• colonel tribune imageStuart Foster is a marketing consultant in the Boston area. He specializes in brand management, social media, and blog outreach. He authors a blog at Thelostjacket.com.

    One voice in mainstream media just wants to sit down and have a scotch with you. That person is Colonel Tribune, the social media face of the Chicago Tribune whose Twitter account and Facebook page have amassed a good deal of attention. What you may not know is the story behind him and his creation. Who is Colonel Tribune? What is the genesis and future for this unique news entity?

    Daniel Honigman, whose official title at Tribune Interactive is Social Media Strategist, has a reporting background and was the key voice in bringing the Colonel into the conversation. He spearheaded and is also behind much of the Tribune’s current social media strategy. Honigman is the man behind the hat.


    Creation


    The Colonel was launched in 2008 with the purpose of trying out content sharing and strategies for the Chicago Tribune. Some initiatives were out there, but according to Honigman, 99% of the conversations were taking place outside of the Tribune’s main site. “Essentially, we wanted to find our audience regardless of the medium.  The Colonel acts as a touch point for the Tribune and serves as our voice on the web. Thus we needed a front man, which turned into Colonel Tribune. Who is kind of a goofy man about town but is an actual person. He would even answer questions that you might have.”

    colonel tribune twitter image

    The “original” Colonel of the Tribune was Mccormick, a former editor of the paper. He is the model on which the Colonel is based. So his historical persona, what he liked to eat, and gentlemanly voice is able to deviate between serious/soft/hard.

    Here is what separated the Colonel from other marketing efforts: the Colonel was just one component of a larger strategy. ”Our efforts to be listening to and  following our audience were run primarily through his voice… He became a part of our comprehensive strategy. The Colonel tries to open the doors to let folks in. He tries to give the audience a voice, much like a community manager for a major company would. The news biz has never been about news, the news attracts audience that attracts advertising. We spend tons of money trying to attract readership and engage in daily conversations. We are audience centric and the Colonel allowed us to take it to a new level.”


    Execution


    Did Honigman gain immediate success? Nope, but he had a few champions on the executive team that saw the potential for greatness and went with the concept. “We went under the radar,” he said, “added tribune support as the project became more effective. We definitely used a periphery approach and not a top down initiative. You can change culture from the outside, you just have to have the right idea. The Colonel did have some key benefactors in Owen Youngman, VP and Bill Adee, Digital editor, and served a direct need: Humanization of the Tribune and engaging bloggers/readers in their territory on their terms.”

    news image

    He went on to elaborate, “Think of it this way: everyone has had a story buried. The fact is if newspapers ceased to exist how would reporters deal? Most reporters don’t have that attitude. My solution? Network and take a blogger’s approach to reporting. Talk with folks who want to expand and begin to build a list/grow. Eventually you will have built up trust…” Essentially, Honigman was able to build a brand and network for the Tribune for the new media age. A brand that interacts, has conversations with, and helps his audience regularly.

    The Colonel is now an offline presence as well and regularly holds tweetups. How did he make the leap offline and to other avenues of conversation? By investing the time and really building a comprehensive strategy for success. The Colonel isn’t just about the Tribune; he’s about Chicago: “Step outside. Meet the audience. Friendship comes from meeting someone and sharing an experience with them,” said Honigman. “The Colonel wants to be your friend and help you out. We could have just left the Colonel behind the curtain but we wanted to take that spirit of helpfulness and engagement further so we organized various events and tweetups.”

    colonol tweetup image

    For a long time the Colonel remained a closely guarded secret of the Tribune. He wouldn’t show up for events that Honigman would host by claiming to be sick or just too busy working. ”The Colonel needed to be a representative of the Tribune but one person isn’t responsible for all the work being done behind the scenes: a team is,” explained Honigman. “Plus, it was a lot of fun maintaining a certain air of mystery around the Colonel. We could be more cryptic and thus have more fun with the brand.”

    This raises another important issue: there is only so much original content. “Developing our staff (the Colonel is now assisted by a team) and creating more of a push for conversation is hard work. Whether it’s an informed decision or entertainment we want to make sure that the Colonel is going to be there.”

    “Colonel Tribune isn’t a model, per se, but our front man in the digital space, and folks have really connected with him, and through him, to the Chicago Tribune,” Honigman said. His recommendation to other news organizations? “Don’t worry about reinventing the wheel, but keep your ear close enough to the ground so that you’re not late to the party, when something new does go on.”


    The Future


    Honigman sees the future of news reporting going a different way than the static broadcasts that have existed in the past: “Don’t underestimate the legwork you’ll do just creating those micro-level connections with your end users. You must learn to embrace your audiences, wherever they are. How will you do that? However you can.” So new media news reporters bashing your head against the wall in bureaucratic futility? The template for excellence is here. You just need to keep making good on your efforts.

    Have any questions for the Colonel? I’m sure he’d be happy to answer them: @ColonelTribune.


    More social media resources from Mashable:


    - 40 of the Best Twitter Brands and the People Behind Them
    - PRESENTING: 10 of the Smartest Big Brands in Social Media
    - Why Big Brands Struggle With Social Media
    - The Importance of Focus: A Guide for Social Media Brands
    - 5 Tips for Optimizing Your Brand’s Facebook Presence

  • Great execution by the Chicago Tribune of appropriate Social Media interaction! I love hearing about companies that are doing it well, and understanding that it's really about relationships. Notice how they talk about the purpose was to "listen". In order to make this happen I'm sure they have people from different parts of the organization engaging and evolving their Social Media - in this case Colonel Tribune's Twitter voice. Well done.
  • Thanks, Chris. When I go into newsrooms, I have to get folks to understand that if the issue is technology, there are people around to help. However, when it comes to embracing digital culture, it's easiest just to jump in.
  • Getting people to drink the digital kool aid is a pain at times.
  • A persona is a fabulous way to personalize a corporate entity. Back in the dot-com days, we created a site called DaveCentral.com (it has since been redirected to Freshmeat.org), which was a downloadable software archive. We took a picture of an editor at Ziff-Davis who looked appropriately geeky, and different people took turns being "Dave." There were no social networks, or even blogs at that point, but Dave would write a daily review of a product "he" especially liked. Many of us took turns being Dave, including my wife. Nobody ever realized that there was no real Dave, he was even asked to review a couple of books, which resulted in him being used for book blurbs.

    Come to think of it, I'm sort of a persona myself, only this is my real picture.
  • And what a picture it is, sir.
  • Chris Tiedje
    Well deserved kudos for Daniel. I've worked with him very closely on initiatives here at our paper, and he really knows his stuff. Keep it up, Colonel.
  • Seth Liss
    Very cool what Honigman has done with the Colonel. This guys definitely gets it.
  • Tom G.
    Interesting article. I don't know if I agree with these tactics, but interesting nonetheless.

    But the part that puzzles me the most is that chart. It's entirely incoherent. Honestly, I don't think it's anything more than someone who doesn't know what they are talking about and throwing a bunch of business and marketing keywords, arrows, and dollar signs on an oversized sheet of paper. Trying to compensate?

    And let's be honest, this form of social media does not produce monetary results. If it did, the company wouldn't be splitting at the seams...or at least as quickly. If the Tribune really valued social media they would have a staff of more than just a couple people. They don't because it doesn't produce that meaningful of results.

    I think it's time that the people on this site don't just pat advocates of social media on the back. People need to be more critical, more skeptical, and more realistic. Because let's be honest, social media isn't producing the results we need...yet. It can, but as people in the industry, we need to work together to figure out what works, what doesn't, and what's a waste of time.

    I think someone could make the argument that Kevin Spacey excutes better social media tactics than the Tribune. 10,000 followers is nothing compared to 200,000+.
  • To answer your points:

    1. The fact is, Tom, that mainstream media has done a great job alienating its audience. For our business to succeed, we must acknowledge that the conversation is as important as the content.

    2. Within several months, I created a 10% bump in the number of page views at ChicagoTribune.com. You'll see more mainstream media sources choosing to monetize unique visits, rather than page views or simple impressions. If I can get the person who comes to my site once a week to come once a day, and the person who comes once a day to come three times a day, I'm doing my job. But that only comes from brand recognition.

    3. How relevant is Kevin Spacey on the social Web? If the only way one values social media success is the number of Twitter followers one hase, I think that person is missing out on a lot. ReTweetist provides a great stat: RTs per thousand followers. The number of RTs I have far outweighs the number of relative RTs by any celebrity, and even the New York Times. I'd rather have 50 out of 10,000 people RT me than 50 out of 700K. It shows that I have a more engaged audience.

    And how about a picture, Tom? This is the social Web, you know.
  • Wow, can't say anything better then Daniel just did...
  • Tom G.
    That 10 percent traffic increase is completely dubious. According to Compete, chicagotribune.com is moving about 3+ million uniques a day. You're telling us that you've added roughly 300K (per day, mind you) to this total, all through a Twitter profile with just 10K followers and a Facebook page with 300 or so fans? Don't buy it. Either you're counting other efforts in there or that number is highly overreported.
  • Not through Twitter alone, but all social media efforts in Chicago.

    But it's not about page views; it's about unique visits.
  • Tom G.
    So what other social media efforts would those be? Those would be more interesting for a profile than the Twitter account, because while you're model may encourage conversation and is a great PR point for the Tribune, it simply can't be moving traffic in that high of volume. No one is on Twitter. It's trendy but ultimately if your standard is uniques, not that useful.

    And I don't understand why you argue the metric should be uniques versus page views either. Page views are a much better indicator of a person's interaction with the brand...that same loyalty you value so highly on Twitter. I can have all the uniques in the world, but if my bounce rate is 99 percent, that's useless. It sounds like you want to encourage repeat visits, which is a better metric, but that's separate from uniques.
  • I think you may be mistaken. As you know, about 70% of Twitter traffic isn't tracked through third-party apps like Tweetdeck, etc.
  • If you want, you can DM me on Twitter and we can continue this conversation elsewhere.
  • Tom G.
    I like having this debate here in a public space because I think it's valuable. It's what I wish Mashable did more of. This isn't anything personal, it's just in everyone's best interest, particularly in journalism, to figure out what the best utilization of new media and manpower is right now.

    I don't find any support anywhere for that 70 percent number, and I know my analytics package does not underreport Twitter by such a massive, massive margin. And if you feed your short URLs through one of the many tracking services, you can get click data that's much more accurate than 70 percent unreported, regardless of what client is being used. I feel like you're obscuring the point a bit.

    I imagine Mashable does a pretty steady traffic via Twitter since their profile is huge and their content is so relevant, but for you, as a general content news source with a limited following, you just simply can't be. The numbers aren't there. I'd wager a guess that on it's best day, Twitter contributes maybe 1 percent traffic to the Tribune's uniques? That's 30,000 people and you only have 10,000 followers. That's generous. So again, what other social media efforts are you doing that are so successful? And why should uniques be the standard versus another metric?
  • Robert Quigley
    Daniel Honigman is a pioneer. When he pushed the Colonel Tribune idea, no other newspaper had figured out how to effectively use social media. Not only was he first, but he did it right.

    I'm sure a lot of people who follow @ColonelTribune are like me - I would not have thought to read the Tribune in the past, but now check it out on a regular basis. The personality and responsiveness that Honigman has helped bring to the Tribune is something that all newspapers and TV stations should emulate. I know I have (to a good measure of success) at the Austin American-Statesman.
  • Bobbie Carlton
    I love this story -- it's a great example of the creation of an online persona while supporting important corporate goals (increased interaction and connection with an audience) and isn't that what we're all doing?

    We pick and choose the thoughts that become the posts (or tweets or whatever) so they support that persona. Often, the most interesting personas are multi-faceted ones, where you get a sense of the person behind the avatar. But too many dimensions can be confusing or seem unfocused.

    Having worked with a company that created a number of fictional characters, I know that the team involved gets to know the persona. You find yourself having conversations about what the character would and wouldn't do. "Oh, he (or she ) would never say that." Sometimes I feel that people need to ask themselves if their online personas are staying "true" and supportive of their overall goals.
  • Thanks, Bobbie! After a while, do you find that the persona consumes you a bit?
  • granolajoe
    It's really frustrating when argumentative people comment as know-it-alls when they are terribly misguided, like Tom G.

    ["Page views are a much better indicator of a person's interaction with the brand...that same loyalty you value so highly on Twitter."]

    Really? How is it it that pageviews are an indicator of loyalty and a person's interaction with the brand? There is a site for the company I work for that gets 200-250K pageviews per month, regularly. But about 90% of visitors return only 1-2 times per month. How the hell does that make pageviews an indicator of loyalty?

    ["And if you feed your short URLs through one of the many tracking services, you can get click data that's much more accurate than 70 percent unreported, regardless of what client is being used."]

    How does click data reflect Twitter client usage? What Daniel was referring to was the amount of people that do prefer to use clients over posting on Twitter.com, which is usually accounted for under "Direct" traffic in analytics applications like Google Analytics.

    Click data doesn't account for usage. It only accounts for people who have clicked on a link, and not everyone that is active on a Twitter client is going to click through it.

    If you're going to be an argumentative prick, at least make sure that you're understanding your stats correctly, and more importantly, have more firepower than the equivalent of "social media doesn't work, because I said so."

    Your attitude shows that it's never worked for you because you simply don't know how to apply yourself. The fact that you even have to ask what other methods besides Twitter there are in social media to help a brand grow, build relationships with consumers and make money show how uninformed you are.

    Unfortunately, what you don't seem to understand is that asking politely is going to be much more helpful than simply coming off as a spoiled brat that is angry because he doesn't "get" something.
  • Tom G.
    1) Page views per unique users. Sorry. Should have been more specific. This really isn't the best loyalty metric either, but it's a better metric of interaction than uniques alone. And I'd rather have one user who visits once a month and clicks through 20 pages than 2 users who visit every week, view a single page and leave.

    2) Of what use to anyone is someone who views a link through a Twitter client but doesn't click through? All the Tribune cares about is traffic on their site, not someone who views the URL in a client. I might be missing your point here...I'm not sure what you're getting at. If the link is clicked, there are ways to track it no matter where it was clicked from.

    3) I know perfectly well what other social media options are available. I'm on them. I don't see the Tribune. That's why his traffic numbers confuse me. I certainly think social media works, but from a business standpoint, I fail to see how Daniel's implementation is helping the Tribune's bottom line, at least from a business standpoint.
  • granolajoe
    My point is that you implied that short URL trackers should account for Twitter usage away from the main website, which they do not.

    Regarding what other social media options there are, here's a hint: not all activity has to be branded. That's where networking and relationships, and making a site attractive to social media users all come in handy. Take a look at Digg, Reddit and Stumbleupon and look at the astounding number of successful submissions from the Chicago Tribune and the LA Times.

    Dan knows what he's doing, and he's one of the first people that was able to make a news organization understand how important it is to have a presence in social media and to take advantage of it. Twitter is only a small fraction of that.
  • Tom G.
    That's exactly my point - Digg, Reddit and Stumbleupon are far better investments in time than Twitter at this point. The Chicago Tribune has had 32 front page stories on Digg.They've had 2 front page stories from chicagobreakingnews.com. Good efforts, but figure 10K on average in uniques from front page stories, and that's still only slightly more than one day worth of the traffic increase Daniel is claiming. Where's the rest of the 10 percent traffic increase?

    And it's a bit inconsistent to tout "openness" and "availability" on Twitter and then game Digg behind the scenes.

    Via Dugg Analytics. http://demo.qlikview.com/qlikview/AJAX/digg/SH_...
  • granolajoe
    Uhh...who said anything about gaming? The tribune has staff that openly states who they work for.

    Case in point: http://digg.com/users/acmaurer

    All I was saying is that you don't have to brand all of your profiles to be present in social media. On some networks it does, and others it doesn't, for example:

    http://digg.com/users/timedotcom

    Also, Twitter *is* driving high traffic to sites when a story goes viral. It takes a different approach than on sites like Digg, Traffic and Stumbleupon, but it's basically a matter of choosing the right content and making sure it gets the right type of exposure, and it does work.

    Here's a case study that illustrates how one individual was able to get a considerable amount of traffic (comparable to your previously mentioned favorites) to his site:

    http://www.winningtheweb.com/twitter-viral-case...

    Anyhow, that's all the time I have. I'm sure in your next comment you'll simply refute any and all facts that support the case for Twitter activity, and though it's fun for a while, I'll have to let someone else take the reigns from here.
  • granolajoe
    By the way, Tom.

    ["No one is on Twitter."]

    Really? Did you happen to miss the 700% year-to-date increase in Traffic in February?

    http://www.itworld.com/internet/66193/twitter-t...

    Not only that, but Twitter caught up to Digg in regard to page traffic in January:

    http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/20...

    Note the blurb about the fact that a large amount of Twitter usage from mobile devices is unaccounted for.

    Suddenly, Twitter doesn't seem like a ghost town anymore, does it?
  • Tom G.
    Certainly did not mean no one was on Twitter. That's pretty bad phrasing on my part...typing quickly. What I mean is that while traffic TO Twitter is high, traffic FROM Twitter isn't as substantial as from other social networking sites.
  • "Game Digg behind the scenes."

    Traffic through lots of social media sites -- Digg, StumbleUpon, Reddit, etc -- doesn't have nearly as much impact, nor is it as local, as traffic from sites like Twitter and Facebook. Does this mean we ignore the fact that these sites are influential? Absolutely not.

    But you're absolutely right, as far as sheer volume. But is your general Digg user who comes to my page for two seconds as engaged or as valuable as a Twitter user who actually reads a story they click through to...or a Facebook user who not only reads the story and comments on it, but shares it on Facebook with their friends?

    Absolutely not.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Advertise Here
 
Advertise Here
 

Sponsored By:

 
Twitter Brand Sponsors

These brands would like to engage with our social media community on Twitter. If you like them, Tweet them!

AmericanCancer : The Society's Web site also contains Spanish and Asian language materials. http://bit.ly/qBgv9
woot: $649.99 : HP Touchsmart Core 2 Duo All-in-One PC with 22" Touchscreen : SOLD OUT http://www.woot.com
etsy : They tell us! @oktak You can submit a "Quit Your Day Job" story to our blog here: http://www.etsy.com/storque/pitch/
6s_marketing : Facebook starts knocking down it's walls by opening up their API to developers http://tinyurl.com/da8wvd
mailchimp : @michaelcruz are you actually using MailChimp as part of your curriculum? This may be a first (that we're aware of). would love to know more
Sociable Ads by Mashable
 
 

Sun Startup Essentials

Sun Startup Essentials

 
 

Mashable Partners

WordPress Plugins

Thanks to the above companies for helping Mashable to provide social media resources every day.

 
back to top