“The Web's most influential climate-change blogger” — Time Magazine A Project of Center for American Progress Action Fund

Relax, climate hawks, it’s not about the science. The White House is just lousy at messaging in general

March 2, 2011

Yes, my sources say the White House communications shop muzzled the Office of Science and Technology Policy from offering a robust defense of climate science after Climategate.  And yes, Obama has utterly failed to offer a strong, coherent message on climate science and related energy policy (see “Obama calls for massive boost in low-carbon energy, but doesn’t mention carbon, climate or warming“).

I’ve been as critical of Obama about this as anybody, and like you, have come to the conclusion that he doesn’t appear to get the dire nature of the situation we’re in.  But, in ‘fairness’ to the President, it must be pointed out that the White House sucks at messaging in general.

Look at their signature health care initiative.  Please tell me what their message is?  (see “Can Obama deliver health and energy security with a half (assed) message?“)  Yet, health care is an issue that everybody in the White House cares about, unlike, say, climate, which beyond Obama and Holdren and, formerly, Browner, is of little political interest to almost all other senior WH staff.

Based on my discussions with leading journalists, as well as current and former Administration staff, this White House is the worst at communications in the past 3 decades.  Indeed, the Obama WH is the worst of both possible worlds.  They are dreadful at messaging BUT they think they are terrific at messaging, so much so that they shut down anybody else in the administration that might actually be good at messaging.

And that brings me to Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus and her op-ed today, “President Waldo:  Barack Obama is often strangely absent from the most important debates.”  Here are some highlights (lowlights?):

Read the rest of this post »

China’s coal policy is breathtakingly self-destructive

March 2, 2011

China EIA

Back in 2007, I wrote that “the immorality of China’s coal policy is breathtaking (literally).”  Sadly, even as it has become the world leader in clean energy, China’s self-destructive coal policy continues unabated.  China’s CO2 emissions now surpass ours by some 40%!

Our cumulative emissions greatly exceed theirs, of course, so I’m not diminishing America’s culpability in the coming climate catastrophe at all. But their CO2 growth rate is staggering whereas ours is mostly stagnating.

Moreover, the impacts of unrestricted CO2 emissions will surely be much harder on their country than ours, and not just because they are poorer with vastly more people.  They are very reliant on inland glaciers that will likely all but vanish this century.

They are vastly more vulnerable to food insecurity. We’re the breadbasket for the world, with vast surplus agricultural production, whereas they might have to import wheat this year if their current extreme drought continues.  They already import staggering amounts of soybeans.

Why have China’s emissions risen so rapidly?  That question is examined in a fascinating analysis from CO2ScoreCard, that I excerpt at length, below.

Read the rest of this post »

A gas station sign of the times

March 2, 2011

This darkly humorous Exxon sign is making the email rounds:

Read the rest of this post »

WashPost’s Milbank slams fawning, stenographic media in Issa scandal: “Rotten to the press corps”

March 2, 2011

[Fired Issa press aide Kurt] Bardella also disclosed contempt for reporters he described as “lazy as hell. There are times when I pitch a story and they do it word for word. That’s just embarrassing. They’re adjusting to a time that demands less quality and more quantity.”

Readers outside of the Washington DC fishbowl probably have no idea who Kurt Bardella is.  Lucky you!

It starts with Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), chair of the House Oversight Committee, named by Rolling Stone as one of the 12 politicians and executives blocking progress on global warming.  His (former) spokesman, Kurt Bardella, wanted to raise Issa’s profile, and in so doing exposed the seamy underbelly of the political-star-making machinery.

Dana Milbank tells the story well in an op-ed headlined, “Rotten to the press corps.”  I was actually surprised that the Washington Post editors would run such a story and its brutal headline (glass houses aside) — though as it turns out they changed the online headline to “Issa press aide scandal is like bad reality TV” and in the link to the story give the headline a question mark:   “Rotten to the press corps?”

When you read it, I think you’ll agree that no question mark is needed:

Read the rest of this post »

Climategate: The greatest nonstory ever sold

March 2, 2011

Back in November, I wrote “A stunning year in climate science reveals that human civilization is on the precipice;  First anniversary of ‘Climategate’: Media blows the story of the century.”

As I documented, the last year has seen more scientific papers and presentations raising the genuine prospect of catastrophe (if we stay on our current emissions path) than I can recall seeing in any other year (not even counting “Royal Society special issue details ‘hellish vision’ of 7°F (4°C) world — which we may face in the 2060s“).

I thought Climategate anniversary reporting would focus on climate scientists at the expense of climate science — precisely the kind of miscoverage that’s been going on the whole year (see “Silence of the Lambs: Media herd’s coverage of climate change “fell off the map” in 2010“).

Still, I never got around to the promised analysis of Climategate.  But Dave Roberts has saved me the trouble with an excellent piece, which is reposted below:

Read the rest of this post »

Australia’s farms “particularly vulnerable” to climate change, adviser Ross Garnaut Says

March 2, 2011

Australia, the fourth-largest wheat exporter, risked more climate-change damage than other developed countries partly because of the threat to its agriculture, said Ross Garnaut, the federal government’s adviser on the topic.

“Our agriculture is particularly vulnerable,” Garnaut told reporters in Canberra. “Australia is already a country of climate extremes where in many places in some parts of the year, temperatures are already near the upper limits of agriculture.”

Australia, also the fourth-largest cotton shipper and biggest coal exporter, will impose a price on carbon in July next year before the start of a trading system as early as 2015, according to plans set out by the ruling Labor Party. Record rain, flooding and a cyclone in the nation’s east damaged crops this season, while drought cut output in the west, increasing concerns that climate volatility and warming will curb output.

Australia is the canary in the coal mine for climate-change impacts (see “Australia faces collapse as climate change kicks in” and Northern Territory Chief Minister on Carlos’s deluge: “So a really one in 500 year event; nobody’s experienced anything like this before”).

It is the most arid habited continent in the world.  As Garnaut notes, some regions are already at times near the upper limits for farming.  The tropical north is vulnerable to staggering floods.  The country is increasingly being whipsawed by human-caused global warming — just as the U.S. SouthEast is (see “Study: Global warming is driving increased frequency of extreme wet or dry summer weather in southeast, so droughts and deluges are likely to get worse“).

Read the rest of this post »

Oil prices: When record-breaking becomes a problem

March 2, 2011

The U.S. Energy Information Administration, or EIA, officially reported on March 1st that domestic gasoline prices have reached the second largest one week increase since 1990CAP’s Valeri Vasquez has the story.

Read the rest of this post »

Energy and global warming news for March 2, 2011: Clean Air Act benefits estimated to reach $2 trillion; Regional cap-and-trade systems improves economy; Extreme winter storms linked to climate change

March 2, 2011

Benefits of Clean Air Act Rules to Reach $2 trillion, EPA Says

A two-decade-old crackdown on smog and soot under the Clean Air Act will yield about $2 trillion in annual benefits by 2020, according to a study (pdf) that was released by U.S. EPA this morning and was touted as proof that the embattled agency’s rules are an economic boon for the American people.

Those rules prevented an estimated 160,000 deaths last year, according to the analysis, and within a decade, that number is projected to rise to about 230,000. That year, the new pollution controls will prevent an estimated 200,000 cases of heart disease, 2.4 million asthma flare-ups and 22.4 million missed school and work days.

Read the rest of this post »

Conservatives oppose adaptation, too

March 1, 2011

Sen. John Barrasso continued his campaign yesterday to stop the Obama administration from incorporating climate change into federal plans and policies, taking aim at an interagency report released in October that proposed ways for the federal government to respond to increased frequency of severe weather events and other effects of global warming….

Barrasso said that even the climate change adaptation efforts recommended in the report “will kill jobs, weaken our energy security and decrease economic growth.”

Right-wing to Americans:  No mitigation, no clean energy deployment, no clean energy R&D, no adaptation.  In short, you are on your own!

Bizarrely, the honest brokers and breakthrough bunch actually believe they can spend their time attacking climate science and climate scientists and cap-and-trade and aggressive clean energy deployment in order to ingratiate themselves into partnership with the right-wing, in the hopes of some sort of trickle-down, post-partisan climate policy.

But for conservatives, if you’re in the pocket of Big Oil and the corporate polluters, you’re going to demand cuts — not increases — in R&D for the clean energy competition, as you have for decades (see NY Times on “The dirty energy party”: “The Republican agenda is breathtakingly negative”).

And if you don’t believe in climate change, why on Eaarth would you spend a nickel adapting to it?  Here’s more from the E&E Daily story, “Barrasso intensifies efforts to stop Obama admin’s focus on adaptation” (subs. req’d), which makes that painfully clear:

Read the rest of this post »

House GOP all vote to protect Big Oil subsidies

March 1, 2011

House Republicans voted in lockstep this afternoon to protect corporate welfare for Big Oil, even as they call for draconian cuts to programs that everyday Americans depend on each day.  ThinkProgress has the story.

As the House of Representatives moved toward approving a stopgap resolution to avert a government shutdown for another two weeks, Democrats offered a motion to recommit that would have stripped the five largest oil companies of taxpayer subsidies, saving tens of billions of dollars in taxpayer funds.

Read the rest of this post »

Annual Letter from Bill Gates silent on climate change

March 1, 2011

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the world’s largest private foundation, aims to help billions of people in developing countries.  The goal of its Global Development Program is “increase opportunities for people in developing countries to overcome hunger and poverty.”  Their Global Health Program “harnesses advances in science and technology to save lives in poor countries.”

I have been critical of their strategy before (see “Can the problems of the developing world be solved by ignoring global warming?“).  And Bill Gates’ annual letter this year does nothing to increase confidence.

There is no mention of global warming or climate change at all.  Indeed, the discussion of agriculture contains this rather naively Panglossian statement:

Read the rest of this post »

The most Orwellian op-ed of the year

March 1, 2011

Note:  No head vise known to humankind can protect you from this op-ed — but for any survivors, I end the post with the joke of the day.

Quick Quiz — Who said what:

  1. For many years, I, my family and our company have contributed to a variety of intellectual and political causes working to solve these problems. Because of our activism, we’ve been vilified by various groups.
  2. I have spent the best years of my life giving people the lighter pleasures, helping them have a good time, and all I get is abuse, the existence of a hunted man.
  3. Despite this criticism, we’re determined to keep contributing and standing up for those politicians, like Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who are taking these challenges seriously.
  4. You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone.

Quotes 1 and 3 are Charles Koch in a head-exploding Wall Street Journal op-ed, “Why Koch Industries Is Speaking Out.”  Quotes 2 and 4 are Al Capone.

Let’s us have a moment of silence for the plight of the misunderstood businessmen.  Time’s up.

Koch’s agenda is to concentrate wealth in the hands of the few, especially himself, with no regard to the health and well-being of the many who will suffer along the way — and he will stop at nothing to achieve this.  He and his brother are the Al Capones of pollutocrats — or Bernie Madoffs, if you prefer the modern-day analogy.  They outspend Exxon Mobil on pro-pollution disinformation aimed at preventing action to preserving a livable climate.  They must make their billions as quickly as possible before the global Ponzi scheme they are pushing  collapses.

The policies of Gov. Walker, of course, would greatly harm the citizens of Wisconsin, again benefiting the super-rich pollutocrats at the expense of the middle class and poor.

The subhead for the WSJ opinion piece could only have been written by some editor at the paper recently hired away from the Ministry of Truth (aka Minitrue):

Read the rest of this post »

House GOP brings Styrofoam back

March 1, 2011

Wonkette ran a good piece yesterday, “Earth-Raping Dictator-Supporting House GOP Brings Styrofoam Back.”  [And folks think my headlines are strong!]

I’m reposting it below — and not just because they link to CP.  It exemplifies what the House GOP are all about.

Read the rest of this post »

House Democrats send clear message: Cut oil subsidies, invest in clean energy future

March 1, 2011

House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and members of the Democratic Policy Steering Committee convened a hearing today on securing America’s energy future. CAP’s Junayd Mahmood has the story.

Democrats called the hearing in front of the steering committee in order to hear from witnesses the GOP would never invite to House energy committees. Witnesses testified in favor of cutting oil subsidies and enacting long-term energy policies aimed at fostering renewable energy. This would create millions of American jobs, and significantly reduce national security risks.

Read the rest of this post »

Energy and global warming news for March 1, 2011: China issues warning on climate and growth

Prime Minister Wen Jiabao: “We must not any longer sacrifice the environment for the sake of rapid growth and reckless roll-outs, as that would result in unsustainable growth featuring industrial overcapacity and intensive resource consumption,”

March 1, 2011

Pretty amazing stuff:

China issues warning on climate and growth

China’s environment minister on Monday issued an unusually stark warning about the effects of unbridled development on the country’s air, water and soil, saying the nation’s current path could stifle long-term economic growth and feed social instability.

Read the rest of this post »

Time’s Eben Harrell responds to my post

March 1, 2011

You can read his comments here.  I don’t think his math — or his analysis — adds up.  My response is there, too (which is why I’m turning off comments here).

Note:  In Firefox, you have to hit refresh on links to my comments.  The IT folks are working on it.

Groucho Marxist Bill McKibben takes on Glenn Beck

February 28, 2011

My life as a communist actually began without me knowing it, on Friday evening, when Glenn Beck spent his program explaining about a “communistic” conspiracy that included 10 groups in America. One was 350.org, a global campaign to fight climate change that I helped found three years ago. He even put our logo up on his whiteboard – and next to it a hammer and sickle.

Since I don’t actually watch Mr. Beck, I didn’t know about it until e-mails began to arrive, informing me that indeed I was a communist. My first reaction was: I’m not a communist. I’m a Methodist.

But then I reconsidered.

Fellow Eaarthling and sometime CP blogger Bill McKibben offers a light touch in his response to the clown prince of disinformers.  Beck is the guy who told William Shatner, “I think there are too many stupid people.”  Now that’s humor!

Here’s more from McKibben’s new Washington Post column, “My life as a communist“:

Read the rest of this post »

Big Oil gains from higher prices while families pay the price

February 28, 2011

Daniel J. Weiss and Valeri Vasquez in a CAP cross-post.

Political instability in the Middle East over the past month has driven parallel unrest in world oil prices. The drive for political freedom in the Middle East has rightfully captured the world’s attention but it has also roiled oil markets.  Governments across the globe are worried that sustained unrest will escalate oil prices past $100 per barrel on their way to $120 or more, choking the struggling economic recovery in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere. One entity, however, is almost certain to benefit from this volatility: Big Oil companies.

Read the rest of this post »

Is Time’s Eben Harrell serious in his EcoCentric post, “Why Nukes are the Most Urgent Environmental Threat”

February 28, 2011

Environmentalists: Wake up! There is a greater and more urgent threat to the climate than even global warming: the threat posed by nuclear weapons.

Uhh, no.

As someone who spent a lot of time working on issues related to the threat posed by nuclear weapons — I was actually a Congressional science fellow two decades ago for a senior member of the House Armed Services committee — I think everyone should be very worried about nuclear weapons.

I even think that the scenario Time’s Eben Harrell lays out is plausible:

Read the rest of this post »

Koch-Powered Tea Party pushes climate denial bill in New Hampshire: “Neither man nor cow is responsible for global warming.”

February 28, 2011

Fueled by the carbon pollution giant Koch Industries, Tea Party Republicans in New Hampshire are attempting to scuttle the state’s involvement in the region’s successful climate program.  Brad Johnson has the story — and one NH  legislator’s amazing rationale.

Robocalls from Koch’s Americans for Prosperity group flooded the state last weekend in support of a bill that would repeal participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which has cut greenhouse and other pollution and created 1,130 jobs as a result of energy efficiency benefits. Rep. Sandra Keans (D-Rochester), told the Nashua Telegraph that AFP’s calls were “sleazy” and deliberately false. “I have never seen such a cowardly perpetration pulled on the citizens of New Hampshire,” Keans said.

On Wednesday, the state’s overwhelmingly Republican House of Representatives voted to support HB 519 by a nearly party-line vote of 246 to 104 (13 Republicans voted against, two Democrats for). The bill has to pass through the finance committee before a final house vote and consideration by the senate. Gov. John Lynch (D-NH), who has touted the success of RGGI in making the air healthier while increasing economic prosperity, is expected to veto the bill, but Republicans hold veto-proof majorities in both chambers of the New Hampshire legislature. The bill is being championed by extreme climate deniers:

Read the rest of this post »

More conclusive proof of global warming

February 17, 2010

In honor of the Vancouver Olympics, I am reposting this humorous video from 2008:

Read the rest of this post »

An illustrated guide to the latest climate science

February 17, 2010

Decadal

Here is an update of my review of the best papers on climate science in the past year.  If you want a broader overview of the literature in the past few years, focusing specifically on how unrestricted emissions of greenhouse gas emissions are projected to impact the United States, try “An introduction to global warming impacts: Hell and High Water.”

Read the rest of this post »

A look at China’s high-speed rail investments

February 21, 2011

This is a 2010 piece that seems timely today given Obama’s efforts to jump-start high speed rail in America and the response by many conservative governors to block that effort (see “Passenger rail is not in Ohio’s future”: New GOP governors kill $1.2 Billion in high-speed rail jobs).

Guest bloggers Julian L. Wong and Nick Wellkamp walk us through China’s aggressive investments in high speed rail.

Read the rest of this post »

U.S. National Academy of Sciences labels as “settled facts” that “the Earth system is warming and that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities”

New report confirms failure to act poses "significant risks"

May 19, 2010

A strong, credible body of scientific evidence shows that climate change is occurring, is caused largely by human activities, and poses significant risks for a broad range of human and natural systems….

Some scientific conclusions or theories have been so thoroughly examined and tested, and supported by so many independent observations and results, that their likelihood of subsequently being found to be wrong is vanishingly small. Such conclusions and theories are then regarded as settled facts. This is the case for the conclusions that the Earth system is warming and that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities.

The National Academy released three reports today on “America’s Climate Choices.”

Read the rest of this post »

Exclusive interview: NCAR’s Trenberth on the link between global warming and extreme deluges

New England, Tennessee, Oklahoma.... Who's next?

June 14, 2010

I find it systematically tends to get underplayed and it often gets underplayed by my fellow scientists. Because one of the opening statements, which I’m sure you’ve probably heard is “Well you can’t attribute a single event to climate change.” But there is a systematic influence on all of these weather events now-a-days because of the fact that there is this extra water vapor lurking around in the atmosphere than there used to be say 30 years ago. It’s about a 4% extra amount, it invigorates the storms, it provides plenty of moisture for these storms and it’s unfortunate that the public is not associating these with the fact that this is one manifestation of climate change. And the prospects are that these kinds of things will only get bigger and worse in the future.

That’s Dr. Kevin Trenberth, head of the Climate Analysis Section at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, on the warming-deluge connection.  I interviewed him a couple weeks ago about Tennessee’s 1000-year deluge aka Nashville’s ‘Katrina’.

Read the rest of this post »

Time magazine names Climate Progress one of the 25 “Best Blogs of 2010″

And one of the "top five blogs Time writers read daily"

June 28, 2010

For any first time visitors here, you might start with “An Introduction to Climate Progress.”

From the savvy to the satirical, the eye-opening to the jaw-dropping, TIME makes its annual picks of the blogs we can’t live without

Here’s the full list along with what Time said about Climate Progress [plus a nice video]:

Read the rest of this post »

UK Guardian slams Morano for cyber-bullying and for urging violence against climate scientists

July 15, 2010

I have previously written about The rise of anti-science cyber bullying and the role played by Swift Boat smearer Marc Morano — who believes climate scientists should be publicly beaten.

The UK Guardian has posted an outstanding piece slamming Morano’s “warped world vision” and the ‘award’ he just won:

Read the rest of this post »

Stanford poll: The vast majority of Americans know global warming is real

Florida, Maine, and Massachusetts residents agree: Global warming is here and we're causing it.

August 11, 2010

By Kalen Pruss of CAP’s executive team.

Large majorities of Florida, Maine, and Massachusetts residents believe that global warming is real—and that humans are causing it.

So says the latest poll from Jon Krosnick, senior fellow at the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University.  Krosnick found that large majorities of Florida, Maine, and Massachusetts residents believe that:

Read the rest of this post »

Real adaptation is as politically tough as real mitigation, but much more expensive and not as effective in reducing future misery

Rhetorical adaptation, however, is a political winner. Too bad it means preventable suffering for billions.

August 27, 2010

We basically have three choices: mitigation, adaptation and suffering. We’re going to do some of each. The question is what the mix is going to be. The more mitigation we do, the less adaptation will be required and the less suffering there will be.

That’s the pithiest expression I’ve seen on the subject of adaptation, via John Holdren, now science advisor.  Sometimes he uses “misery,” rather than “suffering.”

Read the rest of this post »

I’m not an environmentalist, but I am a climate hawk*

October 22, 2010

My Grist colleague Dave Roberts has a must-read post, “Introducing ‘climate hawks’.”  I’ll reprint it below and then offer some comments.  And I am quite interested to hear what you have to say on his idea:

Read the rest of this post »

A stunning year in climate science reveals that human civilization is on the precipice

The first anniversary of 'Climategate': The media blows the story of the century

November 15, 2010

This week marks the one-year anniversary of what the anti-science crowd successfully labeled ‘Climategate’.  The media will be doing countless retrospectives, most of which will be wasted ink, like the Guardian’s piece — focusing on climate scientists at the expense of climate science, which is precisely the kind of miscoverage that has been going on for the whole year!

I’ll save that my media critiques for Part 2, since I think that Climategate’s biggest impact was probably on the media, continuing their downward trend of focusing on style over substance, of missing the story of the century, if not the millennia.

The last year or so has seen more scientific papers and presentations that raise the genuine prospect of catastrophe (if we stay on our current emissions path) that I can recall seeing in any other year.

Read the rest of this post »

Royal Society special issue details ‘hellish vision’ of 7°F (4°C) world — which we may face in the 2060s!

"In such a 4°C world, the limits for human adaptation are likely to be exceeded in many parts of the world, while the limits for adaptation for natural systems would largely be exceeded throughout the world."

November 29, 2010

Figure 7.

“Projections of global warming relative to pre-industrial for the A1FI emissions scenario” — the one we’re currently on. “Dark shading shows the mean ±1 s.d. [standard deviation] for the tunings to 19 AR4 GCMs [IPCC Fourth Assessment General Circulation Models]  and the light shading shows the change in the uncertainty range when … climate–carbon-cycle feedbacks … are included.”

Note:  The Royal Society is making its “entire digital archive free to access” (!) through Tuesday, so download the articles in their special issue on 4C warming ASAP.

One of the greatest failings of the climate science community (and the media) is not spelling out as clearly as possible the risks we face on our current emissions path, as well as the plausible worst-case scenario, which includes massive ecosystem collapse. So much of what the public and policymakers think is coming is a combination of

Read the rest of this post »

Lonnie Thompson on why climatologists are speaking out: “Virtually all of us are now convinced that global warming poses a clear and present danger to civilization”

December 13, 2010

That bold statement may seem like hyperbole, but there is now a very clear pattern in the scientific evidence documenting that the earth is warming, that warming is due largely to human activity, that warming is causing important changes in climate, and that rapid and potentially catastrophic changes in the near future are very possible. This pattern emerges not, as is so often suggested, simply from computer simulations, but from the weight and balance of the empirical evidence as well.

The great cryo-scientist Lonnie Thompson has a must-read paper, “Climate Change: The Evidence and Our Options.”  Thompson has been the Paul Revere of glacier melt.

I wrote about his important 2008 work “Mass loss on Himalayan glacier endangers water resources” (see Another climate impact comes faster than predicted: Himalayan glaciers “decapitated”).  It concluded ominously:

Read the rest of this post »

Where would be the best place to live in 2035? 2060?

December 18, 2010

I often get asked the question where should people live, so that’s the question of this week’s open thread.

Read the rest of this post »

The phrase of the year: Climate Hawk*

December 29, 2010

The staid editors of Merriam-Webster named ‘austerity’ the 2010 Word of the Year.  Meanwhile, the trendier New Oxford American Dictionary’s 2010 Word of the Year is Sarah Palin’s ‘refudiate’.

And while climate activists may see 2010 as a year of austerity in which our efforts were refudiated by the anti-science, pro-pollution crowd, at least we got a name that beats ‘activist’.

Climate Progress names ‘climate hawk’ the phrase of the year!

Read the rest of this post »

What would make a good climate bumper sticker?

Stockbridge Green: The place to get your climate hawk stuff

December 26, 2010

David Stockbridge Smith is a registered architect who has a green building practice.  He designs bumper stickers on the side that you can buy here.

He and I are looking for a good climate bumpersticker.  Please propose your ideas below — also, vote on and repost the ones you like the best.

Smith will turn the best couple of ideas into actual bumper stickers.

UPDATE:  A compendium to vote on can be found in Comment #69 here.  Here is a mock-up of one of the most popular suggestions:

Read the rest of this post »

Simple rebuttals to denier talking points — with links to the full climate science

December 28, 2010

Progressives should know the most commonly used arguments by the disinformers and doubters — and how to answer them.

Read the rest of this post »

Silence of the Lambs: Media herd’s coverage of climate change “fell off the map” in 2010

The NY Times and others blow the story of the century

January 3, 2011

The danger posed to the nation and the world by unrestricted emissions of greenhouse gases is truly the greatest story never told.

Silence

We had jaw-dropping science in 2010 (A stunning year in climate science reveals that human civilization is on the precipice).  We had gripping climatic disasters (Masters: “The stunning extremes we witnessed gives me concern that our climate is showing the early signs of instability”; Munich Re: “The only plausible explanation for the rise in weather-related catastrophes is climate change”).  And we even had major political theater — domestic (The failed presidency of Barack Obama, Part 1 and Part 2) and international (see The Cancun Compromise).

But, as we’ll see, the one-time paper of record didn’t have climate change in a single one of its largest lead headlines.  And analyses of multiple databases reveal that the rest of the media sheepishly returned to 2005 levels of coverage.  The Daily Climate’s Douglas Fischer reports:

Read the rest of this post »

Why science-based (dire) warnings are an essential part of good climate messaging

Nature's Matt Kaplan blows the story

January 5, 2011

Back in November I explained how the media blew the story of UC Berkeley study on climate messaging.   That study found the best message is also the most science-based:  Doing nothing risks “many devastating consequences” but “much of the technology we need already exists.”  We just need to deploy it already!

Brad Johnson also discussed howWinning climate messages combine dire scientific threat with solutions for a just world” — almost the exact opposite of how the media reported it.

Yet Nature’s Matt Kaplan has just published a piece on the study, “Why dire climate warnings boost scepticism” that again utterly misrepresents (and oversells) the results of this tiny-sample study — even though at least one of the people he talked to explained how the study was being misrepresented.

Dr. Robert J. Brulle of Drexel University, “an expert on environmental communications,” emailed me “This isn’t a reliable analysis of science-based education. The conclusions drawn from a tiny study don’t support the extravagant claims made in the press.”

As long as the media, especially the science media, is going to keep getting this important story wrong, I will keep setting the record straight.

UPDATE:  An amusing forth between me and blogger Keith Kloor can be found in the comments section starting here.

Read the rest of this post »

What was the best climate or energy humor of 2010?

January 8, 2011

Not counting the unintentionally funny stuff — like Conservapedia, WattsUpWithThat, and Christine O’Donnell commercials — what was the best climate or energy humor of 2010?

I have a collection here you can review and vote on — also the comments section of many of the humor posts have great links.  Feel free to post your own picks.

Here are a couple of my favorite cartoons, starting with the best Toles cartoon ever:

Read the rest of this post »

What should Ian do with his life?

He wants advice on what an individual can do to help humanity now

January 9, 2011

A 25-year-old reader of ClimateProgress is at a turning point in his life, and he is asking CP readers for advice.

He posted the comment below in the Open Thread here, inspiring a few good responses, but I wanted more people to see this, so I’m pulling it up into a separate post.

UPDATE:  Ian provides more background — and a big thank you to readers — in the comments below here.  He has a degree in film production.

Read the rest of this post »

The full global warming solution: How the world can stabilize at 350 to 450 ppm

January 10, 2011

In this post I will lay out ‘the solution’ to global warming.

This post is an update of a 2008 analysis I revised in 2009.  A report by the International Energy Agency came to almost exactly the same conclusion as I did, and has relatively similar wedges, so I view that as a vindication of this overall analysis.

Read the rest of this post »

Science stunner: On our current emissions path, CO2 levels in 2100 will hit levels last seen when the Earth was 29°F (16°C) hotter

Paleoclimate data suggests CO2 "may have at least twice the effect on global temperatures than currently projected by computer models"

January 13, 2011

The disinformers claim that projections of dangerous future warming from greenhouse gas emissions are based on computer models.  In fact, ClimateProgress readers know that the paleoclimate data is considerably more worrisome than the models (see Hansen: ‘Long-term’ climate sensitivity of 6°C for doubled CO2).  That’s mainly because the vast majority of the models largely ignore key amplifying carbon-cycle feedbacks, such as the methane emissions from melting tundra (see Are Scientists Underestimating Climate Change).

Science has just published an important review and analysis of “real world” paleoclimate data in “Lessons from Earth’s Past” (subs. req’d) by National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) scientist Jeffrey Kiehl.  The NCAR release is here: “Earth’s hot past could be prologue to future climate.”  The study begins by noting:

Read the rest of this post »

Weekend Open Thread

What's your favorite quote?

January 15, 2011

Opine away on any climate/energy topic — or offer up your favorite quote.

Here’s one of mine, from Ian Fleming’s first James Bond book, Casino Royale (1953):

Read the rest of this post »

Must-read Hansen and Sato paper: We are at a climate tipping point that, once crossed, enables multi-meter sea level rise this century

January 20, 2011

Climate change is likely to be the predominant scientific, economic, political and moral issue of the 21st century

Right now, we’re headed towards an ice-free planet.  That takes us through the Eemian interglacial period of about 130,000 years ago when sea levels were 15 to 20 feet higher, when temperatures had been thought to be about 1°C warmer than today.  Then we go back to the “early Pliocene, when sea level was about 25 m [82 feet] higher than today,” as NASA’s James Hansen and Makiko Sato explain in a new draft paper, “Paleoclimate Implications for Human-Made Climate Change.”

The question is how much warmer was it in the Eemian and early Pliocene than today — and how fast can the great ice sheets disintegrate?

We already know we’re at CO2 levels that risk catastrophe if they are sustained or exceeded for any extended period of time (see Science: CO2 levels haven’t been this high for 15 million years, when it was 5° to 10°F warmer and seas were 75 to 120 feet higher).

Hansen and Sato go further, saying we’re actually at or very near the highest temperatures of the current Holocene interglacial — the last 12,000 years of relatively stable climate that has made modern civilization possible.

Holocene

They argue that the Eemian was warmer than the Holocene maximum by “at most by about 1°C, but probably by only several tenths of a degree Celsius.”  Their make the remarkable finding, that sea level rise will be highly nonlinear this century on our current business-as-usual [BAU] emissions that:

BAU scenarios result in global warming of the order of 3-6°C. It is this scenario for which we assert that multi-meter sea level rise on the century time scale are not only possible, but almost dead certain.

While this conclusion takes them well outside of every other recent prediction of sea level rise (SLR), Hansen deserves to be listened to because he has been right longer than almost anyone else in the field (see “Right for three decades: 1981 Hansen study finds warming trend that could raise sea levels“).   Also, at least one recent study that attempts to integrate a linear historically-based analysis with a rapid response term finds we are headed towards SLR of “as much as 1.9 metres (6ft 3in) by 2100″ if we stay on BAU (see “Sea levels may rise 3 times faster than IPCC estimated, could hit 6 feet by 2100“).

Hansen and Sato make their case for a strong nonlinear SLR based on a “phase change feedback mechanism,” that, as we’ll see, appears consistent with the recent scientific literature and observations1:

Read the rest of this post »

Weekend open thread: How can we create a grassroots climate and clean energy movement?

January 22, 2011

And what can ClimateProgress do to help?

Read the rest of this post »

Weekend Open Thread

January 29, 2011

These Weekend Open Threads have been a bigger success than expected.  So I have two questions for this one.

Read the rest of this post »

Despite emails and cold winter, 83% of Brits view climate change as a current or imminent threat

68% agree humanity is causing climate change, while skeptics "represent a fringe position"

January 31, 2011

The public’s belief in global warming as a man-made danger has weathered the storm of climate controversies and cold weather intact, according to a Guardian/ICM opinion poll published today.

Asked if climate change was a current or imminent threat, 83% of Britons agreed, with just 14% saying global warming poses no threat. Compared with August 2009, when the same question was asked, opinion remained steady despite a series of events in the intervening 18 months that might have made people less certain about the perils of climate change

So the emails — which originated in Britain — had no noticeable impact, nor did a couple of “trivial mistakes” in the IPCC.  This suggests the British public understands that, after multiple vindications, the notion that a few cherry-picked quotes from e-mails undermined the overwhelming scientific understanding of climate science was just B.S.*

These findings are consistent with recent U.S. polling by Stanford (see “The vast majority of Americans know global warming is real,” discussed below).

But perhaps the most remarkable finding by the Guardian is the impact of the cold winter on British views of climate change:

Read the rest of this post »

Republicans vote to repeal Obama-backed bill that would destroy asteroid headed for Earth

February 2, 2011

From America’s Finest News Service:

WASHINGTON—In a strong rebuke of President Obama and his domestic agenda, all 242 House Republicans voted Wednesday to repeal the Asteroid Destruction and American Preservation Act, which was signed into law last year to destroy the immense asteroid currently hurtling toward Earth.

The $440 billion legislation, which would send a dozen high-thrust plasma impactor probes to shatter the massive asteroid before it strikes the planet, would affect more than 300 million Americans and is strongly opposed by the GOP.

“The voters sent us to Washington to stand up for individual liberty, not big government,” Rep. Steve King (R-IA) said at a press conference. “Obama’s plan would take away citizens’ fundamental freedoms, forcing each of us into hastily built concrete bunkers and empowering the federal government to ration our access to food, water, and potassium iodide tablets while underground.”

“We believe that the decisions of how to deal with the massive asteroid are best left to the individual,” King added.

Read the rest of this post »

Science: Second ‘100-year’ Amazon drought in 5 years caused huge CO2 emissions. If this pattern continues, the forest would become a warming source.

Lead author Simon Lewis: "Current emissions pathways risk playing Russian roulette with the world's largest rainforest."

February 8, 2011

New research shows that the 2010 Amazon drought may have been even more devastating to the region’s rainforests than the unusual 2005 drought, which was previously billed as a one-in-100 year event.

Analyses of rainfall across 5.3 million square kilometres of Amazonia during the 2010 dry season, published in Science, shows that the drought was more widespread and severe than in 2005.

The UK-Brazilian team also calculate that the carbon impact of the 2010 drought may eventually exceed the 5 billion tonnes of CO2 released following the 2005 event, as severe droughts kill rainforest trees. For context, the United States emitted 5.4 billion tonnes of CO2 from fossil fuel use in 2009.

The authors suggest that if extreme droughts like these become more frequent, the days of the Amazon rainforest acting as a natural buffer to man-made carbon emissions may be numbered.

Lead author Dr Simon Lewis, from the University of Leeds, said: “Having two events of this magnitude in such close succession is extremely unusual, but is unfortunately consistent with those climate models that project a grim future for Amazonia.”

That’s from the University of Leeds’ news release, “Two severe Amazon droughts in five years alarms scientists.”  The Science article itself is “The 2010 Amazon Drought” (subs. req’d).

Here’s a figure from the paper comparing the two droughts [click to enlarge]:

Read the rest of this post »

Question: How can you be most employable in a world of global warming and peak oil and food insecurity?

February 5, 2011

I’m giving this talk to college students for the second year running.

Read the rest of this post »

WikiLeaks peak oil bombshell: Saudi Arabian reserves overstated by 40%, global production plateau immiment

February 9, 2011

http://www.indymedia.ie/attachments/apr2007/peak_oil.jpg

The US fears that Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest crude oil exporter, may not have enough reserves to prevent oil prices escalating, confidential cables from its embassy in Riyadh show.

The cables, released by WikiLeaks, urge Washington to take seriously a warning from a senior Saudi government oil executive that the kingdom’s crude oil reserves may have been overstated by as much as 300bn barrels – nearly 40%.

That we are close to a peak in global oil production should not be a surprise to anyone (see World’s top energy economist warns peak oil threatens recovery, urges immediate action: “We have to leave oil before oil leaves us” and German military study warns of peak oil crisis and Peak oil production coming sooner than expected).

The bombshell is that the U.S. Embassy in Riyadh understands this and that it “now questions how much the Saudis can now substantively influence the crude markets over the long term.”  Who persuaded them of this is equally remarkable — Sadad al-Husseini, “a geologist and former head of exploration at the Saudi oil monopoly Aramco,” who says he isn’t in the peak oil camp but sounds on awful lot like those of us who are.

Consider the first cable, from December 2007:

Read the rest of this post »

GOP announces new climate strategy: Abandon Earth

New House Research and Education Subcommitte chair Mo Brooks rehashes climate zombie talking points

February 10, 2011

I’m also old enough to remember when the same left-wing part of our society was creating a global cooling scare in order to generate funds for their pet projects. So 30-some years ago the big scare was global cooling, and once they drained that [topic], they shifted to global warming….

… it’s cyclical. So how are the proponents going to convince us that it’s not just part of a cyclical pattern?

… to the extent that we have higher levels of carbon dioxide. That means that plant life grows better, because it is an essential gas for all forms of plant life. Does that mean I want more of it? I don’t know about the adverse effects of carbon dioxide on human beings.

That would be freshman Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) — from Huntsville whose district includes NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center — whom the GOP in its infinite wisdom has made chair of the House Science Committee’s panel on basic research and education.

He rocketed over many more senior members to head the panel that oversees research activities at NASA, NSF, DOE and NOAA. Sadly, he doesn’t even know that in the 1970s, most scientists and most scientific papers were warning about global warming (see “The global cooling myth dies again“).  In fact, 30 years ago, James Hansen and six other NASA atmospheric physicists, published a seminal article in Science, “Climate Impact of Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide,” warned of “creation of drought-prone regions in North America and central Asia as part of a shifting of climatic zones, erosion of the West Antarctic ice sheet with a consequent worldwide rise in sea level, and opening of the fabled Northwest Passage.”

So it’s no big surprise that the see-no-warming, hear-no-warming, speak-no-warming GOP plan to gut NASA’s global warming research and focus on manned spaceflight.  Brad Johnson has that story:

Read the rest of this post »

Charles Krauthammer: Global warming is a “religion”

Washington Post columnist catches Gore Derangement Syndrome

February 10, 2011

Look, if Godzilla appeared on the Mall this afternoon, Al Gore would say it’s global warming, because the spores in the South Atlantic Ocean, you know, were. Look, everything is, it’s a religion. In a religion, everything is explicable. In science, you can actually deny or falsify a proposition with evidence. You find me a single piece of evidence that Al Gore would ever admit would contradict global warming and I’ll be surprised.

That would be Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer, who like his colleague George Will, is a climate science denier.  Of course, it is Krauthammer and Will whose denial can never be falsified because it isn’t actually based on science, but rather ideology (see Krauthammer: The real reason conservatives don’t believe in climate science and below).

The scientific literature is clear that indeed global warming will cause more snow — especially in warm years (see “An amazing, though clearly little-known, scientific fact: We get more snow storms in warm years!“).  Indeed, the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) U.S. Climate Impacts Report from 2009 reviewed that literature and concluded:

Cold-season storm tracks are shifting northward and the strongest storms are likely to become stronger and more frequent.

But because Krauthammer doesn’t have the most basic understanding of climate science — more warming means more water vapor in the atmosphere available for more intense storms — he not only labels all of climate science a religion, he falls victim to the full Gore Derangement Syndrome that has infected conservatives like they’re in some sort of zombie apocalypse (see Stop the madness: Mark Kirk, a U.S. Senator, blames his climate flip-flop on … Al Gore’s personal life).

UPDATE:  Some commenters seem to think January saw record-breaking cold for the entire nation or glob.  Globally, NASA reports that January was tied for 10th warmest January on record (see here).  January 2011 was more than 0.1 C warmer than the average January temperature in the 1990s.

And it wasn’t even the coldest U.S. January in 20 years — January 1994 was colder, according to NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center.  Since record highs and record lows are set pretty much every day, regular readers know I prefer the statistical aggregation across the country, since it gets us beyond the oft-repeated point that you can’t pin any one daily record temperature in one city on global warming.

As CapitalClimate reported last week “preliminary data for January from the National Climatic Data Center indicate that, for the U.S. as a whole, record high temperatures actually exceeded record low temperatures.”  The long-term statistical trend is unmistakeable (see “Record high temperatures far outpace record lows across U.S.“):

Read the rest of this post »

The World Bank, droughts, and voodoo economics

Mendelsohn and Saher 'analysis' of "The Global Impact of Climate Change on Extreme Events," cites Roger Pielke, Jr. five times while quoting not one scientific paper focused on droughts!

February 11, 2011

This paper quantifies the global impact of climate change from several extreme events: local storms, heat waves, cold spells, floods, and droughts….  [C]limate change is calculated to increase the damages from these five extreme events by between $11 and $16 billion [sic] a year by 2100….  Summing the damages in this report with tropical cyclone and severe storm damages from the literature suggests that climate change may increase the overall damage from extreme events by $84 billion or 0.015 percent of world GDP.

Yes, two ‘leading’ economists, Robert Mendelsohn and Gokay Saher, actually wrote an entire paper for the World Bank that came to such a conclusion.  It would be laughable were the potential consequences of such misanalysis not so serious.

For the record, when actual climate scientists and agricultural experts look at these and other damages they naturally come to a very different view (see Scientists find “net present value of climate change impacts” of $1240 TRILLION on current emissions path, making mitigation to under 450 ppm a must).

Coincidentally, another just-released study, “The Last Drop: Climate Change and the Southwest Water Crisis,” that actually looks in some detail at the scientific literature for just one region, finds that drought and reduced precipitation in the U.S. SW alone could cost up to $1 trillion by century’s end.

I don’t know who is going to be disdained more by future generations devastated by humanity’s apparent inability to preserve a livable climate — the fossil-fuel-friendly World Bank or the why-bother-reading-the-scientific-literature economics community.

For the umpteenth time, Memo to economists: Please read the scientific literature before opining on the impacts of global warming.

You would think that in any rational world, an “ultimate damage” analysis by the World Bank on “The global impact of climate change on extreme events” including droughts would include multiple citations to the significant scientific literature on droughts and the impacts of reduced precipitation.  Or even cite one damn paper.

You would be wrong.  The mainstream economics community has been taken over by a form of circular benchmarking, a self-delusion where everybody cites each other and ignores the scientific literature.  I would note that the Mendelsohn and Saher cite multiple articles by proponents of traditional cost-benefit analysis for climate impacts, they don’t cite Harvard economist Martin Weitzman’s well-known work calling such an approach into question in this arena (see my post Harvard economist: Climate cost-benefit analyses are “unusually misleading,” warns colleagues “we may be deluding ourselves and others”).

I single out droughts here for one particular reason.  I was chatting recently with one of the World Bank’s leading experts on development, someone who ran one of the in-country offices of a big developing country. I was commenting to him about the devastating impact of the intense deluges that hit developing countries in the past year.  He told me he thought that the impact of extended drought was far worse than deluges because they lasted so long and went to the heart of the country’s ability to feed itself.

I believe that Dust-Bowlification — combined with the impact on food insecurity of Dust-Bowlification combined with other extreme events — is the single biggest impact that climate change is likely to have on most people for most of this century (until sea level rise gets serious in the latter decades).

Let me run through some of the scientific literature that Mendelsohn and Saher — and whoever reviewed the paper at the World Bank — didn’t deem worthy enough to include in their paper on “The global impact of climate change on extreme events” — even though they saw fit to cite their own work three times and Roger Pielke Jr.’s five times.

Read the rest of this post »

The Corn Ultimatum: How long can Americans keep burning one sixth the world’s corn supply in our cars?

Bill Clinton warns: Too much ethanol could lead to food riots

February 24, 2011

corn.jpgI am not a fan of our corn ethanol policy as I made clear made clear during the last food crisis (see “The Fuel on the Hill” and “Can words describe how bad corn ethanol is?” and “Let them eat biofuels!“).  In a world of blatantly increasing food insecurity — driven by population, dietary trends, rising oil prices, and growing climate instability — America’s  policy of burning one third of our corn crop in our engines (soon to be 37% or more) is becoming increasingly untenable, if not unconscionable.

I was glad to see former Pres. Bill Clinton start talking about this in a Washington Post piece  headlined, “Clinton: Too much ethanol could lead to food riots” — though I tend to see the world’s increasing use of crops for fuel as an underlying cause for growing food insecurity, something that makes the whole food system more brittle and thus more vulnerable to triggering events, like once in 1000 100 year droughts and once in 500 year floods, which is to say climate instability (see WashPost, Lester Brown explain how extreme weather, climate change drive record food prices).

If you want to understand why it will be politically difficult to roll back US ethanol production to saner levels, Reuters has a good article, “Analysis: In food vs fuel debate, U.S. resolute on ethanol.”  Yet it is that piece which notes, “U.S. ethanol production this year will consume 15 percent of the world’s corn supply, up from 10 percent in 2008.”

Tim Searchinger, a research scholar at Princeton, had an excellent piece in the WashPost explaining “How biofuels contribute to the food crisis,” which I excerpt below:

Read the rest of this post »

Does Egypt hold any lessons for climate hawks?

February 12, 2011

And above all, we saw a new generation emerge — a generation that uses their own creativity and talent and technology to call for a government that represented their hopes and not their fears, a government that is responsive to their boundless aspirations.

… it was the moral force of non-violence….

That’s Obama speaking Friday.  I’ve been asked by a couple of ClimateProgress regulars if there are any lessons for climate hawks in the incredible Egyptian revolution.

For instance, the 25-year-old Ian of “What should Ian do with his life?” fame asks

Read the rest of this post »

That awkward conversation (about the climate)

February 13, 2011

I’ve spent a lot of time lately thinking about climate change liars. Those people who make a living deliberately deceiving the public about the scientific consensus on climate disruption. These people are awful, they know who they are. They have to live with their lies.

But what’s worse is the other lie I’ve discovered in the process. It’s the lie that I’m telling. It’s the lie that we all tell to our children and each other when we don’t talk about climate disruption. It’s the lie of us all pretending that everything will be OK.

People have lots of opinions about what it takes to be a great parent. But I’m pretty sure that this isn’t on anyone’s list: Lying to your children about the unraveling of nature and the catastrophes that will certainly follow.

That’s Richard Wiles, co-founder of the Environmental Working Group, on HuffPost.  Prior to EWG, Wiles was a senior staff officer at the National Academy of Sciences’ Board on Agriculture.

My daughter just turned 4, so I’m a long way away from having to have this conversation, but, of course, anyone who reads this blog knows what is coming (see A stunning year in climate science reveals that human civilization is on the precipice and links below).

The Wiles’ piece continues:

Read the rest of this post »

Obama, Chu try to slash the multi-miracle hydrogen program once again

February 14, 2011

Technology Review: It used to be thought, five to eight years ago, that hydrogen was the great answer for the future of transportation. The mood has shifted. What have we learned from this?

Steven Chu: I think, well, among some people it hasn’t really shifted. I think there was great enthusiasm in some quarters, but I always was somewhat skeptical of it because, right now, the way we get hydrogen primarily is from reforming [natural] gas. That’s not an ideal source of hydrogen. You’re giving away some of the energy content of natural gas, which is a very valuable fuel. So that’s one problem. The other problem is, if it’s for transportation, we don’t have a good storage mechanism yet. Compressed hydrogen is the best mechanism [but it requires] a large volume. We haven’t figured out how to store it with high density. What else? The fuel cells aren’t there yet, and the distribution infrastructure isn’t there yet. So you have four things that have to happen all at once. And so it always looked like it was going to be [a technology for] the distant future. In order to get significant deployment, you need four significant technological breakthroughs. That makes it unlikely.

If you need four miracles, that’s unlikely: saints only need three miracles.

That was Energy Secretary Steven Chu nearly 2 years ago in a Technology Review interview, explaining why he didn’t think that hydrogen fuel cell vehicle research should be a priority for the DOE.

Back then he tried to sharply reduce the bloated hydrogen budget and redirect the funds toward clean energy technology development and deployment programs that could actually achieve significant benefits for the American public in the foreseeable future, something I’ve been recommending for years. (see “Chu agrees with Climate Progress and slashes hydrogen budget“).  But the Congress restored the money.

Now he’s trying again.  In a blog post Friday, “Winning the Future with a Responsible Budget,” the Nobel prize-winning physicist explains, “In the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, the Department is reducing funding for the hydrogen technology program by more than 41 percent, or almost $70 million, in order to focus on technologies deployable at large scale in the near term.”  Chu said in May 2009 that the multiple technological and infrastructure challenges meant it was unlikely we would convert to hydrogen car economy in the next two decades.

For a detailed analysis of the 4 miracles needed — indeed of the challenges facing all alternative fuel vehicles — see “Hydrogen fuel cell cars are a dead end from a technological, practical, and climate perspective — Chu & Obama are right to kill the program.“  The Nobel Laureate Burton Richter has explained in detail why “The present hydrogen fuel cells are losers… Losers. They have to go back to the R&D lab.”

One reason climate hawks should hope that he succeeds is that hydrogen cars are one of the least cost-effective strategies for reducing carbon emissions ever imagined:

Read the rest of this post »

Exclusive: Richard Muller, Charles Koch, Judith Curry and the implosion of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Study

How to kill a potentially not-bad idea in 5 easy steps

February 14, 2011

Multiple head-vise alert!

http://games.gearlive.com/blogimages/head_asplode.jpgLet’s say you’re a major national lab, affiliated with a major university, concerned about critiques of the global temperature record.  Let’s say you get the bright idea to assemble some really smart scientists and statisticians “to resolve current criticism of the [global] temperature analyses, and to prepare an open record that will allow rapid response to further criticism or suggestions.”

Let’s set aside the fact that the various groups involved from NASA to NOAA to the Met Office have been undertaking their own reviews (see The deniers were half right: The Met Office Hadley Centre had flawed data — but it led them to UNDERestimate the rate of recent global warming and “Watts not to love: New study finds the poor weather stations tend to have a slight COOL bias, not a warm one“).

You know that because you are prestigious, independent institution, you can bring fresh eyes and credibility to this supposed problem.

How would you go about killing this potentially not-bad idea?   How about picking a co-chair whose knowledge of the subject has been widely criticized?  How about including a bunch of prestigious scientists who know very little about the subject and who have little involvement in the actual study?  How about having your only actual climate scientist — presumably chosen for extra credibility — be Judith Curry?  How about having a family member of the ill-informed co-chair be project manager?   How about taking money from one of the biggest funders of anti-science disinformation in the world?

What’s that you say?  No serious organization on the planet would do something like that, especially in an effort whose entire purpose is to boost credibility?

Let me introduce you to the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Study, launched in part with a grant by the prestigious Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, co-chaired by Richard Muller (author of widely debunked books, blog posts and Wall Street Journal op-eds), and co-funded by … wait for it … the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation!

I warned you about the head vises!

Let’s start with Muller.

Read the rest of this post »

S. Korean President: “There is an increasing likelihood of a food crisis globally due to climate change.”

UN's Figueres explains: "If the community of nations is unable to fully stabilize climate change, it will threaten where we can live, where and how we grow food and where we can find water.”

February 15, 2011

According to a statement on the China Meteorological Administration’s Web site, cabinet members were told that there was no end in sight to the drought.

As I’ve written in my series on food insecurity, the expert consensus has been growing on the contribution of record high food prices to Middle East unrest.  So too has our understanding that as the Washington Post and Lester Brown explained, extreme weather and climate change have helped drive record food prices.

Into the discussion comes three important pieces.  First, the NY Times‘ John Broder blogs:

The United Nations’ top climate change official said on Tuesday that food shortages and rising prices caused by climate disruptions were among the chief contributors to the civil unrest coursing through North Africa and the Middle East.

In a speech to Spanish lawmakers and military leaders, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the United Nations climate office, said that climate change-driven drought, falling crop yields and competition for water were fueling conflict throughout Africa and elsewhere in the developing world. She warned that unless nations took aggressive action to reduce emissions causing global warming such conflicts would spread, toppling governments and driving up military spending around the world.

Second, Bloomberg has an equally remarkable piece, “Climate Change May Cause ‘Massive’ Food Disruptions,” which begins:

Global food supplies will face “massive disruptions” from climate change, Olam International Ltd. predicted, as Agrocorp International Pte. said corn will gain to a record, stoking food inflation and increasing hunger.

“The fact is that climate around the world is changing and that will cause massive disruptions,” Sunny Verghese, chief executive officer at Olam, among the world’s three biggest suppliers of rice and cotton, said in a Bloomberg Television interview today. “We’re friendly to wheat, corn and soybeans and bearish on rice.”

Here’s more:

Read the rest of this post »

Rebound effect: The Breakthrough Institute’s attack on clean energy backfires

Top energy experts debunk their false assertions and misleading statements about energy efficiency

February 15, 2011

Proponents of large energy-efficiency rebound effects fail to prove their case.

Advocates of the thesis that “rebound” effects will offset much, most, all, or more than all energy savings from increasing end-use efficiency—a thesis popularized by David Owen’s recent and controversial New Yorker article—were asked in an early-2011 email exchange to illustrate their proposed rebound mechanisms with a hypothetical numerical example. Jesse Jenkins from the Breakthrough Institute obliged them. Jim Sweeney (Stanford) and Amory Lovins (Rocky Mountain Institute) then pointed out specific apparent errors whose correction would reduce Jenkins’s calculated rebound by about 10–20-fold (to a few percent, consistent with their own estimates). Further, the macroeconomic effects that Jenkins and his fellow-advocates had claimed were very large turned out in his example to be very small. Yet neither Jenkins nor his co-proponents rebutted the Sweeney and Lovins critiques. Jenkins now wants to abandon rather than uphold his own example, and big-rebound proponents appear to have withdrawn from the conversation. They insist that their economic calculations prove they’re right, no further proof is required, and the effects they posit are too complex for a numerical example to reflect. This behavior invites the inference that they won’t defend their sweeping claims because they can’t, and that inference will strengthen so long as they fail to do so. The exchange upholds the strength of the scientific process in clarifying understanding and exposing error, although it remains to be seen whether this goal is shared equally by both sides of the conversation. Asked for comment, Lovins quoted Harvard biology professor E.O. Wilson: “Sometimes a c oncept is baffling, not because it is profound but because it is wrong.”

That’s the conclusion Jon Koomey says journalists might well draw from a for-the-record email conversation between The Breakthrough Institute and leading energy experts.  I repost his entire 8-page discussion below.  It makes for fascinating reading and reveals better than anything I’ve seen just how TBI operates.

Koomey, ever the scientist, even has an “abstract,” which reads:

An e-mail conversation about whether “rebound” effects that offset energy savings are big or small reached a critical stage when a numerical example meant to demonstrate big rebounds came under decisive technical criticism—and wasn’t defended.

Recently, the Breakthrough Institute launched a major attack on energy efficiency.  They used talking points that right-wing think tanks have pushed for years (see The intellectual bankruptcy of conservatism: Heritage even opposes energy efficiency).  This shouldn’t be terribly surprising to longtime followers of TBI.  After all, last year they partnered with a right-wing think tank, the American Enterprise Institute, to push right-wing energy myths and attack the most basic of clean energy policies, a clean energy standard.

Read the rest of this post »

Debunking the Jevons Paradox: Nobody goes there anymore, it’s too crowded

February 16, 2011

The “Jevons paradox,” asserts that increasing “the efficiency with which a resource is used tends to increase (rather than decrease) the rate of consumption of that resource.”  It is mostly if not entirely bunk, as the scientific literature and leading experts have demonstrated many times (see “Efficiency lives — the rebound effect, not so much“).

But it lingers on in part because it is one of those quirky, ill-defined contrarian notions that the media can’t get enough of and in part because those who oppose clean energy, often for bizarre ideological reasons, keep pushing it.

So I’m reposting two debunkings written by Real Climate Economics expert Dr. Jim Barrett.  As noted in the second post (whose Yogi Berra quote I repeated for my headline), “Though he discovered it nearly 100 years after Stanley Jevons, I believe [Berra's] exploration of the Jevons effect is more complete and accurate than Jevons’ own, as well as being vastly shorter. The notion that we could get so efficient at using energy that we’d end up using more is about as valid as the idea that a restaurant could get so crowded that it was empty.

Read the rest of this post »

Life-cycle study: Accounting for total harm from coal would add “close to 17.8¢/kWh of electricity generated”

February 16, 2011

Epstein coal2

In a groundbreaking article to be released this month in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Dr. Paul Epstein, associate director of the Center for Health and the Global Environment at Harvard Medical School, details the economic, health and environmental costs associated with each stage in the life cycle of coal – extraction, transportation, processing, and combustion.  These costs, between a third to over half a trillion dollars annually, are directly passed on to the public.

In terms of human health, the report estimates $74.6 billion a year in public health burdens in Appalachian communities, with a majority of the impact resulting from increased healthcare costs, injury and death. Emissions of air pollutants account for $187.5 billion, mercury impacts as high as $29.3 billion, and climate contributions from combustion between $61.7 and $205.8 billion. Heavy metal toxins and carcinogens released during processing pollute water and food sources and are linked to long-term health problems. Mining, transportation, and combustion of coal contribute to poor air quality and respiratory disease, while the risky nature of mining coal results in death and injury for workers.

That’s from a news release for the important new study, “Full cost accounting for the life cycle of coal.”  Dr. Epstein is the lead author, and there are 10 coauthors, public health and environment experts.

We’ve known for a long time that coal is a costly and deadly energy source.  In “The Toll from Coal,” The American Lung Association found that coal-powered electricity alone caused “over 13,000 premature deaths in 2010, as well as almost 10,000 hospitalizations and more than 20,000 heart attacks per year.”

Read the rest of this post »

La Niña weaker, may be gone by summer

February 23, 2011

Meteorologist Dr. Jeff Masters, in a WunderBlog repost.

A significant shift is occurring in the Equatorial waters of the Eastern Pacific off the coast of South America, where the tell-tale signs of the end to the current La Niña event are beginning to show up.

Read the rest of this post »

ClimateProgress is looking for a Reporter/Blogger

February 16, 2011

Resumes are coming in, but I wanted this at the top of the daily 1 pm email!

Read the rest of this post »

Two seminal Nature papers join growing body of evidence that human emissions fuel extreme weather, flooding that harm humans and the environment

February 16, 2011

Here we show that human-induced increases in greenhouse gases have contributed to the observed intensification of heavy precipitation events found over approximately two-thirds of data-covered parts of Northern Hemisphere land areas. These results are based on a comparison of observed and multi-model simulated changes in extreme precipitation over the latter half of the twentieth century analysed with an optimal fingerprinting technique.

Changes in extreme precipitation projected by models, and thus the impacts of future changes in extreme precipitation, may be underestimated because models seem to underestimate the observed increase in heavy precipitation with warming

That’s from the first of two seminal studies in Nature, “Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes” (subs. req’d).  The second looked at “Anthropogenic greenhouse gas contribution to flood risk in England and Wales in autumn 2000” (subs. req’d):

Occurring during the wettest autumn in England and Wales since records began in 1766 these floods damaged nearly 10,000 properties across that region, disrupted services severely, and caused insured losses estimated at £1.3 billion….

Here we present a multi-step, physically based ‘probabilistic event attribution’ framework showing that it is very likely that global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions substantially increased the risk of flood occurrence in England and Wales in autumn 2000.

in nine out of ten cases our model results indicate that twentieth-century anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions increased the risk of floods occurring in England and Wales in autumn 2000 by more than 20%, and in two out of three cases by more than 90%.

Scientists have predicted for decades that human-caused global warming would increased extreme weather events that cause severe harm to humans, property, and the environment.  These two studies are but the latest in a growing body of scientific literature demonstrating that these predictions are coming true now.

They should help lay to rest the myth that human-caused global warming will contribute to grievous harm only in some far-off future.  They also strongly support the view that the human-induced increases in greenhouse gases have contributed to the devastating extreme events that hit Australia and other parts of the world in the past several months, helping to drive up food prices (see how extreme weather, climate change drive record food prices).

The NYT has a great headline on this story, “Research Links Heavy Rains and Snow to Humans.”  It is all heavy precipitation that humans are intensifying.

Of course, many of our top climate scientists have been documenting and explaining these types of conclusions for a while.   I’ll list a bunch of the papers below.  Kevin Trenberth, head of NCAR’s Climate Analysis Section, has a new paper out, “Changes in precipitation with climate change” that is well worth reading.  So I asked him for a comment on these two studies.  He told me:

Read the rest of this post »

Interview with legislator who introduced bill to declare global warming “natural” and “beneficial to the welfare and business climate of Montana”

February 17, 2011

Sure the National Academy of Sciences says the median annual area burned by wildfires is projected to jump 200% to 500% in Montana by mid-century.  And sure warming-driven bark beetles are infesting and destroying the trees around Helena now, as Marketplace reported.  But while some merely want to deny the reality of human-caused climate change and the danger it poses, others actually want to pass laws asserting it doesn’t exist.

WonkRoom’s Brad Johnson has the exclusive interview with one such uber-denier.

Holdren3

A bill has been introduced in the Montana state legislature to declare global warming a “natural occurrence and human activity has not accelerated it,” and that it is “beneficial to the welfare and business climate of Montana.” State Rep. Joe Read (R-MT), a farmer and emergency firefighter who unseated a Democratic incumbent in the climate zombie wave of 2010, introduced HB 549 “to ensure economic development in Montana”:

Read the rest of this post »

NSIDC bombshell: Thawing permafrost feedback will turn Arctic from carbon sink to source in the 2020s, releasing 100 billion tons of carbon by 2100

Study underestimates impacts with conservative assumptions

February 17, 2011

NSDIC Permafrost

Figure:  Carbon emission (in billions of tons of carbon a year) from thawing permafrost.

The thaw and release of carbon currently frozen in permafrost will increase atmospheric CO2 concentrations and amplify surface warming to initiate a positive permafrost carbon feedback (PCF) on climate…. [Our] estimate may be low because it does not account for amplified surface warming due to the PCF itself….  We predict that the PCF will change the arctic from a carbon sink to a source after the mid-2020s and is strong enough to cancel 42–88% of the total global land sink. The thaw and decay of permafrost carbon is irreversible and accounting for the PCF will require larger reductions in fossil fuel emissions to reach a target atmospheric CO2 concentration.

That’s the stunning conclusion from “Amount and timing of permafrost carbon release in response to climate warming” (subs. req’d), a major new study in Tellus by NOAA and the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC).  As we’ll see, the figure above is almost certainly too conservative post-2080.

The permafrost permamelt contains a staggering “1.5 trillion tons of frozen carbon, about twice as much carbon as contained in the atmosphere, much of which would be released as methane.  Methane is 25 times as potent a heat-trapping gas as CO2 over a 100 year time horizon, but 72 times as potent over 20 yearsOne of the most conservative assumptions the study made, the lead author Dr. Kevin Schaefer confirmed in an email, is that all of the carbon would be released as CO2 and none as methane.

The carbon is locked in a freezer in the part of the planet warming up the fastest (see “Tundra 4: Permafrost loss linked to Arctic sea ice loss“).  Countless studies make clear that global warming will release vast quantities of GHGs into the atmosphere this decade.  Yet, no climate model currently incorporates the amplifying feedback from methane released by a defrosting tundra. Heck, the NSIDC/NOAA study itself doesn’t even incorporate the CO2 released by the permafrost carbon feedback into its warming model!

Even so, in their study, the permafrost is adding more than one billion tons of carbon a year to the atmosphere by the mid-2030s!

Here’s some background on the permafrost and the study from the NSIDC release, “Thawing permafrost will accelerate global warming in decades to come, says new study”:

Read the rest of this post »

The Republican plan to abolish the EPA, ending the four-decade bipartisan consensus to ensure healthy air and water for our kids

February 17, 2011

The EPA and its science-based safeguards are the “thin green line” that protects your children from the corporate polluters who want to poison the air and water and oceans and climate.  This ThinkProgress cross-post (with video compilation) reveals just how many GOP extremists want to end that protection.

For the past 40 years, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has played a key role in protecting our nation’s air, lands, and water from polluters. Now, if a growing chorus of Republicans get their way, the EPA’s days could be numbered.

Read the rest of this post »

The GOP decides accurate weather forecasting and hurricane tracking are luxuries America can’t afford

Republicans try to defund NOAA’s satellite program -- just as climate change is making the weather much more extreme.

February 18, 2011

UPDATE:  The author respond to comments below.

By Michael Conathan, CAPAF’s new Director of Oceans Policy

Weather predictions were once a frequent punchline but have improved dramatically in recent years. More often than not you’ll need an umbrella if your local television channel or website of choice tells you to take one when you leave the house. But we could take a huge step back to the days when your dartboard had a reasonable chance of outpredicting Al Roker if House Republicans have their way with the 2011 federal budget.

Read the rest of this post »

Plan solicited by Chamber of Commerce lawyers included malware hacking of activist computers

February 23, 2011

This is a TP cross-post.

Last Thursday, ThinkProgress revealed that lawyers representing the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, one of the most powerful trade associations for large corporations like ExxonMobil and CitiGroup, had solicited a proposal from a set of military contractors to develop a surreptitious campaign to attack the Chamber’s political opponents, including ThinkProgress, the Change to Win labor coalition, SEIU, StopTheChamber.com, MoveOn.org, U.S. Chamber Watch and others. The lawyers from the Chamber’s longtime law firm Hunton and Williams had been compiling their own data set on some of these targets. However, the lawyers sought the military contractors for assistance.

Read the rest of this post »

Energy efficiency and the ‘rebound effect’

Goldstein and Cavanagh join in the debunking of the Breakthrough Institute, which "fails to back up its accusations with facts"

February 23, 2011

1 Quakers book talk 2007.jpg

Energy efficiency saves energy, increases electric reliability, avoids the need to build new power plants, and saves Americans money. It’s really that simple.

Some of the nation’s top energy experts have debunked the Breakthrough Institute’s false assertions and misleading statements about energy efficiency.  Now two more leading experts, David Goldstein and Ralph Cavanagh, weigh in with their analysis.  They are co-directors of NRDC’s energy program, and each has been working to implement energy efficiency at the national and state level since the 1970s.  Their piece is repoted below, followed by Goldstein’s discussion of California’s experience.

Throughout almost four decades of societal progress in getting more work out of less energy, those who deny the promise of energy efficiency have persisted in a bizarre claim:  Any energy savings from efficiency are offset by activities that demand additional energy consumption.

While implausible concerns about “rebound effect” have been around since the mid-nineteenth century, they have not impeded recent progress in improving the efficiency of energy use and reducing its environmental impacts.

The most obvious rebuttal to “rebound effect” claims is the performance of the US economy since the early 1970’s:  Between 1973 and 2009, US economic production more than tripled even as total US energy use increased by less than a third. If “rebound effect” advocates were right, that record would have been flatly impossible, since savings in energy use would be offset by activities that demand energy, keeping energy use trends in lockstep with economic growth (just as they were for the first three decades after World War II).

Read the rest of this post »

How we know recent global warming is not natural

February 22, 2011

This is a Skeptical Science repost on one of the latest denier talking points.

Dr. Roy Spencer, like Dr. Richard Lindzen (the subject of a few recent articles), is one of very few climate scientists who remain unconvinced that most of the the recent global warming has been caused by humans (anthropogenic).  Dr. Spencer has grown frustrated with the fact that most of his climate scientist colleagues conduct research under the premise that the recent warming is anthropogenic, and in an article on his blog, has thrown down the gauntlet:

“Show me one peer-reviewed paper that has ruled out natural, internal climate cycles as the cause of most of the recent warming in the thermometer record.”

This challenge is problematic for a few reasons.

Read the rest of this post »

Half of world’s population could face climate-driven food crisis in second half of the century

Science study warns: “Ignoring climate projections at this stage will only result in the worst form of triage.”

February 24, 2011

[I'm on travel, so I'm updating this timely 2009 post on food insecurity.]

The quote above is the powerful final sentence from a 2009 study in Science, “Historical Warnings of Future Food Insecurity with Unprecedented Seasonal Heat.”  The University of Washington news release release explained:

Rapidly warming climate is likely to seriously alter crop yields in the tropics and subtropics by the end of this century and, without adaptation, will leave half the world’s population facing serious food shortages, new research shows….

“The stresses on global food production from temperature alone are going to be huge, and that doesn’t take into account water supplies stressed by the higher temperatures,” said David Battisti, a University of Washington atmospheric sciences professor.

Yes, this 2009 study is a serious underestimate of the speed and scale of likely impacts for two reasons.

First, the conclusions are solely based upon projected temperature rise.  They don’t even consider the potentially more devastating impact from more extreme drought and Dust-Bowlification (See NCAR analysis warns we risk multiple, devastating global droughts by mid-century even on moderate emissions path) — let alone the combination of heat stress and water stress together.

Read the rest of this post »

Denier-bots live! Why are online comments’ sections over-run by the anti-science, pro-pollution crowd?

February 20, 2011

I’ve been reposting the ThinkProgress exposé on the head-exploding tactics of Chamber of Commerce hacks (henchmen?), like Aaron Barr who heads the private security firm HB Gary Federal (see “Chamber lobbyists solicited firm to investigate opponents’ families, children“).  Daily Kos has a stunning post on HB Gary’s tactics that I reprint in below, since it involves:

creating an army of sockpuppets, with sophisticated “persona management” software that allows a small team of only a few people to appear to be many, while keeping the personas from accidentally cross-contaminating each other.

Many readers have joked that some of the comments at ClimateProgress seem to come from pre-programmed ‘denier-bots’.  Others have noted how the same arguments and phrasings keep cropping up in the comments’ section of the many unmoderated news sites on the web.

The extreme anti-government, pro-pollution crowd has a highly targeted effort to control the debate, even online (see “Digg this: Conservative efforts to manipulate the public discussion extend to social media“).  It is, of course, possible all those comments are from separate individuals, none of whom are paid by corporate polluters or conservative billionaires.  It is also possible we never landed on the moon….

Read the rest of this post »

How to be as persuasive as Lincoln, Part 3: “The greatest thing by far is to be a master of metaphor”:

Part 4 -- Extended metaphor: How Lincoln framed his picture-perfect Gettysburg Address

February 22, 2011

Metaphors are the Rolls Royce of figures. Or, to put it more aptly, metaphors are the Toyota Prius of figures because a metaphor is a hybrid, connecting two dissimilar things to achieve a unique turn of phrase.

Metaphor, like verbal irony discussed in the previous post, is a trope, because it alters or enhances a word’s literal meaning. The headline quote is from Aristotle, who writes in Poetics, “To be a master of metaphor is a sign of genius, since a good metaphor implies intuitive perception of the similarity in dissimilars.”

A 2005 study on “Presidential Leadership and Charisma: The Effects of Metaphor” examined the use of metaphors in the first-term inaugural addresses of three dozen presidents who had been independently rated for charisma. The remarkable conclusion:

Read the rest of this post »

Grantham’s “Things that Really Matter in 2011 and Beyond”: “Global warming causing destabilized weather patterns, adding to agricultural price pressures”

February 20, 2011

Back in July I wrote about uber-hedge fund manager Jeremy Grantham, a self-described “die hard contrarian,” telling it like it is in his blunt 2Q 2010 letter (see “Grantham: Everything You Need to Know About Global Warming in 5 Minutes“).

He wrote back then, “Global warming will be the most important investment issue for the foreseeable future.”  He went through the basics of climate science and then wrote:

Do we believe the whole elite of science is in a conspiracy?  At some point in the development of a scientific truth, contrarians risk becoming flat earthers.

He noted that “the obfuscators of global warming actually use the same “experts” as the tobacco industry did” and wondered, “Have they no grandchildren?”

Grantham has earned his contrarian cred the legit way.  He is former Chairman and now Chief Investment Strategist of Grantham Mayo Van Otterloo (GMO), which has “more than US $107 billion in assets under management as of December 2009. Grantham is regarded as a highly knowledgeable investor in various stock, bond, and commodity markets, and is particularly noted for his prediction of various bubbles.”

In his January 2011 newsletter, “Pavlov’s Bulls,” he has a discussion of climate and commodity prices (emphasis in original):

Read the rest of this post »

Northern Territory Chief Minister on Carlos’s deluge: “So a really one in 500 year event; nobody’s experienced anything like this before.”

Paul Gilding: "The Great Disruption has arrived"

February 22, 2011

Darwin, Australia suffered its greatest 24-hour rainfall in its history [last] Wednesday, when a deluge of 13.4 inches (339.4 mm) hit the city when Tropical Cyclone Carlos formed virtually on top of city and remained nearly stationary. Carlos has now dissipated, and brought only an additional 1.50″ (38 mm) of rain yesterday to Darwin. Over the past four days, Carlos has dumped a remarkable 26.87″ (682.6 mm) of rain on Darwin (population 125,000), capital of Australia’s Northern Territory. Australia’s west coast is also watching Tropical Cyclone Dianne, which is expected to remain well offshore as it moves southwards, parallel to the coast.

How extreme was the latest Australian deluge, which Dr. Jeff Masters described above?  The Northern Territory Chief Minister Paul Henderson said:

Over 420 ml of rain in that catchment in less than 24 hours is off the charts since records began and certainly that combined with a six metre high tide, that water came up very, very quickly. So a really one in 500 year event; nobody’s experienced anything like this before.”

I asked Paul Gilding, author of the forthcoming book The Great Disruption, to comment on the implications of the off-the-charts weather Australia has been suffering though.  He wrote:

Read the rest of this post »

UK’s Chief Scientific Adviser criticizes “journalists wilfully misusing science, distorting evidence by cherry-picking data that suits their view, giving bogus authority to people who misrepresent the absolute basics of science, and worse”

Beddington calls such selective use of science "as bad as racism"

February 21, 2011

Click here to get daily updates on all things climate and clean energy.

Government Chief Scientific Adviser John Beddington is stepping up the war on pseudoscience with a call to his fellow government scientists to be “grossly intolerant” if science is being misused by religious or political groups.

In closing remarks to an annual conference of around 300 scientific civil servants on 3 February, in London, Beddington said that selective use of science ought to be treated in the same way as racism and homophobia. “We are grossly intolerant, and properly so, of racism. We are grossly intolerant, and properly so, of people who [are] anti-homosexuality….  We are not—and I genuinely think we should think about how we do this—grossly intolerant of pseudo-science, the building up of what purports to be science by the cherry-picking of the facts and the failure to use scientific evidence and the failure to use scientific method,” he said.

Beddington said he intends to take this agenda forward with his fellow chief scientists and also with the research councils. “I really believe that… we need to recognise that this is a pernicious influence, it is an increasingly pernicious influence and we need to be thinking about how we can actually deal with it.

I first reported on Beddington back in 2009 when he warned that by 2030, “A ‘perfect storm’ of food shortages, scarce water and insufficient energy resources threaten to unleash public unrest, cross-border conflicts and mass migration as people flee from the worst-affected regions.”  See “When the global Ponzi scheme collapses (circa 2030), the only jobs left will be green” for an amazing speech explaining why.

No doubt Beddington is thinking of UK journalists like David Rose and Richard North (see links below) — and James Delingpole, who recently melted down on the BBC and said, “It is not my job to sit down and read peer-reviewed papers because I simply haven’t got the time…. I am an interpreter of interpretations.”

Here’s more from the UK’s Chief Scientific Adviser:

Read the rest of this post »

Making Egypt More Food Secure

February 21, 2011

Egyptians buy government-subsidized bread from a bakery in Cairo, Egypt. Egypt has spent $4 billion a year, or 1.8% of GDP, on its bread subsidization program in an attempt to insulate the 40% of Egyptians living on less than $2 a day from inflation. But prices continue to rise.

By Jake Caldwell, Director of Policy for Agriculture, Trade, and Energy at American Progress, and coauthor of “The Coming Food Crisis.”

Egypt faces daunting challenges as it prepares for broad presidential and parliamentary elections within a year. Ongoing volatility in global food prices will strain resources during this critical transitional period.

As the world’s largest importer of wheat, Egypt is acutely vulnerable to any surge in food prices. Wheat prices have risen 47 percent over the last year and other staples are rapidly approaching dangerously high levels.

Read the rest of this post »

Accuweather’s Joe Bastardi, denier of basic climate science, resigns after 32 years

February 21, 2011

(TheWeatherSpace.com) – After more than 30 years, Long Range and Expert Meteorologist Joe Bastardi has resigned from Accuweather.com

Jesse Ferrell of Accuweather.com officially announced the rumor as true, leaking it to a known weather forum.

A call into Accuweather to confirm this was met with a hostile person on the other end that declined to comment on why Bastardi left, ending up in a hang up.

“I don’t think we’ve issued an official release, but what I posted on his facebook page serves as truth”, Ferrell said.

Well, who knows, maybe Accuweather reads ClimateProgress [see "How many major scientific misstatements does Joe Bastardi have to make before In-Accuweather fires him as their chief long-range forecaster?"  As expected, he rejects my bet. He says that if he's wrong, he'll be "driven from the field"].

Read the rest of this post »

Energy and global warming news for February 22: Some fifty million environmental refugees by 2020 fleeing food shortages sparked by climate change

February 22, 2011

50 million ‘environmental refugees’ by 2020, experts say

Fifty million “environmental refugees” will flood into the global north by 2020, fleeing food shortages sparked by climate change, experts warned at a major science conference that ended here Monday.

Read the rest of this post »

NY Times on “The dirty energy party”: “The Republican agenda is breathtakingly negative”

February 22, 2011

The New York Times has a good editorial today on the “The dirty energy party” aka the GOP.   It only makes one historical error:

Read the rest of this post »

Race to the bottom: Gov. Walker assaults jobs, innovation, and clean energy in Wisconsin

February 23, 2011

A cross-post by CAP Energy VP Kate Gordon.

Newly elected Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker held an event called “Wisconsin is Open for Business” the day he was inaugurated. But every move the governor makes shows him to be an anti-business, anti-innovation politician intent on running the state into the ground.

Read the rest of this post »

Energy and global warming news for February 23: A tougher greenhouse gas target could boost European economy and create up to 6 million new jobs; Bark beetles aided by climate change

February 23, 2011

EU climate target: Less CO2-emissions could trigger more economic growth,

Increasing the EU’s 2020 greenhouse gas reduction target from 20% to 30% could help boosting European investments from 18% to 22% of GDP, leading to a GDP increase of up to €620bn ($840bn) and the creation of up to 6 millions additional jobs. These are the key findings of a report launched today.

Read the rest of this post »

BEST climate joke: Hockey Stick fight at the you’re-not-OK Corral

Curry repeats Muller's smear that paleoclimate reconstructions were 'dishonest', and NASA's Schmidt eviscerates her (again)

February 23, 2011

BEST is now a joke, officially, thanks to Dr. Judith Curry.  Sure, B.E.S.T.  seemed laughable from the start — see “Richard Muller, Charles Koch, Judith Curry and the implosion of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Study (BEST).”

How could an effort to restore  the supposedly lost credibility of the global temperature record be run by one climate confusionist (Muller),  have as its sole ‘climate expert’ perhaps the leading confusionist (see “Curry abandons science“), and be funded in part by the world’s  biggest funder of climate disinformation!  And  I haven’t even blogged on the head-exploding conflict of interest of having Muller, who runs a for-profit climate consulting business, installing his daughter as B.E.S.T. project manager when she is the CEO of that business!

But that’s not funny.  What’s funny is that Curry had been advertising herself as some sort of a peace-making, I’m-ok-you’re-ok, why-can’t-we-all-just-get-along bridge builder among scientists — a reconciler, as it were (see “Fred Pearce jumps the shark“).

Now, however, she has devoted an entire post at her blog Climate etc. — judithcurry.com — to defending Muller’s claim (in this youtube clip) that “hide the decline” means the paleoclimate re-constructors of the Hockey Stick were “dishonest.”  For the record, the House of Commons vindication of climate scientists involved in the stolen emails  explicitly stated:

… insofar as we have been able to consider accusations of dishonesty—for example, Professor Jones’s alleged attempt to “hide the decline”—we consider that there is no case to answer.

Similarly, Michael Mann has  been through multiple vindications that specifically looked at all of these e-mails.  See also RealClimate (here).

NASA’s Gavin Schmidt  showed up on Curry’s blog to make some incisive comments, and, with Curry’s help, demonstrated that, using her standard, her own work is “dishonest.”  Curry also made clear that her days of reconciliation are over.  She has gone native — or, rather, gone tribal — the full disinformer, as they say.

WattsUpWithThat has, typically, tried to make Schmidt look bad with one piece of not-terribly-damning quote mining, but  I will endeavor to pull out all of the relevant comments (including some by Curry and others).  The whole post and comment chain  is only worth reading if you like unintentional humor and ‘credibility seppuku’:

Read the rest of this post »

Strong opposition nationally and in key districts to House votes to block public health protections

February 24, 2011

Pete Altman, reposted from NRDC’s Switchboard blog.

Nationwide, nearly six out of 10 Americans (58 percent)  – including 55 percent of Independents and about half (48 percent) of Republicans – oppose the U.S. House vote to “block the EPA from limiting carbon dioxide pollution,” according to the survey of 784 registered voters conducted February18-20, 2011 by Public Policy Polling for NRDC.  My colleague Dan Lashof blogged on the bad votes, which have nothing to do with cutting federal spending, a few days ago.

Read the rest of this post »

China’s droughts nears worst in 200 years, adding pressure to world food prices

February 24, 2011

The recent unrest in the Middle East, which has been attributed, in part, to high food prices, gives us a warning of the type of global unrest that might result in future years if the climate continues to warm as expected. A hotter climate means more severe droughts will occur. We can expect an increasing number of unprecedented heat waves and droughts like the 2010 Russian drought in coming decades. This will significantly increase the odds of a world food emergency far worse than the 2007 – 2008 global food crisis. When we also consider the world’s expanding population and the possibility that peak oil will make fertilizers and agriculture much more expensive, we have the potential for a perfect storm of events aligning in the near future, with droughts made significantly worse by climate change contributing to events that will cause disruption of the global economy, intense political turmoil, and war.

That’s meteorologist Dr. Jeff Masters from his WunderBlog.  For background on these issues, see CP’s food insecurity series.

I reported two weeks ago that if China’s drought continued through the month it would be the worst in 200 years (see “UN food agency warns severe drought threatens wheat crop in China, world’s largest producer“).  Below, Masters discusses what’s happening now and what’s forecast to happen in the coming weeks in this repost.

Read the rest of this post »

Climate science vindicated for umpteenth time

Deniers still demand Inquisition

February 25, 2011

Inspector General’s Review of Stolen Emails Confirms No Evidence of Wrong-Doing by NOAA Climate Scientists

Report is the latest independent analysis to clear climate scientists of allegations of mishandling of climate information

Another day, another independent review finds that emails of climate science do nothing to undermine the overwhelming data-driven understanding that humans are changing the climate and that if we keep listening to the deniers, unrestricted emissions of greenhouse gases will bring multiple catastrophes to countless future generations.

What a surprise (see “The first rule of vindicating climate scientists is you do not talk about vindicating climate scientists“).

The headlines are from the NOAA release, which continues:

Read the rest of this post »

EPA’s new standards for boiler pollution reflect business concerns but still protect public health

February 27, 2011

On February 21st the EPA released the final Clean Air Act toxic pollution limits for industrial boilers and incinerators. The protections represent a change from the EPA’s original April 2010 proposal, which was modified after regulated businesses raised cost concerns during the public comment period.

The newly streamlined standards will still significantly reduce toxic air pollution while halving the compliance price tag.  CAP’s Lee Hamill has the details.

Read the rest of this post »

Top medical groups warn Americans of health risks posed by climate change

February 25, 2011

Top medical and health experts came together Thursday to say climate change is hurting Americans now — and if we don’t act now its effects will only get worse.  CAP’s Susan Lyon and Lee Hamill have the story (and audio).

The following top health and medical experts came together Thursday to alert us of the serious health threats posed by carbon pollution and to remind us of the necessity of the EPA in protecting our air, water, and health, on a briefing call hosted by the American Public Health Association (APHA):

Read the rest of this post »

Four disastrous pro-pollution policies from Scott Walker and Wisconsin GOP you haven’t heard about

February 27, 2011

You have to be pretty extreme for centrist WashPost columnist Dana Milbank to label you a “A hooligan governor.”  But that’s the headline in his column today on Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI).

On Friday, Think Progress posted “REPORT: Top 10 Disastrous Policies From The Wisconsin GOP You Haven’t Heard About.”  I’m reposting the whole piece below since four of those disastrous policies would subject Wisconsin families to dirtier air and dirtier water.

Read the rest of this post »

What are you doing now to prepare for climate impacts?

February 26, 2011

I will offer my thoughts below and am interested to hear yours.

This weekend’s climate question is inspired by a Washington Post op-ed from my friend Mike Tidwell, “A climate-change activist prepares for the worst.”

Tidwell is executive director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network and, like most climate hawks, better informed than 98% of policymakers and the media on climate science and likely impacts.  Still, I don’t do any of the things he does — nor would I recommend them:

Read the rest of this post »

NY Times on natural gas fracking: “The dangers to the environment and health are greater than previously understood.”

American Petroleum Institute apparently fine with dumping cancer-causing radioactive waste off Louisiana coast

February 27, 2011

The New York Times has a multi-bombshell piece on natural gas fracking, “Regulation Lax as Gas Wells’ Tainted Water Hits Rivers.”  CP has done a great many pieces on the potential benefits of  fracking — and the potential dangers (see “Getting to the bottom of natural gas fracking and links below).

But while unconventional natural gas might be an energy and climate game changer (over the near term) if it can be developed in an environmentally responsible fashion, the NYT piece itself may be a game changer.

Over the past nine months, The Times reviewed more than 30,000 pages of documents obtained through open records requests of state and federal agencies and by visiting various regional offices that oversee drilling in Pennsylvania. Some of the documents were leaked by state or federal officials.

You can find “the most significant documents … with annotations from The Times” by clicking here.

Here are some excerpts from the story:

Read the rest of this post »

Energy and global warming news for February 28: Greenland’s glaciers double in speed (with video); Global cuts threaten clean energy growth

February 28, 2011

Greenland’s glaciers double in speed (with video)

The contribution of Greenland to global sea level change and the mapping of previously unknown basins and mountains beneath the Antarctic Ice Sheet are highlighted in a new film released by Cambridge University this morning.

Read the rest of this post »