Subscribe to Print Edition | Sat., March 14, 2009 Adar 18, 5769 | | Israel Time: 07:48 (EST+7)
Haaretz israel news English
Haaretz Toolbar
Defense Jewish World Opinion National
Print Edition
Car Rental
Books Haaretz Magazine Business Real Estate Joy of Giving Travel Week's End Anglo File
Is a right-wing government the answer?
By Henry Siegman
Tags: Netanyahu, Israel News 

A right-wing Israeli government led by Benjamin Netanyahu is widely seen as spelling the end of a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Given the ongoing expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which Netanyahu has promised to accelerate, no other outcome seems conceivable.

While this view is undoubtedly correct, the belief that a center or center-left government would conclude a two-state agreement is a delusion Western leaders seem unable to discard, no matter how egregiously the current Kadima/Labor government continues to undermine a two-state solution - with continued seizures of Palestinian territory, expansion of existing settlements, and closing off Jerusalem to West Bank Palestinians.

And yet, a good case can be made for the counter-intuitive notion that only a right-wing government of the kind now being formed by Netanyahu holds the remaining hope for viable Palestinian statehood. Such an argument has nothing to do with the popular Israeli belief that, like Nixon's 1972 visit to China, "only Likud can make peace, and only Labor [or Kadima] can make war," for it ignores the fact that Nixon wanted to go to China, whereas no member of a right-wing Israeli government wants a Palestinian state. What Netanyahu and his prospective radical-right coalition parties want is more Palestinian territory and a Palestinian entity emptied of every vestige of sovereignty.
The argument in favor of a Netanyahu-led government derives from the certainty that a centrist government is equally incapable of reaching a peace agreement with the Palestinians. For all the protestations by Kadima's Ehud Olmert and Labor's Ehud Barak that they are desperately seeking a peace agreement with their favored Palestinian peace partner Mahmoud Abbas, without unprecedented U.S. pressure on Israel to reach an agreement approximating the Clinton proposals, they are no more likely than Netanyahu to do anything other than use the peace process they champion as a cover for the continued expansion of settlements and the closing off of East Jerusalem to any future Palestinian entity.

After all, this is exactly what they have been doing since the Oslo accords and the various ensuing agreements, including the road map and the Annapolis-sponsored peace talks. The only remaining hope to prevent the two-state solution from disappearing entirely is a decisive change in America's Middle East policy - from "facilitation," which in the past meant helping Israel do what it wanted to do, to active intervention. This means presenting both parties with America's outline for a permanent status agreement, endorsed by the international community and supported by significant and evenhanded sanctions on whichever side obstructs it.

While such an initiative can only be led by the U.S., it is unlikely to be undertaken while a center-left government is in place in Israel. American presidents do not enjoy challenging the pro-Israel lobby in Washington, and Congress by going toe-to-toe with Israeli leaders who are perceived in this country, however mistakenly, as truly committed to a two-state solution.

However, a Netanyahu-led government with coalition partners like Avigdor Lieberman and other extreme right-wing parties that do not enjoy much popular support in the U.S. (or anywhere else for that matter) would allow President Barack Obama and his administration to advance such an initiative. It is often forgotten that Netanyahu's obstructionism while serving as prime minister from 1996-1999 was so unpopular that president Clinton was able to bar him from the White House, with hardly a whimper from the Israel lobby.

Given the imminent disappearance of the two-state solution and Israel's military and diplomatic dependence on the U.S. (which has only increased with the growing anti-Israel mood in the region and beyond), an American president who is prepared to say "Enough" to the two adversaries, and present them with clear parameters for a permanent status agreement, is far more likely to do so with a recalcitrant right-wing government led by Netanyahu than with a centrist government headed by those who claim to seek an end to the conflict.

Netanyahu's right-wing government would not yield to such pressure. But having finally established clear parameters and defined the red lines of what kind of peace agreement is acceptable to the U.S. - something a U.S. president is not likely or able to do when a centrist government is in power - such parameters would remain in place once Netanyahu's government collapses, as it surely will, and a center-left coalition returns. This is the only conceivable scenario for a fair and sustainable peace accord that can prevent the disintegration of the Palestinian national struggle into another violent intifada that will do away with the two-state paradigm.

So far, other than appointing George Mitchell as the president's personal emissary, little has happened to warrant the belief that the Obama administration is prepared to pursue a course markedly different from that of its predecessors. Indeed, nothing could be more discouraging than Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's March 3 statement in Israel in which she qualified her strong support for the two-state solution with the observation: "But obviously, it is up to the people and the government of Israel to decide."

Even the Bush administration did not argue that Israelis and their government can deny the Palestinian people the right to a "viable and sovereign" state of their own, as provided by the road map and international law.

One must hope that this was an impromptu, well-intentioned, but ill-considered off-the-cuff remark that does not represent the secretary of state's position or that of the administration. Otherwise, the Kaddish should be recited for the two-state paradigm.

Henry Siegman, president of the U.S./Middle East Project in New York, is a visiting research professor at the Sir Joseph Hotung Middle East Program, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Bookmark to  
Historical invention
Scholar Rachel Elior says The Essenes, the Dead Sea Scroll 'authors,' never existed
Arms set to music
Bollywood-style arms dealer promotional video dubbed 'most atrocious of all time'
  1.   AIPAC`s fighting hard to prevent peace. 11:21  |  Michael 13/03/09
  2.   The two-state idea was still-born 11:40  |  Velvele 13/03/09
  3.   1 Michael 11:50  |  Ardi 13/03/09
  4.   Time for the world to see an Israel without the usual "fig-leaf" 11:53  |  Swiss (Dino) 13/03/09
  5.   War = border expansion, peace = border contraction 11:58  |  Natallie Durson 13/03/09
  6.   There Won`t Be A "Palestinian" State No Matter Who Rules 12:00  |  Yishai Kohen 13/03/09
  7.   Henry Siegman?! First Avrum Burg, & Strenger...Norm Finkelstein? 12:05  |  Noam D. Blume 13/03/09
  8.   what exactly is the question? 12:16  |  quo swing 13/03/09
  9.   # 3 yishai 12:44  |  Axel 13/03/09
  10.   Of course it isn`t 17:52  |  Chris Linthwaite 13/03/09
  11.   For # 5 N. D 18:49  |  The Teacher/Instruct 13/03/09
  12.   Is a right-wing government the answer? 19:33  |  Merry 13/03/09
  13.   Prof. H. Siegman, just a remark - 2nd try 20:31  |  zeev 13/03/09
  14.   Is a right-wing Govt the answer ? (2nd try) 21:02  |  Akram Zekaria 13/03/09
  15.   # 12 zeev 21:13  |  Swiss (Dino) 13/03/09
  16.   The Teacher/Instruct #11 - thank you 21:17  |  zeev 13/03/09
  17.   The Israeli- Palestinians conflict plagued by ignoring history! 22:37  |  Akram Zekaria 13/03/09
  18.   Don`t blame Israel. (4th try) 23:18  |  Akram Zekaria 13/03/09
  19.   Siegman 23:38  |  Joseph 13/03/09
  20.   what left? 02:08  |  annie 14/03/09
  21.   Wake Up 07:36  |  Iain 14/03/09
 Read & React
Gideon Levy: Has anyone in Israel stopped to ask why the Swedes hate us?
Responses: 278
U.S. citizens critically hurt at West Bank anti-separation fence protest
Responses: 127
Sources: Israel agrees to free all 450 Hamas prisoners for Shalit
Responses: 118
Ron Breiman: No room for two states
Responses: 98
Nasrallah vows Hezbollah will never recognize Israel
Responses: 101

More Headlines
07:30 9 nations agree on plan to stem arms flow to Gaza
01:29 Nasrallah vows Hezbollah will never recognize Israel
00:14 Likud, Kadima hold informal coalition talks
22:51 U.S. citizens critically hurt at West Bank protest
23:17 2 Qassams hit Negev day after Hamas condemns rocket fire
14:44 Gideon Levy / Has anyone in Israel asked why the Swedes hate us?
19:50 Dutch teens convicted of insulting Jews ordered to visit Anne Frank House
20:13 Arms dealer promotional film dubbed 'most atrocious of all time'
22:07 Shalit family hold Shabbat dinner at protest tent
11:57 Sources: Israel agrees to free all 450 Hamas prisoners for Shalit
14:45 Ahmadinejad: Sanctions against Iran are 'childish'
17:01 National Union: Likud to incorporate yeshiva funding into state budget
04:38 Scholar: The Essenes, Dead Sea Scroll 'authors,' never existed
23:41 Prof. Neeman to take Justice Min. as Lieberman given absorption portfolio
Previous Editions
Special Offers
Spring Specials-Dan Hotels
Jerusalem from 179$. Tel-Aviv from 223$. Herzliya from 336$
Dead Sea Skin Care
Quality cosmetics from the Dead Sea. Coupon code HAARETZ for 12% off!
Summer in Israel
Israeli style - Tzofim Chetz V'Keshet 2009
Passover Vacations
The BEST Passover Vacations around ? Mexico, Arizona and Florida
Camp Kimama Israel 2009
The best place for your children this summer
Eldan Rent a Car
Israel's leading car rental company offers you a 20% discount on online reservations
Jewish Singles Personal Ads
Find the love of your life on
Junk a car - get free towing nationwide and a tax-deductible receipt
Home | TV | Print Edition | Diplomacy | Opinion | Arts & Leisure | Sports | Jewish World | | Israel 2009 election results
Site rules | Makom: Engaging on Israel | Search engine marketing, the online edition of Haaretz Newspaper in Israel, offers real-time breaking news, opinions and analysis from Israel and the Middle East. provides extensive and in-depth coverage of Israel, the Jewish World and the Middle East, including defense, diplomacy, the Arab-Israeli conflict, the peace process, Israeli politics, Jerusalem affairs, international relations, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, the Palestinian Authority, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Israeli business world and Jewish life in Israel and the Diaspora.
© Copyright  Haaretz. All rights reserved