Agriculture
Climate Change and Food Security
Prepared by Lauren Sacks and Cynthia
Rosenzweig
Introduction
Over the past fifty years, human ingenuity has led to technological
advances in agriculture that have dramatically increased crop
yields. However, despite these improvements, agriculture is still
highly dependent on climate since solar radiation, temperature,
and precipitation are the main drivers of crop growth. Since
the industrial revolution, humans have been changing the global
climate by emitting high amounts of greenhouse gases into the
atmosphere, potentially resulting in higher global temperatures,
changed hydrological regimes, and increased climatic variability.
Climate change over the next century may have significant effects
on food supply, i.e., how much food is produced, as well as food
security, i.e. how much food is available to people. How much,
where, and when food supply and security will be affected by climate
change are questions many scientists and policy-makers are examining.
Global Warming and Food Security
It seems obvious that any significant change in climate on a
global scale should impact local agriculture and thereby affect
the world's food supply. Considerable study has gone into the
questions of how farming might be affected in different regions,
and by how much; and whether the net result may be harmful or
beneficial, and to whom.
Some of the major organizations studying the effect of climate
change on agriculture include:
Impacts of Climate Change on Food Production
and Supply
Overall, climate change, including global warming and increased
climate variability, could result in a variety of impacts on agriculture.
Some of these effects are biophysical, some are ecological, and
some are economic (UNFCCC
Climate Change Information Kit).
They include:
Rosenzweig and Hillel (1995) explain these and other ideas in
Potential
Impacts of Climate Change on Agriculture and Food Supply.
In the early 1990's in a study sponsored by EPA, agricultural
scientists in 18 countries estimated potential changes in national
grain crop yields using crop models and the GCM scenarios at 112
sites worldwide (Rosenzweig and Parry, 1994) (Figure
3). The results of this global assessment suggests that a
doubling of the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration will
lead to only a small decrease in the global crop production.
However, it appears that developing countries in lower latitudes
will bear the brunt of these problems (Figure
4).
Several factors contribute to the latitudinal differences in
simulated yields. In high latitude regions, increased temperatures
benefited crops otherwise limited by cold temperatures and short
growing seasons. The climate change induced warming at low latitudes
brought greater heat and water stress, resulting in greater yield
decreases than at higher latitudes.
In addition, in Rosenzweig et al., Climate
Change and Extreme Weather Events; Implications for Food Production,
Plant Diseases, and Pests, the authors found that global food
supply may be affected by an increase in extreme weather events
and climate variability associated with global warming. Altered
weather patterns can increase crop vulnerabilities to infection,
pest infestations, and choking weeds. This will not only decrease
yields of crops, but also force farmers to apply harmful and expensive
pesticides and herbicides. The increase in extreme weather events
will affect both developed and developing countries, although
developed countries have more resources to deal with vulnerabilities.
Impacts of Climate Change on Food Security
How will climate change alter the ability of the world's growing
population to gain access to food? By integrating agricultural
and socio-economic models, we can begin to predict if there will
be an increase in hunger and famine as a result of global warming.
Food security has been defined as "access by all people at all
times to enough food for an active, healthy life" (World
Bank, 1986). The World Food Summit, convened in 1996
and in 2002
by the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
(FAO) in Rome, highlighted the basic right of all people to an
adequate diet and need for concerted action among all countries
to achieve this goal in a sustainable manner. How vulnerable
households, regions and countries are to climate change's impacts
on agriculture will depend on their access to land, water, and
government support and action.
The World Food Trade Model, designated as the Basic
Linked System (BLS), links countries through trade, world
market prices, and financial power. The BLS estimates that in
1980, there were about 500 million people at risk of hunger in
the developing world (excluding China). Without climate change,
the number of people expected to be at risk of hunger in 2060
has been estimated at ~640 million. This is marked decrease from
23% of the population of developing countries to 6% (excluding
China).
However, with unmitigated climate change, declines in yields
in low-latitude regions (where many developing countries are located)
are projected to require that net imports of cereals increase.
Higher grain prices will affect the number of people at risk of
hunger. The number of hungry people in developing countries will
increase by ~1% for every 2-2.5% increase in prices. This means
that the number of people at risk of hunger grows by 10-60% in
the scenarios tested, resulting an estimated increase of between
60 to 350 million people in this condition (Rosenzweig and Parry,
1994).
Mitigation and Adaptation
Reducing Carbon Emissions
One of the ways to prevent the effects of global warming is to
decrease the amount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases
into the atmosphere. The Kyoto Protocol
is a document that came out of the U.N. sponsored Earth Summit
in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. This agreement, which has been ratified
by over 100 countries, seeks to limit the amount of CO2
emitted into the atmosphere to 1990 levels. However, the United
States, which emits 25% of all global greenhouse gases, has not
yet ratified the Kyoto Protocol.
Adaptation to Global Warming
Even if all CO2 emissions stopped at this moment,
the amount of CO2 already emitted into the atmosphere
will result in an enhanced greenhouse effect for the next 50 years.
Thus, people will need to adapt to the effects of climate change.
Adaptation can be defined as "any action that seeks to reduce
the negative effects, or to capitalize on the positive effects,
of climate change" (Riebsame et al. 1995). Adaptive actions may
be either anticipatory or reactive in nature. An example of an
anticipatory adjustment is the development of heat- and drought-tolerant
crop varieties.
The levels of adaptation undertaken by a region may have significant
effects on how climate change will affect agriculture in that
area. In Rosenzweig and Parry (1994) levels of adaptation were
grouped into two levels.
Level 1 adaptations include:
-
shifts in planting date (±1 month) that do not imply major
changes in crop calendar,
-
additional application of irrigation water to crops already
under irrigation,
-
changes in crop variety to currently available varieties
more adapted to the altered climate.
Level 2 adaptations imply more substantial change to agricultural
systems, possibly requiring resources beyond the farmers' means,
including:
Level 2 represents a fairly optimistic assessment of world agriculture's
response to changed climate conditions.
Adaptation, especially Level 2 adaptation, may significantly
reduce the effect of climate change on agriculture and the number
of people at risk of hunger (Figure 5). However, adaptation in
developing countries, although it does reduce the negative effect
of global warming, does not completely eliminate the potential
increase in hunger (Figure 5).
Conclusion
In conclusion, global warming may result in detrimental effects
on food supply and security, especially in developing countries.
Even if developing countries adapt to climate change, they will
not be able to completely avoid the problems associated with climate
change. Furthermore, these harmful outcomes of climate change
in developing countries and potentially positive outcomes in developed
countries will probably increase the gap in wealth, access to
food, and health between rich and poor countries. This will affect
the worldwide economy as emerging trade-partners are lost, hunger
increases, and refugees leave regions harmed by global warming
in search of food and resources.