Concerns over Britain’s wind plans

Article by LEORA BROYDO VESTEL, greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com 13 January 2010

Prime Minister Gordon Brown of Britain discussing an initiative last week that would greatly expand offshore wind power in the country.
Prime Minister Gordon Brown of Britain discussing an initiative last week that would greatly expand offshore wind power in the country.
On Friday, the British government announced it had awarded licenses for several offshore wind projects with the potential to generate 32 gigawatts of power - or enough electricity to power nearly all the homes in Britain.

This week, concerns were raised over such a huge investment in wind power - particularly given that the country's existing wind energy production was reportedly brought to a near standstill during a recent period of cold air, high pressure and a lack of wind.

Read more...
 
Protestors back MP’s probe call

Article by Uttoxeter Advertiser, www.uttoxeteradvertiser.co.uk

 

An action group against a planned giant wind turbine near Uttoxeter have backed their MP?s calls for an investigation into the noise levels from such structures.

Bill Cash MP, whose constituency covers the village of Checkley which is all set for a 60m high testing mast and eventual turbine, has made the call for the recognition of health consequences of wind turbine noise.Bill Cash MP

Read more...
 
Wind power has CO2 debt – not savings

Article by www.thisisdevon.co.uk 11 January 2010

 

Just before Christmas I could not believe the "front" of a wind farm supporter whose letter condemned an objector for using misleading statistics when arguing against wind farms.

The wind industry is founded on highly-spun, misleading statistics.

For example the "number of homes" figures developers love conveniently omit to mention that homes account for only 29 per cent of electricity use.

Until the Advertising Standards Agency was persuaded that it was not possible to selectively replace electricity that would have been generated in a coal-fired power station, developers claimed carbon offsets double what is now allowed.

But because of the intermittent, highly variable nature of the electricity produced by wind farms, high carbon costs are incurred in keeping the grid stable. Fossil-fuelled power stations have to be turned up and down rapidly which, a retired power engineer told me, "is like driving a steam train around the M25 in rush hour". These costs are never accounted for.

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 3 of 141
Who's Online
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
  • click here to visit the blimp photo gallery
Main Menu
Home
News items
Report to Planning Committee
P.W.A.G's response document
Objection case
Technical information
Video of proposed site
Video of test mast
Official map of proposed site
Library - photo gallery!
Wind turbine horror stories
What the Politicians say
What is the PWAG?
Your local PWAG contacts
What can I do?
PWAG Newsletters
Events
Walk in Robin Hood's footsteps
Who are Banks Developments?
Useful links
Search
Contact Us
PWAG newsfeeds
Choose a newsfeed and keep upto date with what is happening!