved and he says this. This foolish man Chaudhuri builds a book around this statement; that is the kind of absurdity we have to avoid.
The last of your India trilogy, India: A Million Mutinies, was the outcome of your travels in India in the late 80s. Since then India has undergone many changes, chief being economic decontrol.
<b>Earlier you wrote about racketeering, weakness for foreign goods, indifference to squalor. Do you see any changes there especially in the mindset?</b>
It will take time but I think it is beginning to change. Remember these things about squalor cannot be ordered from the top, there has to be a demand from below. People have got to need sanitation before they get it. Economic development solves many of these things at the end.
But I haven't travelled profoundly after '89, so I wouldn't like to make any comments
<b>Recently Mr Advani described you as the second Indian Nobel laureate for literature after Tagore. How do you relate to being co-opted by the land of your forefathers? </b>
I like it. I find it very moving.

 Print this article  Mail this article  Comment on this article
RATE THIS ARTICLE
12345
1=Poor, 3=Average, 5=Outstanding
............................................................
COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE
Be the first to post an opinion on this article.




Hotel stay@ affordable prices.
. Goa Marriott Resort, Goa 3 nights/ 4 days @ 17550
. The Disney Land Magic 3 nights/ 4days @ Rs. 12720
. Finland Naturally 3N/4D @ Rs. 26990
. West Indies 2007 Cricket countdown 8N/9D @ Rs 360000
Mobile Downloads
. Get GURU on your mobile!
. Put your Nishana on a Swift.
. Win big with Indiatimes Voice!
. Sagari Rayn - mobile downloads
PERSPECTIVES
HEADLINES
‘We are keen on entering the pension biz'
Usury raj continues
Demographic dividend: Making it pay
'The Doha round will probably die'
Prevention is better
The growth-social development paradox
‘We plan to invest $1 b in India by 2016
A tribe of losers
Open access in power - A long way off
‘Lack of social cohesion hits growth'
About Us | Advertise with Us | Careers @ TIL | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Sitemap | RssFeeds
Copyright © 2007 Times Internet Limited. All rights reserved. For reprint rights: Times Syndication Service