Opinion

Opinion: Science Shoved Aside in Stem Cell Ruling

Updated: 104 days 14 hours ago
Print Text Size

Susan L. Solomon

Special to AOL News
(Aug. 25) -- Federal funding for stem cell research is once again being held back by politics. Monday, a federal court, in granting an injunction against federally funded human embryonic stem cell research, allowed a vocal minority to hold science hostage to a narrow political agenda.

Judge Royce Lamberth's injunction was issued on the grounds that the guidelines for human embryonic stem cell research "clearly violate" the Dickey-Wicker Amendment, which prohibits the Department of Health and Human Services from using appropriated funds for the creation of human embryos for research purposes or for research in which human embryos are destroyed.

ANOTHER VIEW
A Stem Cell Victory for Patients -- David Prentice, Family Research Council

Dickey-Wicker was created in 1996, before the field of stem cell research even existed, and it was created to be a deterrent to abortion, not to slow down the most promising medical research of our time. But the opponents of stem cell research, in their determination to block the progress of science, are using the old law to new purposes. It will mean, among other things, that more than 400,000 frozen embryos left over from IVF treatments that could have been used for medical research will instead be discarded as medical waste. Is this what is meant by "pro life"?

It's time for Congress to take a stand, remove the Dickey-Wicker Amendment and finally untie the hands of our scientists by allowing the National Institutes of Health to fund the derivation of new stem cell lines. The current restrictive federal policy on human embryonic stem cell research is holding back our best scientific minds and discouraging young scientists from entering this incredibly promising and dynamic area of endeavor.

Although we are confident that the court's decision will not be upheld, the net effect of this ruling is to slow the progress of advancing revolutionary new therapies that have the potential to advance cures and successful treatments for a broad range of diseases and conditions, including diabetes, cancer, AIDS, ALS, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, spinal-cord injury, blindness, cardiovascular disease, and bone and cartilage regeneration.

For eight years under President George W. Bush, human embryonic stem cell research had been a hostage of presidential politics. The previous administration's ban cost researchers precious time in the race for new cures, treatments and discoveries, and it put the United States at a serious disadvantage in its position as an international leader in scientific progress. Last year's executive order by President Barack Obama changed that, lifting many restrictions on federal funding for research on new stem cell lines derived from human embryos, and reaffirming our nation's determination to be in the front line of science, not the rear guard.

Feedback
Send op-eds or letters to the editor to opinion@aolnews.com.

But Monday's opinion by Judge Lamberth brings scientists to a worse state than the Bush administration days. Ironically, now research will even be banned on the human embryonic stem cell lines that the Bush administration approved and the NIH funded for eight years.

Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, stated Tuesday that the NIH will stop its review of roughly a dozen grants for stem cell research worth between $15 million and $20 million, will freeze the renewal of another 22 grants worth $54 million and will not even look at 50 new grant applications for important research using human embryonic stem cells. There is no clearer proof than that of the chilling effect this decision will have on medical research in this country. The American people, the president and the Congress clearly support embryonic stem cell research directed toward the curing of disease and want the United States to be encouraging, not blocking, medical research. But Monday, the courts dashed the hopes of tens of millions of Americans.

Five years ago, the New York Stem Cell Foundation was created to encourage and support the most advanced stem cell research possible. We will continue steadfastly and tirelessly to support and advance this work because of its urgency and its importance to the lives of our loved ones, and of patients everywhere.

Susan L. Solomon is co-founder and CEO of the New York Stem Cell Foundation.


Filed under: Opinion
Follow AOL News on Facebook and Twitter.


2010 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Comments

280Comments

  • Doesn't anyone understand law? Congress, the House and Senate passed the bill. The president signed the bill into law. Our current president says, ignore the law, do what I tell you. This judge said the president cannot ignore prior law. That is the story.

    bob9inv

    Wed Aug 25 13:16:01 EDT 2010

  • As a liberal and pro-life, this opinion piece is absolutely totally wrong. This suit had nothing to do with morality, it was about money. Lamberth issued the injunction because the plaintiffs — James L. Sherley of the Boston Biomedical Research Institute and Theresa Deisher of AVM Biotechnology in Seattle. An appeals court allowed the two researchers to proceed on the grounds that the expansion of NIH funding for human embryonic stem cells made it more difficult for them to win grants for their work on other types of stem cells derived from adult tissues.

    tool3line2

    Wed Aug 25 13:44:00 EDT 2010

  • The judge merely stopped PUBLIC FUNDING of research..If the people commenting in favor of the measure are so vehemently in favor of the benefits of stem cell research.. they should invest their own money into the private institutions who continue their research . I’ m sure the return on the investment will be will be better than the stock market.

    engservprov

    Wed Aug 25 13:48:23 EDT 2010

Add your comment

Discover inspiring videos on TEDWomen where people are reshaping our future with ideas.

View the Video ยป