Li v. Yellow Cab Co. - Case Brief
Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804, 119 Cal.Rptr. 858, 532 P.2d 1226 (1975).
Case Summary
Facts: Li (P) was hit by a cab driver for Yellow Cab Co. (D) as she was crossing three lanes of traffic to enter a gas station. The cab driver had been driving too fast and had run a yellow light. Li sued for damages arising from the accident. The trial court entered a judgment barring damages for P on the grounds that she had been contributorily negligent. P appealed.
Issue: Can opposing parties in a negligence claim both be held liable under the doctrine of comparative negligence? Is secondary implied assumption of the risk subsumed by comparative negligence?
Holding and Rule: Yes and yes. Under the doctrine of comparative negligence, liability is based on the relative percentage each party’s fault if both parties are negligent.
Notes: As a matter of public policy, the doctrine of comparative negligence is preferable to an “all or nothing” rule from the point of view of logic, practical experience and fundamental justice.
Tags: comparative negligence, contributory negligence, negligence, Torts
