|
|
Legal
and Diocesan Documents
The current stage of the ongoing sex abuse crisis is defined
by documents: diocesan documents revealed in discovery by plaintiffs
and newspapers, Vatican and bishops' conference documents that adjust
canon law in complex ways, testimony by bishops and other high church
officials, and investigative reports by grand juries, district attorneys,
and attorneys general. We are posting them all.
As church documents in the thousands have come under public scrutiny
for the first time, lawyers for the church have redoubled their
efforts to prevent other damaging revelations. Innovative claims
of "prelate" and "formation" privilege have
been advanced, and settlements involving hundreds of survivors have
been negotiated among threats of diocesan bankruptcy. |
Featured Documents
* Boston
Archdiocesan Files - We are the largest source on the Internet of
publicly available Boston files, including crucial documents about Birmingham
and Shanley.
* McCormack
Deposition - This important testimony is available only here on the
Internet, and includes links to the 85 exhibits: a cross-section of the
Boston crisis, and in-depth look at McCormack's 10-year career as Boston
abuse fixer.
* New
Vatican Procedures for U.S. Abuse Cases - This previously unreleased
document comes from a February 2003 Vatican training session for U.S.
diocesan abuse experts. It clearly outlines for the first time the Vatican's
role in disciplining accused priests.
Reports by Attorneys General and Grand
Juries
* Boston MA - Reilly
Report and Executive
Summary
* Manchester NH - Attorney
General’s Report and Agreement
* Rockville Centre NY - Suffolk
County Grand Jury Report
* New York NY - Westchester
County Grand Jury Report, June 19, 2002
* Portland ME - Attorney
General’s Report.
Diocesan Archives
* Manchester NH -
The full 9,000-page collection released by the NH arrorney general. Only
available here on the Internet.
* Boston
MA - The first 500-page installment in our project to post the 45,000
page collection in its entirety.
Depositions
* Cardinal Bernard Law - May
8, 2002, June
5, 2002, June
7, 2002, August
13, 2002, August
14, 2002, October
11, 2002, October
16, 2002, January
22, 2003, February
3, 2003
* Bishop
John B. McCormack - June 3, 2002 through November 22, 2002
* Cardinal
Francis E. George - January 30, 2008
Complaints and Other Filings
* Demand
Letter, submitted 9/22/94 [Br. Richard (James Comack)]
* John
Doe 1 v. Des Moines Diocese, filed 12/15/95 [Msgr. Francis T. Zuch]
* A,
B, and C Doe and Jane Roe v. Geoghan, (7/9/96) [Rev. John Geoghan]
* Samide
v. Brooklyn Diocese, filed 10/1/02 [Rev. John Thompson]
* Redacted
v. Rev. Barry Bossa, filed 10/21/02 [Rev. Barry Bossa]
* Complaint
for Racketeering, Personal Injuries, Negligence, and Fraud (4/29/02)
[Cicchillo v. Los Angeles Archdiocese, Cardinal Roger Mahony, Fr. Carl
Sutphin, et al.]
* John
Doe 14 v. Archbishop of Boston, filed 6/4/02 [Rev. J. Kevin McAndrews]
* Plaintiffs'
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion in Limine to Admit Evidence
of Practices and Policies of the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Boston,
a Corporation Sole, Concerning Sexually Abusive Priests Other Than Paul
R. Shanley, in Gregory Ford, et al. v. Bernard Cardinal Law, et al., filed
7/21/03 [Shanley, Buntel, Burns, Coughlin, Finegan, Foley, Forry, Geoghan,
Graham, Johnson, Kelley, Lane, Meffan, Morrissette, Murphy, Paquin, Picardi,
O'Leary, O'Sullivan, Rebeiro, Rosenkranz, Rynne, Tivnan, Tourigney, and
Wilson]
* John
Doe 1 et al. v. Rev. Edmond A. Parrakow et al., filed 2/26/04 [Parrakow,
Caverzan, Whalen, O’Herlihy, Martin, Rios, Greene, Stewart, Netter,
White, Sherlock, and Brady]
* Burnett
v. Bishop of Springfield MA, filed 3/29/05 [Doheny, Page, Weldon,
Berthiaume, Gatineau, Walsh, and Harrington]
* Chambers
v. Kenkel, filed 4/25/05 [Rev. Leonard A. Kenkel]
* Chevedden
v. California Jesuits, filed 5/17/05 [Br. Charles Leonard Connor]
* Nicholson
v. St. Louis Archdiocese, filed 8/25/05 [Rev. William C. Poepperling]
* John
Doe RG vs. Archdiocese of Indianapolis, St. Andrew Catholic Church,
Fr. Harry Monroe, and Does 1-100 Inclusive, filed 9/8/05. [Rev. Harry
Monroe]
* John
Doe CT vs. Archdiocese of Indianapolis, St. Catherine Parish n/k/a
Good Shepherd Parish, Fr. Harry Monroe, and Does 1-100 Inclusive, filed
9/22/05. [Rev. Harry Monroe]
* John
Doe HB vs. Archdiocese of Indianapolis, St. Catherine Parish n/k/a
Good Shepherd Parish, Fr. Harry Monroe, and Does 1-100 Inclusive, filed
10/25/05. [Rev. Harry Monroe]
* John
Doe NM vs. Archdiocese of Indianapolis, St. Catherine Parish n/k/a
Good Shepherd Parish, Fr. Harry Monroe, and Does 1-100 Inclusive, filed
10/25/05. [Rev. Harry Monroe]
*
John
Doe DB vs. Archdiocese of Indianapolis, St. Paul Church, Fr. Harry
Monroe, and Does 1-100 Inclusive, filed 11/9/05. [Rev. Harry Monroe]
* John
Doe KW vs. Archdiocese of Indianapolis, St. Paul Church, Fr. Harry
Monroe, and Does 1-100 Inclusive, filed 1/30/06. [Rev. Harry Monroe]
* John
Doe 141 vs. Archdiocese of Indianapolis, St. Paul Church, Fr. Harry
Monroe, and Does 1-100 Inclusive, filed 2/7/06. [Rev. Harry Monroe]
* John
Doe WD vs. Archdiocese of Indianapolis, St. Andrew Catholic Church,
Fr. Harry Monroe, and Does 1-100 Inclusive, filed 2/14/06. [Rev. Harry
Monroe]
* John
Doe 103 v. Chicago Archdiocese, filed 3/23/06 [Rev. Chester Przybylo]
* John
Doe OD vs. Archdiocese of Indianapolis, St. Michael Church, Fr. Harry
Monroe, and Does 1-100 Inclusive, filed 6/5/06. [Rev. Harry Monroe]
* John
Doe WC vs. Archdiocese of Indianapolis, St. Patrick Church, Fr. Harry
Monroe, and Does 1-100 Inclusive, filed 6/13/06. [Rev. Harry Monroe]
* John
Doe HS vs. Archdiocese of Indianapolis, St. Paul Church, Fr. Harry
Monroe, and Does 1-100 Inclusive, filed 6/15/06. [Rev. Harry Monroe]
* John
Doe 113 v. Bishop Fliss, filed 11/22/06 [Rev. Edward Beutner]
* John
Doe 26 v. Miami Archdiocese, filed 10/25/06 [Rev. Anthony Mercieca]
* JP
v. Archbishop of Seattle, filed 3/9/07 [Rev. James Knelleken]
* Hoatson
v. Egan, filed 8/14/07
* John
Doe 116 v. Chicago Jesuits, filed 8/21/07 [Rev. Donald McGuire SJ]
* John
Doe 119 v. Las Vegas Diocese, filed 1/15/08 [Rev. John Patrick Feeney]
* Cunningham
v. California Franciscans, filed 8/6/08
* Ernesto
C. v. Franciscan Friars of California, filed 10/5/09
* Craig
Clover v. Franciscan Friars of California, filed 11/3/09
Canonical Documents
Readers should note that the so-called Mixed Commission (whose work was
rubber-stamped at the 11/02 USCCB meeting in DC) revised the Dallas Norms
to bring them in line with Pope John Paul II's 4/30/01 Apostolic Letter,
its attached Norms, and Cardinal Ratzinger's 5/18/01 explanatory letter
(see those documents below). Our intention here is to make available all
the documents referred to in the Charter and Norms, and other documents
that reflect the church's approach to sexual abuse by its priests and
related issues.
* Religiosorum Institutio (Instruction on
the Careful Selection and Training of Candidates for the States of Perfection
and Sacred Orders), issued by the Sacred Congregation for Religious (2/2/61)
- English
* Crimen Sollicitationis (The Offense of Sollicitation), by Cardinal Ottaviani,
approved by Pope John XXIII (3/16/62) - Latin
and English
* Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church
on the Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons, a CDF letter to the bishops
by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Archbishop Alberto Bovone (10/1/86) -
English
* Pastor Bonus (The Good Shepherd), Pastor Apostolic Constitution by Pope
John Paul II (6/28/88) Latin
and English,
in which the CDF's jurisdiction over "more serious" offenses
is briefly described in Section
III, article 52.
* NCCB Guidelines and Other Considerations in Pedophilia Cases, by Bishop
A. James Quinn, at Midwest Canon Law Society Meeting (4/23-25/90) Transcript
[note in particular the passage (PDF p. 31) on sending documents that
"you really don't want people to see" to the Vatican embassy
in Washington "because they have immunity"]
* Canonical Delicts Involving Sexual Misconduct and Dismissal from the
Clerical State, by Msgr. John A. Alesandro, published by the NCCB/USCB
(1995) {1}{2}{3}{4}
* Agendi Ratio (Plan of Proceeding in an Investigation of Beliefs), by
Cardinals Ratzinger and Bertone (6/29/97) - Latin
* Always Our Children: A Pastoral Message
to Parents of Homosexual Children and Suggestions for Pastoral Ministers,
a statement by the then-NCCB Committee on Marriage and Family (9/10/97)
- English
* Sacramentorum Sanctitatis Tutela (Safeguarding
the Sanctity of the Sacraments), Apostolic Letter by Pope John Paul II
with related Norms Regarding the More Serious Offenses Reserved to the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (4/30/01) - Latin
of the letter and English
translation of the letter and the norms, with another earlier
translation of the Norms for comparison. The letter is posted only
in Latin
on the Vatican Web site, and without its attached Norms, which seem never
to have been published in Latin.
* Letter Regarding the More Serious Offenses Reserved to the Congregation
for the Doctrine of the Faith, by Cardinals Ratzinger and Bertone (5/18/01)
- Latin
and English
* Early
Draft of the Dallas Charter - (6/4/02)
* Dallas
Charter - (6/14/02)
* Dallas
Norms - (6/14/02)
* Exchange
of Letters between Cardinal Re and Bishop Gregory about Vatican reaction
to the Dallas Norms (10/14-15/02)
* Changes
in the Norms Made by the Mixed Commission - (10/29/02)
* Comparative
Text of the Dallas Norms and the Mixed Commission Norms
* Final
Norms (12/8/02)
* Final
Charter (12/8/02)
* A
Manual for Canonical Processes for the Resolution of Complaints of Clerical
Sexual Abuse of Minors, from Msgr. Charles Scicluna's seminar in Washington
DC (2/03)
|
|