PopPhoto.com -- The online home of American Photo and Popular Photography & Imaging

Free Newsletter: Camera reviews,
lens tests, photo news and more!
May 13, 2008
Search

Subscribe

Popular Photography American Photo
Subscriptions/Customer ServiceDigital Subscription
Give a GiftRenew My Subscription

 More Zoom Lens - Standard Articles (1 of 46)Next Article >
Printer Friendly Send to a Friend Photo Gallery

Lens Test: Canon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM AF

Dramatically compact, satisfyingly sharp, unusually designed, and optically stabilized. This full-framer is for Canon shooters who want it all in one lens.


April 2008


Lens Test: Canon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM AF
Click photo for a gallery of images taken with the Canon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM AF.

One of only two lenses that contains both refractive and diffractive glass elements, this image-stabilized tele zoom is dramatically more compact -- and expensive ($1,143, street) -- than its refractive-only Canon ($549, street) or Nikon ($479, street) counterparts. Unlike more common refractive optics, diffractive optical design is based on how light rays bend when forced to move around (not through) an obstruction -- in this case, a pattern of molded, sawtooth, Fresnel-like, concentric circles. A full-frame lens, it scales up to a 105-450mm on Canon EOS Digital Rebel models.

Hands On:

About one-third smaller than other 70-300mm stabilized lenses, it's also a few ounces lighter. Ribbed and rubber-clad focus and zoom rings turn evenly and smoothly. On our EOS 5D test camera, autofocus action is silent, rapid, and sure. In addition to AF-, IS-, and IS-mode switches, a fourth locks the zoom in its 70mm position.

In The Lab:

SQF tests found sharpness and contrast in the Excellent range at 70mm and 200mm, dipping to Very Good at 300mm, roughly equal to Canon's refractive version. DxO Analyzer 3.1 tests found Slight barrel distortion at 70mm (0.11%) and Visible pincushion distortion at 200mm and 300mm (0.34% and 0.33%, respectively), slightly better than the non-DO lens. Light falloff left the corners by f/5.6 at 70mm, and by f/8 at 200mm and 300mm, an average performance, but again slightly better than the refractive zoom. Maximum magnification ratios at the uniform close-focusing distance of about 52.5 inches were 1:14.25 at 70mm; 1:6.33 at 200mm; and 1:4.75 at 300mm (less power than Canon's claimed 1:4). Our image stabilization tests were based on DxO's Blur analysis: Three different users gained 2.5 to 3 stops of handholdable shutter speeds.

Conclusion:

Willing to pay to travel light and save space? You won't be disappointed with this remarkably bulk-free, satisfyingly sharp, full-frame, stabilized tele zoom.

Specifications

70-300mm (74.15-282.15mm tested), f/4.5-5.6 (f/4.74-n.a.* tested), 18 elements in 12 groups. Focusing turns 160 degrees counterclockwise. Zoom ring turns 80 degrees clockwise. Focal lengths marked at 70-, 100-, 135-, 200, and 300mm. • Diagonal view angle: 34-8 degrees. • Weight: 1.63 lb. • Filter size: 58mm. • Mounts: Canon AF. • Included: Lenshood, soft case. • Street price: $1,143.

*Unable to measure due to instrument limitation.


RELATED ARTICLES
Lens Test: Sony 24-70mm f/2.8 Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* ZA SSM AF
Lens Test: Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S
Lens Test: Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS
Lens Test: Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G ED AF-S
Lens Test: Pentax DA* 16-50mm f/2.8 SDM AF


Search




Click to compare prices on photo equipment:


Newsletter Promo Button
Digital Days Promo Button
American Photo On Campus
Mentor Series Promo Button