Events every day in every corner of the world remind us that America's economic future and our ability to compete globally demand that we wake up to this reality: we must produce and consume energy in a fundamentally different way than ever before. President Obama's call in the State of the Union address for a new goal that 80 percent of our electricity must come from clean energy sources by 2035 is absolutely achievable, but not without changes in policy, in our habits, in our very way of thinking about energy.
The stakes are high with increasing pressure to spark economic growth, wean the U.S. off its dependence on foreign oil, and comply with federal air quality standards. As Washington debates a path forward, the states are where we should be looking for viable solutions. From energy independence, to clean air to job creation, we are tackling some of our nation's toughest challenges in Colorado. And, we can do it in other states, as well.
As a candidate for Governor in 2006, I argued that the future of Colorado's economy was building wind farms in wheat fields, a symbol of the need to change our energy mindset. As Governor, I worked determinedly to create a "new energy economy" because I believed that we could create good jobs for the future, foster our research and development in our universities and in the private sector, clean up our environment, and help wean our country from dangerous dependence on oil produced by countries that are often hostile to our best interests.
That's why I pushed successfully for a 30% renewable energy standard in Colorado, the 2nd highest in the nation. It's why I signed 57 different pieces of legislation in 4 years related to clean energy, including tax credits and other incentives. It's why I tirelessly marketed Colorado as a place where solar and wind and other renewable energy companies can thrive; countless new clean energy companies from Vestas Wind to Abound Solar now call Colorado home.
It is also why I'm such a strong advocate for the important role natural gas must play in America's clean energy future. Colorado is blessed with abundant gas reserves. Its production has been a critical part of our economy for years, providing good jobs and economic opportunities throughout our state. It's the cleanest-burning fossil fuel, emitting far less carbon and other dangerous pollutants than coal. This fact was recognized by Congress in 2009 when it switched the U.S. Capitol Power Plant from coal to natural gas and created a clean precedence for all of America to follow. This long-term commitment to reducing the Hill's carbon footprint marked the end of D.C.'s last coal burning facility.
Natural gas production is not without controversy, and among my proudest accomplishments as Governor was implementing reforms to the regulations and oversight of oil and gas production. I tangled with the industry, insisting that tighter rules were needed to protect air, water, wildlife and community values, all the while knowing that production and protection can co-exist.
In fact, it must exist if we are serious about achieving our national clean energy goals. In the wake of the rules' fight in Colorado, working with natural gas companies, utilities, conservationists, local leaders and others, we passed bipartisan legislation to increase jobs, decrease air pollution, spur natural gas production and protect utility rate-payers.
The "Clean Air Clean Jobs Act" that I signed in 2010 establishes a process for converting aging inefficient coal-fired power plants to cleaner burning natural gas. It's an innovative, bipartisan solution, achieved by creating a new, diverse coalition of Coloradans committed to economic growth and opportunity, and the protection of public health and the air we breathe.
It's a responsible model for other states to consider.
Natural gas has many applications, for utilities, transportation and other energy needs. It can and must be a major part of our energy future -- along with wind, solar, biofuels, clean coal, nuclear, energy efficiency measures, and other technologies. Natural gas development is a part of doing what we know we must do: transition to a clean energy economy for the 21st century.
Bill Ritter, Jr., was Governor of Colorado from 2007 to 2011, and currently directs the Center for the New Energy Economy at Colorado State University.
Share your Comment:
two areas near my home exploded last week......
http://www
Once you've read these recommenda
Though politician
Talk to the many sick people, and ask about their sick livestock of those who live near these natural gas wells. Exploitati
Progressiv
China is using every energy resource, including natural gas and coal to fuel its economic growth. And China is generating less than 1% of its energy from clean energy sources.
America is the Saudi Arabia of coal and has hundreds of years of natural gas. The USA, like China, should use these resources to declare energy independen
Imagine the lives that could have been saved and America’s economy if those trillions had been spent in America.
http://www
http://won
http://new
Some folks were told not to even wash their clothes in their after-the-
China's futuer is being sold out for short term profits by the cronies running that country. They are NOT anything we should be emulating. Also, I believe you are mis-inform
Natural gas is not a long term solution. It is a short term way to make profits, and it, like other fossil fuels, is setting us up for some major problems down the road. The time to invest in genuine clean energy is now. Not 60 years from now.
Economic growth for the sake of economic growth is not a good thing. China is heading directly into the greatest ecological catastroph
The time to invest in genuinely sustainabl
With a food shortages happening around the world, why on earth would one entertain the idea of bio-fuels?
We need that land to plant as much food as possible.
Solar and wind is like most of Europeans prohibited from using air-condit
So every now-n-then you see headlines of Italians boiling to death because of the extreme heat.
The answer to any shortage = produce more
You can't "conserve" your way out of a shortage and you waste time, energy and money, on inadequate forms of energy.
Nuclear is the only way to go and dealing with toxic waste will have to be the "cost" of modern civilizati
Why is it now in our culture to approach our problems with half measures?
We need the best, the very best, and the latest and we don't need to deprive people of food to do it.
Agreed, but it's never been in a corporatio
For me, it's pretty simple: get corporatio
Nuclear isn't the answer because it's never demonstrat
In 2009 my city had to pay such high prices for natural gas that the average bills were $500/mo and up and they never even warned us until the calls to their office were non-stop with people screaming at them. I had friends who got bills that were over $700/mo.
I am not in favor of fracking. It sounds like a horror for those communitie
Something has to be done to find an affordable way to heat our homes.Frac
We hit the peak of oil supplies in 2006--sinc
Meanwhile, the producers have been stopped on hydrofrack
Colorado may well get 30% of its energy from renewables in coming years, but that won't be because renewables have ramped up. Instead, convention
http://www
for more technical analysis:
http://www
A report on Bakken output in 2009. While the potential is that several hundred billion barrels may be locked up in shale, present technology sees extraction of no more than 3.6 B barrels—ab
This is a report on shale and its limitation
http://www
But thanks for playing!
Tell that to the people who are sick and dying.
Tell that to the whole communitie
Yeah America will have gas for a few years but they won't have clean water or their health. The folks that took the deal from the gas companies are using their money for Doctor bills now. Some trade-off eh?
There really are no "clean" carbon combustion fuels.
We need a source tax on all carbon fuels.
That will allow non carbon energy sources to compete.
And we can give the money to regular Americans so they can pay for the increase in fuel costs the producers will seek to apply - and maybe help the increasing number of poor being created by our the collaborat
They would probably appreciate the money being given to them as a reverse tax (see President Nixon).
It's basically take from the rich carbon fuels drug lords and give to the poor energy consumers.
It adjusts the balance of the playing field and gives solar and wind a better shot.
But that may not be what you want.
"Y'all just can't get over getting shellacked last November can you. As someone once said, elections have consequenc
You have no interest in decreasing poverty or increasing the Democratic voting base.
You just don't want to see anything get in the way of big oil and big coal and big natural gas.