Posted on November 30th, 2010 by Daniel Larison
Ross has qualified the claims he made in his column, and explains how he thinks partisanship affects political opinions in a new post. He writes: So the great T.S.A. debate doesn’t show that conservatives are about to repudiate everything the Bush administration did on national security….What it does show, though, is that conservatives are increasingly [...]
Filed under: foreign policy, politics
Posted on November 30th, 2010 by Daniel Larison
For most of the last two weeks, I have been arguing for START ratification, and I have been insisting that ratification will boost American and allied security. One of the advantages that treaty supporters have had is that arguments in support of the treaty have generally been well-grounded in reality. It is therefore remarkably unhelpful [...]
Filed under: foreign policy, politics
Posted on November 29th, 2010 by Daniel Larison
Really? Because I’m fairly certain a lot of voters sort of expected Obama to be better on civil liberties than his predecessor. I’m quite certain that Obama did not in fact run on expanding the scope and intrusiveness of the TSA to include naked scanners and groping. I’m quite certain that many of the people [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on November 29th, 2010 by Daniel Larison
Ross: In the 1990s, many Democrats embraced Bill Clinton’s wars of choice in the Balkans and accepted his encroachments on civil liberties following the Oklahoma City bombing, while many Republicans tilted noninterventionist and libertarian. If Al Gore had been president on 9/11, this pattern might have persisted, with conservatives resisting the Patriot Act the way [...]
Filed under: foreign policy, politics
Posted on November 27th, 2010 by Daniel Larison
My new column for The Week on the consequences of New START’s failure is now online.
Filed under: foreign policy, politics
Posted on November 23rd, 2010 by Daniel Larison
Institutions should do what they are good at. And the expansion of NATO is one of the few true post-Cold-War foreign-policy success stories. By including some of NATO’s old enemies inside its security umbrella, we ensured, at a minimal cost, the political, economic and ideological “Westernization” of an enormous swath of the continent. We could [...]
Filed under: foreign policy, politics
Posted on November 22nd, 2010 by Daniel Larison
Jackson Diehl outdid himself with an exceptionally poor column today. It was odd enough that he decided to choose the week after the Lisbon NATO summit to declare that Obama’s foreign policy is defined by the concerns of the early ’80s. At that summit, which saw the first meeting of the NATO-Russia council since before [...]
Filed under: foreign policy, politics
Posted on November 21st, 2010 by Daniel Larison
I just saw today that Chalmers Johnson had passed away yesterday. Steve Clemons has written a long tribute to him at The Washington Note. Though he had a long career before he became a leading critic of American empire, it is for this criticism that he is best known to those of us in my [...]
Filed under: foreign policy, politics
Posted on November 21st, 2010 by Daniel Larison
When Palin told Barbara Walters last week that she believed she could beat Barack Obama in 2012, it wasn’t an idle boast. Should Michael Bloomberg decide to spend billions on a quixotic run as a third-party spoiler, all bets on Obama are off. ~Frank Rich The sheer silliness of this scenario is comforting. It’s as [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on November 21st, 2010 by Daniel Larison
In The Washington Post recently, Robert Kagan advised his fellow conservatives to show maturity and readiness to govern: “Blocking the treaty will produce three unfortunate results: It will strengthen Vladimir Putin, let the Obama administration off the hook when Russia misbehaves and set up Republicans as the fall guy if and when U.S.-Russian relations go [...]
Filed under: foreign policy, politics