Stop stressing over that essay! Don't spend your time worrying about how to complete your law essay. Our qualified, experienced law writers will take your question and give you the EXACT model answer that you need. We've helped thousands of students all over the world to obtain top marks for their law essays. Why not let us help you? Click here to order a custom written model answer today - GUARANTEED 100% original, written to your question and to the standard (1st Class, 2.1 or 2.2) that you order.
Criminal Law Cases
0-9 | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y |
- A (a child) v Ministry of Defence
- A (children) (conjoined twins: surgical separation), Re
- A v B
- A v Bottrill
- A v DPP
- A v Essex County Council
- A v X
- AB (care proceedings: disclosure of medical evidence to police), Re
- AB v South West Water Services Ltd
- Abbott v Bayley
- Abu v MGN Ltd
- Acrecrest Ltd v W S Hattrell & Partners
- Ad Valorem Factors Ltd v Ricketts sub nom Ricketts v Ad Valorem Factors Ltd
- Adam Phones Ltd v Goldschmidt
- Adams v Schering Chemicals Ltd
- Adams's Application for Judicial Review, Re
- Adlington v Comr of Police for the Metropolis
- Advocate (Lord) v Wemyss
- A-G for Tuvalu v Philatelic Distribution Corpn Ltd
- A-G of Gambia v N'Jie
- A-G v Associated Newspapers Group plc
- A-G v Birmingham Post and Mail Ltd
- A-G v British Broadcasting Corpn
- A-G v Carlton Bank
- A-G v English
- A-G v Guardian Newspapers Ltd
- A-G v Guardian Newspapers Ltd sub nom A-G v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 3)
- A-G v Independent Television News Ltd
- A-G v MGN Ltd
- A-G v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- A-G v Newspaper Publishing plc
- A-G v Newspaper Publishing plc
- A-G v Newspaper Publishing plc
- A-G v Observer Ltd, Re an application by Derbyshire County Council
- A-G v Punch Ltd
- A-G v Punch Ltd
- A-G v Times Newspapers Ltd
- Agnew v Jobson
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 1975)
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 1995)
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 1997)
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 2001)
- A-G's Reference (No 1 of 2002)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1992)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1999)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1999)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 1999)
- A-G's Reference (No 2 of 2003)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1975)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1992)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1994)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1994)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1998)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1998)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 1999)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 2004)
- A-G's Reference (No 3 of 2004)
- A-G's Reference (No 4 of 1980)
- A-G's Reference (No 4 of 2000)
- A-G's Reference (No 6 of 1980)
- A-G's Reference (No 76 of 2004)
- A-G's Reference (No 79 of 2006); R v Whitta
- Ahsan v University Hospital Leicester NHS Trust
- Ailesbury (Marquis) and Iveagh (Lord), Re
- Airbus Industrie GIE v Patel
- Akenzua (administrators of the estate of Laws (decd)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Aldridge, Re, Aldridge v Aldridge
- Alexander Forbes Europe Ltd v SBJ Ltd
- Allen v The Oliver Group plc
- Allied Domecq Leisure Ltd v Cooper
- Allied Maples Group Ltd v Simmons & Simmons (a firm)
- AMF International Ltd v Magnet Bowling Ltd
- Anderson v Heatherwood and Wexham Park Hospitals NHS Trust
- Anderson v Milton Keynes General NHS Trust
- Andrews v Barnett Waddingham (a firm)
- Anns v Merton London Borough Council
- Anon
- Anon
- Anon
- Anson v Anson
- Arauco Co Ltd, Re
- Archibald Kinross v Sterling Precast Ltd
- Armagas Ltd v Mundogas SA, The Ocean Frost
- Armstrong v Ministry of Defence
- Arndt v Smith
- Arnott v Sprake
- Arthur v HM Advocate
- Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police
- Asiansky Television plc v Bayer Rosin (a firm)
- Asiansky Television plc v Bayer-Rosin
- Asiansky Television plc v Bayer-Rosin (a firm)
- Asiansky Television v Bayer Rosin (a firm)
- Askey v Wood
- Astbury v Astbury
- Atkins v DPP, Goodland v DPP
- Atkins v Dunn & Baker (firm)
- Atkinson v Warne
- Attorney-General v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd
- Auckland Unemployed Workers' Rights Centre Inc v A-G
- Australian Coastal Shipping Commission v Green
- Aylwen v Taylor Joynson Garrett (a firm)
- Azanian Peoples' Organisation (AZAPO) v President of the Republic of South Africa
- B & J (children) (care proceedings: responsibility for child's injury), Re
- B (a child) (care proceedings: additional expert evidence), Re
- B (a minor) v DPP
- B (a minor) v DPP
- B (a minor) v DPP
- B (a minor) v DPP
- B v United Kingdom (Application 9840/82)
- Baines v Tweddle
- Baker v Snell
- Bakhtiar v Keoshgerian
- Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd v Kelston Sparkes Contractors Ltd
- Balfron Trustees Ltd v Peterson
- Ball v Druces v Attlee (a firm)
- Ballard v Bond
- Bamford (Inspector of Taxes) v ATA Advertising Ltd
- Banditt v R
- Banditt v R
- Banks v Ablex Ltd
- Barber v DPP
- Barclays Bank plc v Kennedy
- Barings plc (in liq) v Coopers & Lybrand, Barings Futures (Singapore) Pte Lyd (in liq) v Mattar
- Barings plc, Re, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Baker (No 5)
- Barker v Corus UK Ltd; Murray v British Shipbuilders (Hydrodynamics) Ltd; Patterson v Smiths Dock Ltd
- Barker v R
- Barker v R
- Barker v Saint Gobain Pipelines plc
- Barnfather v Islington Education Authority
- Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council
- Basma v Weekes sub nom Abdul Karim Basma v Weekes
- Bassie v Merseyside Fire and Civil Defence Authority
- Bate v Mishcon de Reya
- Bates' Patent, Re
- Batty v Danaher (practising as Jack Danaher & Co)
- Baxall Securities Ltd v Sheard Walshaw Partnership (a firm)
- Baxendale v Bennett
- Bayer AG v European Commission: T-41/96
- Beary v Pall Mall Investments (a firm)
- Beauchamp (Earl) v Winn
- Beckham v Drake
- Beckham v Drake
- Beckham v Drake
- Bedell v Russell
- Bedingfeld and Herring's Contract, Re sub nom Re Beddingfield, Norris and Herring's Contract and Vendor and Purchaser Act 1874
- Bell v Bell
- Bell v The Spirit Group Ltd
- Bella Casa Ltd v Vinestone Ltd
- Bellamy v Central Sheffield University NHS Trust
- Beoco Ltd v Alfa Laval Co Ltd
- Bernard v A-G of Jamaica
- Bews v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust
- Bhoomidas v Port of Singapore Authority
- BHP Billiton Petroleum Ltd v Dalmine SpA
- BHP Billiton Petroleum Ltd v Dalmine SpA
- BICC Ltd v Cumbrian Industrials Ltd sub nom Parkman Consulting Engineers (an unlimited company) v Cumbrian Industrials Ltd
- Bilbie v Lumley
- Bingham v Dinardo Partnership
- Bird v Holbrook
- Bird v Holbrook
- Birkbeck Freehold Land Society, ex p
- Birmingham City Tramways Co Ltd v Law
- Birmingham City Tramways Co Ltd v Law
- Blackburn Rovers Football & Athletic Club v Avon Insurance plc
- Blackburn v Mackey
- Blackmore v Tidderley
- Blake v Barnard
- Blake v Galloway
- Bland v Morris
- Blayney v Knight
- Bloor v Liverpool Derricking and Carrying Co Ltd
- Bluett v Suffolk County Council
- Blunt v Beaumont
- Blyth v HM Advocate
- Blyth v HM Advocate
- Boateng v Hughmans (a firm)
- Bolton Pharmaceutical Co 100 Ltd v Swinghope Ltd
- Boodoosingh v Ramnarace
- Boome v Bromley R D C
- Boon v Eddison
- Booth v Crown Prosecution Service
- Booth v Hanley
- Booth v Smith
- Borwick v Urquhart (Procurator Fiscal, Kirkwall)
- Boughey v R
- Boulter v Clark
- Boulter v Clark
- Bovis Lend Lease Ltd v RD Fire Protection Ltd, Huthco Ltd v Bovis Lend Lease Ltd
- Bowden Wire Ltd's Trade Marks, Re, Bowden Wire Co Ltd v Bowden Brake Co Ltd
- Bowe v Townend
- Bowlt v Clark
- Bown v LAS Direct Ltd
- Boyce v Wyatt Engineering
- Bradford v Robinson Rentals Ltd
- Bradlaugh v Erskine
- Bradley v Wallaces Ltd
- Bravery v Bravery
- BRB (Residuary) Ltd v Cully
- Breeze v Ahmed
- Brew Bros Ltd v Snax (Ross) Ltd
- Brewer v Broadwood
- Bridgman v Skinner
- Briggs and Spicer, Re
- Brisbane v Dacres
- Bristol & West Building Society v Rollo Steven & Bond
- Bristol and West Building Society v May May & Merrimans (a firm)
- Brocks Mount Ltd v Beasant
- Brooke and Fremlin's Contract, Re
- Brooklyn House Ltd v Commission for Social Care Inspection
- Broom v Morgan
- Brown (Reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003), Re
- Brown v Bennett
- Brown v Corus (UK) Ltd
- Brown v KMR Services Ltd
- Brown v Lewisham and North Southwark Health Authority
- Brown v R
- Brown v Robinson
- Bunting Electric Manufacturing Co Ltd, Re; Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Golby
- Burns v Nowell
- Burton v Voelker
- Bush v Parker
- Butcher v Cornwall County Council
- Butler v Austen
- C v Cairns
- C v D
- C v Middlesbrough Council
- C v Middlesbrough Council
- Calden (Administrator of the Estate of Amanda Calden (decd)) v Dr Nunn and Partners
- Caltex Oil (Australia) Pty Ltd v Dredge Willemstad
- Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc
- Cameron v Maguire (Procurator Fiscal, Oban)
- Cameron v Maguire (Procurator Fiscal, Oban)
- Campbell (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003), Re
- Canadian Pacific Rly Co v Kelvin Shipping Co Ltd, The Metagama
- Cardigan v Curzon-Howe
- Carford Catering Ltd v Fowler
- Carlisle and Cumberland Banking Co v Bragg
- Carter v McLaren
- Carty v Croydon London Borough Council
- Casey v Cartwright
- Casey v Morane Ltd
- Catherall v Michelin Tyres plc
- CB and JB (minors) (care proceedings: case conduct), Re
- Celanese International Corpn v BP Chemicals Ltd
- Central Asbestos Co Ltd v Dodd
- Centuryan Security Services v Kelly
- Cercato-Gouveia v Kyprianou
- CGB Publishing v Killey
- CGU International Insurance plc v Szabo
- Chambers v Miller
- Champion v Maughan
- Chantrey Vellacott (a firm) v Convergence Group plc
- Chappel v Hart
- Charles v State
- Cheltenham and Gloucester Building Society v Ricketts
- Chester v Afshar
- Chester v Afshar
- Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary v Shimmen
- Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police v Liversidge
- Chief Constable of Cumbria v McGlennon
- Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan sub nom Khan v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police
- Chilvers v Rayner
- Chipchase v Chipchase (otherwise Leetch, otherwise Matthews)
- Christopherson v Bare
- Christopherson v Bare
- Chua Tian Bok v Public Prosecutor
- Cinci v HM Advocate
- City of Lincoln, The
- Clare v Buckle Mellows (a firm)
- Clark v Chief Constable of Essex Police
- Clarke, Re, ex p Debtor v S Aston & Son Ltd
- Clay v A J Crump & Sons Ltd
- Climpson v Coles
- Clinton Cards (Essex) Ltd v Royal and Sun Alliance Co Ltd
- Clough v First Choice Holidays and Flights Ltd
- CMC Group Plc v Zhang
- Cobb v Great Western Rly Co
- Cockcroft v Smith
- Codd v Cabe sub nom Cod v Cabe
- Coflexip SA v Stolt Offshore MS Ltd
- Cohen's Executors and LCC, Re
- Cole v Turner
- Collinge's Settled Estates, Re
- Collins Stewart Ltd v Financial Times Ltd
- Collins v Hertfordshire County Council
- Collins v Wilcock
- Compania Maritima San Basilio SA v Oceanus Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Ltd, The Eurysthenes
- Compania Naviera Maropan SA v Bowaters Lloyd Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd
- Concord International (Mauritius) Ltd v Concorde Tourist Guide Agency Ltd
- Connolly v Dale
- Conradi v Direction de la concurrence et des prix des Hauts-de-Seine and Minist�re public: 198/86
- Constable's Settled Estates, Re
- Conti v St Mary's Hospital NHS Trust
- Continental Oxygen Co, Re, Elias v Continental Oxygen Co
- Conway v Spencer
- Cook v Beal
- Cook v UK Insulation Ltd
- Cooper v Belsey
- Cooper v DPP
- Cooper v Phibbs
- Coppard v Customs and Excise Comrs
- Corporation of London v Eurostar (UK) Ltd
- Corporation of London v Eurostar (UK) Ltd
- Corr (administratrix of Corr deceased) v IBC Vehicles Ltd
- Cotterill v Starkey
- Cotton's Trustees and London School Board, Re
- Coulson v DPP
- County Ltd v Girozentrale Securities
- Coupe v Guyett
- Coward v Baddeley
- Cox v Sun Alliance Life Ltd
- Crapp v East Stonehouse Local Board
- Craven Settled Estates, Re
- Craven v Riches
- Credit Lyonnais Bank Nederland NV (now known as Generale Bank Nederland NV) v Export Credits Guarantee Department
- Credit Suisse (Monaco) SA v Attar
- Cross, Re, Harston v Tenison
- Crossley v Rawlinson
- Crown Dilmun v Sutton
- Cuckmere Brick Co Ltd v Mutual Finance Ltd
- Cummings v Granger
- Curtis v Betts
- Customs and Excise Comrs v Air Canada
- D & F Estates Ltd v Church Comrs for England
- D v DPP
- D v Irvine (Authority Reporter, Edinburgh)
- D v Irvine (Authority Reporter, Edinburgh)
- DA v North East London Strategic Health Authority
- Daglish v Ministry of Defence
- Dale v Wood
- Danby v Coutts & Co
- Daniel v Metropolitan Rly Co
- Daniels, Re
- Daniels, Re
- Danns v Department of Health
- Davey v Lee
- Davies and Kent's Contract, Re
- Davies v Eli Lilly & Co
- Davies v Swan Motor Co (Swansea) Ltd
- Davis v Schrogin
- Davis, ex p
- De La Bere v Pearson Ltd
- De Romana v Roberts
- Dean v Taylor
- Deane, Re, Bridger v Deane
- Debtor (No 1 of 1941), Re
- Debtor, a (No 7095/2001), Re
- Deep Vein Thrombosis and Air Travel Group Litigation, Re
- Deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemicals Corp Ltd v Davy McKee (UK) London Ltd
- Dempsey v HM Advocate
- Dench v Flynn & Partners
- Denham v Scott
- Denham v Scott
- Denny v Supplies and Transport Co Ltd
- Derby (Earl) and Fergusson's Contract, Re
- Deriche v Ealing Hospital NHS Trust
- Des Reaux and Setchfield's Contract, Re
- Desmond v Safeway Stores plc
- Deutsch v R
- Devon County Council v Clarke sub nom Clark v Devon County Council
- Dhedhi v United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust (formerly Pilgrim Health NHS Trust)
- Dibagula v Republic
- Dickenson v Watson
- Dickin and Kelsall's Contract, Re
- Dilke, Re, Re Dilke's Settlement Trusts, Verey v Dilke
- Dillon v Dillon
- Director General of Fair Trading v Buckland
- Director General of Fair Trading v Buckland
- Director General of Fair Trading v Pioneer Concrete (UK) Ltd sub nom Supply of Ready Mixed Concrete (No 2), Re, Director General of Fair Trading v Pioneer Concrete (UK) Ltd
- Dixon v Clement Jones Solicitors (a firm)
- DN v Greenwich London Borough Council
- DN v Greenwich London Borough Council
- DN v Greenwich London Borough Council
- Docwra, Re, Docwra v Faith
- Doe (a pseudonym) v Bennett
- Dominion Natural Gas Co Ltd v Collins and Perkins
- Donachie v The Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police
- Donachie v The Chief Constable of the Greater Manchester Police
- Donaldson v Williams
- Dornan v JW Ellis & Co Ltd
- Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Co Ltd
- Downs v Chappell
- Doyle (John) Construction Ltd v Laing Management (Scotland) Ltd
- Doyle (John) Construction Ltd v Laing Management (Scotland) Ltd
- DPP v Ara
- DPP v Everest
- DPP v Glendinning
- DPP v K & B
- DPP v K & B
- DPP v K (a minor)
- DPP v Merriman
- DPP v Morgan
- DPP v Newbury; DPP v Jones
- DPP v Ping Lin
- DPP v Santra-Bermudez
- DPP v Santra-Bermudez
- DPP v Santra-Bermudez
- DPP v Smith (Michael Ross)
- DPP v W
- DPP v W
- Drake v Beckham
- Drake v Beckham
- Dudarec v Andrews
- Duke v Robson
- Duncombe v Wingfield
- Dunnachie v Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
- Dunnachie v Kingston-upon-Hull City Council and other appeals
- Dziennik v CTO Gesellschaft Fur Containertransport MBH
- E v S Garages Ltd
- Eames v Hacon
- East Anglian Rlys Co v Eastern Counties Rly Co
- East India Co v Tritton
- East Yorkshire Gravel Co Ltd's Application, Re
- EB v Order of the Oblates of Mary Immaculate in the Province of British Columbia (A-G of Canada intervening)
- Ebbs v James Whitson & Co Ltd
- Eckersley v Binnie
- Edgcombe v Rodd
- Edinburgh United Breweries Ltd v Molleson
- Edwards and Rudkin to Green, Re
- Edwards v Governors of Hanson School
- Effort Shipping Co Ltd v Linden Management SA, The Giannis NK
- Eggarevba v State
- Eiles v Southwark London Borough Council
- El Awadi v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA Ltd
- Elcom, Re, Layborn v Grover Wright
- Eleady-Cole v The Brothers of Charity Services Merseyside
- Electronic Data Systems Ltd v National Air Traffic Services Ltd
- Elliott v C (a minor)
- Elworthy v Bird
- Ely Brewery Co v Pontypridd U D C
- Emeh v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Area Health Authority
- Enertrag (UK) Ltd v Sea and Land Power and Energy Ltd
- Engelhart v Farrant & Co
- Ernst & Young (a firm) v Butte Mining plc
- Essa v Laing Ltd
- Essendon Engineering Co Ltd v Maile
- Essendon Engineering Co Ltd v Maile
- Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Hall Russell & Co Ltd and Shetland Islands Council, The Esso Bernicia
- Etherington and Lancashire and Yorkshire Accident Insurance Co, Re
- European Commission v Volkswagen AG: C-74/04
- Evans v Benyon
- Evans v Clifton Inns Ltd
- Evans v Volex Group plc
- Everard (F T) and Sons Ltd v BP Marine Ltd
- Express Ltd (t/a Express Dairies Distribution) v Environment Agency
- Eyre v Norsworthy
- Fagan v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Fagan v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Fagan v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Fairbrother v Gabb & Co
- Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd (t/a GH Dovener & Son)
- Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd and other appeals
- Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd; Fox v Spousal (Midlands) Ltd; Matthews v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (1978) Ltd
- FAL Oil Co Ltd v Petronas Trading Corpn SDN BHD sub nom FAL Oil Co Ltd v Petronas Trading Corpn, The Devon
- Farah v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Farah v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Farquhar v Newbury RDC
- Farrell v Merton Sutton & Wandsworth Health Authority
- Farrell v Secretary of State for Defence
- Farrer v Lacy, Hartland & Co
- Farrier-Waimak Ltd v Bank of New Zealand sub nom Bank of New Zealand v Farrier-Waimak Ltd
- Farrukh v Irwin Mitchell (a firm)
- Faulkner v Talbot
- Feakins v Burstow
- Featherstone v Staples
- Federal Commerce and Navigation Ltd v Suisse-Atlantique Soci�t� D'Armement SA, The Cruzeiro do Sul
- Federazione Nazionale del Commercio Oleano (Federolio) v EC Commission: T-122/96
- Fennelly v Connex South Eastern Ltd
- Ferguson-Davie v Ferguson-Davie
- Fernback v Clarke
- Ferrer v Beale sub nom Fetter v Beale sub nom Fitter v Veal
- Finecard International Ltd (t/a The Ninja Corpn) v Urquhart Dyke & Lord (a firm)
- Flack v Hudson
- Flannagan v Shaw
- Fleming v Securities Commission
- Fletcher v Brent London Borough Council
- Fletcher v Collis
- Flintshire County Council v Reynolds
- Floyd v John Fairhurst & Co
- Forde v Skinner
- Formula One Autocentres Ltd v Birmingham City Council
- Forticrete Ltd v Lafarge Roofing Ltd
- Foster v Biosil
- Foster v Biosil
- Foster v Prince
- Fotedar v St George's Healthcare NHS Trust (No 2)
- Fountain Forestry Ltd v Edwards
- Fowler v Lanning
- Frances v Ley sub nom Day v Beddingfield
- Francisco v Diedrick
- Fraser v Berkeley
- French v Chief Constable of Sussex Police
- French v Thames Valley Strategic Health Authority
- Frewen v Hays
- Frewin v Consignia plc
- Furbert v R
- G (DM) (an infant), Re,
- Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v A-G of Hong Kong
- Gammon (Hong Kong) Ltd v A-G of Hong Kong
- Garcia v East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust
- Garcia v St Mary's National Health Service Trust
- Gardner v RP Winder (Wholesale Meats) Ltd
- Garnett, Re, Gandy v Macaulay
- Garrett v Halton Borough Council; Myatt v National Coal Board
- Garth v Earnshaw
- Gavalas v Police
- Gavalas v Police
- Gavalas v Police
- Gaylard v Morris
- Geffroy (criminal proceedings against): C-366/98
- General Engineering Services Ltd v Kingston and St Andrew Corpn
- Gertor, The
- Gibbon v Christchurch, High Harrogate (All of), Sheepshanks Intervening
- Gibbons v Pepper sub nom Gibbon v Pepper
- Gibbons v Pepper sub nom Gibbon v Pepper
- Giblett v P & NE Murray Ltd
- Gilhespie v Burdis
- Giorgianni v R
- Girbash v Main Line Auto Engineering Ltd
- Glamorganshire Iron and Coal Co v Irvine
- Glanville v Glanville
- Glencore Grain Ltd v Goldbeam Shipping Inc; Goldbeam Shipping Inc v Navios International Inc; The Mass Glory
- Glentree Estates Ltd v Gee
- Glicksman v Redbridge Healthcare NHS Trust
- Glover v London and South Western Rly Co
- Godden v Kent and Medway Strategic Health Authority
- Golden Strait Corpn v Nippon Yusen Kubishika Kaisha, The Golden Victory
- Goldman v Thai Airways International Ltd
- Gordon v HM Advocate
- Gordon v Selico Co Ltd
- Gorham v British Telecommunications plc
- Gorrie v The Marist Brothers
- Gowans (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003), Re
- Grainger v HM Advocate
- Grand Trunk Rly Co v McAlpine
- Grand Trunk Rly Co v McAlpine
- Gray v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board
- Gray v Southampton and South West Hampshire Health Authority
- Gray v Southampton and South West Hampshire Health Authority
- Greater Manchester Passenger Transport Executive v Sands
- Green v Bannister
- Green v Chief Constable of Lothian and Borders Police (Green, third party)
- Green v Hills
- Green v Vickers Defence Systems Ltd
- Green v Yorkshire Traction Co Ltd
- Greenwich London Borough Council v Browne
- Gregg v Scott
- Gregg v Scott
- Greis Case
- Grell-Taurel Ltd v The Caribbean Home Insurance Co Ltd
- Grey v Grant
- Greymalkin Ltd v Copleys (a firm)
- Griffith-Boscawen v Scott
- Griffiths v Dunnett
- Griggs v Transco plc
- Groom v Selby
- Groupama Insurance Co Ltd v Channel Islands Securities Ltd
- Grove, Re, Public Trustee v Dixon
- Guest v Warren
- Gurney, Re, Mason v Mercer
- Gusty, The and The Daniel M
- Guy v Livesey
- Haggard v Mason
- Halbot v Lens
- Hale v Jennings Bros
- Halkett v Earl of Dudley
- Hall Dare's Contract, Re
- Hall v Fearnley
- Hallam, petitioner
- Halsted v Clark
- Hamer v London, City and Midland Bank Ltd
- Hamilton v Papakura District Council
- Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council v Monk
- Hancock v Somes
- Harding v Scott-Moncrieff
- Harding v The Pub Estate Co Ltd
- Hardman v Child
- Harkness and Allsopp's Contract, Re
- Harley Street Capital Ltd v Tchigirinsky
- Harracksingh v A-G of Trinidad and Tobago
- Harris v Mobbs
- Harris v Perry & Co
- Harrison v Hodgson
- Harrison v Michelin Tyre Co Ltd
- Harrison v West of Scotland Kart Club
- Harrow London Borough Council v Shah
- Harrow London Borough Council v Shah
- Hatton v Treeby
- Hawker's Settled Estates, Re
- Hawkins v R
- Hawley v Luminar Leisure Ltd
- Hawley v Luminar Leisure plc
- Haystead v Chief Constable of Derbyshire
- Haystead v Chief Constable of Derbyshire
- He Kaw Teh v R
- He Kaw Teh v R
- Head's Trustees and Macdonald, Re
- Heasmans v Clarity Cleaning Co Ltd
- Hedley v Barlow
- Hemmings v Stoke Poges Golf Club
- Hendry v Turner
- Hereford and Worcester County Council v Clayton
- Hevican v Ruane
- Hewitt v DPP
- Heyward v Plymouth Hospital NHS Trust
- Hibbert v R
- Hibbert v R
- HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd v Chase Manhattan Bank
- Hillman (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003), Re
- Hills v Potter
- Hills v Potter
- Hillsdown Holdings plc v Pensions Ombudsman
- Hinckley and Country Building Society v Henny
- Hipwood v Gloucester Health Authority
- HM Advocate v Caledonian Newspapers Ltd
- HM Advocate v Shearer
- HM Prison Service v Beart
- Hobin v Douglas
- Hobson v Bartram & Sons Ltd
- Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd (trading as Crisis Couriers)
- Holmes (W & R) and Cosmopolitan Press Ltd's Contract, Re
- Holmes v Mather
- Holsgrove v South West London Strategic Health Authority
- Holt v Holroyd Meek Ltd
- Holtby v Brigham & Cowan (Hull) Ltd
- Holy v Law Society
- Holyday v Oxenbridge
- Hone v Going Places Leisure Travel Ltd
- Hook v Hook and Brown
- Hopper v Reeve
- Horton v Evans
- Horton v Taplin Contracts Ltd
- Hotson v East Berkshire Area Health Authority
- Hounslow London Borough Council v Pilling
- Howard v Bergin, O'Connor & Co
- Howe v David Brown Tractors (Retail) Ltd (Rustons Engineering Co Ltd, third party)
- Howell v Jackson
- Hudson v Crane
- Huggins v Butcher sub nom Higgins' Case sub nom Higgins v Butcher
- Hughes v Lord Advocate
- Hughes v National Union of Mineworkers
- Hulme v DPP
- Hurditch v Sheffield Health Authority
- Hurst v Bryk
- Hurst v Bryk
- Hurst v Picture Theatres Ltd
- Hussaney v Chester City FC
- Hutchinson (administratrix of the estate of Hutchinson (decd)) v Epsom and St Hellier NHS Trust
- Hutton v Mansell
- Hyam v DPP
- Hyett v Great Western Rly Co
- Hyundai Merchant Marine Co Ltd v Furness Withy (Australia) Pty, The Doric Pride
- Ikumene Singapore Pte Ltd v Leong Chee Leng
- Ilott v Wilkes
- Ilott v Wilkes
- Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India
- Innes v Wylie
- International Transport Roth GmbH v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- IRC v Joicey (No 2)
- IRC v Thompson
- Irvine v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Issa v Hackney London Borough Council sub nom Hackney London Borough Council v Issa
- Ive v Steel
- J (a child: adoption), Re
- J (Children) (abduction: child's objections to return), Re
- J and M (children) (care proceedings: responsibility for child's injury), Re
- J and M (children) (care proceedings: responsibility for child's injury), Re
- J D Williams & Co Ltd v Michael Hyde & Associates Ltd
- Jaggard v Dickinson
- James v Cliffe
- James v Cliffe
- James v Fairley
- Jamieson v HM Advocate
- Janaway v Salford Area Health Authority
- JEB Fasteners Ltd v Marks, Bloom & Co (a firm)
- Jenkins and H E Randall & Co's Contract, Re
- Jenney (a minor) v North Lincolnshire County Council
- Jervis, Re
- Jetley v Hill
- JJ Coughlan Ltd v Ruparelia
- John Gerrard Barry v John Sutherland
- John Mowlem Construction plc v Neil F Jones & Co (a firm)
- John v MGN Ltd
- Johnson (t/a Johnson Butchers) v BJW Property Developments Ltd
- Johnson (t/a Johnson Butchers) v BJW Property Developments Ltd
- Johnson v Gore Wood & Co (a firm)
- Johnson v Northwood
- Johnson v State
- Jones (L E) (Insurance Brokers) Ltd v Portsmouth City Council
- Jones v Ministry of the Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs intervening)
- Jones v Ministry of the Interior of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs intervening); Mitchell v Al-Dali
- Jones v Owen
- Jones v Sherwood
- Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd
- Jones v Tower Boot Co Ltd
- Jones v Trollope Colls Cementation Overseas Ltd
- Jones, Re, Jones v Cusack-Smith
- JT (adult: refusal of medical treatment), Re
- Judson v British Transport Commission
- K v Gilmartin's Executrix
- K v Minister of Safety and Security
- Kaberry v Freethcartwright (formerly Freeth Cartwright Hunt Dickens) (a firm)
- Kamilla Hans-Peter Eckhoff KG v AC Oerssleff's EFTF A/B, The Kamilla
- Kandalla v British Airways Board
- Karia v ICS (Management) Services Ltd
- Kauesa v Minister of Home Affairs
- Kearn-Price v Kent County Council
- Keir v Leeman
- Keith v Chalmers
- Kelly v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
- Kenny & Good Pty Ltd v MGICA (1992) Ltd
- Kent County Council v Batchelor
- Kerifford's Case
- Khaliq v HM Advocate
- Khanna v Sombra
- Kim v HM Advocate
- King v Brandywine Reinsurance Co (UK) Ltd (formerly known as Cigna RE Co (UK) Ltd)
- King v Dept of Transport, Local Government and the Regions
- King v Phippard
- King v RCO Support Services Ltd
- King v Zurich Insurance Co
- Kingsberry v Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority
- Kirkland v Robinson
- Kirkland v Robinson
- Knight v Nicholls
- Knight v Nicholls
- Knight v Vale Royal Borough Council
- Knightley v Johns
- Knott v Knott
- Knott v Newham Healthcare NHS Trust
- Kooragang Investments Pty Ltd v Richardson and Wrench Ltd
- KR v Bryn Alyn Community (Holdings) Ltd (in liq)
- KR v Bryn Alyn Community (Holdings) Ltd (in liq)
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (No 3)
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Co (No 4)
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Corp
- Kuwait Airways Corp v Iraqi Airways Corp (No 7)
- Laboratorios RTB, SL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Design): T-162/01
- Lake, Re, ex p Howe Trustees
- Lalji v Post Office Ltd
- Lambson Aviation v Embraer Empresa Brasiliera de Aeronautica SA
- Lamoon v Fry
- Lane v Holloway
- Latter v Braddell
- Latter v Braddell
- Laverton v Kiapasha (trading as Takeaway Supreme)
- Laybourn v R
- Le Lievre v Gould
- Leefe v NSM Music Ltd
- Leggett v Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire Strategic Health Authority
- Leicestershire County Council v Gordon Hewitt Associates
- Leigh v Gladstone
- Leslie v Archer
- Leslie, Re, ex p Leslie
- Lesogoro v State
- Letang v Cooper
- Lever v Hide sub nom Glever v Hynde
- Levy v Edwards
- Lewis v Arnold
- Lewis v Lewis
- Lexmead (Basingstoke) Ltd v Lewis sub nom Lambert v Lewis
- Lillicrap v Nalder & Son (a firm)
- Lillywhite v University College London Hospitals' NHS Trust
- Lim Chin Aik v R
- Lincolnshire County Council v RJ (X intervening)
- Lindsay v Alliance & Leicester plc
- Lister v Hesley Hall Ltd
- Lister's Case sub nom R v Lister
- Livesey v Parker Merchanting Ltd
- Livingstone v Fife Council
- Lloyd v John Lewis Partnership
- Lloyds TSB General Insurance Holdings Ltd v Lloyds Bank Group Insurance Co Ltd, Abbey National plc v Lee
- Lloyds TSB General Insurance Holdings Ltd v Lloyds Bank Group Insurance Co Ltd, Abbey National plc v Lee
- Lloyd-Wolper v Moore (National Insurance Guarantee Corpn plc, Pt 20 claimant, Moore, Pt 20 defendant)
- Lobb (Alec) (Garages) Ltd v Total Oil GB Ltd
- Loftus-Brigham v Ealing London Borough Council
- Logicrose Ltd v Southend United Football Club Ltd
- London and North Western Rly Co v Swainson
- London Drugs Ltd v Kuehne and Nagel International Ltd
- Longman v Bath Electric Tramways Ltd
- Lonrho plc v Fayed
- Lord Advocate's Reference (No 1 of 2001)
- Lord Advocate's Reference (No 1 of 2001)
- Lord Advocate's Reference (No 1 of 2001)
- Lord v Pacific Steam Navigation Co Ltd, The Oropesa
- Lowe v Havering NHS Trust
- Lowry v Bourdieu
- Lucas v R
- Luck (trading as G Luck Arboricultural & Horticultural) v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council
- Lyttle v HM Advocate
- M (a minor) v Oxford
- M (Care Proceedings: Disclosure: Human rights), Re
- M v Blackpool Victoria Hospital NHS Trust
- M v HM Advocate
- M v Singer
- Macey v Warwickshire Health Authority
- Maguire v Harland & Wolff plc
- Maguire v Regentford Ltd
- Mahmud v BCCI SA (in liq); Malik v BCCI SA (in liq)
- Mainstream Properties Ltd v Young
- Majrowski v Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust
- Majrowski v Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Trust
- Makanjuola v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Maltby v Murrells
- Man Nutzfahrzeuge Aktiengesellschaft v Freightliner Ltd
- Mann v Ward
- Mansfield v Weetabix Ltd
- Manual Work Services (Construction) Ltd, Re
- Margolle v Delta Maritime Co Ltd
- Markham Main Colliery Ltd, Re
- Marr v Lambeth London Borough Council
- Martin v Stanborough
- Mattei v Vautro
- Matthews v Neill
- Mattis v Pollock (trading as Flamingos Nightclub)
- Mattis v Pollock (trading as Flamingo's Nightclub)
- Mattocks v Mann
- Mawdsley v Cosmosair plc
- Mayo, Re, Mayo v Mayo sub nom Mayo's Will Trusts, Re
- MB (an adult: medical treatment), Re
- M'Bain v Crichton
- Mbutu v De La Rue Brown
- Mbutu v De la Rue Browne
- McCarey v Associated Newspapers Ltd (No 2)
- McCue v Cameron sub nom McCue v Currie (Procurator Fiscal, Kilmarnock)
- McCue v Cameron sub nom McCue v Currie (Procurator Fiscal, Kilmarnock)
- McDonald v HM Advocate
- McDonnell v Holwerda
- McDowall v Great Western Rly Co
- McElhinney v Ireland (Application 31253/96)
- McFarland, Re
- McFarlane v Tayside Health Board
- McFarlane v Thain
- McGhee v National Coal Board
- McGovern v British Steel Corpn
- McGovern v Owen (t/a Owen Lyons Estate Agents)
- McHugh v Kerr
- McKearney v HM Advocate
- McKearney v HM Advocate
- McKenzie v Chilliwack Corpn
- McKew v Holland and Hannen and Cubitts (Scotland) Ltd
- McKinnon v HM Advocate
- McKinnon v HM Advocate
- McLoughlin v Jones (a firm)
- McManus v Beckham
- McMylor v Firth Rixson plc
- McNairn v HM Advocate
- McSorley, Petitioner
- M'Curday v Driscoll
- Meadow v General Medical Council
- Mellor v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- Melton, Re, Milk v Towers
- Melville v HM Advocate
- Melvin v HM Advocate
- Merelie v Newcastle Primary Care Trust
- Meridian Global Funds Management Asia Ltd v Securities Commission
- Merrett v Schuster
- Merson v Cartwright
- Metropolitan Police Comr v Caldwell sub nom R v Caldwell
- Metropolitan Police Comr v Caldwell sub nom R v Caldwell
- Metropolitan Rly Co v Jackson
- MFI Warehouses Ltd v Nattrass
- Middle Temple v Lloyds Bank plc
- Milkhu v North West Hospitals NHS Trust
- Miller v Minister of Pensions
- Milne v Express Newspapers plc
- Milner v Wilson
- Milner v Wilson
- Minister of Pensions v Chennell
- Minister of Safety and Security v Carmichele
- Ministry of Defence v Bloomfield-Evans
- Ministry of Defence v Cannock
- Mirvahedy v Henley
- Mirvahedy v Henley
- Mirvahedy v Henley
- Mitchell v Milford Haven Port Authority
- Mitera Marigo (M/V) (Owners) v M/V Fritz Thyssen (Owners), The Fritz Thyssen
- MMR and MR Vaccine Litigation (No 3), Re
- Moffat v Burges Salmon (a firm)
- Moffat v Burges Salmon (a firm)
- Mohamed v Alaga & Co (a firm) sub nom Mohamed v Alaga
- Mok Wei Tak v R
- Moncrieff v Jamieson
- Monks v Dykes
- Moores v Bude Stratton Town Council
- Moreton v Hardern
- Morgans v Launchbury
- Moriarty v Brooks
- Morrisey v R
- Morriss v Marsden
- Morrow v Belcher
- Mortin v Shoppee
- Morton, Re, Morton v Morton
- Moses v Midland Rly
- Mostyn v Mostyn
- Moy v Pettman Smith (a firm)
- Moy v Pettman Smith (a firm)
- Mpala v State
- MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co SA v Delumar BVBA
- Mulhouse (formerly Mulhausen) v Mulhouse (formerly Mulhausen)
- Mulvenna v Royal Bank of Scotland plc
- Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Harrop
- Munro v Daw
- Murray v Foyle Meats Ltd
- Mutch v Allen
- Mutual Aid Permanent Benefit Building Society, Re, ex p James
- Nation v King's Healthcare NHS Trust
- National Rivers Authority v Alfred McAlpine Homes (East) Ltd
- National Rivers Authority v Alfred McAlpine Homes (East) Ltd
- National Rivers Authority v Alfred McAlpine Homes (East) Ltd
- National Rivers Authority v Yorkshire Water Services Ltd
- National Utility Services Ltd v St James Court Hotel Ltd
- National Westminster Bank plc v Brice Droogleever (a firm)
- Nationwide Building Society v Balmer Radmore (a firm)
- Needler Financial Services v Taber
- Neill v North Antrim Magistrates' Court
- Nelder v DPP
- New Zealand Guardian Trust Co Ltd v Brooks
- Newbold v Ministry of Defence
- Newhart Developments Ltd v Co-operative Commercial Bank Ltd
- Ng Keng Yong v Public Prosecutor
- Nicholson v Booth and Naylor
- Nisbet v Chief Constable, Strathclyde
- Noakes v Noakes & Co Ltd
- Noden v Johnson sub nom Nodin v Johnson
- Noel v Poland
- Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v Scalera
- Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyd's of London v Scalera
- Norberg v Wynrib
- Norberg v Wynrib
- Norjarl K/S A/S v Hyundai Heavy Industries Co Ltd
- Norman (Alec) Garages Ltd v Phillips
- Normans Bay Ltd (formerly Illingworth Morris Ltd) v Coudert Brothers (a firm)
- Norris v Brown & Root Ealing Technical Services Ltd
- Northern Garage Ltd, Re
- Noyes v Pollock
- Nwali v State
- Nyakbambo v Minister of Justice
- Nygaard v R
- Nygaard v R
- O v Governor of Holloway Prison
- O v Governor of Holloway Prison
- O v Ministry of Defence
- Ocloo v Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust
- Office of Fair Trading v X
- Official Solicitor v Allison
- Ogwo v Taylor
- Oksuzoglu v Kay
- Old Grovebury Manor Farm Ltd v W Seymour Plant Sales and Hire Ltd
- Oliver v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police
- O'Neill v DSG Retail Ltd
- O'Neill v Governors of St Thomas More RCVA Upper School; O'Neill v Bedfordshire County Council
- Onibudo v Law Society
- Ophthalmic Innovations International (United Kingdom) Ltd v Ophthalmic Innovations International Inc
- Organophosphate Litigation, Re, Snell v Robert Young & Co Ltd
- O'Riordan v DPP
- Orkem v EC Commission: 374/87
- Osborn v Veitch
- Osei-Bonsu v Wandsworth London Borough Council sub nom Wandsworth London Borough Council v Osei-Bonsu
- O'Shea v MGN Ltd
- Osland v R
- Ostrowski v Palmer
- Ostrowski v Palmer
- Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller Steamship Co Pty, The Wagon Mound (No 2)
- Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock and Engineering Co Ltd, The Wagon Mound
- P v HM Advocate
- Pacific Direct Ltd v Riaz
- Page v Smith (No 2)
- Palfrey v ARC Offshore Ltd
- Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons
- Palmer v Guadagni
- Palmer v Locke
- Paragon Finance plc (formerly National Home Loans Corpn plc) v Freshfields (a firm)
- Parker v PFC Flooring Supplies Ltd
- Paterson v Blackburn Corpn
- Paterson Zochonis & Co Ltd v Merfarken Packaging Ltd
- Patrick v Johnson
- Patten and Edmonton Union Poor Guardians, Re
- Patterson v National Floor Coverings Ltd
- Paul Davidson Taylor (a firm) v White
- Pauling's Settlement Trusts, Re, Younghusband v Coutts & Co
- Pawley and London and Provincial Bank, Re
- Payless Travel Ltd v Baba Krupa Holidays Ltd
- Peace v HM Advocate
- Peck v Craighead sub nom Debtor, a (No 10 of 1992), Re, Peck v Craighead
- Peel's (Sir Robert) Settled Estates, Re
- Penn v Ward
- Pennington v Cayley
- Pensher Security Door Co Ltd v Sunderland City Council
- Perrott and King's Contract, Re
- Petchey v Broker
- Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Storkwain Ltd
- Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Storkwain Ltd
- Phelps v Hillingdon London BC
- Phelps v London Borough of Hillingdon, Anderton v Clwyd County Council, Jarvis v Hampshire County Council, Re G (a minor)
- Phillip v State
- Phillips v Eyre
- Phillips v Henlys Ltd
- Phillips v Howgate
- Phillips v Phillips
- Pickford v Imperial Chemical Industries plc
- Pigford v City of Sunderland
- Piggott v Kemp sub nom Pigott v Kemp
- Pigney v Pointers Transport Services Ltd
- Pinekerry Ltd v Kenneth Needs (Contractors) Ltd
- Plant Construction plc v Clive Adams Associates
- Plant Construction plc v Clive Adams Associates
- Plymouth and Torbay Health Authority v Glanfield
- Polemis and Furness Withy & Co, Re
- Pope's Contract, Re
- Poppleton and Jones' Contract, Re
- Porter (JP) Co v Bell
- Porter (JP) Co v Bell
- Portsea Island Mutual Co-operative Society Ltd v Leyland
- Power v Banks
- Preferred Mortgages Ltd v Bradford and Bingley Estate Agencies Ltd
- Preferred Mortgages Ltd v Countrywide Surveyors Ltd
- Price v John
- Pride Valley Foods Ltd v Hall & Partners
- Pride Valley Foods Ltd v Hall & Partners
- Pride Valley Foods Ltd v Hall & Partners
- Pride Valley Foods Ltd v Hall & Partners
- Priestley v Ellis
- Priestley v Harrogate Health Care NHS Trust
- Pritchard (Inspector of Taxes) v Arundale
- Prosser (A) & Son Ltd v Levy
- Provimi Ltd v Roche Products Ltd
- Provimi Ltd v Roche Products Ltd
- Puffett v Hayfield
- Pugh v Cantor Fitzgerald International
- Pugh v Comr of Police for the Metropolis
- Pursell v Horn sub nom Purcell v Horne
- Purset v Hutchings
- Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School Blackburn Ltd v Banks Wilson Solicitors (a firm)
- Quinn (or Quin) v Burch Bros (Builders) Ltd
- R (minors) (abduction: consent), Re
- R (on the application of A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of B) v Head Teacher of Alperton Community School
- R (on the application of Bempoa) v Southwark London Borough Council
- R (on the application of Caine) v Cavendish
- R (on the application of CD) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeal Panel; R (on the application of JM) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeal Panel
- R (on the application of E) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeals Panel
- R (on the application of E) v Criminal Injuries Compensation Appeal Panel
- R (on the application of Grundy & Co Excavations Ltd) v Halton Division Magistrates Court
- R (on the application of IFG Financial Services Ltd) v Financial Ombudsman Service Ltd
- R (on the application of Khan) v Her Majesty's Coroner for West Hertfordshire
- R (on the application of M) v Inner London Crown Court
- R (on the application of Mach) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of McCann) v Crown Court at Manchester; Clingham v Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council
- R (on the application of O'Reilly) v Blenheim Healthcare Ltd
- R (on the application of P) v Liverpool City Magistrates' Court
- R (on the application of R) v Durham Constabulary
- R (on the application of S) v Inner West London Coroner
- R (on the application of Selter Associates Ltd) v Leicestershire County Council
- R (on the application of Stunt) v Mallett
- R (on the application of Taylor) v Haydn-Smith
- R (on the application of the RSPCA) v Sittingbourne Magistrates
- R (on the application of U) v Metropolitan Police Comr; R (on the application of R) v Durham Constabulary
- R (on the application of Yildrim) v Immigration Appeal Tribunal
- R Cruickshank Ltd v Chief Constable of Kent County Constabulary
- R v A
- R v A
- R v Adaway
- R v Adomako
- R v Ainscough
- R v Anglian Water Services Ltd sub nom Hart v Anglian Water Services Ltd
- R v Antoine
- R v Antoine
- R v Antoine
- R v Antoine
- R v Archibald, A-G's Reference (No 69 of 2001)
- R v Associated Octel Co Ltd
- R v B
- R v B
- R v B
- R v B
- R v B
- R v Bahadoor
- R v Bailey
- R v Bailey
- R v Baldwin
- R v Banks
- R v Barlow
- R v Barnes
- R v Barney
- R v Barratt
- R v Bartley
- R v Bashir
- R v Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, ex p Bassett
- R v Bates
- R v Beasley
- R v Begum (Husna)
- R v Begum (Husna)
- R v Belfon
- R v Bell
- R v Bennett
- R v Bennett
- R v Berry (No 3)
- R v Billinghurst
- R v Blake
- R v Blake
- R v Bland
- R v Blaue
- R v Blyth Valley Magistrates' Court, ex p Dobson
- R v Boguszewicz
- R v Bolduc and Bird
- R v Bolduc and Bird
- R v Boreman
- R v Boreman
- R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust, ex p L
- R v Boyton
- R v Bradish
- R v Brady
- R v Brady
- R v Breckenridge
- R v Briggs
- R v Brighton Borough Council, ex p Harvey
- R v Brockley
- R v Brown
- R v Brown
- R v Brown and other appeals
- R v Brown and other appeals
- R v Bruce
- R v Bryce
- R v Bryce
- R v Buckingham
- R v Burgess
- R v Burstow
- R v Burton
- R v Butler
- R v Byrne
- R v Byrne
- R v Byrne
- R v C
- R v C
- R v C
- R v Camden London Borough Council, ex p Aranda
- R v Camden London Borough Council, ex p Aranda
- R v Case
- R v Castle
- R v Cato
- R v Cerovic
- R v Choudhury, R v Uddin sub nom R v Choudhoury, R v Uddin
- R v Chute
- R v Clark
- R v Clark
- R v Clark
- R v Clarke
- R v Cole sub nom R v Cole, Lees and Birch
- R v Cole sub nom R v Cole, Lees and Birch
- R v Coleman
- R v Coles
- R v Coles
- R v Colle
- R v Colwill
- R v Cooper
- R v Coote
- R v Cope
- R v Corran
- R v Crabbe
- R v Cronshaw
- R v Croydon London Borough, ex p Easom
- R v Cuerrier
- R v Cunningham
- R v Cutts
- R v D
- R v D
- R v Dakou
- R v Dalby
- R v Davidson
- R v Davies
- R v Davies
- R v Day
- R v Dean
- R v Dear
- R v Densu
- R v Dhaliwal (appeal under s 58 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- R v Dias
- R v Dimsey; R v Allen
- R v Dimsey; R v Allen
- R v Docherty
- R v Dodman
- R v Doring
- R v Doring
- R v Downes
- R v DPP, ex p Cooke
- R v DPP, ex p Jones
- R v Drew
- R v Driscoll
- R v Dunne
- R v Easton
- R v Egan
- R v Elliott
- R v Elliott
- R v Ellis
- R v Ellis
- R v Elrington
- R v Erisman
- R v Evans
- R v Ewanchuk (A-G intervening)
- R v Ewanchuk (A-G intervening)
- R v Ewanchuk (A-G intervening)
- R v Fancy
- R v Fancy
- R v Finlay
- R v Finta
- R v Finta
- R v Fisher
- R v Fitzgerald
- R v Forest of Dean Justices, ex p Farley
- R v Forsyth
- R v Franklin
- R v French
- R v Futter
- R v FW Woolworth & Co
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v G
- R v Gabriel
- R v Gateway Foodmarkets Ltd
- R v Giannetto
- R v Gibson; R v Sylveire
- R v Gibson; R v Sylveire
- R v Gill
- R v Governor of Brockhill Prison, ex p Evans (No 2)
- R v Gowans; R v Hillman
- R v Graham
- R v Graham, R v Kansal, R v Ali, R v Marsh, R v Graham, R v Prince, R v Bramich
- R v Graham-Kerr
- R v Grant
- R v Gray and Evans
- R v Greatrex, R v Bates
- R v Green
- R v Greenstein, R v Green
- R v Groves
- R v Grunwald
- R v Guilfoyle
- R v Hagan
- R v Hall
- R v Hallett
- R v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council, ex p P
- R v Hancock; R v Warner; R v Michael
- R v Hardie
- R v Hardie
- R v Harding
- R v Harrison
- R v Harrison
- R v Harrow London Borough Council, ex p Coker
- R v Harrow London Borough Council, ex p Fahia
- R v Hart
- R v Haslam
- R v Havard
- R v Headley
- R v Hogan
- R v Horn
- R v Horseferry Road Magistrates' Court, ex p K
- R v Horseferry Road Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Siadatan
- R v Howells
- R v Hussain
- R v Ike
- R v Inspector of Taxes, ex p Clarke sub nom R v Freshwell General Comrs for Income Tax, ex p Clarke
- R v Islam
- R v Izod
- R v Jackson
- R v Jackson
- R v Jackson
- R v Jackson
- R v Jakeman
- R v Janjua, R v Choudury
- R v Jefferson
- R v JF Alford Transport Ltd
- R v Jobidon
- R v Jones
- R v Jones
- R v Jones
- R v Jones
- R v Jurtyn
- R v K
- R v K
- R v K
- R v K
- R v K
- R v Kearns
- R v Kellam, ex p South Wales Police Authority
- R v Kennedy
- R v Khan
- R v Khan
- R v Kiddle
- R v Kimber
- R v King, R v Stockwell
- R v Kingham
- R v Kingston
- R v Kirkland
- R v Knight
- R v Kowalski
- R v Lalani
- R v Lamb
- R v Larter and Castleton
- R v Law Society, ex p Ingman Foods AB
- R v Lawrence
- R v Lawrence
- R v Lee
- R v Levine
- R v Lincolnshire (Kesteven) Justices, ex p O'Connor
- R v Linekar
- R v Linsberg and Leies
- R v Livesey
- R v Lock
- R v Loizou
- R v London Borough of Merton, ex p Ruffle
- R v Loukes
- R v Lynsey
- R v Lytton
- R v M
- R v M
- R v Macdougal
- R v Makoare
- R v Malpas
- R v Manning
- R v Marcus
- R v Mark
- R v Martin
- R v Martineau
- R v Mason
- R v Matudi
- R v Matudi
- R v May
- R v McCormack
- R v McCrudden
- R v Mellor
- R v Meredith
- R v Merrick
- R v Metcalfe
- R v Miah
- R v Milford Haven Port Authority
- R v Miller
- R v Miller
- R v Miller
- R v Minhas
- R v Mitchell
- R v Mohan
- R v Moloney
- R v Monk
- R v Montila sub nom R v M
- R v Morgans
- R v Morrison
- R v Muhamad
- R v Muhamad
- R v Munro
- R v Murphy
- R v Nathaniel
- R v Neale
- R v Neary
- R v Nichol
- R v Nicholas
- R v Nicholson
- R v Nicholson
- R v Noakes
- R v Nwinski
- R v Oakley
- R v Okolie
- R v Ondhia
- R v Orpin
- R v Orpin
- R v Osborne
- R v O'Shay
- R v Osolin (A-G of Canada intervening)
- R v P
- R v Paine
- R v Paine
- R v Paine
- R v Paraskeva
- R v Park
- R v Parker
- R v Parmenter
- R v Parmenter
- R v Pearce
- R v Peters
- R v Phekoo sub nom R v Pheekoo
- R v Pickford
- R v Pigg
- R v Pitman
- R v Pontes (A-G of Canada intervening)
- R v Poole
- R v Powell
- R v Powell and Daniels
- R v Powell and Daniels
- R v Powell, R v English
- R v R
- R v R
- R v Ramosa Ltd
- R v Ramzan; R v Israel; R v Vaikilipour
- R v Rashid
- R v Reid
- R v Reid
- R v Reid
- R v Renouf
- R v Richards
- R v Richards
- R v Richardson
- R v Richardson, R v Irwin
- R v Richardson, R v Irwin
- R v Riley
- R v Roberts
- R v Roberts, R v Taylor, R v Chapman, R v Daly
- R v Robertson
- R v Robinson
- R v Rogers
- R v Romeo
- R v Rook
- R v Rosinski
- R v Royle
- R v Russell
- R v Russell
- R v Ruzic (A-G for Ontario intervening)
- R v Ryland
- R v Saik
- R v Saik
- R v Sakavickas
- R v Salim (aka Herbinier)
- R v Sangha
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Gallagher
- R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Ghulam Fatima sub nom R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal, ex p Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R v Seymour
- R v Seymour
- R v Sharif
- R v Sheehan; R v Moore
- R v Sheppard
- R v Sheppard
- R v Sheppard
- R v Shillibier, Re HTV
- R v Shivpuri
- R v Shohid
- R v Short
- R v Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council, ex p Griffiths
- R v Slingsby
- R v Smith
- R v Smith
- R v Smith
- R v Smith
- R v Smith (Wallace Duncan)
- R v Smith (Wallace Duncan)
- R v Smith; R v Khela
- R v Sood
- R v Southwood
- R v Speechley
- R v Spratt
- R v Spratt
- R v St George
- R v St George
- R v Staines
- R v Steel
- R v Steer
- R v Stephens
- R v Stephenson
- R v Stone, R v Dobinson
- R v Suchedina
- R v Sultana
- R v Sutton
- R v Sutton Justices, ex p DPP
- R v Swarsbrick
- R v Symonds
- R v T
- R v T
- R v Taaffe
- R v Tabassum
- R v Tabassum
- R v Tatton
- R v Tewkesbury Corpn
- R v Thomson Holidays Ltd
- R v Timmins
- R v Tobierre
- R v Toews
- R v Toews
- R v Tombe
- R v Tutton
- R v Venna
- R v W
- R v W
- R v W
- R v Walker
- R v Walkington
- R v Warburton
- R v Warburton-Pitt
- R v Warden of the Fleet
- R v Warwick, R v Webster
- R v Welburn
- R v Welburn
- R v Wells Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Westminster City Council
- R v Wells Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Westminster City Council
- R v Wharton
- R v Wight
- R v Wight
- R v Williams
- R v Williams
- R v Wilson
- R v Winter
- R v Wollaston
- R v Wolverhampton Coroner, ex p McCurbin
- R v Wood
- R v Woodhurst
- R v Woodward
- R v Woollin
- R v Woollin
- R v Yaqoob
- R v Young
- R v Yuen Chong
- R v Zaman
- Racz v Home Office
- Racz v Home Office
- Rahman v Arearose Ltd
- Ranjan v Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police
- Rawlings v Rawlings
- Rawlings v Till sub nom Rawlins v Pitt
- Re W & P (a child: non-accidental injury)
- Read v Coker
- Read v J Lyons & Co Ltd
- Ready Mixed Concrete (Supply of), Re sub nom Director General of Fair Trading v Smiths Concrete Ltd
- Ready Mixed Concrete (Supply of), Re sub nom Director General of Fair Trading v Smiths Concrete Ltd
- Redfern v Brownhart Ltd
- Reece v Taylor
- Rees v Dewhirst plc
- Reeves v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Rehman v University College London Hospitals NHS Trust
- Reilly v R
- Rennick v Rennick
- Republic v High Court, Accra, ex p Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice
- Rhodian River Shipping Co SA and Rhodian Sailor Shipping Co SA v Halla Maritime Corpn, The Rhodian River and Rhodian Sailor
- Rich (Marc) & Co Ltd v Societa Italiana Implanti PA
- Rich (Marc) & Co Ltd v Societa Italiana Implanti PA
- Richardson v Howie
- Richmond Ltd v DHL International (NZ) Ltd
- Richmond v Burch
- Rickards v Lothian
- Rimmer v Rimmer
- RJ (minors) (fostering: person disqualified), Re
- Roadrunner Properties Ltd v Dean
- Robbins v Whyte
- Roberton v Lewis (trading as Virginia Music)
- Roberts v Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
- Robertson (Charles) (Developments) Ltd v White
- Robinson v Buss Murton LLP
- Robinson v Ealing London Borough Council
- Robinson v Post Office
- Rolls Royce plc v Heavylift-Volga DNEPR Ltd
- Romney Marsh (Lords Bailiff-Jurats) v Trinity House Corpn
- Ronson International Ltd v Patrick
- Rooney v Cardona
- Roquette Fr�res SA v Directeur G�n�ral de la Concurrence, de la Consommation et de la R�pression des Fraudes: C-94/00
- Rose v Kempthorne
- Rossiter v Conway
- Rossiter v Tilsley
- Roth, Re, Goldberger v Roth
- Roughton v Weston Area Health Authority
- Roughton v Weston Area Health Authority
- Rous v Mitchell
- Rouse v Squires
- Rowe v Lindsay
- Rowe v Tutte
- Royal Greek Government v Minister of Transport
- Royall v R
- Royall v R
- Royall v R
- Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson
- Rumbelow v Rumbelow and Hadder (or Hadden)
- Rumney and Smith, Re
- Ruoff v Long & Co
- Russell v Home Office
- Sabena Technics SA v Singapore Airlines Ltd
- Sabri-Tabrizi v Lothian Health Board
- Sadler v South Staffordshire and Birmingham District Steam Tramways Co
- Salcon Ltd v United Cement Pte Ltd
- Sales v Stromberg
- Sam v Atkins
- Sands v Thompson
- Savory v Holland Hannen and Cubitts (Southern) Ltd
- Sawyer v Sawyer
- Schulte (Bernhard) GmbH & Co KG v Nile Holdings Ltd sub nom Schulte (Bernhard) GmbH
- SCI (Sales Curve Interactive) Ltd v Titus SARL
- Scotney v Lomer
- Scott v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire
- Scott v Copenhagen Reinsurance Co (UK) Ltd
- Scott v Davis
- Scott v Shepherd
- Scottish & Newcastle plc v Raguz
- Seaboard Offshore Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport, The Safe Carrier
- Seaboard Offshore Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport, The Safe Carrier
- Seah Kok Meng v Public Prosecutor
- SEB Trygg Liv Holding AB v Manches sub nom AMB Generali Holding AG v SEB Trygg Liv Holding Aktiebolag
- Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v W
- Securicor Ltd v Smith
- Segara s/o Pillay v Public Prosecutor
- Selkirk v Romar Investments Ltd
- Seton v Lafone
- Settlement Corpn v Hochschild (No 2)
- Shah v Gale
- Shanghai Teraoka Electronic Co Ltd v European Council: T-35/01
- Shankie-Williams v Heavey
- Shapland v Palmer
- Sharma v Royal Mail Group plc
- Sharp v Highland and Islands Fire Board
- Sharp v Powell
- Shaw v Chairitie
- Shaw v Redbridge London Borough Council
- Sherman v Perkins
- Shoreditch Corpn v Bull
- Siddell v Smith Cooper & Partners (a firm)
- Siddiqui v James & Charles Dodd
- Sidhu v Aerospace Composite Technology Ltd
- Simmons v British Steel plc
- Simpson v A-G (Baigent's Case)
- Singleton Abbey (SS) (Owners) v SS Paludina (Owners), The Paludina
- Sivanandan v Hackney Action for Racial Equality
- Six Continents Retail Ltd v Carford Catering Equipment Ltd
- Skerman v H Bollman Manufacturers Ltd
- Skerries Salmon Ltd v Braer Corpn
- Skevill v Avery
- Slattery v Moore Stephens (a firm)
- Slipper v BBC
- Smart v HM Advocate
- Smillie v Lothian and Borders Police Board
- Smith (a child suing by his father and litigation friend) v Sheridan
- Smith (by her mother and next friend) v Secretary of State for Health
- Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Citibank NA sub nom Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Scrimgeour Vickers (Asset Management) Ltd
- Smith v Harris
- Smith v Ministry of Defence
- Smith v Newcastle & North Tyneside Health Authority
- Smith v West Yorkshire Health Authority (formerly Leeds Health Authority)
- Smith v Zeneca (Agrochemicals) Ltd
- Smithkline Beecham plc v Apotex Europe Ltd
- Smithwick v National Coal Board sub nom Smethwick v National Coal Board
- Sneddon v HM Advocate sub nom Sneddon v HM Advocate; P v HM Advocate
- Sneddon v HM Advocate sub nom Sneddon v HM Advocate; P v HM Advocate
- Sneddon v HM Advocate sub nom Sneddon v HM Advocate; P v HM Advocate
- Sneesby v Lancashire and Yorkshire Rly Co
- Sole v W J Hallt Ltd
- Somatra Ltd v Sinclair Roche & Temperley
- Somchai Liangsiriprasert v Government of the United States of America
- Somerset v Hart
- Somji v Cadbury Schweppes plc
- Sooklal v State
- Souchette Ltd v London County, Westminster and Parr's Bank Ltd
- Sousa v A & J Bull Ltd
- South Wales Police Authority v Morgan
- Southard v DPP
- Sparks v HSBC plc
- Spence v R
- Spencer v Boots The Chemist Ltd
- Spendiff v HM Advocate
- Stafford v State
- Stammers v Yearsley
- Standing v Bowring
- Stanley v Powell
- Stanley v Powell
- Stapley v Gypsum Mines Ltd
- Stark v Post Office
- State of New South Wales v Lepore and related appeals
- Stephens v Myers
- Steuerman v Dampcoursing Ltd
- Stevens v Lynch
- Stevens v R
- Stewart v Lambeth London Borough Council
- Stocken v Carter
- Stoneham's Settlement Trusts, Re, Popkiss v Stoneham
- Stotardt v South East London and Kent Bus Co Ltd
- Stovold v Barlows
- Stuttard (t/a De Wynns Coffee House) v Comrs of Customs and Excise
- Sully v Morewood
- Summers (by her litigation friend) v Stubbs
- Summers v Salford Corpn
- Sun Permanent Benefit Building Society v Western Suburban and Harrow Road Permanent Building Society
- Sunair Holidays Ltd v Dodd
- Sunport Shipping Ltd v Tryg-Baltica International (UK) Ltd
- Sutherland v Gustar (Inspector of Taxes)
- Sweetman v Nathan
- Syers v Chapman
- T (children: interim care order), Re
- Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations PTY Ltd
- Tanqueray-Willaume and Landau, Re
- Tant v HM Advocate
- Tappoo Holdings Ltd v Stuchbery
- Targett v Torfaen Borough Council
- Taylor Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd, Old and Campbell Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Friendly Society
- Taylor v Mostyn
- Taylor v Neri
- Taylor v Poncia
- Taylor v Rover Co Ltd
- Taylor v Topping
- Telewest Ltd v Yorkshire Electricity Distribution plc
- Temple Bar (Owners) v Guildford (Owners), The Guildford sub nom The Guildford
- Temple v South Manchester Health Authority
- Tennant Radiant Heat Ltd v Warrington Development Corpn
- Thacker's Goods, Re
- Thames Cruises Ltd v George Wheeler Launches Ltd
- Thames Water Utilities Ltd v London Regional Transport
- The Sivand
- Therm-A-Stor Ltd v Home Insulation Ltd
- Thomas v Kostanjevec
- Thomas, Re, Davies v Davies
- Thompson and Curzon, Re
- Thompson and Holt, Re
- Thompson v Bradford
- Thompson v Home Office
- Thompson v James
- Thompson v Schmidt
- Thompson's Settlement, Re, Thompson v Thompson
- Thomson Travel Ltd v Roberts
- Thomson, Re, Thomson v Thompson
- Thorn v City Rice Mills
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England
- Three Rivers District Council v Bank of England
- Thurogood v Van Den Berghs and Jurgens Ltd sub nom Thorogood v Van Den Berghs and Jurgens Ltd
- Titley v Foxall
- Tobacco Trade Benevolent Association, Re, Baron Sinclair v Finlay & Co Ltd
- Tomlinson v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Topp v London Country Bus (South West) Ltd
- Toronto Rly Co v King
- Total Spares & Supplies Ltd v Antares SRL
- Toth v Jarman
- Tottage v Petty
- Townsend v Achilleas
- Trac Time Control Ltd v Moss Plastic Parts Ltd
- Transco plc v HM Advocate
- Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan BC, Reddish Vale Golf Club v Stockport Metropolitan BC
- Tree v Bowkett
- Tremain v Pike
- Triodos Bank NV v Dobbs; Dobbs v Morrison
- Truscott v Carpenter and Man
- Turbervell v Savadge sub nom Tuberville v Savage
- Tweedie v Miles, Re
- Union Accident Insurance Co Ltd, Re
- Union Bank of Jamaica Ltd v Yap
- Union Bank of Manchester Ltd v Grundy
- Unipart Group Ltd v O2 (UK) Ltd
- Unipart Group Ltd v O2 (UK) Ltd
- United States of America v Dynar
- University of Keele v Price Waterhouse (a firm)
- Uttley v Uttley
- Uzor v Chinye
- Vakante v Addey & Stanhope School
- Van Colle v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police
- Vasey v Surrey Free Inns
- Vaughan v Halifax-Dartmouth Bridge Commission
- Vaughan v Hampson
- Vaughan v McKenzie
- Vehicle and Operator Services Agency v F & S Gibbs Transport Services Ltd
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Blakes Chilled Distribution Ltd
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Blakes Chilled Distribution Ltd
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Blakes Chilled Distribution Ltd
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Blakes Chilled Distribution Ltd
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Nuttall (t/a Redline Coaches)
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Nuttall (t/a Redline Coaches)
- Vehicle Inspectorate v Nuttall (t/a Redline Coaches)
- Verdon v Topham
- Verrell's Contract, Re
- Viasystems (Tyneside) Ltd v Thermal Transfer (Northern) Ltd
- Vincent and Tomlinson v Eyton
- Vinmar International Ltd v Theresa Navigation SA
- Vision Golf Ltd v 1 Loft House Hill Ltd
- Vision Golf Ltd v Weightmans (a firm)
- Volkswagen AG v European Commission: T-208/01
- Vowles v Evans
- Vrinera Marine Co Ltd v Eastern Rich Operations Inc, The Vakis T
- W (a child) (non-accidental injury: expert evidence), Re sub nom W v Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council
- W v Minister of Pensions
- Wagner v West Ham Corpn
- Walker v Mottram
- Walker v Murphy
- Walters v North Glamorgan NHS Trust
- Ward v Ward
- Wardlaw v Farrar
- Warner v Sampson
- Waters v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Waters v Metropolitan Police Comr
- Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd
- Watson v British Boxing Board of Control Ltd
- Watson v Christie
- Watson v Hythe Borough Council
- Watson v Ian Snipe & Co (a firm)
- Weait v Jayanbee Joinery Ltd
- Weaver v Bush
- Webb v Barclays Bank plc
- Webster (Procurator Fiscal, Dunoon) v Dominick
- Webster v Watts
- Weir v Bettison (sued as Chief Constable of Merseyside Police)
- West Bromwich Building Society v Mander Hadley
- West London Commercial Bank v Reliance Permanent Building Society
- West Pennard Churchyard, Re
- Western Trust & Savings Ltd v Travers & Co (a firm)
- Western Trust and Savings Ltd v Strutt and Parker
- Westminster City Council v Blenheim Leisure (Restaurants) Ltd and Langer and Cura
- Westminster City Council v Blenheim Leisure (Restaurants) Ltd and Langer and Cura
- Westminster City Council v Croyalgrange Ltd
- Westminster Corpn and United Travellers Club Co Ltd v Chapman
- Weston v Gribben
- Wheeler v Morris
- Whistler, Re
- White Rose Cottage, Re
- White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police sub nom Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police
- Whitham, Re, Whitham v Davies
- Whitting v Whitting
- Whittle v Bennet
- Whittle v Bennett
- Wigman v R
- Wildtree Hotels Ltd v Harrow London BC
- Willett and Argenti, Re
- Williams Bros Direct Supply Stores Ltd v Cloote
- Williams v Home Office
- Williams v Jones
- Williams v Linnitt
- Willie v Companies House
- Willis v Redbridge Health Authority
- Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority
- Wilson (trading as Wilson's Greengrocers) v Knight
- Wilson v Pringle
- Wilson v South Kesteven District Council
- Wilson, Re, Wilson v Holloway
- Wimpey (George) & Co Ltd v BOAC
- Wings Ltd v Ellis
- Wings Ltd v Ellis
- Winterburn v Brooks
- Wisdom v Hodson
- Witter (Thomas) Ltd v TBP Industries Ltd
- Wong v Parkside Health NHS Trust
- Wong v Parkside Health NHS Trust
- Woolworths plc v Henry Boot Management Ltd
- Wootton v Dawkins sub nom Wootton v Dorking
- Wright v HM Advocate
- Wright v McLean
- Wright v McLean
- Wright v Olswang
- Wright v Robotham
- Wrothwell (FJH) Ltd v Yorkshire Water Authority
- Yates (Peter) & Co v Bullock
- Yates, Re, Bostock v D'Eyncourt
- Yip v R
- Young v Ministry of Defence
- Young v Pridd
- Younger v Saner
- Younger v Saner
- Youssif v Jordan
Did you know that we also do...
essay marking and custom essay writing?
Our qualified team of professionals can review your essay for you, correcting spelling, grammar, structure and referencing - and most importantly, they will determine its overall likely mark upon submittal to your University. When you instruct us to help you we will consider how well you have answered your essay question and offer feedback with practical suggestions for improving your answer. Our team will help you to identify where you are going wrong and how to write better essays in the future. Why chance submitting an incorrect answer - be 100% sure of your success!
Alternatively, you can order a custom, model answer written by an academic professional which deals with your exact essay question. This can be used as a starting point for your own work. All of our academics hold AT LEAST a 2:1 law degree; most are practicing lawyers and have teaching or grading experience. Give yourself that academic edge and order today!
