"Measles and Small Pox as an Allied Army of the Conquistadors of America" by Carlos Ruvalcaba, translated by Theresa M. Betz in "Encounters" (Double Issue No. 5-6, pp. 44-45) The year was 1520. Cortes had already entered the capital of the Aztec empire and imprisoned Moctezuma when he received notice of the arrival of Narvaez at the port of Veracruz, with express orders to apprehend him. Cortes left for Veracruz accompanied by a few men and soundly defeated Narvaez in just a few hours. When he returned victorious to Tenochtitlan, he discovered that the Aztecs were readied for combat. Pedro de Alvarado, who had stayed behind in Mexico as commander-in-chief during Cortes's absence, had uncovered a secret insurrection under the guise of a fiesta and proceeded to massacre women, old people, and warriors dressed in festive costume, as well as a large number of children in the streets of the great city. The massacre infuriated the Aztecs, who could not retaliate because the Spaniards held their ruler Moctezuma prisoner. Nevertheless, Hernan Cortes never imagined that the "Noche Triste" was fast approaching, a night during which he would suffer his greatest defeat and find his army on the verge of extermination. But a natural element turned out to be Cortes's principal deadly weapon, an element that was much more effective than his cannons, horses, and crossbows. Smallpox and measles epidemics joined the conquering army and laid waste to the great Aztec empire. Some historians think these diseases were not endemic to the Aztec world and therefore Aztec doctors did not know of any type of treatment, so the epidemics spread rapidly throughout the Americas. The first data offered by the chroniclers situate these illnesses--at least in respect to the continent--in the capital of the great empire, Tenochtitlan. In the darkness of the "Noche Triste," while Cortes wept beneath the historic tree, the Aztecs gathered bodies by the thousands which were scattered through forests and over plains. They had won their first great victory over the powerful invaders, but the apocalyptic panorama, so costly in lives, allowed for no type of celebration. There were many Spanish soldiers among the thousands of warriors fallen in battle. There was also a man who was neither Aztec nor Spanish, a person who passed into history name unknown and who was nonetheless perhaps one of the most powerful forces that helped secure the conquest of the New World, even though he himself never knew it. The Aztec warriors had abandoned their weapons, had even decided not to pursue Cortes's very decimated army, in order to recover their dead, but there were still more surprises in store for them. In the darkness of the late afternoon, a warrior discovered a strange being who was dying. His black skin was a rarity as unknown to the Aztecs as the very whiteness of the Spaniards. The black man had been brought by Narvaez, probably from Cuba or Haiti, and was on the brink of death, not from battle wounds but from the virulence of an illness that caused bleeding from the nose, much coughing, inflammation of the throat and nose, and small and large ulcers all over his body. The Aztec warrior who found him spread the news about the existence of that strange being, and it is surmised that many curious people came to see with their own eyes the color of that strange skin. That nameless black man unintentionally contributed one of the greatest weapons of the conquistadors, and in a short time the Aztec capital and surrounding areas were suffering the rigors of a great epidemic. Thus was their situation when Cortes and his soldiers had recovered from their wounds and prepared the counterattack, helped by the Tlaxcaltecas. The chronicles of Columbus already speak of various contagious communities afflicted by smallpox in 1507, in the recently discovered islands and later in Haiti in 1517, which makes credible the hypothesis of the black man as transmitter of the disease. Five years later, smallpox was also wreaking havoc among the Incas in what is now Peru and Ecuador, although it has not been possible to determine if the contagious disease came from the Aztec world or if it was brought by people who traveled with Pizarro. Some chronicle note that in 1525, when the Extremenian conquistador was making a trip through those lands, he found the village of Tumluz half destroyed, "because of a great pestilence that happened to them." The hypotheses point with greater insistence toward the possibility that the illness came from Mexico, since it is known that over the course of those five years the epidemics destroyed the Mayas and Guatemaltecos, implying a shifting towards the south that could well have reached the Incas by means of traders. There are some researchers who affirm that it wasn't smallpox that devastated the Aztec people but measles, and they support their theories with the Memorial de Tecpan Atitlan, which explains the symptoms of the sickness that produced the epidemic. These researchers affirm that the nasal hemorrhage, angina, and bronchial pneumonia can be complications of smallpox, but the symptoms don't form an obligatory part of the clinical picture, as in the case of measles. With respect to the chroniclers' continuous mentions of smallpox, the same researchers referred to above say that the chroniclers, when speaking about epidemics of smallpox, were referring to the illness with a generic name, lacking medical knowledge. Another of their arguments, though perhaps weaker, is that in a great smallpox epidemic the survivors are left marked on the skin, and often blind, but no chronicler nor indigenous codex tells of groups of people with scarred skin or who were blind. This makes one think that the survivors of the epidemics survived measles and not smallpox. To end this series of arguments, it can be added that in 1532 Pedro de Alvarado sent a letter to Carlos V, dated September 1st, in which he says: "In all of New Spain there came a pestilence over the natives that they call measles." Archaeological specimens dating from before the conquest have been found with human figures that show traces on the figures' faces of something similar to the pits left by smallpox, although these sculptural testimonies don't show anything concrete either. It is known that in pre-Cortes America there was an illness that caused swelling and inflammation on the body and face, and that even some Spaniards caught the disease, but it hasn't been proven that that illness left pock marks, though some speculate that the marks on these figures represent that mysterious disease. At any rate, we can't reject the possibility that smallpox might have been known in America and that it cyclically caused damage. What is certain is that measles was unknown, but the Aztecs must have suffered epidemics of one or the other illnesses. Thus the discussion comes down to which illness the Aztecs were suffering from when they were defeated by Cortes and his allies. That it might have been either smallpox or measles is pecata minuta, compared with the results it produced in favor of the fistful of men that dared to confront the great Aztec empire. When Cortes and his men regained their strength and reorganized their army, they constructed ships in order to attack the capital of the New World from the great lake Texcoco. This attack was a determining factor in the definitive victory and capture of the sacred city and the other allied capitals that formed the "One World." The small work boats of the Indians and their fragile war canoes were easily sunk by the Spanish ships and the cities were cruelly bombarded until they were destroyed, due to the refusal of the Aztecs to surrender. The Aztecs, victims of panic, confronted the cannon balls with their lances and arrows, while afflicted with nasal hemorrhages, angina, inflammation of the throat, and small ulcers on their faces that had already begun to enlarge. Though it is certain that the true conquest was yet to take place after the capital was seized, it can't be denied that these epidemics were an important ally to the army of the conquerors of America.