The Secret History of Beslan

From the outside, the violence in the Caucasus looks like a religious war or an independence struggle. In this installment from a monthlong travel diary, our correspondent finds that in North Ossetia, ethnic tension adds a deadly twist.

BY TOM PARFITT | MARCH 1, 2011

VLADIKAVKAZ and BESLAN, Russia — In these sleepy towns in the Russian republic of North Ossetia, it's no surprise that fury against the Islamist militants who plague the North Caucasus runs deep. Beslan is, of course, the infamous site of the most savage and terrifying militia attack in recent memory, the raid on School Number One that left hundreds of people dead on the third day of the fall semester in 2004. Vladikavkaz, the capital of North Ossetia, has seen a series of suicide attacks in its crowded city center.

But when you ask people here who they really blame for these tragedies, you hear something unexpected: Instead of viewing the war as one fought between guerrillas and security forces, with civilians as collateral damage, the Ossetians see it through the prism of a festering ethnic conflict. The real enemy, they say, lives just across the nearby border, not a 20 minute drive away, in the republic of Ingushetia.

This conviction derives partly from history and partly from a series of fatally misguided decisions from Moscow on how best to fight the violence that's plagued its southern border for decades.

The Ossetians are a largely Orthodox Christian nation at the center of the Greater Caucasus mountain range. Vladikavkaz is just 15 miles from Nazran, the largest settlement in Ingushetia, which is predominantly Muslim.           

Tension between the two nations goes back for hundreds of years. During the 19th century, the Ossetians were Russia's key regional allies in its battle to conquer the surrounding Muslim highlanders, including the Ingush, Chechens, and Circassians.

Then at the end of World War II, Joseph Stalin deported several North Caucasus nations en masse to Kazakhstan and Siberia for allegedly siding with the invading Germans (in fact, only a minority did so). Among them were 92,000 Ingush. When the Ingush were rehabilitated and allowed home in 1957, they returned to find that a chunk of their territory, the Prigorodny district, had been handed to North Ossetia.

Through the late Soviet period the Ingush lobbied for Prigorodny to be reattached to their joint republic with Chechnya. Then, after the USSR crumbled in 1991, the lid was off. A year later, fighting broke out in Prigorodny. The Russian army sided with the Ossetians. At least 600 people died in the hostilities, and between 30,000 and 60,000 Ingush fled their homes.

The conflict officially ended with Boris Yeltsin decreeing that the district should remain a part of North Ossetia. But the pain and anger associated with that mini-war almost two decades ago -- and the absence of any concerted Kremlin effort to resolve its consequences -- continue to poison ties between North Ossetia and Ingushetia.

More recent events have only made matters worse. In the minds of many here, the critical moment in the modern history of Ossetian-Ingush relations was in September 2004, when a team of Islamist gunmen stormed School Number One at Beslan, a town close to North Ossetia's airport famous for its vodka factory.

The men took 1,100 pupils, parents, and teachers hostage as they celebrated the beginning of the school year, issuing a demand for Russia to withdraw its troops from Chechnya. Fifty-two hours of unimaginable horror ensued. The captives were herded into the school sports hall, which the guerrillas wired with explosives. Several hostages were summarily executed. At least 370 died after two blasts, a fire, and a gun battle ended the siege. According to Russian authorities, 19 of the 33 attackers were residents of Ingushetia (which borders Chechnya to the east and whose people share strong cultural and language links with the Chechens).

Beslan left many observers thinking that armed conflict would reignite between the Ossetians and Ingush. I was there as a reporter, and I remember standing at the freshly dug graves on the edge of the town as scores of victims were buried after the siege. Three Ossetian men next to me were cursing under their breath.

Tom Parfitt

 

Tom Parfitt is a fellow of the London-based Royal Geographical Society and a former public policy scholar at the Woodrow Wilson International Center. His trip is supported by the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.

Previous entries of Sword or Samovar:

Part 1: Sword or Samovar

Part 2: Blood Relations

Part 3: Islamists on Trial

Slide show: Russia's Bloody Backyard

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

NSC LOS ANGELES

11:55 AM ET

March 2, 2011

It is offensive

To read anything related to Beslan that either glosses over or totally fails to mention of the fact that women, young girls and children were raped to death at that school. Smyrna all over again eh? Let's just not talk about what really happened. Allahu akbar.

  REPLY
 

KHALID MUFTI

3:36 PM ET

March 2, 2011

In the good old days...

...of the Cold War, we rejected every Russian or Soviet statement about almost everything as Communist propaganda. Because that suited our interests.

Now, we believe every piece handed out by those same people, so long as it vilifies Muslims. Because THIS now suits our interests and narrative.

Were you there at Beslan? Did you see women, young girls and children raped to death? Did you at least get a first-hand account of the atrocities, or is it "neo-Communist" hearsay?

Compare this with the atrocities at Abu Ghraib, documented by a person of unimpeachable integrity--Seymour Hersh--who reported first-hand accounts of young boys being sodomized and brutalized in other ways. Now THAT is believable, even if it hurts your tender feelings.

  REPLY
 

NSC LOS ANGELES

5:02 PM ET

March 2, 2011

A few points for you

1. Survivor testimony is well documented. But I guess in you world that's just false informatoin cooked up by Mossad like the shark attacks in Egypt? Was I there? Obviously not.

2. The atrocities at Abu Graib were completely credible and I believe 100% that those things went on there. I know you think anyone who criticizes your religion of peace must be in support of (or at the very least dismisive of) events like Abu Graib, but you're quite mistaken. It doesn't bother my "tender feelings" to admit the atrocities of the Bush Admin in the slightest, the man and his cohorts were enemies of humanity that shamed our nation and our civilization.

3. Your feeble mind is showing - do you not grasp the irony of dismissing Muslim atrocities while calling attention to Abu Graib, and in the same breath criticizing those who selectively focus on events that suit "their narrative?" This total lack of self-awareness and reflection probably contributes significantly to the state the civilization is in today.

4. Do you really think the overwhelming failures and vile acts of Islam are simply propoganda? Does it hurt your "tender feelings" to read daily accounts of the barbarity of the religion of peace? I doubt it does, but perhaps it should.

5. Seymour Hersch is a person of "unimpeachable integrity?" What are you smoking?

  REPLY
 

NSC LOS ANGELES

5:15 PM ET

March 2, 2011

Apologies for typographical errors

Blame the cold medication folks, makes me a bit sloppy

  REPLY
 

GONZOV

5:15 PM ET

March 2, 2011

"Terrorist tweet"

http://www.kavkazcenter.com/eng/

  REPLY