Commentators

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 10° London Hi 9°C / Lo 8°C

Andreas Whittam Smith: This is not the Great Depression

We don't face anything like the intensity of the crisis that confronted Roosevelt

Friday, 16 January 2009

The famous remark by Franklin Roosevelt that "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself" was made in the short speech he gave immediately after being sworn in as the new President of the United States on Saturday, 4 March, 1933.

The phrase reverberated around the world. For the first time radio stations, including the BBC, had broadcast the ceremony. Roosevelt struck a chord because he spoke to the pervasive loss of confidence that was one of the causes of the Great Depression. Three years later, Keynes defined the problem as the paradox of thrift. If individuals prudently reduce their spending during times of recession, then economic activity will decline further and a downward spiral will be created. Facing as we do a similar threat today, President Roosevelt's words are remembered and repeated.

Do not forget, though, how great are the differences between then and now. When Roosevelt came into office, unemployment in the US was running at about 30 per cent, a proportion three times greater than anything we are likely to experience. Nor were there any welfare payments for people out of work. The Dow Jones index had dropped by 90 per cent since it peaked in the autumn of 1929. This time the stock market has declined by about 40 per cent since the summer of 2007, though it could fall further. Then, US banks were failing on almost a daily basis. The Federal Government provided no help. No bank was rescued. Ten million depositors lost their savings.

As inauguration day approached, the situation continued to deteriorate. By the close of business on the day before Roosevelt became president, 32 states had closed all their banks until further notice, six states had closed most of them and the remaining states were limiting withdrawals to small amounts. In the recession we face, no bank with retail depositors has been allowed to fail. We are not going to go through anything approaching the intensity of the crisis that enveloped Roosevelt as he spoke from the rostrum on the steps of the Capitol.

Roosevelt confronted fear straight away. His defiance stood at the opening of his speech rather than being its conclusion. "So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself-nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance." Then after describing the misery of the people: "the withered leaves of industrial enterprise lie on every side; farmers find no markets for their produce; the savings of many years in thousands of families are gone", he turned to what he called the "money changers".

"Faced by failure of credit they have proposed only the lending of more money. Stripped of the lure of profit by which to induce our people to follow their false leadership, they have resorted to exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored confidence. They know only the rules of a generation of self-seekers. They have no vision, and when there is no vision the people perish." And he went on: "The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilisation. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths. The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit."

Today many would say "Amen" to that. Finally, after laying out the broad sweep of the New Deal he came back to the financiers. "In our progress toward a resumption of work we require two safeguards against a return of the evils of the old order: there must be a strict supervision of all banking and credits and investments, so that there will be an end to speculation with other people's money; and there must be provision for an adequate but sound currency."

Roosevelt's avoidance of any pointed reference to bankers or speculators or financiers and his use of the biblical term money changers was probably deliberate. In his biography of Roosevelt, Conrad Black describes this lack of specificity as the beginning of a consistent and inspired policy to channel all the anger and frustration of those terrible times against unnamed forces. In this way he dispersed the country's rage harmlessly.

Nonetheless the new President's first task was to attend to the banks. He immediately declared a bank holiday under which the very few that had remained open through the election would close their doors for a short period. This would give time for bank directors to see if they could find means of bolstering their balance sheets. By the time the holiday was over, some had been able to do so. But many remained shut. The situation had been stabilised, albeit at substantial cost.

Then from 9 March, Roosevelt began to send a stream of bills to Congress. He started from the programmes initiated by his predecessor, Hoover, the George W Bush of his day. The major relief effort for the unemployed was given a new name and expanded. A Civilian Conservation Corps was established which hired 250,000 unemployed young men to work on rural local projects. Mortgage relief was provided for millions of farmers and homeowners. Federal funds were directed into railroads and industry. Congress did the President's bidding not just because the election had provided a new and decisive mandate. Congress was responsive also because the economic situation was extremely dire. Likewise Barack Obama has recently been authorised to tackle the 2009 recession with despatch and vigour. But whether Congress will be equally co-operative this time remains an open question.

At the same time, however, just as Roosevelt was entering the White House, dramatic changes were taking place in Germany whose consequences would in due course come to dominate the President's second and third terms. The German Parliament building went up in flames on 27 February, and on 5 March, the day after Roosevelt's inauguration, Hitler emerged victorious from a general election with a 52 per cent share of the vote. The march to the Second World War had begun on Roosevelt's first day in office. It wasn't only fear of economic ruin that he would confront, but the terror unleashed by Nazi Germany.

a.whittamsmith@independent.co.uk

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

ti_opinion - Andreas Whittam Smith: This is not the Great Depression
Home

ti_opinion

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Andreas Whittam Smith: This is not the Great Depression

Posted by the_independens
  • Friday, 16 January 2009 at 07:29 pm
Published: 2009-01-16 00:00:01

The phrase reverberated around the world. For the first time radio stations, including the BBC, had broadcast the ceremony. Roosevelt struck a chord because he spoke to the pervasive loss of confidence that was one of the causes of the Great Depression. Three years later, Keynes defined the problem as the paradox of thrift. If individuals prudently reduce their spending during times of recession, then economic activity will decline further and a downward spiral will be created. Facing as we do a similar threat today, President Roosevelt's words are remembered and repeated.

Do not forget, though, how great are the differences between then and now. When Roosevelt came into office, unemployment in the US was running at about 30 per cent, a proportion three times greater than anything we are likely to experience. Nor were there any welfare payments for people out of work. The Dow Jones index had dropped by 90 per cent since it peaked in the autumn of 1929. This time the stock market has declined by about 40 per cent since the summer of 2007, though it could fall further. Then, US banks were failing on almost a daily basis. The Federal Government provided no help. No bank was rescued. Ten million depositors lost their savings.

As inauguration day approached, the situation continued to deteriorate. By the close of business on the day before Roosevelt became president, 32 states had closed all their banks until further notice, six states had closed most of them and the remaining states were limiting withdrawals to small amounts. In the recession we face, no bank with retail depositors has been allowed to fail. We are not going to go through anything approaching the intensity of the crisis that enveloped Roosevelt as he spoke from the rostrum on the steps of the Capitol.

Roosevelt confronted fear straight away. His defiance stood at the opening of his speech rather than being its conclusion. "So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself-nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance." Then after describing the misery of the people: "the withered leaves of industrial enterprise lie on every side; farmers find no markets for their produce; the savings of many years in thousands of families are gone", he turned to what he called the "money changers".

"Faced by failure of credit they have proposed only the lending of more money. Stripped of the lure of profit by which to induce our people to follow their false leadership, they have resorted to exhortations, pleading tearfully for restored confidence. They know only the rules of a generation of self-seekers. They have no vision, and when there is no vision the people perish." And he went on: "The money changers have fled from their high seats in the temple of our civilisation. We may now restore that temple to the ancient truths. The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply social values more noble than mere monetary profit."

Today many would say "Amen" to that. Finally, after laying out the broad sweep of the New Deal he came back to the financiers. "In our progress toward a resumption of work we require two safeguards against a return of the evils of the old order: there must be a strict supervision of all banking and credits and investments, so that there will be an end to speculation with other people's money; and there must be provision for an adequate but sound currency."

Roosevelt's avoidance of any pointed reference to bankers or speculators or financiers and his use of the biblical term money changers was probably deliberate. In his biography of Roosevelt, Conrad Black describes this lack of specificity as the beginning of a consistent and inspired policy to channel all the anger and frustration of those terrible times against unnamed forces. In this way he dispersed the country's rage harmlessly.

Nonetheless the new President's first task was to attend to the banks. He immediately declared a bank holiday under which the very few that had remained open through the election would close their doors for a short period. This would give time for bank directors to see if they could find means of bolstering their balance sheets. By the time the holiday was over, some had been able to do so. But many remained shut. The situation had been stabilised, albeit at substantial cost.

Then from 9 March, Roosevelt began to send a stream of bills to Congress. He started from the programmes initiated by his predecessor, Hoover, the George W Bush of his day. The major relief effort for the unemployed was given a new name and expanded. A Civilian Conservation Corps was established which hired 250,000 unemployed young men to work on rural local projects. Mortgage relief was provided for millions of farmers and homeowners. Federal funds were directed into railroads and industry. Congress did the President's bidding not just because the election had provided a new and decisive mandate. Congress was responsive also because the economic situation was extremely dire. Likewise Barack Obama has recently been authorised to tackle the 2009 recession with despatch and vigour. But whether Congress will be equally co-operative this time remains an open question.

At the same time, however, just as Roosevelt was entering the White House, dramatic changes were taking place in Germany whose consequences would in due course come to dominate the President's second and third terms. The German Parliament building went up in flames on 27 February, and on 5 March, the day after Roosevelt's inauguration, Hitler emerged victorious from a general election with a 52 per cent share of the vote. The march to the Second World War had begun on Roosevelt's first day in office. It wasn't only fear of economic ruin that he would confront, but the terror unleashed by Nazi Germany.

a.whittamsmith@independent.co.uk


View full article here

Comments

How to assess the impact of economic cataclysm
[info]quemann wrote:
Friday, 16 January 2009 at 08:52 pm (UTC)
I think it is meaningless to compare the unemployment rates between now and the Great Depression, let alone bank closures and stock market closures. Which economic disasters are bigger, wider, and more persistent in terms of its impact? There is no comparison. "This is not the Great Depression" is a kind of silly wishful thinking.

Figuratively speaking, there is no comparison between an Alaskan tsunami with a wave height of 150 meters and the 2004 Indonesian tsunami with the wave height of 30 meters, which killed over 350,000 people. Comparing the vertical height of tsunamis can hardly be a convincing yardstick fo measuring the impact thereof.

I believe the current economic cataclysm is more devastating than the Great Depression in terms of geographical coverage and industrial linkage. Should any political and financial leadership in any country believe it is not worse than the Great Depression era, this wishful thinking will perhaps pepetrate the current economic woes.
Bank failures
[info]michelant wrote:
Friday, 16 January 2009 at 10:12 pm (UTC)
I am afraid that Mr Whittam Smith is unfortunately factually incorrect in claiming that no bank with retail depositors has been allowed to fail.
Retail depositors in KSF in the Isle of Man are likely to lose a large proportion of their deposits as a direct result of action by the UK government. Whilst KSF IOM was apparently solvent a large proportion of its assets were held in the form of deposits with KSF UK. When the UK government put KSF UK in receivership it guaranteed the deposits of all retail depositors with KSF UK but not with KSF IOM. In fact as a direct consequence of the UK government action the retail depositors with KSF IOM are likely to receive a lower payout!
Advertisement

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Report Comment

To report an offensive comment for review, please send a Personal Message and provide a link to the comment. The moderators will review it and take action if necessary.
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by [info]chasethestars
 

Columnist Comments

andrew_grice

Andrew Grice: Labour must stop fighting a class war

The ‘class war’ headlines generated by Harman’s plan worried some ministers

christina_patterson

Christina Patterson: Escapism - for those that can escape

It is hard to celebrate a society that remains as cruel as that of Mumbai

howard_jacobson

Howard Jacobson: A silly lad is not a murderous racist

The palace is still no place to acquaint a boy with the ironic locutions of the street