You must enable JavaScript to view this site.
Homepage > Key Issues > Iraq: The Struggle over Kirkuk

Iraq and the Kurds: The Struggle over Kirkuk

1. The Current Situation

2. Crisis Group Resources

Picture: A fireman hoses down a burning oil pipeline after a bomb attack near the city of Kirkuk May 24, 2007. REUTERS/Slahaldeen Rasheed


Updated January 2010

1. The Current Situation

Among the many disputes roiling the Iraqi body politic, one has been particularly intractable: the conflict between the federal government in Baghdad and the Kurdistan regional government in Erbil over Kirkuk. Kirkuk is a city and province that straddles an unofficial dividing line between Arab and Kurdish Iraq. It has a thorough mix of ethnic and religious groups – Arabs, Kurds, Turkomans, and various small Christian denominations; it also happens to be an area rich in oil and gas. The dispute over its administrative status is contaminating and even paralysing national politics.

Crisis Group has followed developments in and concerning Kirkuk since the U.S. invasion in March 2003. The 2005 constitution prescribed a process to resolve the status of Kirkuk and other disputed territories. This process has run aground, however, over the federal government’s unstated but unambiguous resistance to implementing steps that could lead to Kirkuk’s incorporation into the Kurdistan region. Both a census and a referendum in these territories have been allowed to miss their end-of-2007 deadline. Ever since, tensions have been building along the Arab-Kurdish dividing line, along which federal army troops and Kurdistan regional guard fighters are encamped, and which therefore is sometimes referred to as a “trigger” line.

The struggle between the federal government and Kurdistan regional government concerns more than just territory. They disagree also on how they should divide power between them, manage the country’s hydrocarbons wealth, and distribute revenues from oil and gas sales. But in each of these issues, the Kirkuk question plays a pivotal role. Moreover, the inability to resolve Kirkuk’s status has muddled parliamentary debates and obstructed legislation of nationwide import, such as the laws for provincial elections in 2009 and legislative elections in 2010.

The UN Assistance Mission for Iraq has charted a way to navigate the conflict over the disputed territories, but progress has been slow, due in part to the weakness of the Iraqi state. What happens in Kirkuk as U.S. troops withdraw from Iraq by the end of 2011 will play a major role in determining, through political/legislative or violent means, the shape of the Iraqi state.


2. Crisis Group Resources

Crisis Group Reports

Other commentary

For all Crisis Group Iraq reports, click here.

For background to the conflict, see Crisis Group's Iraq conflict history.

For a month-by-month report on developments in Iraq since September 2003, see Crisis Group's CrisisWatch Database.