Sun Open Performance Contest Winners Blog About Sun Products |
"For reasons I can't even begin to fathom myself, I've always been a fan of the SPARC based Sun platforms. I initially had to sort of bear with Solaris in my development projects on the platform - although I've come to absolutely love Solaris 10 with the major improvements found here." -Mark Martin |
Winner - Sun Fire T2000 Server
Dr. Wetter IT Consulting ran a performance comparison, mainly disk and network I/O, and a variety of application benchmarks, some locally like big compiler jobs and others like LDAP and WWW over the network. The competitors were Solaris 10 HW 6/06 on one side and Ubuntu 6.06 LTS on the other side.
"The T2000 hardware made a good and solid impression as it is almost usual from Sun." "Solaris 10 U2 – as expected – installed without any problems on the T2000 and the new features especially the Zettabyte file system brought Solaris another step forward." "The strength besides the low energy consumption is the multiprocessing / threading technology. The good thing is that you (still) can try before you buy, that should help you to make a purchase decision without risk." -Dr. Dirk Wetter |
Winner - Sun Ultra 20 M2 Workstation
Geek Patrol worked with the Sun Ultra 20 M2 workstation, running Solaris 10 and Windows XP. After spending some quality time with Solaris 10 running on a Sun Ultra 20 M2, Geek Patrol ported Geekbench 2006 to Solaris for both 32- and 64-bit x86-based processors. Geek Patrol simulated processor and memory intensive tasks using Geekbench 2006.
"Solaris outperformed Windows in almost every benchmark category, even outperforming Windows dramatically in some specific tests (such as some of the floating point benchmarks). If you're working with processor-intensive tasks, Solaris might be the operating system for you." -John Poole |
Winner - Sun Ultra 40
"A VMWare approach, allowing you to run multiple concurrent different operating systems on the same hardware instance may prove to be more useful in the long run, even if the administration overhead is perhaps a little higher." -Nik Clayton |
Winner - Sun Fire T2000 Server
"T2000 is an excellent machine to build big parallel computing clusters or big data centers. If we look at the SWaP results is clear that an array of T2000 machines will give us a powerful supercomputer and we will make big savings in power consumption and space." -Mitch Theys |
Winner - Sun Fire T1000 Server
"Our data center electricity bills cross my desk every month so I'm glad to see Sun pushing hard on this issue. The T2000 and T1000 that I tested both met or exceeded what Sun's data sheet says they consume." -Charles Lamb |
Winner - Sun Fire T2000 Server
"The Sun Fire T2000 has certainly proven its worth. Some may be put off by the relatively low processor speed (the model tested was a mere 1GHz) but it is clearly not an impediment. The 8 core CPU seems to be up to the challenge and I'm sure with additional tuning I'm sure they'd scream." -Jon Emmons |
Winner - Sun Fire T2000 Server
MySQL and Apache (replacing 14 HP DL 145's with 2 T2000's)
Winner - Sun Fire T2000 Server
Apache Bench 2.0.55 requesting different number of static and dynamic pages using connections with and without keep-alive feature over a gigabit line
"If you're running a web site, get rid of any old hardware you might still own. The Proliant clearly was no match for the other two. No (big) surprises there, I'd say. If your web sites use static pages only, you may want a Sun Fire T2000 to serve them. The overall performance is better than what the really well equipped Lynx server provided." -Stefan Rubner |
Winner - Sun Fire T2000 Server
"What I couldn't wait for though, is to communicate the effect some single changes in our benchmarking setup have achieved. A few days ago I raved about the 5700 requests per second I was getting out of the Niagara box. Turns out that was a load of crap, here's what I'm getting now;" |
Requests per second: 15298.68 [#/sec] (mean) And here’s what an active HEAnet is pushing; Requests per second: 4445.26 [#/sec] (mean) * ftp.heanet.ie is currently running on a Dell Poweredge 2650 and a
Poweredge 7250. coroebus.heanet.ie acting as a web/ftp/rsync server, and
canyonero.heanet.ie acting as an rsync and content mirroring client. |
Those were terrific results Colm - are they too good to be true???
Applications: Plone and Zope
Applications: Apache, PHP, Java Virtual Machine with XML and XSLT processing
Application: Berkeley DB Java Edition
Application: Oracle 9iR2
Applications: In-House scientific computing codes
Application: Apache and PHP
Application: Tomcat
Application: MySQL
Application: MySQL
Application: PostgreSQL
Applications: Web Server with PHP
Applications: Apache, PHP and MySQL
Applications: Web services with SOAP, Xfire, Jetty and Woodstock XML parser
Applications: Apache, PHP and MySQL
Application: MySQL
|