The map is based on the reports published by the U.S. Sentencing commission.

Defendents charged with of The map is based on reports released by the U.S. Sentencing Commission in 2006

Defendents charged with of powdered cocaine. The map is based on reports released by the U.S. Sentencing Commission in 2006.

The map is based on the U.S. Sentence Commission reports for the year 2006. The map has data for the number of defendents charged with either trafficking or possessing marijuana.

The U.S. Sentencing commission has recommended that the mandotory sentencing guidelines for crack be reduced by almost 27 months. That would in turn qualify release from prison for certain number of prisoners currently serving time for crack related drug covictions. The map shows the qualifying numbe of prisones by district courts who could qualify released from prison over the next six years. The mandatory drug sentence laws passed during eighties have resulted in large sentences for those convicted of crack cocaine even for those with just one offense. The so called equivalency rule equates 1 gram of crack cocaine with 100 grams of powedered cocaine. Thus more people are convicted due to smaller amount of crack cocaine possession and receive larger setnences compared to those convicted of powedered cocaine It so happens that much of this small trade involves higher number of blacks comapred to any other race and therefore those serving larger prison sentences happen to be blacks. Finally the commission decided to mitigate this disparity of prison sentences received by crack and powedered cocaine criminals and suggested a retroactive reduction of 27 months in prison sentence. The map shows the number of crack cocaine criminal who may be eligible for early prison release.

The map is based on the U.S. Sentence Commission reports for the year 2006. The map has data for the number of defendents charged with either trafficking or possessing crack cocaine.

The map is based on estiamtes of veteran population by congressional districts from year 2000 to 2030. Note that orignial table from Veteran Administration has these numbers by 100th Coungrssional districts. And hence used boundary file for the 110th Congress (current Congress) from Census to generate these maps.

The map is based on Veteran Health (VHA) estimates of veteran population 85 and older between 2000 and 2007, by county. VHA is organized into 22 VISNs (Veterans Integrated Service Networks.) The data is derived from regional network 22 VISNs (Veterans Integrated Service Network; [Link] VHA operates 173 hospitals, 396 ambulatory care facilities, 133 nursing homes, 40 domiciliaries, and 205 readjustment counseling centers, called "Vet Centers."

The map is based on Veteran Health (VHA) estimates of veteran population 85 and older between 2000 and 2007, by county. VHA is organized into 22 VISNs (Veterans Integrated Service Networks.) The data is derived from regional network 22 VISNs (Veterans Integrated Service Network; [Link] operates 173 hospitals, 396 ambulatory care facilities, 133 nursing homes, 40 domiciliaries, and 205 centers, called "Vet Centers."

The map is based on Veteran Health (VHA) estimates of veteran population 85 and older between 2000 and 2007, by county. VHA is organized into 22 VISNs (Veterans Integrated Service Networks.) The data is derived from regional network 22 VISNs (Veterans Integrated Service Network; [Link] operates 173 hospitals, 396 ambulatory care facilities, 133 nursing homes, 40 domiciliaries, and 205 centers, called "Vet Centers."

The map is based on Veteran Health (VHA) estimates of veteran population 85 and older between 2000 and 2007, by county. The data is derived from regional administrative network of 22 VISNs (Veterans Integrated Service Network; [Link]

The map is based on Veteran Health (VHA) estimates of veteran population 85 and older between 2000 and 2007, by county. VHA is organized into 22 VISNs (Veterans Integrated Service Networks.) The data is derived from regional network 22 VISNs (Veterans Integrated Service Network; [Link] operates 173 hospitals, 396 ambulatory care facilities, 133 nursing homes, 40 domiciliaries, and 205 centers, called "Vet Centers."

The map is based on Census data table showing veteran population as percent of total population over 18 by the congressional districts in year 2000.

The map is based on FEC disclosure reports by major candidates from both parties released on 15th Oct, 2007. It shows the percent share of campaign donations by zipcode raised by major candidates from both the GOP and Democratic parties: Clinton, Obama, Giuliani, Romney and Thompson. For eg., say total of $100 are raised by Clinton, Obama, Giuliani, Romney and Thompson from a zipcode area, then this map will show each candidates percent share of the monies raised in that zipcode. This could also be used to show geographic strongholds of each of the major party candidates.

The map is based on FEC disclosure reports by major candidates from both parties released on 15th Oct, 2007. It shows number of donors by zipcode, who contributed to major candidates from both the GOP and Democratic parties: Clinton, Obama, Giuliani, Romney and Thompson.

The map is based on FEC disclosure reports by major candidates from both parties released on 15th Oct, 2007. It shows the campaign donations by zipcode raised by major candidates from both the GOP and Democratic parties: Clinton, Obama, Giuliani, Romney and Thompson.

The map is based on data released by Federal Election Commission on 15th Oct, 2007. The FEC data was geocoded and aggregated to 5 digit zipcode areas. It has number of donors and total donations for the 3rd quarter by zipcode.

The map is based on data released by Federal Election Commission on 15th Oct, 2007. The FEC data was geocoded and aggregated to 5 digit zipcode areas. It has number of donors and total donations for the 3rd quarter by zipcode area.

The map is based on data released by Federal Election Commission on 15th Oct, 2007. The FEC data was geocoded and aggregated to 5 digit zipcode areas. It has number of donors and total donations for the 3rd quarter by zipcode.

The map is based on data released by Federal Election Commission on 15th Oct, 2007. The FEC data was geocoded and aggregated to 5 digit zipcode areas. It has number of donors and total donations for the 3rd quarter by zipcode.

The map is based on data released by Federal Election Commission on 15th Oct, 2007. The FEC data was geocoded and aggregated to 5 digit zipcode areas. It has number of donors and total donations for the 3rd quarter by zipcode.

The map is based on data released by Federal Election Commission on 15th Oct, 2007. The FEC data was geocoded and aggregated to 5 digit zipcode areas. It has number of donors and total donations for the 3rd quarter by zipcode.

The map is based on DoD's report on procurment contracts for the year 2006. The report has over 1.25 million records, each corresponding to a contract for procurement of The map shows average amount of contracts by zipcode in the lower 48 states. Top five zipcodes in terms of highest value of procurement contracts are: 1. Zipcode 76108; Over 1,260 procurement contracts worth more than $10.6 billion 2. Zipcode 22202; Over 16,000 procurement contracts worth $8.23 billion 3. Zipcode 63042; Over 4,160 procurement contracts worth $7.34 billion 4. Zipcode 77020; Over 460 procurement contracts worth $5.57 billion 5. Zipcode 90807; Over 330 procurement contracts worth $4.40 billion Just 50 zipcodes had nearly $114 billion worth of contract between them. Nearly 700 zipcodes had at least $50 million or more procurement contract; between them they had more than 600,000 contracts worth more than $238 billion. The top five zipcodes with highest value of average cotract amounts are: 1. Zipcode 20585; 5 contracts with average value of: $175 million 2. Zipcode 11431; 1 contract with a value of $120 million 3. Zipcode 77010; 7 contrats with average value of $115.6 million 4. Zipcode 16149; 1 contract of value: $97.7 million 5. Zipcode 90623; 13 contracts with average value of $45 million Nearly 350 zipcodes recevied over $120 billion DoD procurement dataset shows the total value of procurement contracts by zipcode

Map is based on 2006 DoD report on procurement from DoD's website. It shows all the US based Defense Contractors with contract value of $10 Mill or more. Much of the contractor list is filled with "Who's Who" from the defense industry. And yet, there are a handful of big contracts that do not have contractor name(s). The top 5 contracts are: 1. $2.02 billon to McDonnell Douglas, Long Beach, CA 2. $1.89 billion to Lockheed Martin, Tarant, TX 3. $1.66 billion to Lockheed Martin, Tarant, TX 4. $1.38 billion to Undisclosed, Arlington, VA 5. $1.36 billion to Electric Boat Company, Groton, CT The total value of over 3,700 contracts of $10 Mill or more is nearly $157 billion, that is more than 50% of all of 1.25 million awards worth $292 billion.

The map is based on the output of 10 year return coastal flood model run on HAZUS. Flood levels are measured in feet. Much of the coastal area is safe for average level of flooding, however all along the waterfront average flood levels are can be as high as 10 ft.