Dean's World
 Defending the liberal tradition in history, science, and philosophy.

.:: Dean's World: July 2004 Archives ::.

July 4, 2004

Paul Revere's Ride

by Henry Wordsworth Longfellow

Listen my children and you shall hear
Of the midnight ride of Paul Revere,
On the eighteenth of April, in Seventy-five;
Hardly a man is now alive
Who remembers that famous day and year.

He said to his friend, "If the British march
By land or sea from the town to-night,
Hang a lantern aloft in the belfry arch
Of the North Church tower as a signal light,--
One if by land, and two if by sea;
And I on the opposite shore will be,
Ready to ride and spread the alarm
Through every Middlesex village and farm,
For the country folk to be up and to arm."

Then he said "Good-night!" and with muffled oar
Silently rowed to the Charlestown shore,
Just as the moon rose over the bay,
Where swinging wide at her moorings lay
The Somerset, British man-of-war;
A phantom ship, with each mast and spar
Across the moon like a prison bar,
And a huge black hulk, that was magnified
By its own reflection in the tide.

Meanwhile, his friend through alley and street
Wanders and watches, with eager ears,
Till in the silence around him he hears
The muster of men at the barrack door,
The sound of arms, and the tramp of feet,
And the measured tread of the grenadiers,
Marching down to their boats on the shore.

Then he climbed the tower of the Old North Church,
By the wooden stairs, with stealthy tread,
To the belfry chamber overhead,
And startled the pigeons from their perch
On the sombre rafters, that round him made
Masses and moving shapes of shade,--
By the trembling ladder, steep and tall,
To the highest window in the wall,
Where he paused to listen and look down
A moment on the roofs of the town
And the moonlight flowing over all.

Beneath, in the churchyard, lay the dead,
In their night encampment on the hill,
Wrapped in silence so deep and still
That he could hear, like a sentinel's tread,
The watchful night-wind, as it went
Creeping along from tent to tent,
And seeming to whisper, "All is well!"
A moment only he feels the spell
Of the place and the hour, and the secret dread
Of the lonely belfry and the dead;
For suddenly all his thoughts are bent
On a shadowy something far away,
Where the river widens to meet the bay,--
A line of black that bends and floats
On the rising tide like a bridge of boats.

Meanwhile, impatient to mount and ride,
Booted and spurred, with a heavy stride
On the opposite shore walked Paul Revere.
Now he patted his horse's side,
Now he gazed at the landscape far and near,
Then, impetuous, stamped the earth,
And turned and tightened his saddle girth;
But mostly he watched with eager search
The belfry tower of the Old North Church,
As it rose above the graves on the hill,
Lonely and spectral and sombre and still.
And lo! as he looks, on the belfry's height
A glimmer, and then a gleam of light!
He springs to the saddle, the bridle he turns,
But lingers and gazes, till full on his sight
A second lamp in the belfry burns.

A hurry of hoofs in a village street,
A shape in the moonlight, a bulk in the dark,
And beneath, from the pebbles, in passing, a spark
Struck out by a steed flying fearless and fleet;
That was all! And yet, through the gloom and the light,
The fate of a nation was riding that night;
And the spark struck out by that steed, in his flight,
Kindled the land into flame with its heat.
He has left the village and mounted the steep,
And beneath him, tranquil and broad and deep,
Is the Mystic, meeting the ocean tides;
And under the alders that skirt its edge,
Now soft on the sand, now loud on the ledge,
Is heard the tramp of his steed as he rides.

It was twelve by the village clock
When he crossed the bridge into Medford town.
He heard the crowing of the cock,
And the barking of the farmer's dog,
And felt the damp of the river fog,
That rises after the sun goes down.

It was one by the village clock,
When he galloped into Lexington.
He saw the gilded weathercock
Swim in the moonlight as he passed,
And the meeting-house windows, black and bare,
Gaze at him with a spectral glare,
As if they already stood aghast
At the bloody work they would look upon.

It was two by the village clock,
When he came to the bridge in Concord town.
He heard the bleating of the flock,
And the twitter of birds among the trees,
And felt the breath of the morning breeze
Blowing over the meadow brown.
And one was safe and asleep in his bed
Who at the bridge would be first to fall,
Who that day would be lying dead,
Pierced by a British musket ball.

You know the rest. In the books you have read
How the British Regulars fired and fled,---
How the farmers gave them ball for ball,
From behind each fence and farmyard wall,
Chasing the redcoats down the lane,
Then crossing the fields to emerge again
Under the trees at the turn of the road,
And only pausing to fire and load.

So through the night rode Paul Revere;
And so through the night went his cry of alarm
To every Middlesex village and farm,---
A cry of defiance, and not of fear,
A voice in the darkness, a knock at the door,
And a word that shall echo for evermore!
For, borne on the night-wind of the Past,
Through all our history, to the last,
In the hour of darkness and peril and need,
The people will waken and listen to hear
The hurrying hoof-beats of that steed,
And the midnight message of Paul Revere.

Posted by dean | PermaLink | | TrackBack (0)

Very Cool

While you're waiting for Dean's World to transfer to its new server (remember, things will be weird for a day or two, some of you will see the new site and some won't during the transition), you may want t check out this very cool patriotic video. I'll have one last posting here on the old system, then that'll be it.

Anyway, Happy Independence Day, my fellow Americans!

(And thanks to Dani for the link.)

Posted by dean | PermaLink | | TrackBack (0)

July 3, 2004

"Tax Audit"

And so I say to all of you:

"Tax Audit."

That means "good bye" (to your bank accounts in any language).

And so it's time for me to head back to my own blog The Moderate Voice. Please do come and visit us during the week....SEE YA!

Posted by joe gandelman | PermaLink | | TrackBack (0)

Where's The Outrage There And Here? (Joe Gandelman)

Open your eyes and look at what's happening not only in the Arab news media but here, too.

That's the key warning from Arab media expert Mamoun Fandy, a columnist for two daily newspapers, Asharq al-Awsat in London and al-Ahram in Cairo. He is also a senior fellow at the United States Institute of Peace and author of "Saudi Arabia and the Politics of Dissent." And, in a Washingon Post piece, he issues a warning about what's going on "out there" and "over here."

Let's take his last three conclusions first here, since they're the most compelling. They are:

(1)"The American media also have a role to play. They could make it easier for Arabs unequivocally to condemn beheadings and other acts of barbarism by talking to a broader range of commentators in the region. ".

(2) "If Arab moderates were to become prominent in the West, they would certainly become prominent at home. Instead, the BBC has been treating us to Atwan -- bin Laden's mouthpiece and the main cheerleader of suicide bombers on al-Jazeera -- as its main commentator on Arab affairs. Western media should tip the balance in favor of those who condemn terrorism but so far have been afraid to do so publicly."

(3)"The American media should also stop replaying images of violence from al-Jazeera and al-Arabiya, because when the Arab media air these gruesome images, they animate the logic of terror. They export fear to America. If the Americans did not import these pictures, the Arab media would stop manufacturing them. That could be a first step toward defeating the terrorists who kill not just for Allah and jihad, but for airtime."

He hits the nail on the head. The problem that is being battled against is the "everyone else is doing it and I need to get it on first" syndrome that permeates the media (to all those who felt The Front Page culture died, it is very much alive, but in newer forms in newsrooms and on the Internet).

Fandy notes in his piece how when upon scanning Arab newspapers and broadcast outleets after the most recent beaheadings in Iraq and Saudia Arabia he saw "very little condemnation and a widespread willingness to run the stomach-turning video and photos again and again." In his piece, he outlines how this is created by cultural shifts in the Arab news media -- as well as a big dose of fear.

    Islamic radicals have killed writers in Algeria, Egypt and elsewhere whose work challenged the logic of martyrdom and "random jihad," or killing foreigners in the name of Islam. But the lack of condemnation of the beheadings, despite their barbarism, is a direct result of a broad and dangerous trend in Arab media and in Arab culture broadly. The Arab world today swims in a sea of linguistic violence that justifies terrorism and makes it acceptable, especially to the young.

He points to articles that "glorify death and urge young people to be suicidal, are part of the steady diet that Arab youths are exposed to every day," and a lopsidded point of view in favor of terrorists in general:
    Another example: Faisal Qasim, al-Jazeera's most popular talk-show host, recently devoted his entire 90-minute show to berating those who condemn terrorism in the Arab world, whom he called "agents of Washington's neo-cons." He wrote an article that made the same point for the pro-bin Laden newspaper al-Quds al-Arabi, whose editor in chief, Abdul Bari Atwan, is a regular guest on al-Qasim's show.

    Last month I traveled to Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Lebanon and saw for myself the effect on the young of the Arab media's tendency, particularly on satellite television, to portray terrorists as resistance fighters and to broadcast in their entirety the videotaped messages of al Qaeda.

So the carnage is being encouraged by the Arab news media as de facto cheerleaders -- and the cheerleaders (and terrorists) are getting their postive reinforcement by the news media and some websites here which give them full credit in the form of extensive coverage for their "work."

The eager audience validates the cheerleaders who cheer the terrorist team on. But if the audience did little or more restrained validations the cheerleaders might perhaps do a bit less -- and then maybe the terrorist team woudn't taste the huge publicity bonanzas that now help spur them on to slit again and again.........

Posted by joe gandelman | PermaLink | | TrackBack (0)

Pure Coincidence, Of Course....

There couldn't be any connection, could there?

Move Note

Am shutting down comments now on all threads except those posted today. Transition begins in a few hours. See you all on the other side....

She Was Warned (Joe Gandelman)

Her mother toad her to be careful.

And Let's Not Forget Him (Joe Gandelman)

His ordeal, grace, courage and written thoughts will never be out of our mind. This week the world paid their final goodbye.

"Small-minded" and "incompetent" (Joe Gandelman)

Hey, it sounds like one of the people in the comment boxes talking about me!

But no, it's actually Boston's Mayor Thomas Menino who is absolutely livid with anger and unloaded with both barrels on his fellow Democrat and Massachusetts official John Kerry after Kerry snubbed him by siding with union picketers outside a U.S. Conference of Mayors event. (Nice to see the party is so unified going into the convention.......)

For More Perspective On The Terrorists (Joe Gandelman)

The San Diego Union-Tribune's Insight Editor Robert Caldwell offered one of his as-usual insightful and blunt analysis last Sunday on the terrorism situation. You can read it here. And it's more important now in light of the new Iraqi government being in place...plus the sad news about the Marine. These may seem like (and are) acts of madness...but there is a grand plan.

Marine Hostage Reportedly Killed (Joe Gandelman)

The terrorist group holding a Marine hostage now says in an Internet statement that he was beheaded -- and they're already touting the beheading video that'll soon be available for all to see on the Internet.
Reuters first report:

    BAGHDAD, Iraq - The militant group the Army of Ansar al-Sunna said in an Internet statement that it had beheaded U.S. marine kidnapped in Iraq.

    “We tell your leadership that we beheaded the marine of Lebanese origin Hassoun and you will see the film with your own eyes soon,” said the Arabic-language statement which was carried on at least two Islamic Web sites.

    An Arabic television last Sunday screened a video tape of militants holding a blindfolded Wassef Ali Hassoun with a sword poised over his head.


The group's FULL STATEMENT which is addressed to President Bush announces that the hostage has been "slaughtered" (apt word) -- and promises more of the same.

Meanwhile, the AP's latest notes that there is no confirmation yet from the U.S. military, which is looking into it.

James Joyner also sites a Reuters report that had section:
    Arabic television Al Jazeera last Sunday screened a videotape of militants holding a blindfolded Wassef Ali Hassoun with a sword poised over his head. They demanded the release of prisoners in Iraq. It was not immediately possible to verify the authenticity of the statement, which was addressed to U.S. President George W. Bush and advised him to withdraw his troops from Iraq.
    “Your soldier had romantic relations with an Arab girl and he was lured away from his base,” the statement said. “And we will soon issue a new tape showing a new infidel hostage,” it said without giving the nationality of the hostage.

Our initial thoughts on this report (assuming that this report is accurate and that he has been murdered and they will post a video):

(1) It's clear how much the new media technology plays into plans of Al Qaeda. The murder is timed to fall right around the time of the U.S. July 4th weekend. It seems less aimed at intimidation than an act of brutal goading. And we know as soon as the photos are out they'll be on certain websites (D-R-U-D-G-E) before a bucket of tears are shed. That's the new reality.

As someone who was trained as a journalist and worked in the media for nearly 20 years, this can be stated as a certainty: in the news media some things are done because everyone does them and no one wants to be last. The same with the new rule of thumb about helping Al Qaeda spread its publicity of terror.

(2) This is going to shove the Al Qaeda beheadings to a new level, because an American military man (if the report is true) will have been brutally butchered. Even though there is some controversy over whether this Marine was AWOL...he was above all a Marine.

And as someone who lives not too far from Camp Pendleton (and who used to cover the base for a newspaper) if the reports are true it may have some consequences in the short and long term. No matter what their assignment, the Marines do their job with steely determination; this will throw something new into the mix. You can read PROOF of this prediction by reading an incredible letter to the terrorists from a Marine posted here.

(3)Once again Al Qaeda will have gone for a qualitative act of terror -- picking a highly symbolic individual and also picking a highly symbolic timeframe.

(4)Each time a terrorist group beheads someone the general populace is becoming a mite more desensitive. A tiny part of the shock value and revulsion wears off, because human beings are basically resiliant. Reality is adjusted in a relationship akin to when you stick your hand in a sink of water: your hand goes in and the water adjusts around the hand. Similarly, our perception of reality (a more brutal world) adjusts.

If these reports prove incorrect, some of the above will be "inoperative" but not all of it.

CAUTION: So far there is no confirmation that the hostage was executed. Just an internet statement.

NOTE: Dean's World learned of this before it was on the wires from Jeff Quinton at Backcountry Conservative who cited blogger Chris Short's breaking-news post that Marine hostage Cpl. Wassef Ali Hassoun has been beheaded. Short posted it immediately upon seeing a bulletin on Fox.

A bit more background, on this case from the AP:
    Hassoun, from West Jordan, Utah was last seen about a week before the videotape was broadcast, the military said.

    U.S. forces initially believed Hassoun may have gone missing, but last month's Al-Jazeera video had led to the military changing his status to "captured."

    The New York Times, citing a Marine officer who spoke on the condition of anonymity, has reported on its Web site that Hassoun had been traumatized after seeing one of his sergeants killed by a mortar, and was trying to make his way back to Lebanon. The officer told the paper that Hassoun sought the help of Iraqis on the base, was betrayed by them, and was handed over the extremists.

    Hassoun's eldest brother, Mohammad, who lives in a Salt Lake City suburb, denied the report.

As noted above, in the end the controversy over this will matter little. The brutality and gleefulness will trump all.

UPDATES:
--Running unpdate at Backcountry Conservative.
--James Joyner also has a roundup and writes:"Given that Hassoun is/was Muslim, it’s unclear why he was an “infidel.” And, since he is/was of Lebanese Arab extraction, why his relations with an Arab girl would be problematic is also unclear."
--Talk Left says of the video the terrists say they're going to release:"We won't be watching."
--The great new blog Terrorism Unveiled explains why the terrorists feel he should be beheaded even though he is a Muslim -- as well as an incredible letter from a Marine to the terrorists. (Also linked above in our thoughts on this latest murder)
--Donald Sensing now mentions it on his site. Check back to his site often; he is one of the most thoughtful people around, of any ideology.
--Q and O: "Apparently the particular "branch" of Islam to which these ignorant pigs belong find it irrelevant that Cpl. Wassef Ali Hassoun is a Muslim. I'm sure that in their warped minds, his association with the US Marines was enough to have him declared apostate and could therefore be murdered. Rest in peace, Cpl. Hassoun. Once a Marine, always a Marine ... and I can promise you, the filth that killed you will soon get their wish when your comrades "martyr" them in the most horrible way they can fashion."
--Jihad Watch:"His family had pleaded for his life on the basis that he was a Muslim. But that wasn't enough this time -- he was still in the military of the Great Satan."
--CBS NEWS reports that Hassoun's brother, Sami says the family hasn't gotten any news yet. So as of this writing it is STILL NOT CONFIRMED.
--Fox News reports that Hassoun's family in Utah is in seclusion.
--The U.S. military still doesn't have confirmation but it's investigating it.
--Rambling Journal:"Hopefully, the powers that be will take the chains off of the Marines. I know that they are chomping at the bit to go and wipe out every last one of these bastards."

Why We Just Love France...(Joe Gandelman)

Patrick Belton at the always level-headed Oxblog noticed this interesting tidbit.

Posted by joe gandelman | PermaLink | | TrackBack (0)

So What Next On Internet Porn Controls For Kids? (Joe Gandelman)

This week the Supreme Court shocked some by nixing a law passed by Congress aimed at keeping kids away from Internet porn. This drew mixed interpretations on various blogs of varying political outlooks.

Now, Newsday says, it's time for the Congress to try again because the issue is too important. It's editorial says in part:
There is almost certainly a way to shield children from sexually explicit material on the Internet without unconstitutionally infringing on adults' First Amendment rights, but Congress hasn't found it yet. That's the message the Supreme Court sent to Capitol Hill Tuesday when it ruled that the Child Online Protection Act is probably unconstitutional.

Washington should take another crack at striking an acceptable balance that will protect free speech and children by looking to technology rather than criminal sanctions.......

But to pass legal muster, an Internet pornography law must employ the least restrictive means possible to achieve its objective. That's actually an elegant legal formulation. It seeks to allow children to be shielded while ensuring that free speech is curtailed as little as necessary.

The Supreme Court didn't reject the 1998 law outright. It sent the dispute back to the U.S. District Court in Philadelphia for trial. So government lawyers can try to prove that the law is the least restrictive way to limit access to Internet porn by people under 17. It imposes a $50,000 fine and 6six months in jail for knowingly posting content that is "harmful to minors" on the Web for commercial purposes. To guard against criminal charges, providers would have to require a credit card or age verification from customers.

The court suggested a better alternative: Promoting the use of filtering software to block access to explicit material. It would be less restrictive than the disputed law and, according to the government's own Commission on Child Internet Protection, more effective than criminal sanctions.

Filters, if effective, would allow selective screening on the receiving end rather than universal restrictions at the source. Adults would not have to identify themselves to gain access to material they have a right to see. Filters would block not only U.S.-made pornography, but the 40 percent that originates outside the country. And filters would not require criminalizing any speech. They're not a perfect solution, but filters have the distinct advantage of being constitutional.
Tip: invest in computer SOFTWARE....

Mommy Knows Best (Joe Gandelman)

Everywhere.

Ralphie's Big Adventure (Part I)

This has not been a good two weeks for third party candidate Ralph Nader. First he was rejected by his former buds in the Green Party. Then there was the screechfest with Democratic black members of Congress who told him to get out of the race. Now he can't get on the Arizona ballot. And he's accusing the Democrats of playing dirty tricks on him (dirty tricks? In American politics? NO WAY!)..

But something tells us that this campaign won't be the respectful cake-walk for RN like four years ago -- when Republicans encouraged him to take votes away from the old version of Al Gore (Gore has changed, you know...) and Democrats made nice to him because they didn't want to upset him.

We predict this time the gloves will come off...because Nader is taking his gloves of as you can see above...and by this below:

    (IsraelNN.com) On Tuesday, as broadcast on the American cable network C-Span, independent presidential candidate and environmental crusader Ralph Nader said the following:

    "What has been happening over the years is a predictable routine of foreign visitation from the head of the Israeli government. The Israeli puppeteer travels to Washington. The Israeli puppeteer meets with the puppet in the White House, and then moves down Pennsylvania Avenue, and meets with the puppets in Congress. And then takes back billions of taxpayer dollars. It is time for the Washington puppet show to be replaced by the Washington peace show."

    He made the speech as part of a conference of the Council for the National Interest titled, "The Muslim Vote in Election 2004". In addition to Nader, speakers included Ambassador Edward Peck, former Iraq Chief of Mission and others.

This can be interpreted in many ways...and something tells us Nader might not be given a pass (by the press or his foes) this time.

UPDATE:One of the facscinating aspects of Nader's candidacy this time is how his support from Republicans has changed this time around, and the kind of reaction it's getting.

Remember that there is nothing that's illegal about that support or even slightly politically immoral (actually there is NO SUCH THING as "political morality"). It's a valid part of the political process. Democrats were absolutely thrilled when Ross Perot siphoned votes from Poppy Bush in 1992. In the latest development, Nader has now accepted the endorsement of the former Perot/Pat Buchanan Reform Party.

But you can see here that GOP support is not even covert during this election. And it's being turned into a news story, which is not going to help Nader in terms of votes, attracting his former Green Party supporters, or encouraging a Democratic strategy of trying to placate or ignore him. (We just read the this column linked above -- looks like he ran my post, from the first sentence!)

So as all the fuss is made about Ralph just remember: there really is nothing politically wrong about helping Nader to siphon votes away from John Kerry. What IS off kilter is Nader repeatedly insisting nothing of the sort is going on and telling Demcrats that his candidacy will actually hurt George Bush.

Either he's not as smart as we all thought he was for years (and The Moderate Voice grew up watching a young cruisading Ralph Nader in his home state of Connecticut) -- or he's not being honest with voters.

College Students Now Have PROOF That Prayer Really Works (Joe Gandelman)

It finally happened.

A Militant Moderate? (Joe Gandelman)

We know you have Liberals and Conservatives. A Liberal doesn't doubt for one milli-second that a Conservative is indeed conservative. And a Conservative doesn't doubt that a Liberal holds liberal beliefs. But a moderate?? And why should anyone care?

In his brand new blog Tutakai, Jason Steck (we quoted his review "Michael Moore's Mendacity" at the end of our Michael Moore post) looks at this issue very seriously -- and he argues that there are substantive policy reasons why it matters a great deal. In a post titled Militantly Moderate he makes several points you don't see on too many websites. A few excerpts:

    The first thing to understand about being a moderate is that almost no one will ever believe that you actually are a moderate. Bizarre as it may sound, people will believe that their right to label you trumps any right of yours to describe your own beliefs. They may create "tests" that you have to meet before they will consent to consider you a moderate -- generally, these tests will involve you agreeing with them in both style and substance.

    That leads to the second curious experience about being a moderate -- most political junkies will not only label you, but will almost automatically assume that the appropriate label is "enemy". As a moderate, you will be assumed to be on the other side. ....

    And that leads to the third strange part about being a moderate -- you will find yourself having far more in common with the politically disengaged than with your fellow political junkies. Because modern American political rhetoric has become so degraded and poisonous, most of the vast number of potential voters who are moderates have found themselves turned off by the stridency and unreasonableness of the extremists who deploy their shrill, loud voices to dominate the political stage.

    This is where the militant moderate comes in. Its time that moderates stopped being rhetorical doormats for extremists of left and right......... Moderates are in a position to draw upon the intellectual and rhetorical resources of both sides and to begin to construct a genuine middle road for public policy that avoids the wild vacillations between left and right...

    Being open and engaged with arguments from both sides has the effect of an innoculation against most forms of political pathologies, trendy ideologies, and fleeting infections of political passions.


And now comes that dreaded phrase you all fear: Read the whole thing.

Rock, Paper, Scissors

Saddam plays Rock Paper Scissors. Pretty damn funny.

Also a lot of work to put together. I'm impressed.

(Via Michele.)

It's A Sign Of The End Of The World (Joe Gandelman)

You-know-what must be freezing over.

More Fun From Teddy Kennedy (Joe Gandelman)

This time kids are going to suffer.

Attention Bob Dole (Joe Gandelman)

You won't like travelling in Korea.

German Court Slaps Naked Jogger with Fine (Joe Gandelman)

Details here from Reuters. He should turn the other cheek.

A Rare Smart Political Move (Versus Inertia) By John Kerry? (Joe Gandelman)

Just for a second, forget all the speculation about John Kerry running with Hillary as his Veep and how smart that'd be. Or running with John Edwards and how smart that would be. Or running with Dick Gephardt and how dumb that would be (that would be the ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ Ticket. But the Washington Post says it is a distinct possibility).

Michele Malkin notes that Kerry may have finally made a SMART political move.

Unless you've been living on Venus, you may know that the Kerry campaign so far has largely consisted of being the anti-Bush --being an almost Thomas E. Dewey-like campaign aimed to not upset anyone but being just visible enough to be an alternative to an incumbent who is perceived in some quarters to be in trouble.

Malkin (who has a great new blog by the way) reminds us that in 1992 Bill Clinton had his political-history-making Sister Souljah Moment and Malkin even gives us this link that explains exactly what it is.

In case you're too lazy to click or your finger is physically challenged (hope that is the right term), the SSM is defined by World History.Com as "...a political tactic wherein a politician publicly repudiates an allegedly extremist person, statement, or position nominally having some affiliation with the politician, in order to appeal to a large centrist voting base. The term originates from the 1992 presidential candidacy of the Democratic politician Bill Clinton" -- when Clinton publically blasted the rapper in a way that a Republican candidate would, and is believed to have polished his centrist image (and picked up votes).

In the case of Kerry, Malin writes:

    I have long assumed that John Kerry is as much of an open-borders advocate as George W. Bush, if not more so. But yesterday, Kerry struck a different note. He told the Spanish-language television outlet Telemundo that he opposes granting driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. "I think that driver's licenses are part of the legality of being here," he said.

    This is the Sister Souljah moment of the 2004 presidential campaign. In fact, it's even better than a Sister Souljah moment. When Bill Clinton distanced himself from Sister Souljah, he was merely taking the same (presumed) position as his opponent, then-president George H.W. Bush. (Bush hadn't commented on Sister Souljah, but everyone knew he was no more a fan than Clinton.)

    In this case, Kerry simultaneously proves his willingness to stand up to an important far-left ethnic constituency, as Clinton did, and highlights an important Bush vulnerability. (Bush's brother, Florida Governor Jeb Bush, strongly supports giving drivers' licenses to illegal aliens--the same position that helped get Gray Davis ousted from the California governorship last fall.)


She also urges Kerry not to back off from this stance as well as noting:

(1)California is really not competitive. Every four years Republicans say they think they have a chance in CA, and they usually don't (definitely seems like wasted $$$ to us)

(2)She's quite certain now that Kerry wouldn't stick to this position once he gets in -- but the point, she notes, is what Kerry is doing now and what it does to the political mix in the election campaign.

The UNEDITED Clinton White House Portrait

We showed you one a few weeks ago that we realized wasn't the real portrait. We are told this is the UNEDITED Clinton White House portrait.

Comment Closings

In preparation for the big move tonight, I'm closing comments on all threads more than a day or so old. We'll pick things up to more normal levels in the next few days as the transition is made.

Patience, all.

Posted by dean | PermaLink | | TrackBack (0)

Michael Moore Has Competition (Joe Gandelman)

The new grosses are out. Michael Moore needs to get a can of Raid. Still, his movie's grosses ain't chopped liver (which makes me sick by the way).

UPDATE: For those of you who are outraged by Michael Moore here is (no joke) a site for you that you'll visit often.


July 2, 2004

Your Moment Of Zen

Watch Colin Powell's rendition of YMCA.

For real.

I mean, like, really.

Marlon Brando Dies (Joe Gandelman)

One of the greatest actors of his generation (some say any generation) has died at 80. Initial report is here.

Here's a fact sheet on Brando. And some good info is also here and here.

More on Marlon.

Will Either GWB Or (the new) JFK Be Able To Govern?

Some politicos and experts believe it'll be tough (or impossible) given the intense polarization. And some also see problems simmering within the parties themselves.

Al Qaeda-linked Group Threatens Europe

It basically gives Europe two more weeks left on the April 15th "truce" in their one-sidded hostilities: pull out all of your troops from Iraq or else.

INSTANT PSCHIC INFORMAL CONTEST: Which country do you think will be the first to capitulate, and why? And, if why none, which will be the first to tell the terrorists to get lost?

Making Deals With Terrorists? (Joe Gandelman)

Terrorists freed two Turkish hostages....and not out of the kindness of their hearts. The terrorists say there's no deal, but it sounds their prisoners' company made a deal to get back the hostages... would up kneeling in the end. Read it...and let us know YOUR interpretation:

    BAGHDAD, Iraq July 2, 2004 — Iraqi insurgents on Friday freed two Turkish hostages whose company had reportedly promised to stop working with the U.S. miltary in Iraq to with their release.

    The two hostages, an air conditioner repairman and his co-worker, were reported missing June 1. CNN-Turk television in Turkey had reported last week about the deal to let them go.

    Al-Jazeera television aired a videotape Friday showing the two men kneeling before three masked insurgents, one of whom read a statement saying the men promised not to work with coalition forces again.

    "To honor the Muslim Turkish people, and upon the repentance of the two hostages, and their pledge not to do such a thing again.....we decided to release them in return for nothing," the speaker said.

    Their captors identified themselves as the Mujahadeen Brigade.

    Last week, the father of one of the captives said the company they worked for, Kayteks, had agreed to stop working as a contractor for the U.S. military in Iraq to win their release. The two hostages were allowed to call their families to say they would be freed within a week.

    A Turkish official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the two were released at about 10:30 a.m. The official at the Turkish Embassy said no ransom was paid.

    The hostages were identified as Soner Sercali, an air conditioning repairman, and his co-worker, Murat Kizil.

    Thousands of Turks work as truck drivers or contractors in Iraq. On Tuesday, insurgents in Iraq freed three other Turkish hostages, saying it did so because they were Muslims.

    The abduction of the Turks was claimed by Jordanian terror mastermind Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, whose followers killed American Nicholas Berg last month and South Korean Kim Sun-Il.

More On Moore's Film: I Saw It (Joe Gandelman)

I decided to see it for myself. I saw it, I thought about it and reached some conclusions that you can find here along with excerpts from my four favorite reviews of the movie.

Ayn Clouter's Boyfriend

Hey, remember Ayn Clouter? Well guess what? I believe I've discovered Ayn Clouter's boyfriend.

Who said the internet can't find matches made in Heaven?

(Via Andrea.)

Life After Death -- Or Internet After Life? (Joe Gandelman)

You've stayed awake at night wondering about the answer to a vital question. But, no, you can't get Viagra at a cheaper price...

Well, there is ANOTHER vital question: what happens when you die?

You live on....online.

On The Hillary For Vice President Broo-ha-ha (Joe Gandelman)

Is the prospect serious or silly? And who was the source?

If Terrorists Strike The US: What About Our Elections? (Joe Gandelman)

The Unmentionable Issue is now being Mentioned. The AP:

    WASHINGTON - The government needs to establish guidelines for canceling or rescheduling elections if terrorists strike the United States again, says the chairman of a new federal voting commission.

    Such guidelines do not currently exist, said DeForest B. Soaries, head of the voting panel.

    Soaries was appointed to the federal Election Assistance Commission last year by President Bush Soaries said he wrote to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge in April to raise the concerns.

    "I am still awaiting their response," he said. "Thus far we have not begun any meaningful discussion." Spokesmen for Rice and Ridge did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    Soaries noted that Sept. 11, 2001, fell on Election Day in New York City — and he said officials there had no rules to follow in making the decision to cancel the election and hold it later.....

    "Look at the possibilities. If the federal government were to cancel an election or suspend an election, it has tremendous political implications. If the federal government chose not to suspend an election it has political implications," said Soaries, a Republican and former secretary of state of New Jersey.

    "Who makes the call, under what circumstances is the call made, what are the constitutional implications?" he said. "I think we have to err on the side of transparency to protect the voting rights of the country."

    Soaries said his bipartisan, four-member commission might make a recommendation to Congress about setting up guidelies.

    "I'm hopeful that there are some proposals already being floated. If there are, we're not aware of them. If there are not, we will probably try to put one on the table," he said. "The states control elections, but on the national scale where every state has its own election laws and its own election chief, who's in charge?"

    Soaries also said he wants to know what federal officials are doing to increase security on Election Day. He said security officials must take care not to allow heightened security measures to intimidate minority voters, but that local and state election officials he's talked to have not been told what measures to expect.

Indeed: just ponder the possible scenarios..and implications.....with increasingly sharper polarization of this country and a potentially close election. If a plan is not drawn up, and broad bipartisan consensus reached on what to do, the controversy over Florida could look like a minor dispute.

Canadian Election Coverage

You should go read the best roundup yet of the recent Canadian elections.

Anti-Fredom

What is the difference between the loyal opposition--critics of war policies--and crypto-Fascism? I think Citizen Smash explains it pretty well.

What's sad is that some on the anti-War side resent having to distinguish themselves from the crypto-fascist, anti-freedom, anti-American jerks. But as annoying as it must be, it's a burden they must bear. As someone who quite unwaveringly supported the liberation of Iraq, I get annoyed at having to separate myself from the Arab-haters who make up a certain percentage of those who favored the invasion. Oh well. It happens.

This is where you can find sane critism of our Iraq operation. I mean, I think it's often terribly misguided, but it's sane, and doesn't start from an "America sucks" position.

This, by comparison, is a crypto-fascist pretending to be a patriotic critic.

It's like finding out that the local KKK group favors abortion rights. What of it? Is that supposed to change my opinion on abortion either way?

Bill Cosby Strikes Again (Joe Gandelman)

In comments to ensure yet more controversy, (and fill lots of time on talk shows and generate lots of posts on weblogs) the comedian has fired another broadside at some aspects he doesn't like about the modern black community. Greg Piper puts it under his well-focused microscope.

FOOTNOTE: The Moderate Voice does lots of fairs in his incarnation as an entertainer. Bill Cosby remains one of the most popular entertainers on the summer fair circuit, a guarenteed crowd-drawer and crowd-pleaser.

UPDATE: Some more on Cosby's speech.

You Saw Sadaam's Face On TV....(JOE GANDELMAN)

.....but much more is at stake in this trial than how he looks, or even the courtroom drama. There are implications -- positive and negative.

Microsoft Goes After Google's Business (Joe Gandelman)

The Moderate Voice is SHOCKED! He didn't know they were so ruthlessly competitive...

Ahalan! (Joe Gandelman)

That's "hello" for our many Arabic-language speaking readers.

It's me again Joe Gandelman (a bar mitzvahed Infidel) back for two more days of Guest Blogging on Dean's World.

I have to be careful what I write, I take it, so I'm not sued here. So I will be very charming this time (and if you don't like me all I can say is: "You don't wear underwear.")

I'm going to be in and out today due to some ^#%@(*!@ computer problems (whoops! I'm not in Congress so I can't say that) that made yesterday the only day I didn't do a new post on my blog (except for when I'm guest blogging here). So as I'm writing this finishing up two posts for my blog and will be up veerrrrrry late. My posts today at Dean's World will be up in the morning and evening.

It's always a pleasure to be here at Dean's World, even though I detect a bit of "global warming" with the lawsuits. (So a bit of sophisticated humor for the lawyers who are reading this to get ammo on Dean: "What do you call a lawyer with an IQ of 10?" "Your honor.")

See ya later today........

Penny Wit

Have you met Penny Wit? Now that's the finest new left-leaning weblog I've come across in quite some time. Definite blogroll material.

Presidents and Economies

One of the oddest things about the American electorate, to me, has always been the peculiar notion that Presidents control the economy. This to me has long seemed like an odd notion because, if you study our system as it's structured today, Presidents really have terribly limited influence on it.

For example, though conservatives like to blame Jimmy Carter for the bad economy of the late 1970s, this is a bum rap. He was in office too little time to have a major effect on it, and policies he put in place actually helped the economy after he left office. Indeed, he was the man who put Paul Volker in charge of the Federal Reserve, and it was Volker, not Reagan, who had the most to do with the monetary policies that resulted in economic improvements we saw in the 1980s.

Presidents make a difference in the economy generally by either proposing bold, sweeping, radical changes--which they almost never do--or by making comparatively minor contributions with tax and regulatory policy. And whatever they do, it generally takes a minimum of one year to have any effect at all, and more realistically 2-3 years before any impact is really measurable. And that effect, whatever it is, is usually small.

Yet Gallup notes once again that about 4 in 10 Americans think that a President's most important job is managing the economy.

I understand why politicians want us to buy into this. When times are good, Presidents want to take credit for it. When times are bad, their opponents want to blame them for it. Ultimately though, woudln't it be healthier if we all stopped acting like the economy is something the President controls? What, do we think the man sits in the White House fiddling with knobs and levers? The most important economic factors are things that no President could ever control, unless we became a fascist dictatorship or a communist collective or something.

The older I get, the more bemused I become by this viewpoint.

Angry Cos

Bill Cosby's not shutting up I see.

Good.

Write Your Senator

Our troops in the field could use your help with a matter pending before the Senate. Black Five has details you should read. I respect his judgement on these matters, so as Mark Noonan suggests, you can easily contact your Senator right here to express your support for the bill--which shouldn't cost anything and will help our troops in the field according to our military vet friends.

Go ahead and write your Senator if you support this, as I do.


July 1, 2004

Lawsuit Threat #3!

Woo-hoo! Envy me, my fellow webloggers: I have now had not one, not two, but three, count 'em, three lawsuit threats since opening up Dean's World barely two and a half years ago. Because of this I now propose the Esmay Standard of Blogging: You're not really important until you've received your first death threat and you first lawsuit threat.

Anyway, I could use some pro bono legal advice. Since I know there are several attorneys who read Dean's World, I figure one of you might be willing to opine for me. Here's the story:

Some Tapioca-Brained Schmuck (henceforth referred to as TBS) here in the Dean's World comments snottily implied that another commenter (hereafter referred to as Barking Moonbat Attorney, or BMA), was a child molester. The reference by TBS was obviously intended to be sarcastic and not serious, but of course that's a horrible thing to say about someone even in jest. Under normal circumstances, I'd instantly delete such a comment as soon as I saw it, and ban TBS for making the crack.

But the target of the inappropriate remark, BMA, instead of just drawing my attention to the inappropriate comment, is threatening to sue me if I don't remove the comment. He is giving me a 72 hour deadline to comply in order to avoid said lawsuit. He says he's an attorney, and he says he's serious.

Now I feel bullied. I don't react well to that. It makes me cranky. Gets my testosterone flowing, my adrenaline pumping, and makes the hairs on my back poof up like an angry tomcat. Normal people, they have what's called a "fight or flight" mechanism, but due to a tough childhood I lost the "flight" instinct a long time ago. With me it's more of a "fight or fight harder" instinct. Kind of ugly I know, but I work on it.

But, you know, I once broke my back in a skydiving accident and, instead of quitting jumping, I made sure to start jumping again after that just to prove to myself that I would never quit something out of fear.

And the nature of this threat has me wondering if I have a wider responsibility to the weblogging community. If I give in to bullying and intimidation tactics, am I making it easier for harassment-by-attorney to be used against other webloggers? Should I disclaim responsibility for the remark, but let it stand on free speech grounds? Refuse to accept liability, and just let myself get sued?

See, the thing is, I'm not afraid of lawsuits. For several reasons, but the biggest being I'm so goddamned broke that you might as well sue a turnip for all the cash you'll squeeze out of me. I opened my checkbook recently and moths came out if it, if you know what I mean. I'm a full-time student, a full-time wage earner, and still worried about making my bills next month. I'm so damn broke I can't even pay attention.

So you know, would it be worth letting myself be sued just so we can establish some sort of precedent that webloggers can't and shouldn't be bullied by people in the legal profession?

What do you guys think? And remember, Barking Moonbat Attorney is probably reading.

Multivitamin AIDS Therapy

I notice that the New England Journal of Medicine has a study out suggesting that multivitamin supplements slow the progression of immune deficiency in AIDS patients.

(Looks at ceiling, pokes tongue in cheek, and wonders if Dr. Mike is still reading.... heehee.)

Thinness + Longevity Therapy

Researchers at Medical College of Georgia have identified a gene therapy which might well both extend lifespan and promote thinness. The bad news: it may also help ameliorate the causes of Alzheimer's and Parkinson's.

I can hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth of the social conservatives now. Next thing you know people might not have to be miserable just to live longer, healthier lives. That can't be a good thing....

Michael Moore Loves George Bush?

I've been wondering for some time if Michael Moore's little hate-film isn't going to wind up helping Bush significantly. For, while it's certain to make some people vote against Bush, it's also likely to alienate a lot of people, especially as more and more evidence comes to light about how much outrageous misinformation and truly vicious twistings are in it.

Bill Hobbs thinks that, indeed, Fahrenheit 911 is John Kerry's Sister Souljah moment. Bill Clinton knew his party would be harmed by embracing hatred and extremism, and spoke up about it.

In 2000, while the Bob Jones controversey was clearly overblown in several important areas, the truth was that George Bush missed an opportunity to criticize them, and only did it when John McCain called him out on it. Then, to his credit, Bush did say something rather than simply letting the moment pass.

So now here's the question: Will John Kerry have as much dignity, decency, and fundamental honor?

I hope so. I really do. I'm rather ashamed of some of my friends over this movie, and I hope Kerry shows the kind of leadership that's needed in the White House by being at least as honorable as Bush was over Bob Jones U. and as Bill Clinton was over Sister Souljah.

In The Doghouse

Again. (Sigh.)

Assume standard orbit, Data! (Casey)

How many times have we heard that over the years? The TV guys make it sound so easy.

But the reality is much more diffficult, especially when you are watching from more than halfway across the solar system.

Spacecraft Cassini Enters Saturn's Orbit(AP)
Cassini Spacecraft Enters Saturn's Orbit Between Two of Its Rings
...
A carefully choreographed maneuver allowed Cassini to be captured by Saturn's gravity as it arced within 12,500 miles of the giant planet's cloud tops.

Using its big radio dish as a shield against small particles, the spacecraft ascended through a gap between two of the rings, then spun around and fired its engine for more than 1 1/2 hours to slow its acceleration.

The craft then rotated again to place its shielding antenna in front as it descended back through the gap.


Since the craft was over 900 million miles away, all JPL could do was watch, and hope that Cassini-Huygens worked as advertised. It did so, by flying between two of Saturn's rings.

Good on ya, guys!

You can find more information about Cassini-Huygens here, as well as the latest images.

(This is cross-posted from The Gantry Launchpad)

The Ennui Is Oppressive

James Lileks pretty much nails the cynical reactions to Saddam's trial. You don't even have to read anything else to know what the paint-by-numbers set will be saying.

My favorite is his conclusion:

Take your choice. Wallow, if you will, in this day of shame. Saddam is going to stand trial – and Bush isn’t. Truly a world turned upside down.
Truly, truly.... oh, yes, I'll have another half-caf moccha latte with extra foam, please....

Online Reality

There's an interesting story in the San Jose Mercury News you might want to read. It requires registration, but, it's basically about someone who ran a weblog for three and a half years about a person who did not exist, known as "Layne Johnson."

Since I wasn't a reader of the site I have no strong feelings on the matter. I know there are people using weblogs as a basis for writing stories, and it frankly strikes me as a very neat character development tool. Although I'd think that if you're going to do something like that, you'd want to go well out of your way to avoid getting too intimate with your readers, and to make it clear to people in some fashion that you're writing stories. Or a "caveat emptor" warning, anyway.

I kind of liked what Emma said. "Online is real." And it is. I've had very good friends I've met online, many of them people I've either never met face to face, or only met face to face once or twice, or talked to on the phone a few times. Written communication is still real communication. It's not really all that new, either, for in centuries past there were people who would carry on written correspondence with each other for many, many, many years without ever seeing each other. So, as with many things, the internet isn't really creating things anew so much as it's making faster and more common what used to be slower and more rare.

Hey, Do Me A Favor

Buy this book.

Thanks.

Positive Stories On Weblogging

Our friend Trudy Schuett has set up a new weblog devoted to showcasing positive stories about the weblogging phenomenon: charity fundraising, helping people in need, and so on. You might want to check it out.

It was apparently inspired by an idea from Anil Dash. And it's not a bad idea at all.

Electoral College Game

Tom McMahon has a neat little game: he'll show you the results of the electoral college votes going back through history, and you guess which election it was. A neat diversion for history geeks like me.

Protest Warriors Rule

Check out the cool gate-crashing video by the Protest Warriors. Be sure to view the video!

I love these guys. The "liberal media" line is unfortunate but let's not quibble, especially when these guys managed to get on-screen right before some chowderhead who was denouncing the upcoming trial of Saddam Hussein as a pathetic "show trial."

Ahhh, 21st century activism: it's a beautiful thing.

(Via Heathen Wench SondraK.)

Iraq-Al Qaeda Link

The 9/11 Commission now admits there was an Iraq/Al Qaeda link all along.

Do you suppose those who called the Bush administration "liars" will now have the class to apologize?



.:: ABOUT DEAN'S WORLD ::.


.:: BEST OF DEAN'S WORLD ::.


.:: RECENT ENTRIES ::.


.:: ARCHIVES ::.


.:: MISC ::.