• Home
  • Politics
  • Media
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
  •  Comedy
  • Business
  • Living
  • Style
  • Green

Salam Fayyad, Palestinian Prime Minister, Focuses On Building State

KARIN LAUB and MOHAMMED DARAGHMEH | 04/27/10 04:27 AM | AP

What's Your Reaction?
Palestinian State Salam Fayyad
Salam Fayyad

ARURA, West Bank — Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad is quietly changing the rules of the Arab-Israeli conflict with a simple credo: Palestinians have to build their state now and cannot wait for an elusive peace deal with Israel.

He is moving ahead with an ambitious plan to get the Palestinians ready for statehood by August 2011 by trying to build it from the ground up: paving roads, reforming the judiciary, planning new cities.

The U.S.-trained economist has been showered with praise, money and support by the U.S. and Europe. Official Israel has said little, though some in Israel express concern that Fayyad is spearheading a Palestinian strategy to bypass negotiations, declare a de facto state and seek international recognition for it.

Fayyad believes success creates its own momentum, that presenting a compelling case for a Palestinian state will make it inevitable. But he stops short of saying the Palestinians would declare independence on their own.

"The thinking was, by around mid-2011, if the political process will not have produced an end to the occupation ... the reality of a Palestinian state would force itself on the political process, on the world," he said in a recent interview conducted in his motorcade driving through the West Bank.

Fayyad has focused in recent months on trying to rekindle enthusiasm among Palestinians disillusioned by years of failed peacemaking.

He is reaching out to them, bypassing the power structures of the Fatah movement of his boss, President Mahmoud Abbas. Fayyad, an independent, delivers a weekly radio address, meets regularly with Palestinian reporters and has hired a consultant to manage his Facebook and Twitter accounts.

And unlike Fatah politicians, who mostly hold court in their offices, he travels to different parts of the West Bank every few days.

Fayyad's high-profile appearances have shifted attention away from Abbas, who as chief peace negotiator has little to show for five years in office and spends much of his time on diplomatic missions abroad. The 75-year-old Abbas says he won't seek reelection, and there has been speculation Fayyad might one day seek the presidency.

Story continues below

Fayyad says he is campaigning for a vision, not political office.

Yet the gap between reality and aspirations remains huge.

Fayyad, who was appointed to his post in 2007 by Abbas, only has limited authority over 40 percent of the West Bank, with the rest under full Israeli control. The Gaza Strip – which together with the West Bank is supposed to make up a Palestinian state – is in the hands of Hamas militants who drove out Abbas' forces in 2007.

And Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he will never let go of east Jerusalem, the Palestinians' hoped-for capital.

Fayyad's life reflects these contradictions.

He lives in Israeli-annexed east Jerusalem. His wife, Bashayer, has permanent residency there as a Jerusalem native. As a West Banker, Fayyad lives in Jerusalem on a visitor's permit, renewed by Israel every few months.

During his work day in Ramallah, Fayyad often receives foreign dignitaries. On his drive home, he crosses through an Israeli checkpoint.

"If I, for a minute, were to think that this is something I have to deal with all my life ... then one would think, forget about it, this is just really too bizarre," says Fayyad, 58. "But it's a transition. To me, all this is a transition to freedom, to statehood."

Fayyad's strategy stands in contrast to the all-or-nothing approach of more traditional Palestinian leaders – and even invited comparisons to Israel's founding father, David Ben Gurion.

His approach is a balance of cooperating with Israel and confronting it.

Israel responded to Fayyad's success in restoring order in once chaotic West Bank towns by scaling back troops and easing movement restrictions. This enabled the hard-hit Palestinian economy to bounce back a little. The boomlet, along with Fayyad's transparent spending and his state-building plan, persuaded donor countries to keep sending massive amounts of aid.

However, Fayyad also supports Palestinian grassroots protests against Israel and has pushed to build in the 60 percent of the West Bank off-limits to Palestinian development.

"Fayyad's biggest challenge is that he has to walk a tightrope between the coordination with Israel that his statebuilding plan requires and the defiance of Israel that Palestinians demand and toward which they are gravitating," said Robert Blecher, an analyst at the International Crisis Group think tank.

Israel has given Fayyad high marks for improving security. But several officials have criticized what they interpret as his plan to declare statehood unilaterally.

"I don't think it will be of any avail," said hardline Cabinet minister Benny Begin. "We're not going to withdraw because of any statement, even if it is endorsed."

Some Palestinians warn that Fayyad's strategy could hurt their case by creating the trappings of statehood without actually achieving it – something they fear Israel could capitalize on by saying a final deal is no longer needed.

However, Fayyad's appeal in the West Bank is growing.

In a recent outing, Fayyad visited the West Bank village of Arura, where residents tried to set a Guinness record for the world's largest dish of musakhan, a local chicken specialty. Thronged by the crowd, Fayyad inspected the huge tray of food in the village square, then carried a plate piled with chicken to his seat and began munching with his fingers.

Men watching from under a tree had mixed views.

Some praised him for coming, saying it's the first time a senior official made it to the village. Others said they felt that after years of failed peace talks and uprisings, Fayyad was the only leader with a plan.

But Moawiya Rimawi, a local engineer, said Fayyad was selling illusions. "This is just numbing people," he said. "The Palestinian Authority has no control over people or territory, so how come we would be able to have a state in two years?"

Fayyad said he still encounters plenty of skepticism, but that the mood is shifting.

Asked if he believes he is becoming a symbol of hope, he said: "With all modesty, I think so."

Get HuffPost World On Twitter, Facebook, and Google Buzz!
ARURA, West Bank — Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad is quietly changing the rules of the Arab-Israeli conflict with a simple credo: Palestinians have to build their state now and cannot w...
ARURA, West Bank — Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad is quietly changing the rules of the Arab-Israeli conflict with a simple credo: Palestinians have to build their state now and cannot w...
Report Corrections
 
Comments
171
Pending Comments
1
View FAQ
Our moderators screen these comments before they are published
You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »   (2 pages total)
Show: 
Vlady   01:41 PM on 4/28/2010
It would be nice if any of those attacking Israel had any sense of history or just facts instead of ranting.
photo
eaglewing   07:51 PM on 4/27/2010
1948 PaIestine beIongs to the PaIestinians. The BaIfour declaration was illegal, and the British had no right to give any part of PaIestine to other people. JerusaIem belongs to PaIestine.
Vlady   4 hours ago (1:48 PM)
"The BaIfour declaration was illegal, and the British had no right to give any part of PaIestine to other people.". I was a British territory, so to return it to Jews was an act of fairness to its original owner.
italianwine   01:56 PM on 4/27/2010
Go Mr. Fayyad Go !!! The international community will be with you.

Ship all those illegal messianic settler terrorist out and back to Israel proper and give all those settlements to the Palestinian refugees living in the direst conditions. They deserve compensation for the lands and homes stolen or destroyed by Israel.

Israel is long overdue to undergo the same racial reckoning and transformation that the United States underwent in the 1960s and South Africa passed through in the 1990s.

The dual system of law that prevails in the occupied West Bank and favors Jewish settlers to the detriment of Palestinians is unacceptable in the 21st century.

Israel’s settlers must decide if they will abide by international law and leave the occupied territories or stay on—as offered by Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayyad—provided they live under Palestinian law.
photo
Json   03:08 PM on 4/27/2010
Nice off-topic rant. Did you notice that the word "settler" it not used even once in the article?
photo
muck-raker   04:55 PM on 4/27/2010
italianwine.....great post....and fanned...

also.............Fayyad....needs to watch his back!
bannedingaza   05:18 PM on 4/27/2010
So..get the Arabs to attack Israel yet again..it will be their final attack..that you can be sure of!
bannedingaza   05:19 PM on 4/27/2010
What a great OXYMORON......Palestinian Law!! LMAO!
calidudeee   11:28 PM on 4/27/2010
A real OXYMORON......Israel and International Law! LMFAO!

Oh and if your apartheid state would make all of Palestine/Israel one state with 2 people you wouldn't be banned from living in Gaza so thank your apartheid country for that.
photo
Trollstein   01:49 PM on 4/27/2010
PS> If something were to go horribly wrong, resulting in the deaths of tens or hundreds of thousands of Israeli civilians, half the people who had maintained adversarial positions to Israel would say: 'Woops, guess I was wrong . . " the other half would say: 'Good, they had it commin'.
This is simply not enough of an investment to be taken fully seriously.
catrst   05:45 PM on 4/27/2010
I am concerned about Israeli security and it is a life or death situation for people, but I thought everyone was unhappy with the leadership of the Palestinians and that was why for all these years no one would negotiate with them. Then I thought the argument was that the Palestinians had no preparation for statehood and could not maintain the rule of law within their own territory. Now there is a breakthrough in both leadership and direction and its a bad thing? The far right fringe in Israel has the same problem that that element has the world over. If they make the decisions for the country it will be warmongering and no chance of peace. We have seen that here, and in Iran.
photo
Trollstein   05:55 PM on 4/27/2010
If you had read my first statement on this topic you would know that I favor independance (even unilatterally) for the West Bank. My above comments were generally to address all the drifting reactions from a variety of other posters. But why did you assume that I opposed independance? I said nothing above which would provide for that.
photo
dabblesome   12:05 PM on 4/27/2010
The 750,000 Jews who were former citizens of the Ottoman Empire before being ethnically cleansed by Arab governments, owned huge swathes of land between the Nile and Euphrates. They should have been given the option of going over to Israel with that land rather than the newly created Arab states.
Nwo2012   12:19 PM on 4/27/2010
Hard to hold Palestinians responsible for that.
photo
Trollstein   01:50 PM on 4/27/2010
Right, their leaders are to be held responcible because there are the same war lords who push the buttons throughout the entire Middle East. The 'street level' palestiniaqn people are merely pawns. Its hard to hold the Israelis responcible for that.
photo
skialethia   12:40 PM on 4/27/2010
Great and now they have Israel! That's some pretty great compensation! And what do Palestinians have, huh??? They lost half their land in 1947 when it was turned over to those 750,000 Jews and then the less than 50% they were left with was again reduced when Israel occupied their land in the West Bank!

So what are you crying about??? Talk about being ungrateful!
italianwine   01:50 PM on 4/27/2010
So? The Palestinains have nothing to do with this.
photo
dumbeddown   02:49 PM on 4/27/2010
No reason to source that at all? :)
photo
Aussieposter   09:07 PM on 4/27/2010
I would suggest that the appropriate diplomatic solution would be this.

The Arab nations that ethnically cleansed Jews from their borders allow them to return and provide them with compensation.

Israel that ethnically cleansed Palestinians from their borders allow them to return and provide them with compensation.

Both sides have guilt and neither can claim the moral high ground.
photo
dabblesome   09:21 PM on 4/27/2010
I don't think many people that have been 'ethnically cleansed' would be comfortable returning. I also dispute the notion that the palestinians were ethnically cleansed.
photo
Json   11:46 AM on 4/27/2010
The palestinians are going to focus on building their own state instead of destroying Israel? Great! If it is really true, nobody needs to worry about them unilaterally declaring a state..the Israelis will be waiting at the negotiation table for them.
photo
Smithn   11:50 AM on 4/27/2010
"The proof is in the pudding." -- unknown
photo
dabblesome   12:49 PM on 4/27/2010
There is no such thing as a Palestinian anymore. They will become citizens of Jordan
Freenation   04:51 PM on 4/27/2010
Or Israel can be renamed to Jordan and they can all live in one BIG country
photo
StCuthbert   06:53 PM on 4/27/2010
Not true. The Palestinians have proven themselves to be an independent people who deserve their own state.
photo
FairuzGhowar   1 hour ago (4:33 PM)
Palestinians who are Israeli citizens, Us citizens, Chilean citizens are still Palestinian. Citizenship doesnt change that. Italian Americans dont stop being Italian.

They exist try as you may they wont disappear
reciprocat   22 hours ago (8:03 PM)
NO need for a negotiating table. UNILATERALLY.
photo
american-dolt   11:27 AM on 4/27/2010
And then he sang, "I did it my wayyyyyyyyy"
photo
Trollstein   11:03 AM on 4/27/2010
3/3 Once that were to occur, Israel would (officially) reject U.N. Jurisdiction and (minimally) the matter would be adjudicated, which has never occurred in 90 years of ongoing controversy. The adversaries of Israel have avoided this contingency and ignored the Jewish legal claims for a reason. Because they know these claims exist and are valid, as much as they try to word-smith and re-write history around it. Lastly, for those who say that European Jews have no business in any Mid Eastern Jewish nation, that too is pure fantasy--as the intent of creation of the Jewish National Homeland was to provide such a home and the support which Kaiser Wilhelm gave to this idea (before WW1) was intended to provide a place for German Jews to immigrate. Certainly the efforts of the Jews of Europe to obtain these national rights could not be dismissed on the grounds that they are white. What few people counted on was the extreme strategic effect of oil.
Nwo2012   11:15 AM on 4/27/2010
Just post a link next time instead of spamming the board. Theres a word limit for a reason.

Other people have voices too.
photo
Trollstein   11:21 AM on 4/27/2010
I don't have links. Besides, there is no rule against segmenting. HP allows this for a reason. Other people do it. I may be long-winded but this is a 90 year old, highly intwined controversy which I have unraveled. It is NOT "spam". Please mind your own business. Thank you.
photo
Smithn   11:58 AM on 4/27/2010
Does anybody really read stuff this long? Does anybody really nee more history lectures on this subject? In this instantaneous information age, haven't we evolved enough yet to expect resolutions to millenia old greivances?
photo
Trollstein   12:20 PM on 4/27/2010
In spite of the endless bantering, nonsensical comments continue to persist such as:
"1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians. The BaIfour declaration was illegal, and the British had no right to give any part of Palestine to other people. Jerusalem belongs to Palestine." (eaglewing). I have all but given up trying to impart some sense into such bloggers, as they are willingly zombified in their own fantasy world. However, other bloggers can be influenced by the waterfall of disinformation. Thus the need for my pleadings (corrections of the record). As far as third-party readers, I have some success in reasoning with them, oddly enough, ESPECIALLY if they are Arab or Muslim, because I find the MAJORITY of the intransigence on the part of white people--who seem to personally enjoy their (often baseless) condemnations of Israel, even more then they dislike being rhetorical demagogues.
italianwine   01:49 PM on 4/27/2010
Ridiculous, more hasbara.

...The adversaries of Israel have avoided this contingency and ignored the Jewish legal claims for a reason. Because they know these claims exist and are valid, as much as they try to word-smith and re-write history around it.

You mean like the UN, the Hague, International Law, Geneva Conventions? Your hasbara does not and will not work. as much as you try to word-smith and re-write history around it.
photo
Trollstein   02:48 PM on 4/27/2010
See my other comments re: Article-95 of the Treaty of Sevres and Article-80 of the united Nations Charter. These do not invalidate claims of violations of the Geneva conventions but they do invalidate claims that the United Nations has jurisdiction to direct the outcome of this controversy, namely borders. Thus, it does not matter one molecule how many countries agree or disagree with the United Nations Resolutions on Israeli borders. The UN lacks jurisdiction to make such resolutions. Just as someone who is under the age of 35 is inelligible to become US president, it does not matter how many voters writes this persons name in their ballots. It could be every single one.
photo
Trollstein   11:03 AM on 4/27/2010
2/3 Certain enlightened Arab leaders of the day were in agreement with the Jewish movement for independence with a capitol centered in Jerusalem. Militant Arab factions (often with fundamentalist Muslim underpinnings) rejected this. However, the sovereign rights which Jews obtained from Turkey at the conclusion of WW1 were legally binding under international law. The critical (key) treaty which provided these rights was the Treaty of Sevres because this was the first time when Turkey agreed to trade land for peace. Article-95 dealt with the formation of a "Jewish National Homeland" in Palestine. Now, some very creative people have asserted that a "National Homeland" is not a "Nation". Of course, that is pure nonsense. When we refer to our "National Anthem" we are referring to the anthem of our NATION. The word "nation" is contained within the word "National". Moreover, the United Nations has absolutely no [read: ZERO] jurisdiction to arbitrarily revoke or modify this legally binding international law. This, because Article-80 of the United Nations Charter specifies that no such jurisdiction exists in dealing with EXISTING treaties inherited by the U.N. And THAT is why there is no "Palestinian" state yet today. Once an independent Palestinian state were to be formed, it would have the obligation to seek its redress with the ICJ on its border dispute with Israel
JanetBW   12:26 PM on 4/27/2010
Try reading something other than propaganda. Directly from the time period,

"In 1919 the General Secretary (and future President) of the Zionist Organization, Nahum Sokolow, published a History of Zionism (1600–1918). He also represented the Zionist Organization at the Paris Peace Conference. He explained:

The object of Zionism is to establish for the Jewish people a home in Palestine secured by public law." ... ...It has been said and is still being obstinately repeated by anti-Zionists again and again, that Zionism aims at the creation of an independent "Jewish State" But this is wholly fallacious. The "Jewish State" was never part of the Zionist programme. The Jewish State was the title of Herzl's first pamphlet, which had the supreme merit of forcing people to think. This pamphlet was followed by the first Zionist Congress, which accepted the Basle programme – the only programme in existence.[51]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Mandate_of_Palestine#cite_note-50

Legally binding international law, aka, the Mandate documents state "it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine."

Please why don't you try and read some original sources.
photo
Trollstein   01:43 PM on 4/27/2010
""it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine."
Yes, true but that provision was dated to coinside with the treaty which contained it. "existing" meant existing as of the time the Mandate took effect. Besides, the claims that such rights by non-Jews of (now) israel have been denied are gross exaggerations if not outright lies. As for Nahum Sokolow, I could not care less what he may have said or may have been misquoted as saying. He is one persona nd did not speak for the hundreds of thousands of Jews living for hundereds and thousands of years throughout the Mid East, including my relitives.
italianwine   01:47 PM on 4/27/2010
Nonsense, more hasbara. These do not hold up against international law. Period.
photo
Aussieposter   09:54 PM on 4/27/2010
Your view of history seems to rest on the legality and binding nature of the "Treaty of Sevres." Here is your problem. The "Treaty of Sevres" was annulled and replaced by the "Treaty of Lausanne" in 1923.

Trollstien wrote” in 1917, there was nothing unnatural or inequitable about the Jews of the Mid East demanding independence"

One should note that the census taken of Palestine in 1922 shows a total population of 752,048 with the Jewish population of 83,790. That’s 88.86% non-Jewish population to 11.14%. To grant independence to the 11.14% while forcing the majority of the 88.86% to leave would seem to be a case of the tail wagging the dog, and in Trollstiens words " unnatural or inequitable"

Further, since you seem to be arguing that due to the "Treaty of Sevres." The United Nations has no jurisdiction in this matter that would then make the U.N. partition plan illegal. The U.N. General assembly resolution 181 setting up the state of Israel null and void.

What we are then left with is a treaty between a group of imperialist powers deciding the fate of a group of people without their consent, and an ethnic minority trying to impose its will on the majority. Definitely unnatural and inequitable.
photo
Trollstein   11:03 AM on 4/27/2010
1/3 The history of Zionism explained: (Especially for eaglewing and Alysheba 3)
German Jews are somewhat atypical because they often tried to completely blend into German society. The "Zionist" movement of Berlin resulted in large part because the Jews were not being permitted to blend, as hard as they tried. This had noting whatsoever to do with the longstanding desire of Mid East Jews to emancipate from their minority status in dozens of locations. The Turks who are not Arabs had no special admiration for their Arab tribes and at odd times in history, actually showed favor to the Jewish population. This became an acute problem with the pending independence of the various Arab nations after WW1. The Jews of the Middle East were in the process of regressing far backwards in social status, as Turkish law had been the only thing standing between the Arab mobs and their Jewish victims. However, the Mid Eastern Jews had very little political power and with a very few exceptions, very little economic power either. So they relied on their Jewish counterparts in European capitols to arrange the details surrounding the Jewish National Homeland in Palestine. But fundamentally, in 1917, there was nothing unnatural or inequitable about the Jews of the Mid East demanding independence and a safe haven, in view of the complete independence of the Arab tribes occurring all around them. The Mid East Jews had been subjects of Turkey, not Arabia, for 400 years.
photo
Trollstein   10:21 AM on 4/27/2010
Mazeltov. Let them declare independance in the West Bank and see what develops. If they want neighbors rather then enemies, to make business instead of making war, the progress may surprize everyone. But also be afraid, be very afraid that militant factions within the Arab world may see this as more of a threat to them and their 1,400 year old power structure then Israel sees it as any such threat. Do not be surprized therefore if the resulting terrorism becomes Arab on Arab, similar to conditions in Iraq.
Lastly, PLEASE, PLEASE MR. FAYYAD WHEN YOU ARE DONE REFORMING THE PALESTINIAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM, COME HERE AND FIX OURS, which may be more of a challenge then forging peace in the middle east.
Nwo2012   10:36 AM on 4/27/2010
Palestinians have too much support around the world for this to fail. Theres simply too much optimism from powerful people for it not to work.

Its thing they've been asking for all their lives and one of the few things tat unites the Arab world.
photo
Json   11:58 AM on 4/27/2010
There is tremendous support for their struggle, but not as much for the actual creation of a state. Arab states love the struggle because it allows them to deflect criticism of their own regimes. ("Now isn't the time to worry about the lack of free elections, the israeli's are killing our brothers...")
If there is peace and the Israel-palestinian situation is not the #1 topic for complaint, then the arab leaders we will start hearing a lot more from their people about their corruption and lack of freedoms.
The arab leaders know this and that is why see hear lots of support for the palestinains and their armed struggle, but very little movement on actually helping them build a state.
italianwine   01:45 PM on 4/27/2010
1/3 - Just more hasbara. Keep it up. Your monologues only move people to the Palestinains side as the facts are against you, you just can't admit it.

... But also be afraid, be very afraid that militant factions within the Israeli world may see this as more of a threat to them and their illegal settler terrorist network than Palestine sees it as any such threat. Do not be surprized therefore if the resulting terrorism becomes israeli illegal terrorist settler on illegal terrorist settler, similar to conditions in Iraq.
setstein   10:07 AM on 4/27/2010
Why do you Americans permit this???:

"Another Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache, stated that she was not worried about negative ramifications the Israeli onslaught on Gaza might have on the way the Obama administration would view Israel. She said 'You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable. What can they (Americans) do to us? We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America. In America you can criticize God, but you can't criticize Israel."
photo
alysheba 3   11:04 AM on 4/27/2010
Please supply a link to that quote.

Not saying that it was never said, but if true then you should be able to supply a link to the source.
photo
StCuthbert   12:10 PM on 4/27/2010
Boy, you're hoping against hope it's true, aren't you?
photo
Json   12:11 PM on 4/27/2010
Interesting. Do you have any actual quotes from people that aren't fictional?
(Are you a dupe or are you deliberately spreading fake quotes?)
setstein   02:19 PM on 4/27/2010
Google it yourself. Interesting. By the way, the Jewish orgs, including Israel, have a habit of being able to delete references to whatever they like to be unsaid. Never mind. I have heard many Jews, including Israelis say exactly the same with pride and customary hatred.
photo
StCuthbert   12:12 PM on 4/27/2010
photo
Trollstein   01:38 PM on 4/27/2010
What is so extremely absurd about this quote is that it is clearly, plainly engineered to do maximum damage to Israel. These BTW are the same, tired accusations made by the Soviets towards the Jews of Russia and the world. These also mirror the forged quotations contained within the infamous "Protocols of Elders of Zion". Jews control everything, thus, they are enemies of everyone else.
The original (authentic) remark was made by Ariel Sharon after a meeting he had with an American Christian evangelist leader. Sharon stated that the Christian leader told him not to worry--that they (the Christians of his sect) had George W Bush with them and they (again the Christians) also had Israel's back.
This was later twisted to become a blanket conspiracy for Israel to "occupy" the United States.
setstein   04:31 PM on 4/27/2010
It does not matter what the origin of this quote is, in fact noone seems to really know - and some links are deleted..... , since it correctly describes an attitude prevalent among Israelis and Jews around the world. I have heard this said in many ways and in exactly the same spirit in NY, Russia and Israel. It just states obvious, observable and shameful facts.
photo
Aussieposter   11:28 PM on 4/27/2010
When I first read the quote I knew it was not true. StCuthbert I checked out your links and did not find a mention of the quote on those web sites. One of which was down. However I would not put it passed white supremacist organizations to create such a hoax. While we disagree on the question of Palestine we share a common cause against such organizations.
photo
gakabani   09:27 AM on 4/27/2010
This is a dream as long as the occupation continues where the army, military checkpoints and criminal settlers can do as they please. There is no way the Pals can build an infrastructure in front of the Zionist entity. The Zionists will see that it is destroyed after completion. It the way it operates.
Elbrando   09:05 AM on 4/27/2010
I truly hope that Mr. Fayyad is able to accomplish everything he is setting out to do. He is creating a Palestinain State and a true road to peace.

However, there are those that will fight him. Hamas and hard line radicals in Isreal will see him as a threat. I worry for him and only hope that he will be able to continue his path of peace.
phute   09:52 AM on 4/27/2010
It's going to be tough - but here's hoping!
Too many people are worn out with this conflict.
photo
Smithn   12:14 PM on 4/27/2010
"How wonderful it isthat nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve th world." .--Anne Frank


Perhaps Mr. Fayyad has picked up the Anne Frank philosophy that the Israelis no longer honor. hopeful.
Macready   08:50 AM on 4/27/2010
go for it Mr Fayyad . . .declare Palestinian independence .. . the UN will have to get involved and support you . . .