Chicago Reader

Friday, June 25, 2010

Alison True Fired as Reader Editor

Posted by Michael Miner on Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:49 PM

AlisonTrue9358KringSept2008.1600.jpg
  • Karen Kring
Alison True was fired Friday morning by acting publisher Alison Draper as editor of the Reader, the paper which True joined as an editorial assistant in the early 1980s. True's dismissal was announced by Draper at a staff meeting later in the morning attended by Marty Petty, CEO of the Creative Loafing chain of weekly papers.

I consider this act unfathomable — a tragic misjudgment by two people, Draper and Petty, whom I respect. I suppose they have a vision of tomorrow's Reader they think True is wrong for. Change is in the air — design consultant Ron Reason has just finished helping Creative Loafing's Atlanta paper overhaul itself, and he's due in Chicago in a few weeks to add his two cents here. True, in the last couple of years, had to fire some extraordinary journalists — among them writers John Conroy, Steve Bogira, Tori Marlan, and Harold Henderson. The original leaders of Creative Loafing had saddled her with a budget under which she couldn't afford them — I got that, though a lot of readers understandably didn't. But operating within a drastically smaller budget, True produced a Reader that did what it could still afford to do at a level that maintained its traditional standards.

I mourn True — who's as good a friend as I have — and hope for the best for those standards.

UPDATE: Alison Draper says that Ron Reason is not booked to participate in any sort of retooling of the Reader. She writes: "The Reader has not engaged Ron Reason on any projects. I have not determined the timeline for a redesign, nor engaged any designers in initial conversation. The leadership team at the Chicago Reader will determine when and if a redesign is to take place. We will collaborate around which designer(s) best understands the needs of the Chicago Reader and its audience and can best assist in the process of evaluating brand-centric creative options."

Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (60) RSS

Showing 1-60 of 60

Add a comment

Regular readers are probably aware of the esteem in which I hold longtime contributor Lee Sandlin. To get a sense of what Alison's meant to the Reader (and being comparatively new, I can't pretend to have a full grasp of what that means), I would encourage you to read Sandlin's dedication to Alison True:

http://leesandlin.com/site/dedication.htm

I'm heartbroken.

Posted by whet on | Report this comment

The Reader in its current iteration is a superb publication, keeping its traditional long-form stories and in-depth reporting side-by-side with an easy-to-use website and solid, reliable listings - and very good tweets and facebook updates. I don't know what else the money-people can expect than what you guys already turn out.

Posted by Marc Geelhoed on | Report this comment

WHAT. I gasped out loud when I saw this. Alison was great to me when I was an intern and took the time to cultivate new writers, as well as manage an insane workload as more and more editors were laid off. I am so baffled. Sure, people whine about the Reader getting smaller/laying off fantastic writers, but she had to work within very difficult budgetary constraints. Seems like a bit of killing the messenger here. Alison, I hope you land on your feet okay. This is totally undeserved, from my outsiders' viewpoint.

Katie

Posted by Katie on | Report this comment

well said, mike, as always...

Posted by jenniferMcL on | Report this comment

I'm very saddened to hear this. I've been working with Alison at the Reader since the late 80s--in fact, I'm pretty sure she gave me my first assignment. I've always held her in high regard and felt sympathy for her being stuck in the middle between the new owners and a staff that she clearly loved and respected.

Posted by Jim Newberry on | Report this comment

Having a hard time believing/accepting this. I began writing for Alison when I was still in college and she was an editorial assistant back in the mid-80s and always found her and still find her to be incredibly astute.

Posted by Adam Langer on | Report this comment

My professional association with Alison goes back almost twenty years now, and I would have to call it one of the great experiences of my life. Everything I wrote from the early 90s till a few years ago, I wrote with her in mind: I thought of her as my ideal audience for my most envelope-pushing experiments in feature journalism. Of course that changed when the Reader changed, and she no longer had the room for my favorite kind of work -- but she was constantly trying to find ways of coaxing me back anyway. And leaving aside how much I owe her, just think of how much this town owes her: even when the Reader was basically reduced to panhandling for spare change to pay its contributors, Alison was still running amazing journalism every week. Firing her is a monumentally stupid decision.

Posted by Lee Sandlin on | Report this comment

Oh, Christ. Toward what end?

Posted by Cliff Doerksen on | Report this comment

So what's the Reader's next move? Outsource editorial duties to the Trib just like they're going to do with circulation?

Posted by top geezer on | Report this comment

What Whet said.

Posted by Kate Schmidt on | Report this comment

I'm having a hard time grasping this. As a journalist in this town, though one who has never had the pleasure of working with Allison, I'm appalled. As a news consumer, I'd saddened and worried about the Reader's future direction. Having been unaware of budgetary constrains prior to today, I am amazed at what Allison could do with what little she had. This strikes me as a total injustice.

Posted by Anna Tarkov on | Report this comment

I had the pleasure of working with Alison over the past year and found it challenging and always worthwhile. I have no insight into the machinations of the newspaper industry but doubt very much that there's any sense to this move...

Posted by Dmitry Samarov on | Report this comment

I was lucky enough to work at the Reader for a couple of years, and I look back on that time as the most valuable experience I've had in journalism. Most of what I know about good writing and editing I learned from Alison and the paper she ran so well---even when it was owned by people who often seemed actively determined to run it into the ground. I don't know how to express how saddening it is to hear she's been let go.

Posted by Mark Athitakis on | Report this comment

I've worked with her only briefly, but Alison True has impressed me as an editor of high integrity and intelligence.

Posted by Robert Loerzel on | Report this comment

MM- what happened to not ending sentences with a preposition? Like "for" in your article?

I love the Reader. Great content, with credible long form reporting. My one gripe: why is the section "What the Reader's Reading" not updated daily? Someone has been slacking.

Posted by jeffrey harley on | Report this comment

I've written for a lot of local and national publications, but the standards for writing, editing, and reporting that I learned at the Reader are still the highest, hands down.

Posted by Heather Kenny on | Report this comment

I assure you, Mr. Harley, that nobody at the Reader has been slacking. Not Alison, not anybody.

Posted by Philip Montoro on | Report this comment

Oh, Jeffrey. You win today's contest for best "Lamenting the scattered deck chairs on the Titanic" moment.

Posted by Pvt. McCormick on | Report this comment

I checked my phone at a stoplight and was so appalled and saddened that I had to pull over. Alison True is one of the best editors I've worked with. One of those editors who you still wanted to work for/with even though she couldn't pay you as much with the budget cuts. Who championed and helped shape stories that kept the true grit and characters of Chicago above ground, not buried. This is a sad, sad day.

Posted by Leah Pietrusiak on | Report this comment

Well put, Leah.

Posted by Robert Loerzel on | Report this comment

Alison True is a superb editor and manager. The Best of Chicago has just walked out the door.

Posted by J.R. Jones on | Report this comment

The Velvet Lounge loses Fred Anderson and the Chicago Reader loses Alison True, both in the same week. Must be the season for tearing the hearts out of things.

At least Alison is still with us in life, so that we only have to mourn her as our editor.

Posted by Philip Montoro on | Report this comment

Terrible news. Hopefully Alison will land somewhere where upper management will appreciate her.

Posted by me3dia on | Report this comment

Alison has shepherded many, many fine pieces of journalism during her tenure and succeeded longer than most in an increasingly demanding field. I wish her well.

Posted by Frank Sennett on | Report this comment

I thought this was some sort of inside joke when I saw the headline link going around twitter earlier. I can only hope the Reader doesn't become a street rag of bite-sized stories and pop-colored headlines paired with an ad-heavy, flashy website of quick hit info. (That is perhaps a more powerful statement when I add that I work in advertising design and run two music blogs.) I like the Reader because it has always played on it's own field and never needed to step into that world to be a recognized voice. And, it still doesn't. I thank Alison for her effort and for giving me a path to aspire to.

Posted by Veronica M. on | Report this comment

Truly a sad day for Reader writers and Reader readers. Alison has always been a great, generous editor to work with, someone who said yes to weird stories no one else would have touched. I am grateful that I had the chance to work with her for the past six years.

Posted by Jessica Hopper on | Report this comment

Yep. Nothing like out-of-town corporate ownership!

Posted by sherylwriter on | Report this comment

As I have watched from afar as the Reader has been redesigned, restructured and resold I always thought that the core of what made the Reader distinctive and sustainable could carry the company through the turmoil in the media industry. Now with this latest news about Alison, I'm beginning to think this is the beginning of the end. I still think no one person makes the Reader special. It really is the work and culture of a whole lot of special people. But so many things and people have been cut or diminished that I'm really afraid that the Reader will die by a thousand cuts. I hope that's not true. Chicago needs the Reader's distinctive voice.

Posted by Rena on | Report this comment

As a long time Reader reader, I am moved by this outpouring of emotion, appreciation, and support from Allison's colleagues. It will, I hope, be a consolation to her on what certainly has been a painful day.

Posted by martin75 on | Report this comment

What the ____!!!

There is no short epitaph that would sum up what Alison was to the Reader through the many, many, many years she spent there trying to make it, like everyone who has ever worked there tried, a perfect thing of beauty.

Posted by Kathryn on | Report this comment

Please change the name of this paper already.

Posted by bangie99 on | Report this comment

This is sad news-- and a big mistake on the part of management. Much of the Reader's success over the past many years and its 'voice' is indirectly due to Alison True being at the helm of the paper's editorial ship.

Though I only worked with Alison very briefly on a couple of stories I wrote which appeared in the Reader in 2003, I knew her again- and again briefly- when I joined the Reader's ad sales team less than two weeks before the paper was acquired by Creative Loafing in 2007. Needless to say, the ship went down from there, and I resigned 11 months later to go back to a former employer.

Despite the onset of phrases like 'urban explorer' which came from Creative Loafing mgmt (one of whom accompanied me on a sales call to a potential bar advertiser in Wicker Park and kept idiotically saying to the person that we were trying to sell to that we would help him "capture the urban explorers of Atlanta!" - wtf? we were in chicago?!) to these "brand-centric creative options" Draper speaks of, each week I pick up the Reader and I am thankful that much of its content is still very strong. This is no accident-- it is due to Alison's influence.

Having known someone who was cut from the editorial team because he was too senior, even he knew it was nothing personal and it was all about money and the bottom line. It's obvious and unanimous from all of the posters and comments that Alison has been able to make more out of an increasing amount of less these past few years... and now they've let go of who is best about the Reader too.

Posted by Alma on | Report this comment

The Reader has lost its mind, disposed of its arms and legs, and now, its heart. Godspeed to Alison, and to the remaining vital organs left in her wake.

Posted by linda m on | Report this comment

So now the Reader is at the mercy of a Florida CEO who did such a good job at her last job they let her go, and an "acting" publisher du jour from Texas whose last great accomplishment was cutting the frequency of the publication she managed from daily to weekly. I'm sure, Mike, they're absolutely lovely people, but they seem less like saviors than Atalaya vultures.

Without Alison True, I would never have become a writer on architecture, but not even that can tarnish Alison's reputation as an exemplary editor who cared about developing writers and nurturing distinctive outlooks that made for compelling stories. Week after week, Alison put out a product whose quality frequently put Chicago's two dailies to shame. My suspicion is that Alison's unforgivable crime was that her commitment to that quality made her an obstacle to those absentee landlords who seek a cheaper, more blandly marketable, more generically modular Reader whose content can be created largely on autopilot from the home office in Florida.

For management to dismiss Alison is a huge misfortune for the Reader and an outrage to its readers. What would be a tragedy, however, would be for Chicago to lose her entirely. We can only hope that a major publication that still retains some capacity for judging talent will snap her up - and quickly.

Posted by Lynn Becker on | Report this comment

I was fortunate enough to establish myself as a writer with feature stories for the Reader in its glory years. I had the latitude to write about almost anything that interested me - and the trust and first-rate editing of people like Alison True, Mike Miner, and Kitry Krause. To say that I am appalled by this action is to be guilty of the grossest understatement.

Sarah Bryan Miller

Posted by Sarah Bryan Miller on | Report this comment

Says Ms. Draper: "We will collaborate around which designer(s) best understands the needs of the Chicago Reader and its audience and can best assist in the process of evaluating brand-centric creative options."

What sort of brain-dead corporate fuckstick writes a sentence as ugly, empty, and meaningless as that?

Posted by dh4f on | Report this comment

There's not much I can add that hasn't already been nicely stated in the comments above except to say that I'm enormously grateful to Alison for her kindness and encouragement and that I hope that the personal and professional generosity she's put out there over the years will come back her way many times over.

Posted by Reece Pendleton on | Report this comment

I'm not sure which Reader everyone else here has been reading the past five to eight years.

But the editorial content of the paper has been VERY inconsistent. Some cover stories like Robert Loerzel's recent piece on public transit have been great. And pretty much you know any cover story by Dumke and/or Joravsky is going to kick ass and make someone in city hall cry like a baby. But more often than not, I can barely suppress a yawn trying to get through the first page of many cover stories in recent years.

Years back, nearly every week the Reader's cover story would be a hard hitting piece that would grab you by your lapels and slap you right in the face. Sometimes you couldn't bear to put it down. There was some seriously excellent journalism going on then.

The consistency was excellent, although the length of these articles were often prohibitive. Of course, the recent state of the newspaper industry in general, and the declining number of editorial inches everywhere, would make any editor's job much more difficult.

And while within the last 12 months, things have improved mildly, overall the Reader has seen better days.

The idea of objectivity in reporting is often thrown out the door on many stories. The flaming left wing stance of the paper is so all encompassing, I can't recall, in 20+ years of reading that newspaper, a story or column of any type that even tried to represent or report fairly on an issue from the right side of the political spectrum.

To my mind, perhaps Ms. True's abrupt firing will be a fresh start for the paper to rediscover or even reinvent itself.

In my opinion, the Reader needs to re-double its commitment to the type of journalism and story telling that made it a weekly must read over a decade ago, lose that smirking left wing attitude and perhaps make some of their current writers take a refresher course in the fundamentals of objective reporting that ultimately best serve the (lower case r) reader.

Posted by Mike Timble on | Report this comment

I don't know Alison True. But after reading all the comments here, I fear for this publication without her. The Reader is enormously important to Chicago in the absence of a serious local daily. Speaking more personally, it helps me feel at home here. It's the only publication--the only one--that routinely surprises and informs me and rudely grabs my attention. I appreciate that.

How can we help? How can readers help to liberate this institution from, as others have noted, its idiot out-of-town corporate ownership. The Reader needs to be locally owned and safely in the black. Let's all think about this and then act. Maybe we can get Allison True and some of the other great people who once worked at the Reader back.

And let's launch that discussion on this thread. Having dropped the non-serious local dailies, I (for one) have some spare change. I'd be willing to shell out, say, $5 a week for a copy of a reinvigorated Reader liberated from editorial interference by Creative Loafing. How that would be collected and how a non-free Reader would be distributed I don't know. But let's think about it and get something going before it's too late.

This is it, folks. If the Reader goes the way of RedEye, we're all really, really, and I mean REALLY screwed.

Posted by Pelham on | Report this comment

Wow is right! This is a terrible mistake on the part of the owners. They are slowly but surely casting off that which is the soul of the Reader. Chicago will be worse off for this poor decision. I just hope True hooks up with a better, smarter company.

Posted by Mark Greenberg on | Report this comment

Mr. Timble, there is certainly an overall liberal point of view to the Reader - but I wrote major features for the cover and inside from a libertarian/conservative point of view, on subjects ranging from gun control to survivalism to homelessness. The Reader isn't as monochromatic as you would have it.

Posted by Sarah Bryan Miller on | Report this comment

I can't believe this. This is absolutely ridiculous. I have such high hopes for the future of this paper, not anymore.

Posted by delivery on | Report this comment

Ms. Miller,

I'm glad to hear the Reader's coverage is not quite as one-sided as I thought. But, as an avid and longtime Reader reader, as well as an insatiable consumer of the news, the VAST majority of that newspaper's point of view leans leftward--and in many cases there's not even the pretense of hiding it. Often, the one-sided coverage of an issue would produce poorly reported stories and again, the reader gets the short end of the stick.

Even if you factor in the stories you have written for the newspaper and consider those stories on the right or Libertarian side of the political spectrum, those edit inches would show up as a rounding error, as it would account for such a tiny percentage of the Reader's stories.

It's my contention, that the best news reporting is done with the goal of objectivity. And often the Reader comes up short on this. While I don't expect any human to be 100% objective trying to report a story, but at least, with the help of an editor, a reporter should be able to come close. To me, there's something wrong with an editorial department when so many stories lack objectivity even after a series of editors look over a story before publication.

Sometimes a drastic shakeup like this is good for the health of a publication or any organization or group for that matter. Sometimes, events like this turn out to be healthy for both parties. Perhaps Ms. True has been at the Reader too long.

However, it's my guess, a person with the vast experience and journalistic pedigree like Ms. True will not be on the job market for very long.

Here's hoping to a stronger, better, aggressive, more objective Chicago Reader, and a new, challenging and better paying position for Ms. True.

Posted by Mike Timble on | Report this comment

Mr. Timble -

"A fresh start for the paper to rediscover or even reinvent itself."

Check out Creative Loafing's other journals if you want a taste of the future. These are today's lead-ins on CL's websites for journals in other cities:

CL Atalanta - "Gilbert Godfried Told Me Some Dirty Jokes"
CL Charlotte - "Cover Run: The DC Comics Art of Adam Hughes"
Washington City Paper - "Fort Reno Schedule"; Olde Tyme Misogyny Cartoon Corner"; and "What Does It Mean That Al Gore's Accuser Saved Her Pants?"
CL Sarasota - "Cook to Bang: The Lay Cook's Guide To Getting Laid"
CL Tamap - "Pride Day Survey" Is U.S. Soccer Superstar Landon Donovan Gay?"

Doesn't seem like the Reader's going "to re-double its commitment to the type of journalism and story telling that made it a weekly must read over a decade ago ..."

But check it out for yourself - http://www.creativeloafing.com/


Posted by marcmonaghan on | Report this comment

Mr. Timble -

"It's my contention, that the best news reporting is done with the goal of objectivity."

Absolutely, without a doubt, and particularly in mainstream news media reporting. However, everyone has a point of view, and I personally prefer to know where reporters stand. (As a certain notable Cook County politician said at his first news media dinner event, "Most of you covered (my campaign). All of you voted for me.")

I wrote about survivalism at a time when the mainstream (including Mother Tribune) was portraying it as the exclusive purview of dangerous right-wing nutcakes. I talked to some people who saw it more as a matter of self-sufficiency and precautions. (What to do when the power goes out, or there's an earthquake, or civil unrest?) Thanks to the Reader, an alternative viewpoint (libertarian, not Libertarian per se) got some coverage.

At its worst, of course, the Reader is predictable. At its best, it provides alternative angles for viewing a subject, and a starting point for other outlets. That's worth maintaining.

Posted by Sarah Bryan Miller on | Report this comment

Alison hired me as the greenest of green editors in 1998 and, over almost 10 years, was the best boss at the best job I'll probably ever have. She, and everyone at the Reader, taught me the value of skepticism in reporting and precision in language. Constitutionally immune to making a scene, she is a professional role model of the first order and I consider myself very, very lucky to have had the benefit of her support and expertise. I'll spare the internet the rest of my current, less charitable thoughts on the matter.

Posted by martha on | Report this comment

alison was my editor for years -- crucial years for my development as a writer and as a human being. i learned lots about writing but also about diplomacy and decency. godspeed, indeed, alison. thank you for everything.

Posted by achy obejas on | Report this comment

Well put, Martha. We love you, Al.

Posted by Kate Schmidt on | Report this comment

Two further points, prompted by these fascinating posts.
First, about Mr. Timble's idea that the Reader used to be "objective" and but lately under Alison's lead has somehow been transformed into nothing but liberal propaganda -- this kind of charge from conservatives about the Reader's politics has a long history. In fact I was hearing it back in my earliest days of writing for the Reader, more than twenty-five years ago, when Alison was (if I recall correctly) still working in the Reader mailroom. It went along with another charge I often heard back then -- only this one came from the left: that the Reader had once upon a time been a voice for progressive politics but had lately sold out to rightwing corporate America. I once wrote a long essay about World War 2, and I got several angry letters and phone calls from people who called themselves longtime Reader readers, and who were furious with me because I hadn't followed a Marxist interpretation of Hitler. To them it was proof that the old reliably leftwing Reader had been ruined by effete apolitical types like me...
Second, let me just mention my reaction to the corporate-speak emitted by Ms. Draper. I don't wish unemployment on anybody, particularly not Alison, but if she's been having to listen to a lot of that kind of thing lately, maybe being fired isn't an unmixed misfortune.

Posted by Lee Sandlin on | Report this comment

I peruse the Reader from afar on a regular basis and only know Alison True from the work seen via the Internet. All of these commiserations are well, good and cathartic, of course. What's required now, however, is a good reason for the owners to reconsider their decision, besides earnest testimonials to that effect. Unless advertisers are given a good reason to hold back their advertising dollars -- a readers' boycott of the print product, for example -- all of the weeping and wailing will go for naught.

This not being the '60s, though, I wonder if such an action would even be possible, unless kindred blogs, radio stations, websites, nightclubs, theaters and massage parlors were willing to spread the news. If nothing else, it would be a neat experiment in 21st Century commercial activism. Good luck on that.

(By the way, out here in LaLa land, if sex and clinical-marijuana ads were eliminated from the editorially decimated and woefully synergized Weekly -- owned by the Voice conglomerate -- it would have to change its name to the Monthly or Never.)

Posted by gdretzka on | Report this comment

Great, courageous reporting as always, Mike. So sad to hear. I had the pleasure of working at the Reader in its hay-day which lasted many years. Longer than these guys will be able to hold on as this publication becomes more and more homogenized. Alison was always greatly respected by her staff and by those who believe in journalism. Not many of us are left. I wish you well, Alison. The rest of you - keep fighting for as long and as hard as you can.

Posted by Lil L. on | Report this comment

... I have just thrown my pen across the room... it made a black mark on the wall that looks just like a centipede. I have circled the mark and labeled it, "The day they let Alison True go..."

Posted by Kurt Mitchell on | Report this comment

". . .can best assist in the process of evaluating brand-centric creative options." oh dear. Alison's life at the Reader must have been truly fraught under a regime in which people actually talk like this. Wasn't the Reader awesome back in the day, though? Thank you, Alison, and hang on, Kiki.

Posted by lindaray64 on | Report this comment

Thank you Allison for all the amazing work you have done for Chicago. And thank all of you current reader cats for hanging in an not letting them totally fuck up the paper.

Posted by edmar on | Report this comment

"brand-centric creative options." Yeah, no. I worked for the Reader for 13 years--as a typesetter for much of that time as well as a music writer, and it was never about Orwellian newspeak like that, it was always about (a) good ideas and reporting (b) good solid style and (c) NO TYPOS EVER. We used to beat ourselves up when even the smallest one got through. Every bit of copy went through at least half a dozen people, several times--and most of it on Mondays and Tuesdays. We saw the occasional sunrise from the back end. We didn't mind doing it because we believed in what we were doing, we all cared about the final result, and we respected the people we worked with. Alison was a huge part of that vibe - even when she had to play "bad cop" and there were personality clashes, we all understood the reasoning behind it. (And there WAS always reasoning behind it, reasoning based in a concept of good journalism and good writing rather than "branding," which still strikes me as something mostly done to cattle and to people with more extreme kinks than mine.) That Reader has been gone for a long time. Alison, I am so, so sorry. You deserve so much better.

Two years ago when the round of layoffs with my name on the axe came around, Alison wept with me. I think she was possibly more hurt to have to let longterm colleagues and friends go than many of us were to be let go...after all, the atmosphere in the office had been so tense for so long, and she was the one who had to take responsibility although she had little real freedom left. Every time someone got cut, in the Layoff Years, those of left kept thinking, "Shit, who's gonna do the work?" Almost all the people still left are doing the work that used to be done by multiple others. I still have friends there, and I know it's taking an intense toll, both mental and physical. I can't imagine what will happen now. You cannot create a truly great, or even halfway decent, creative product with a stressed-out, miserable workforce who no longer fully believe in what they do and know that loyalty and dedication is likely to reward them with a kick in the crotch.

Posted by Monica Kendrick on | Report this comment

I feel sick. Alison's been at the helm the entire time I've written for the Reader--in other words, the entire time I've been a writer. Her encouragement, insight, and support have been epic.

Posted by Anne Ford on | Report this comment

This is extremely unfortunate. The Reader has become one of, if not THE best source of Chicago news. It will be sad to see its decline with out of towners at the helm.

Posted by ChicagoBookBabe on | Report this comment

One last reflection about all this, and then I'm done.
The critic Randall Jarrell once said that you can always tell when you're living in a golden age, because everybody's bitching about how yellow everything looks. I heard a lot of pissing and moaning about the Reader in the 80s and 90s -- I did a lot of it myself -- but I think we did know how unbelievably lucky we were. Bob Roth (the primordial Reader head honcho) said to me once that the Reader was the only market he knew of for a 20,000 word story about beekeeping. That was a tradition that Alison kept going, and pushed to the maximum -- otherwise how could I write 35,000 words of eccentric reflections about World War 2? I can't think of another place in the country that would have run it. But that piece got me a stronger reaction from readers than everything else I've ever written put together: I still get letters about it almost fifteen years later.

The thing about luck, though, is that you know going in that it's bound to run out eventually. For me it ended sometime in the early 2000s, when the Reader's editorial space shrank down to nothing -- that was when my last long story ran, not in one or two issues as originally planned, but as a fourteen-part serial, because there was no room for it otherwise. Alison told me that there was just no way she could do that again. I'm not looking for sympathy for this, because I've done OK for myself -- I now write these even longer things called "books." And I've done the occasional review since then -- Alison had been after me to write more -- but for me the Reader was basically over with years ago.

What makes me think of Alison as a genuinely great editor, though, is that even when she'd lost so many of her essential staffers and freelancers, even when the Reader's offices had started to look like a ghost town, she was still finding ways of making it work. The Reader today is a shadow of what it was a decade ago, but the quality of the journalism it's been running about, say, TIFs, not to mention the Olympics, is as good or better than anything it ran in the glory days. That's Alison. I wish my remaining friends there nothing but the best, but even if I thought the Reader's new "leadership team" was made up anything other than a pack of useless corporate idiots, I don't see how they'd find an editor who could match her.

Posted by Lee Sandlin on | Report this comment

monica, you nailed it, as always ...

i worked at the READER 29 years, the last couple puzzling over why the hell they'd keep a picky-ass dinosaur like me around * but alison did that, when she really didn't have to, when i hardly seemed a comfortable fit in the new-model media world * maybe that's why she got fired, for dedication above and beyond the call to semiredundant/superannuated gaffers like myself--what we might call a "humanist" avocation, that the prevailing species of corporate thugs and cutthroats have no bottom-line use for * still: she was always the first person i'd ask about whenever i got to wondering how things were going at the paper * guess i won't be asking anymore ...

Posted by mr. belvedere on | Report this comment

Add a comment

Latest in The Blog

Author Archives

  • Black Like Him

    Fifty years ago John Howard Griffin traveled the south disguised as an African-American man.
    • Apr 22, 2010
  • Two Cheers for Vocalo

    An encouraging word for Vocalo
    • Apr 30, 2010
  • The Reader's "Shadow Budget" Coverage Wins a Lisagor

    Ben Joravsky and Mick Dumke take home the Peter Lisagor award for in-depth reporting for their coverage of the city's Shadow Budget—arising from the city's tax increment financing program.
    • Apr 26, 2010
  • More »

Recent Comments

©2010 Creative Loafing Media
All Rights Reserved.