Posted on May 31st, 2009 by Daniel Larison
Victor Davis Hanson writes one of the odder critiques of affirmative action I have seen in a while: Indians, Basques, Greek-Americans, Arab-Americans, Japanese-Americans, and Chinese-Americans-regardless of their appearance or superficial distance from the dominant “white” tribe” -are probably not going to receive special consideration to trump strict criteria like GPAs and test scores when applying [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on May 31st, 2009 by Daniel Larison
Returning to the Sotomayor discussion one more time, I wanted to respond to something else Jim Antle said. He wrote: The practical result of eliminating color-blind justice will not be that all Americans celebrate their rootedness in unique, decentralized communities instead of being deracinated, atomistic individuals. And in terms of political norms, refraining from criticizing [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on May 29th, 2009 by Daniel Larison
Whenever I come across people like Dreher and Friedersdorf piously attacking movement types, it miraculously makes me want to stick up for the Dittoheads (quite an accomplishment.) ~Richard Spencer Let’s suppose for a moment that I understand why Richard wants to do this. In this view, there are the “wishy-washy” and the strong, and Richard [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on May 29th, 2009 by Daniel Larison
For some reason, Richard has penned a glowing defense of the antics of Mark Levin and Robert Stacy McCain. Richard mentions near the end: Republicans have a tendency to sound like Ron Paul when they’re out of office, and then act like LBJ once they get elected. The two people he defends in that post [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on May 28th, 2009 by Daniel Larison
Jim Antle replies: Okay, here is how a reversal of the statement would read: “I would hope that a wise white man with the richness of his experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a Latina who hasn’t lived that life.” The title of the speech? A “White Judge’s Voice.” (Or [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on May 28th, 2009 by Daniel Larison
To reduce her full Berkley [sic] remarks to an inoffensive paean to experience and the limits of impartiality strikes me less as a fair-minded reading than an exercise in wishful thinking. ~Jim Antle Jim must be one of the few who has looked at her full remarks and still concluded that there was something deeply [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on May 27th, 2009 by Daniel Larison
Apparently, there is nothing so worrisome as a judge biased in favor of the status quo. Fortunately, we have Jonah Goldberg to tell us why: The “empathy” thing strikes me as a warrant for bias (which is an ancient problem) not judicial activism (a more recent, or at least more specific, phenomenon). And, as it [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on May 26th, 2009 by Daniel Larison
I haven’t said anything yet on the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court, and one reason has been that I did not know much about her outside of the Greenwald-Rosen clash a few weeks ago. I’m not sure that I know that much more about her now, but I can say something about [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on May 26th, 2009 by Daniel Larison
Nothing could better demonstrate the truth of this assessment of the state of internal conservative debate (or lack thereof) than the tiresome Mark Levin fracas. This will be my first and last post on the subject. In the original post, I said: There is relatively limited engagement between the two because dissident conservatives have increasingly [...]
Filed under: politics
Posted on May 24th, 2009 by Daniel Larison
The ongoing debate in the comments of this post has spurred me to make a few points that I think have tended to get lost in much of the post-election quarreling and recriminations on the right. One of the remarkable things about the Gallup poll I was commenting on in the initial post was the [...]
Filed under: politics