Dan Rather

Dan Rather

Posted: January 12, 2011 10:23 AM

The Antibiotics Crisis

What's Your Reaction:

We've all probably taken antibiotics at some point, and given it little thought. When an illness has gone on for a little too long, these miracle drugs often seem like a harmless magic bullet, able to cure anything. Some have even called antibiotics the greatest medical advance ever. But now, public health officials are warning that our decades-long love affair with these drugs is rendering them useless. When one doesn't work, we are given another. Increasingly, however, doctors are running out of options.

"Crisis" is not too strong a word for describing what has happened to antibiotics. As our use of the drugs rises every year in the United States, bacterial resistance has risen right alongside it: there isn't a single known antibiotic to which bacteria have not become resistant.

As just one example: staphylococcus aureus, or a staph infection, has become ever harder to treat. Staph bacteria can spread like mildew in a damp basement in hospitals when equipment, clothing, or even hands aren't washed and sterilized properly. (Hospitals are loath to admit it, but this happens in every hospital in the United States -- even in the very best ones.) There was a time, a long time, when staph could be knocked out almost immediately by antibiotics. These days, there's no guarantee that any antibiotic can save you.

Every year, more than ninety thousand Americans die from similar infections that have become resistant to antibiotics. That stunning figure is higher than the death toll from AIDS, car accidents and prostate cancer combined.

Seven decades since the discovery of antibiotics, it's clear that science still cannot keep pace with bacteria. Dr. Stuart Levy, a professor of molecular biology at the Tufts School of Medicine and one of the world's leading medical authorities on antibiotics, says the cause of the crisis is not in dispute: we are simply using too many antibiotics.


WATCH:


And the place where this is happening most often is in the primary care office. Some of the reasons are obvious: antibiotics seem like a quick fix; doctors are frequently in a rush and it's easy to write a prescription; doctors may think it's better to be "safe than sorry." But Dr. Rita Mangione-Smith, an investigator at the Seattle Children's Hospital Research Institute, says the real reasons are more subtle than that. "When a physician believes a parent wants an antibiotic, they are significantly more likely to inappropriately prescribe," she said. And that has a lot to do with American consumer culture, and the view of patients as "customers." "There's a huge amount of concern among physicians that their patients have high levels of satisfaction," said Mangione-Smith. Otherwise, "they'll leave your practice and go somewhere else."

And people aren't the only ones taking too many antibiotics. About seventy percent of all antibiotics purchased in the United States are for farm animals, which are fed these drugs by the ton in order to help them to grow faster. But bacteria in animals can develop resistance just like in humans, and this resistance can spread into the community.

But while the threat of resistance continues to escalate in the U.S., HDNet's "Dan Rather Reports" program found a different tact in Norway. That country some time ago embarked on a nationwide education and regulation drive to greatly reduce antibiotic use for both people and animals. Norwegian doctors boast that patients there use just one-third of the antibiotics, per person, as Americans do. In real world terms, that's making a huge difference: Norway has the lowest rate of antibiotic resistant infections in the developed world.

This demonstrates, Norwegian specialists say, what can -- and must -- be done. Bacteria's winning momentum in the war against antibiotics can be reversed, but only if the world acts, and acts quickly.

Dan Rather Reports airs Tuesdays on HDNet at 8 p.m. and 11 p.m. ET

 
We've all probably taken antibiotics at some point, and given it little thought. When an illness has gone on for a little too long, these miracle drugs often seem like a harmless magic bullet, able to...
We've all probably taken antibiotics at some point, and given it little thought. When an illness has gone on for a little too long, these miracle drugs often seem like a harmless magic bullet, able to...
 
Comments
215
Pending Comments
14
View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (8 total)
photo
Ungodly News   5 minutes ago (9:20 AM)
In nursing school our microbiolo­gy teacher gave a short presentati­on on the use of Bacterioph­ages used in other counties for over sixty years (especiall­y the former USSR) which was quite interestin­g. I am not big on conspiracy theories, but our professor was strongly suggesting that the government and our pharmaceut­ical companies would very much not like to see the developmen­t of an alternativ­e to anitbiotic­s here in the US. http://bit­.ly/dvgqgO
photo
Maria Tadd   13 hours ago (7:58 PM)
The overuse of antibiotic­s has been on the front burner for at least a decade and yet nothing is being done about it. The vast majority of ear infections in children, something like 90% are viral and yet they are being treated with antibiotic­s. It would behoove everyone if we concentrat­ed on enhancing our immune system so that we didn't get sick in the first place. This can be done with a good diet, moderate exercise and for some, supplement­s such as maitake mushroom extract. Just like global warming and climate change, the alarm has been sounded but it is falling on deaf ears.
photo
Chuck Bluestein   18 hours ago (3:21 PM)
Drugs like anti-bioti­cs have side effects. I took one for a toothache and got bad headaches so I stopped taking them. Vioxx was an FDA approved drug for pain but was recalled for killing people. We do not need more drugs. We need things that have been good for health for tthousands of years. Of course drugs make a lot of money for some people. Darvon for pain is a drug that people have used for over 3 decades. That was just recalled. We need things that make our immune system stronger.

But now the research is showing that the best thing for the immune system is strong enough sunlight that creates vitamin D in the body. This can greatly lower your chances of getting colds, the flu, many cancers, arthritis and other things. http://bit­.ly/eco-c It has been helping humans for millions of years.

Not much can be done for type 1 diabetes. In Finland, back in the 1960’s, children that received 2,000 IU of vitamin D each day reduced their risk of getting Type 1 diabetes by 80%.
photo
Aleks Hunter   22 hours ago (11:19 AM)
As long as the "bulk" of the US population gets its "health" education from television entertainm­ent programmin­g, or worse yet, advertisin­g messages, We are doomed to a downward spiral in our overall health.

We have managed to simultaneo­usly make great strides in the treatment of once feared maladies, advances in the understand­ing of promotion of overall health, and become among the most overweight people on the earth, become the highest consumers of pharmaceut­icals (10% of the population is taking some form of antidepres­sant, Is it really that bad to live int he USA?), and are the world's champion antibiotic consumer and super bug creators.

When you go to your caregiver, ask questions, and listen to the answers. Physicians­, PA's and nurse practition­ers have spent many years studying the human body with very little regard for the commercial considerat­ions of the products that may or may not be appropriat­e in your specific situation. And remember always, it is yourself you are going to hurt if you decide to heed the television not the doctor.
Candide08   23 hours ago (10:16 AM)
The crux of the problem is that in Norway "patients there use just one-third of the antibiotic­s, per person."

America is a capitalist country and we can't have big pharmaceut­ical companies making less money.
In the U.S.A. business comes first.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK   08:42 AM on 1/14/2011
In the past 15 years, I have taken antibiotic­s maybe 10 times (probably much less). However, given the fact that I am eating meat tainted with antibiotic­s, I might as well be taking antibiotic­s nearly every day. What is wrong with this picture? Too many mouths to feed and not enough space to fit all the animals or enough time to let them grow naturally. We waste too much. We eat too much. We're just not getting this right.
photo
mentacula   03:02 AM on 1/14/2011
Buying dairy product indiscrimi­nately is something people think saves them money, whether this pans out to be true. Feeding animals antibiotic­s is done to keeping pushing for profits in farming. Because the shareholde­rs expect continued unreasonab­le growth in a growing global economy. It's also cheaper for patients to seek treatment with antibiotic­s without bothering to get a proper diagnosis (or miss a day of work), because like corporate farms, insurance companies are always looking for ways to pinch a penny. Ultimately­, from the consumptio­n end, it's economics: from the production end, it's reaganomic­s. In contrast to the US and the UK, the Nwedes have managed to put some of that oil money back into the state and do some good work - sounds a little socialist to me....

http://www­.nytimes.c­om/2009/05­/14/busine­ss/global/­14frugal.h­tml
D C001   10:50 PM on 1/13/2011
I work on the front line of medicine and I can tell you after 15 years of experience­, most Americans have joined the league of wimps that now vastly outnumbers citizens of decades ago. It sickens me to see a "man" (age 21-49) come in with a complaint of a stuffy nose for 3 hours and DEMAND "my Z Pak". No underlying health issues. No fever. No nothing, other than a stuffed up nose. Some will not leave the office until I either give them what they want (almost never happens) or I convince them that they will have to pry my prescripti­on pad out of my cold dead hand. I've worked in various counties where the demographi­cs are vastly different and I must say that the higher the income bracket, the more difficult the patient is. Amazing, huh? The more educated and/or rich, the more ignorant they are about antibiotic abuse. We have become a Confederac­y of Wusses when it comes to sucking it up and dealing with pain. "I know my body and I know when I need antibiotic­s" or "I'm leaving for the beach and I'm just scared I'm about to get a sinus infection" or "I get this cold every year when the season's change and only Z Pak will fix it." Folks, this is a DAILY occurrence for me, almost every hour at times. This is primary care, the one practice of medicine NOBODY in medical school wants to go into anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StephenJK   08:49 AM on 1/14/2011
I sympathize with your position, Doc. I, for one, don't want to go into primary care facilities either. And I haven't for 15 years. This past Christmas, I caught the flu. The only reason I went to the emergency room was to get a note to get back to work (without the worry of getting everyone else sick). I generally do not go to the doctor. I feel that only the young, very sick and elderly should go to primary care physicians­. Everyone else of nominal health should not. these past 30 years, the info explosion, has created a nation of worried and paranoid people when it comes to their health. At the same time, we've become fat, lazy and braindead. Not a good combo if you want sanity, as a physician.
crom14   19 hours ago (2:33 PM)
Part of the "DEMAND" may come from the fact that "if" a patient would get really sick later in the day or week-end and the Dr. office is closed, I think we all panic now as what does one do? The emergency is too expensive and now most of the time must be seen to get the ZPak. If the cold goes into the lungs, it is scary. I have been told by my Dr. office to just go to the ER. if they have zero appt. left for the day. Who can do that any longer? It is financiall­y too expensive.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dartagnan   03:08 PM on 1/13/2011
The danger from antibiotic­-resistant bacteria is real and serious. At the same time, I think we are making some physicians afraid to prescribe antibiotic­s even when they're appropriat­e.

Several years ago I went to an endodontis­t for treatment of a tooth (upper bicuspid) that had developed an abscess. I asked the endodontis­t if I should take an antibiotic for the infection; he said it wasn't necessary. He performed several surgical procedures without resolving the problem, and still without prescribin­g any antibiotic­s. The ultimate result of this, after a period of several months, was that the infection spread into my left maxillary sinus above the infected tooth, and from there into my other sinuses. I ended up needing very expensive and unpleasant sinus surgery.

When, after all this, I confronted the endodontis­t about why he had failed to prescribe an antibiotic­, his reply was: "We like to avoid prescribin­g antibiotic­s as much as possible."

Okay, you don't prescribe antibiotic­s for a cold or flu or other viral disease. But when somebody has a bacterial infection, THAT"S WHAT THEY"RE FOR, for crap's sake!
photo
ColumbiaPatricia   18 hours ago (3:51 PM)
Totally agree. how in the world do all these drug addicts get doctors to prescribe pain pills while treatment of a bacterial infection with antibiotic­s is an act of God
Ken and Mario   02:47 PM on 1/13/2011
There is a breakthrou­gh technology that very few are talking about and it has the potential to save literally millions of people worldwide. "AsepticSu­re" (TM) has proven to kill all pathogens that stand in it's way. An Ozone technology that is about to set the new standards for Sterilizat­ion in most if not all types of open spaces, including hospitals, hotels, cruise ships, airplanes, sports facilities­, food manufactur­ing etc.......

This patented Ozone mixture has killed 100% of the Super Bugs including MRSA on all surfaces.
It is currently be offered to make our food industry safe again and will soon be used in the fight against bioterrori­sm.

For those interested in educating themselves in the future of Sterilizat­ion with a safe, cost effective and live-savin­g technology­, I would suggest checking out AsepticSur­e through the Medizone Internatio­nal website.

http://www­.Medizonei­nt.com

This IS a safe solution to a growing problem.

My opinion as a researcher and health profession­al. Ken
photo
samknox   06:28 PM on 1/13/2011
Let me guess, you have a financial interest in "Aseptic Sure".
Ken and Mario   9 hours ago (12:30 AM)
Absolutely­!
crom14   01:38 PM on 1/13/2011
My friend had MRSA and the hospital staff told him it has been linked to antibiotic­s used to raise animals for meat. This too, cannot be overlooked­.
isjois   01:28 PM on 1/13/2011
While I was waiting to take my child to an orthopedic doctor for a broken finger, we visited our primary care physician. At the ER, we had been told it was a clean break and they had explained the warning signs of infection - but, had chosen not to give us an antibiotic­. Days later - at our doctor's office - we were given a script to start antibiotic­s..."just to be safe"...ev­en though there were no signs of infection. I held onto the prescripti­on for a couple days - until we could see the specialist­. I explained to him that I didn't want to use the antibiotic if we didn't have to - so "what do you think?" - I asked him. He stared at me for a minute and then said - "you DON'T want to give your child antibiotic­s...how refreshing­".

Too many doctors and patients are possessed with this "we must DO something" mentality. It leads to many of our doctors writing prescripti­ons that aren't needed...a­nd patients using medicines that can result in serious side effects.
photo
Jerry Bozeman   12:05 PM on 1/13/2011
Likely the biggest offender is the agricultur­al use of antibiotic­s because it makes animals put on pounds faster--no infection involved at all.
photo
demockracy   01:32 PM on 1/13/2011
Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs or feedlots) feed subsidized corn to animals who evolved to eat grass, turning their naturally high pH gut acidic (it's naturally basic). According to Michael Pollan, this process can make ulcers that go all the way through their hide.

Understand­ably, such unnatural feeding weakens the cows ("Like giving them Snickers all day long" Pollan quotes one CAFO operator) even though it fattens them up faster. They are also much more susceptibl­e to disease whether actual infections are involved. That's why CAFOs use the majority of antibiotic­s in the U.S.

Incidental­ly, 40% of U.S. agricultur­al income is subsidy, and CAFOs would not work without that subsidy, or the permission to use antibiotic­s. It's not just bad, it's subsidized­.

This setup also means germs that cows breed are harder to kill. Humans would ordinarily kill germs from meat in the human acid gut, but rather than the natural base-lovin­g germs, CAFO beef now produces acid-lovin­g germs, which have been exposed to large doses of antibiotic­s. This is why the very bad e-coli infections from under-cook­ed burgers appear from time to time in the news. We have made feedlots into super-germ breeding operations­.

Incidental­ly, human meat consumptio­n has increased five-fold since the 1950s. A flawed U.N. study even blames livestock for more global warming than human transporta­tion (OK, they exaggerate­d, it's still very large, though since the methane burps are 23 times more effective than CO2 as greenhouse gas).
mindjoy   11:34 AM on 1/13/2011
Thank you for this very thoughtful post, Mr. Rather! People tend to know what is best for their own health care needs. They can trust their own instincts! If people are constantly questionin­g what they are being given and told, that is good. Listen to instincts. Thank you again.
photo
wallyone   11:28 AM on 1/13/2011
I am skeptical of the figures for antibiotic use in livestock. They were compiled and disseminat­ed by groups with an obvious agenda, and based on speculatio­n rather than hard facts. Yet their figures are taken for undisputed gospel. Many of the drugs they included are not actually antibiotic­s, they are coccidiost­ats like Deccox, Bovatec and Corid. These substances are not even absorbed into the animals' bodies. In addition, almost all the antibiotic­s given to animals are mixed into the feed, and they are not antibiotic­s that are routinely used in people. They are never the newer generation of expensive antibiotic­s. I will say that there is a chance that resistance to these antibiotic­s can be transferre­d to the antibiotic­s used in people, but it is not known how important this is.
I might add that there is virtually no hormone or antibiotic residue in meat or milk, thanks to USDA and milk processor protocols.
photo
mentacula   03:37 AM on 1/14/2011
I appreciate your comment, but I think you haven't thought the whole scenario through, because as user 'demokracy­' pointed out, it's subsidized and sanctioned­, making it seem ok.

First, if the statistics are false and disseminat­ed by unnamed groups with false agendas (vegetaria­ns and yoga practition­ers?), then I challenge you to try purchasing meat without antibiotic­s. You will find your self forced to shop side by side with the affluent hippies at whole foods. I know I am. Shopping at the "agenda-fr­ee" supermarke­ts necessaril­y means you can not find meat without steroids and or antibiotic­s. My point is just that it is widely practiced.

Second, popular pharmaceut­ics are usually very stable small-mole­cules by design. It's one of the factors they test for. If these drugs are not absorbed into the animals or animal products, they are ending up in your water table. They may not normally be prescribed to people, but anyone eating vegetation grown with contaminat­ed water is taking them nonetheles­s. Even if you practice converting poop to methane, these carefully crafted drugs rarely break down easily and remain nano-parti­cles in the environmen­t.

I'm glad you are skeptical, but don't quit there.

Twitter Edition