Enjoy Battlefield 1943 Weapons in Battlefield: Bad Company 2

Fans of Battlefield 1943 will feel right at home in EA DICE's next title, Battlefield: Bad Company 2.

Why?

Owners of 1943 will have exclusive access to some of their favorite WWII-era weapons in the multi-player mode of Bad Company 2!

We can't wait to see how these decades old weapons will stack up against the latest and greatest of Bad Company 2.

We're in the process of finalizing exactly which weapons will make the jump, so vote for your favorite in the latest poll!

Comments

  • Commander x202x wrote:
    August 7, 2009 06:46 PM

    Haha! This sounds so sweet! Good thing I have BF43!!

  • Mer44 wrote:
    August 7, 2009 07:45 PM

    Yay!

  • MAXIMUS I7I wrote:
    August 7, 2009 08:14 PM

    I'm a huge Battlefield fan, but this doesn't make any sense.  I mean come on who would want to use a fifty year old weapon over the latest in high-tech weapons?  Which one should I use, the M1 semi-automatic rifle or the M4 automatic assault rifle?  Hmmm... yeah that's a tough choice. lol  I would understand if they make it a disadvantage to use the old weapons, and it's more of a personal choice for anyone who wants to use them.  For example, kind of like the MP44 for COD:Modern Warfare.  In the end  I just don't want to see people actually dominating with a wwII weapon over the latest weapons that are out right now.

  • ovicidal01 wrote:
    August 7, 2009 10:36 PM

    Good point maximus..  Mind you if the weapons are balanced as they compare in reality, it would still offer a certain amount of fun and throw in badges/achievements/trophies... etc. for using those weapons, it'll be worth while.

  • worthxgamer94 wrote:
    August 8, 2009 12:11 AM

    im rooting for the U.S. M1 Garand Semi Automatic Rifle

  • Hiorth wrote:
    August 8, 2009 01:47 AM

    Yay! :) Sounds cool and I've BF1943 :)

  • assassin3feb wrote:
    August 8, 2009 01:58 AM

    I want the m1 garand

  • Maddox[NL] wrote:
    August 8, 2009 03:27 AM

    Maximus +1

    Old weapon? Less damage.. if it deals the same amount of damage like the new weapons it would be crap.. Can you use the old weapon in bf bc 2 as well if you get the pc version?

  • MarckGalvan wrote:
    August 8, 2009 04:48 AM

    That´s cool ! But I want the PC version of BF:BC2 without a delay

  • gunmenator wrote:
    August 8, 2009 05:13 AM

    nice :) this will be fun

  • Maddox[NL] wrote:
    August 8, 2009 06:56 AM

    Why are you all so happy about it? if you like old weapons that much then just keep playing Bf 9143.

  • zzSQUIRTLEzz007 wrote:
    August 8, 2009 08:07 AM

    Maddox seems to make the most sense keep this game as its own and the others as thier own

  • alexcazz wrote:
    August 8, 2009 09:45 AM

    m1 garand all the way

  • OGMASSA wrote:
    August 8, 2009 09:47 AM

    I think its great. And to the people b****ing, DONT USE IT THEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wow that was soooooooooooo hard to think up I'll go take a nap now. ;)

  • Killzone_Kid wrote:
    August 8, 2009 10:14 AM

    Why rifle grenade is a separate vote? How can you use one without the one of them rifles?

  • Yustax wrote:
    August 8, 2009 10:27 AM

    Its wasted space in my opinion. I could only let pass the Colt 45 because its still in use today. But no m1 garand, or a thompson. Its kind of ridiculous, they still have the time to put more weapons into the game. And instead they'll waste space instead of doing new weapons for all classes. Dont get me wrong, is not that Im insulting their choice...but recapitulate on that decision, new weapons would be an improvement. WW2 stylish weapons just dont have a place in a modern war, 'cept for the Colt 45. Post wars are acceptable, hell I even want an vietnam era M14 or even the mighty AK47 and the SVD. Old weapons but still used today. But no jap smg or a springfield or k98. Please dont be that harsh for deciding what comes in the next game with a senseless poll...

  • Maddox[NL] wrote:
    August 8, 2009 11:00 AM

    Fact: 99.9% of the people voting in this poll first watched where everyone was voting on and then made there 'decision'

    Thanks Squirtle there are at least some people here who are not total dumb f****

    What's the point of putting old weapons in a new game? It wont be used anyway. It's just to crap compared to the real guns.

    Come on EA! We have been waiting for years for a real Bf and now you do this!

  • TMartins_PT wrote:
    August 8, 2009 12:46 PM

    yeaah!

  • superweapons wrote:
    August 8, 2009 01:30 PM

    will there be online co op this time it be nice to have?

  • JimJohnson wrote:
    August 9, 2009 06:07 AM

    This is so bad.

    If you like weapons in BF1943 then play that game, don't try to put old weapons in a modern army.