Knowing WWE, the Hell in a Cell PPV will not feature a Hell in the Cell match.

You know, instead of changing names to PPVs, they should just simply remove PPVs in general. I'm sick of seeing a PPV every three weeks.

lol

WWE copying TNA's Lockdown

... Lock-Up? ... really?

No Escape sounded better, and that's not saying much

Annihilation, does this mean that they will actually annihilate each other? Probably not. And Hell In A Cell will probably be Triple H and Orton for the umpteenth time. The reason for all the PPVs is to keep making money. Someone will keep buying the PPVs no matter what. There should only be 4 PPVs a year. Royal Rumble, Wrestlemania, Summerslam and Survivor Series. Anything else is overload and stupid.

Doing only 4 PPV's a year isnt the anwser...because the increase in buys for the BIG 4 wouldn't be enough to cover the lost ones. So thats not gonna happen.

I think WWE thinks this is their way of freshening up the PPV's....but personally think WWE needs 2 overhaul the overall look of their entire product. The scratch WWE logo has been around for 12 years. Watch the open of a WWE show. You can almost predict what shot they are going to go to next.

WWE needs an extreme makeover....even if they dont do anything "extreme" anymore...

Having an all Hell in a Cell pay-per-view so they can officially kill the aura of that match? Here's a thought, maybe people would buy pay-per-views if there weren't 14 of them a year priced at $45 each, and $60 for WrestleMania. Seriously, one per month is MORE than enough or if they had good enough writing to warrant it. Smackdown and ECW are still pretty decent, but Raw sucks ass right now and Raw is more likely to get half of the matches on a pay-per-view anyway. Having a gimmick for a pay-per-view can work under certain circumstances. The old Survivor Series will all elimination matches, fine. King of the Ring with a one night tournament, fine. An interactive pay-per-view, fine if done right.

But Hell in a Cell is a match that should only come along when a feud has reached a certain point and needs to be settled. There have only been 14 of them in 12 years, and they were one or two per year, not 6 or 7 on one night. Pretty bad when WWE is stealing the Lockdown concept from TNA. Hey lets throw these guys who have only been feuding a month in Hell in a Cell or lets throw a bunch of guys with nothing better to do in Hell in Cell. Its bad enough having two Elimination Chamber matches at No Way Out, but if they're spaced out with one starting the show and one ending the show, its at least partially acceptable. Extreme Rules having all gimmick matches has gotten old fast. Whats the point of having those gimmick matches at other pay-per-views when a feud actually needs settled when they just had two guys fight in that type of match for no rhyme or reason a couple months ago? Whats next, 3 or 4 Royal Rumble matches in January? An all ladder match pay-per-view? These are supposed to be rare matches that are special each time you see them, not run into the ground so much that people don't care about them anymore. What happened to the philosophy less is more? It doesn't matter if you do 6 or 7 Hell in a Cell matches on one night or do a Hell in a Cell match every 2 months, it dilutes the concept either way.

I was fine with them having Hell in a Cell at a different pay-per-view each year (Badd Blood in 1997, Bad Blood in 2003 and 2004, King of the Ring in 1998, WrestleMania in 1999, No Way Out and Armageddon in 2000, strangely none in 2001, Judgment Day and No Mercy in 2002, Vengeance and Armageddon in 2005, Unforgiven in 2006, Survivor Series in 2007 and Summerslam in 2008.) They were spaced out enough and built up well where it made sense. I'll wait and see how they do it, but I don't think it will be a good idea.

Agreed WWE needs a new logo and a makeover. They had the block logo for the Rock n' Wrestling Era, the slanted logo for the New Generation Era, the scratch WWF logo for the Attitude Era and the current logo for the....Brand Extension Era? As the late great Owen Hart said: Enough is enough and its time for a change.

HEAR HEAR

JEREMY GET A LIFE

on a side note, an all submission PPV can go either way. Not every one is a great technical wrestler and should not even be in a submission match.

"What happened to the philosophy less is more?"

The WWE philosophy, for many years, has been "excess is never enough."

All Hell in a Cell pay per view????

Noooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Damn you, Vincent K McMahon.

Here's some pay-per-view names that didn't quite make the WWE ballot: WWE Uninteresting; WWE Over Exposed; and of course WWE S.O.S (Same Old Sh*t)

That's not a PG name. Maybe they will have a Cena PPV and name it STFU. Oops I mean STF.

I'd be willing to bet anything that the Hell in the Cell pay-per-view would have two HITC matches top, not an entire pay-per-view with HITC matches.

I think if anyone is going to get an entire pay-per-view to themself, it'll be HHH.

Welcome to WWE Egomania!! Tonight HHH battles the Colons, THE Brian Kendrick, Matt Hardy, John Morrison, Even Bourne, D.H. Smith, and T.J. Wilson in an 8-on-1 Burial Match!

If it wasn't for satellite piracy, the WWE wouldn't be on half as much. Funny how TNA gets slammed but Vince keeps copying their product. What can you expect with an organization that is all sizzle with no steak. I'd lost it years ago for wwe because the part-time wrestler, the Undertaker, would show up for a couple of months to win at Wrestlemania. WWE rules in name only.

I have been looking up as much news as I can on this. And from how it looks WWE is not going to make every match a Hell in a Cell match. Only the main events will be Hell in a Cell matches. TNAFan is right. And WWE Breaking Point is going to be the same way. Only the main events are going to be submission matches. Now when it comes to WWE Annihilation there have been a couple different reports. Most are hinting that this is just going to be a regular ppv with a new name but some are not sure what is going to happen with it

By the way just because my name says kid doesnt mean i am a young kid I am actually 16 in case anybody is wondering

sorry bro, 16 is a young kid.

and that's great. so instead of a TNA knockoff we get a No Way Out knockoff.

Talk about uncatchy names..Naming a PPV after a match its unorigina,I was fine with No Mercy and Unforgiven!Now they have to build up a new idk call it history with the new names..Poor Trish Stratus now the new kiddie fans will not remember where she retired or in the least know who she was.

Kind of but not exactly because fans probably like the No Way Out idea of having two elimination chambers so they make this because they know the fans like it and as long as they split up the matches with one at the beginning and one at the end the fans will enjoy it

I partly agree with you Rose but the wwe did not name them they had the fans do it with surveys I personally like WWE No Escape for the for Hell in Cell because they probably wont be doing each match in HIAC format it will just be main events. But that probably is to similar to No Way Out. Breaking Point is a pretty good name and although Annihilation sounds a little corny it stills gives a tough extreme name.

Please!If they do an all Hell In a Cell PPV, it would take the term "watered down" to a whole new meaning.I would probably cry, honestly. & an all submission PPV would be the most boring, depressing thing ever.
P.S. The Bash is the stupidest PPV name in history.Extreme Rules is a very close second.Apparently, Vince hates having fans.Keep up the good work, you out of touch douche!I weep for the future...