US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

People Business Geography Newsroom Subjects A to Z Search@Census

American Community Survey (ACS)

Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables 2003 Index (Main) > Median Household Income (In 2003 Inflation-adjusted Dollars) (Place Level)
Median Household Income (In 2003 Inflation-adjusted Dollars)
Households (Place level)
Rank Place Median Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 San Jose city, CA 70,240 67,128 73,352
2 Anchorage municipality, AK 59,459 56,489 62,429
3 San Francisco city, CA 57,833 54,779 60,887
4 Virginia Beach city, VA 52,175 48,922 55,428
5 Colorado Springs city, CO 50,667 47,243 54,091
6 Seattle city, WA 49,469 45,996 52,942
7 Arlington city, TX 48,775 42,850 54,700
8 San Diego city, CA 47,631 44,800 50,462
9 Honolulu CDP, HI 46,839 44,214 49,464
10 Riverside city, CA 46,755 42,725 50,785
11 Bakersfield city, CA 45,791 39,819 51,763
12 Anaheim city, CA 45,707 40,632 50,782
13 Raleigh city, NC 44,452 41,124 47,780
14 Aurora city, CO 44,401 37,630 51,172
15 Charlotte city, NC 44,375 40,969 47,781
16 Oakland city, CA 44,129 39,596 48,662
17 Las Vegas city, NV 44,078 40,188 47,968
18 Denver city, CO 43,978 40,696 47,260
19 Stockton city, CA 43,857 37,077 50,637
20 Boston city, MA 42,567 37,868 47,266
21 Sacramento city, CA 42,142 37,983 46,301
22 Washington city, DC 42,118 40,279 43,957
23 Minneapolis city, MN 42,010 39,625 44,395
24 Corpus Christi city, TX 41,743 32,692 50,794
25 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 41,349 38,623 44,075
26 Mesa city, AZ 41,230 38,087 44,373
27 Jacksonville city, FL 41,167 39,393 42,941
28 Austin city, TX 40,921 37,755 44,087
29 Phoenix city, AZ 40,919 39,174 42,664
30 Portland city, OR 40,885 39,978 41,792
31 Chicago city, IL 40,879 39,672 42,086
32 St. Paul city, MN 40,866 38,598 43,134
33 Los Angeles city, CA 40,733 39,867 41,599
34 Omaha city, NE 40,436 39,106 41,766
35 Albuquerque city, NM 40,061 37,574 42,548
36 Columbus city, OH 40,042 39,151 40,933
37 New York city, NY 39,937 38,970 40,904
38 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 39,794 36,101 43,487
39 Fort Worth city, TX 39,729 37,015 42,443
40 Wichita city, KS 38,846 35,565 42,127
41 Kansas City city, MO 38,639 35,724 41,554
42 Lexington-Fayette, KY 38,288 33,729 42,847
43 San Antonio city, TX 36,994 35,461 38,527
44 Santa Ana city, CA 36,968 31,725 42,211
45 Dallas city, TX 36,678 35,226 38,130
46 Long Beach city, CA 36,652 32,479 40,825
47 Tulsa city, OK 36,581 34,548 38,614
48 Fresno city, CA 36,537 33,251 39,823
49 Oklahoma City city, OK 35,694 32,306 39,082
50 Houston city, TX 35,597 34,544 36,650
51 Tampa city, FL 33,424 28,751 38,097
52 Philadelphia city, PA 33,062 31,540 34,584
53 Atlanta city, GA 32,635 28,881 36,389
54 El Paso city, TX 32,495 29,292 35,698
55 Baltimore city, MD 32,452 29,240 35,664
56 Tucson city, AZ 32,414 31,323 33,505
57 Memphis city, TN 32,315 30,300 34,330
58 Milwaukee city, WI 32,291 30,594 33,988
59 Toledo city, OH 31,982 28,793 35,171
60 Newark city, NJ 31,449 24,550 38,348
61 Pittsburgh city, PA 30,976 28,518 33,434
62 Cincinnati city, OH 30,850 28,843 32,857
63 St. Louis city, MO 30,032 27,719 32,345
64 New Orleans city, LA 28,645 26,716 30,574
65 Buffalo city, NY 28,499 25,092 31,906
66 Detroit city, MI 26,157 24,082 28,232
67 Miami city, FL 23,774 21,309 26,239
68 Cleveland city, OH 22,978 20,924 25,032

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

this table from 2000

this table as printable pdf

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2003 Index

 

      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2003 American Community Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

  [PDF] or PDF denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader This link to a non-federal Web site does not imply endorsement of any particular product, company, or content. available free from Adobe.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007